Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, I'm testing with 0.98.0 (with the optimization problem patched
> away). Maybe something in 0.98.3 is very different?
I installed 0.98.0 today for a while.
Seems to run about the same here.
--
joq
On 7 Jun 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just for the record, I had terrible troubles using 2.6.6 from Debian
> > on my machine. This means random segmentation faults and crashes, without
> > using jack, nor the realtime module. As it seems to work OK for
> On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 21:00, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > Today, I've been testing with NPTL (using the env variable). That
> > seems to work, too, on Debian. This is still without your patch, just
> > JACK 0.98.3 from CVS.
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, I'm test
On 6 Jun 2004, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> I have not seen segfaults at all, just xruns (and weird situations where
> I can get the machine to almost lock up - everything slows down
> enormously, killing jack stops the problem).
Hi,
Just for the record, I had terrible troubles using 2.6
4 matches
Mail list logo
