Hello!
[Fri, 27 Feb 2004] guenter geiger wrote:
> Taking into account that theoretically all applications that support
> jack in a given (reasonabley stable) system will support the same
> version (ABI-wise), I think we could live with ppl having to update their
> whole jack - system, not just a
Post-mortem reports on this, and slight updates.
> > 11 Feb 2004 : All jack-related packages enter testing, or gets removed
> > from testing.
>
> This is rather optimistic at this rate. We may delay by a few weeks.
This wasn't delayed by too many weeks, and we have jack in testing.
Congratu
> > I'd like the conflicts added so that only one version of libjack
> > can be installed at the same time.
>
> > And a provides: line so that future version of libjack can
> > provides: and conflicts: that virtual package to ensure
> > incompatible libjack/jackd combinations aren't installed
> >
> "ln" == noreply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ln> Feature Requests item #723, was opened at 27/02/2004 18:18 You
ln> can respond by visiting:
ln> http://devel.agnula.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120&aid=723&group_id=8
ln> Category: None
> "Free" == Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The choice of having the FSFE as a partner inside the AGNULA
> consortium (I recall that DeMuDi is an AGNULA sub-project) was
> take with explicit intention of being very neat and picky with
> respect to licencing
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote:
> So if for example hydrogen is removed from testing during a libjack
> transition, it can _not_ stay installed anymore and will be removed by apt,
> if all libjacks conflict with each other (or depend on a versioned
> jackd, what comes out to be the sa
> "rj" == Robert Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rj> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>> Robert, as stated in my previous post, I'd like to keep
>> synchronized DeMuDi with Debian with respect to the jack
>> library. Is there a time line whic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Robert, as stated in my previous post, I'd like to keep synchronized
> DeMuDi with Debian with respect to the jack library. Is there a time
> line which maintainers of jack dependent packages are supposed to
> respect when a new version of the
> > Martin suggested us to be even more closed to Debian, and to make
> > sure that our packagesarealways aligned with the
> > unstable/testing environemnt, and, having well written build
> > dependencies, this should not be to difficult to achieve, as it
> > would be j
9 matches
Mail list logo
