Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

2004-01-13 Thread guenter geiger
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > We had a request from Junichi for a "mini-freeze" around JACK in > November. I don't know if that really is still valid because the goal of > that freeze is reached and the timetable for the release changed a lot. > I think we can do it and push another

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

2004-01-13 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Mon, 12 Jan 2004] guenter geiger wrote: > Looks good to me - only did some barebone tests, qjackctl and ladcca > compiled against 0.80.0 work. > > Anyhow, now that 0.75.0 is in testing we can go ahead and upload > to unstable directly. Jack related packages will have to be > recompiled an