> Do we have a plan how to handle this with future JACK packages ?
>
> I think that it would be better to include the strict dependency rules
> in the packages instead of forcing them by the naming scheme of
> the JACK libraries. Several of the packages that rely on JACK only
> use a subset of i
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi, fellow debian audio developers, and release managers.
>
>
> > > I think jack-audio-connection-kit and related packages should enter
> > > mini-freeze,
> > > to get something released to testing.
>
>
> This is my (3rd?) update on the freeze status.
2 matches
Mail list logo