On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:04:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:51:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >...
> > What criteria are you using to classify this as a grave bug, given that
> > the vast majority of sarge users will be running 2.4 kernels? I don't
> > recall see
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > * wine -- which has a grave bug that it doesn't work on 2.6.0, I
> > > > > posted a workaround patch
> > > > Why would this be considered grave? 2.6.0 hasn't even been officially
> > > > released, has it?
> > > Don't be ri
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:51:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> What criteria are you using to classify this as a grave bug, given that
> the vast majority of sarge users will be running 2.4 kernels? I don't
> recall seeing anything that made 2.6 support a "must" for sarge, so I
> don't see
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:47:08PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:32:37PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > * wine -- which has a grave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:32:37PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Update:
> > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
> > > * wine
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:15AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote:
> > > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
>
> > > > * gem -- which seems to have experienced build failure for powerpc and
> > > > hppa
>
> > For my part,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Update:
>
> > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
>
> > * wine -- which has a grave bug that it doesn't work on 2.6.0, I
> > post
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:32:37PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > * wine -- which has a grave bug that it doesn't work on 2.6.0, I
> > > posted a workaround patch
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:15AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote:
> > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
> > > * gem -- which seems to have experienced build failure for powerpc and
> > > hppa
> For my part, I would prefer that jack gets pushed in and gem stays
>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Update:
> From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
> * wine -- which has a grave bug that it doesn't work on 2.6.0, I
> posted a workaround patch
Why would this be considered grave? 2.6.0 hasn't even
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > For my part, I would prefer that jack gets pushed in and gem stays
> > uninstallable for some days, than having jack to wait another 10
> > days. ... So feel free to remove gem from testing, I will try to
> > figure out whats happening on ppc and hppa and
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:15AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Update:
> > >
> > >
> > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
> > >
> > > * gem -- w
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Update:
> >
> >
> > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for
> >
> > * gem -- which seems to have experienced build failure for powerpc and hppa
For my part, I
13 matches
Mail list logo