Re: jack 0.80.0

2003-09-04 Thread Eduardo Marcel Macan
I think it is worth it to have the newest jack, even if that means recompiling a lot of apps, I'm trying to do some more serious work and jack is disconnecting all my apps with no apparent reason, I have a reasonably fast machine, a good amount of ram, kernel with rt patches... is anyone having th

Re: jack 0.80.0

2003-09-04 Thread Jack O'Quin
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes, you are right, theoretically we should test other architetures > > too. An important one is powerPC, anyone has experience with jack on > > PowerPC ? > > Currently jack probably runs on MacOSX, but probably not on Debian PPC; > we'll probably ne

Re: jack 0.80.0

2003-09-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> > Status of current jack is that currently it compiles on all arches, > > but actually runs on > > ia64, i386, x86_64 > > only (to my dismay, which I found by running on my Zaurus PDA). > > :) JACK on PDA > > Yes, you are right, theoretically we should test other architetures > too. An import

Re: jack 0.80.0

2003-09-04 Thread guenter geiger
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Jack 0.80 has been released, and some apps that requires 0.80 > (like ecasound 2.3) have already come out. > > I'm not quite sure of the binary compatibility; it should > somehow work. > > Status of current jack is that currently it compiles on all arche