Hello!
[Fri, 22 Aug 2003] Uekawa, Junichi wrote:
> I'm rather convinced that there should be a new version.
> I'm moving this discussion to multimedia, but I think most of this is
> summed up now
>
> [New Version of Jack to hit unstable]
>
> The new version of Jack 0.75 will be uploaded RSN.
>
>
> As I said: Jack does not get in because that applications that use it
> need the glibc bugs and gcc bugs fixed. So you would have to remove
> _all_ jack applications from testing to let jack in because the ones in
> testing break if the old jack library disappears and the new
> applications br
2 matches
Mail list logo