already been fixed in version 3-3, a NMU by Hamish. It
> had been in the repository, but now seems to have vanished.
It only went to unstable, thus vanished when it was replaced by your
maintainer upload of 4-1.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://y
kage already Depends: on for other reasons.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://yawn.nocrew.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ignificant
| amount of functionality.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://yawn.nocrew.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just depend on perl, libdbi-perl, libnet-perl,
libdbd-mysql-perl | libdbd-msql-perl, mysql-base | msql and depend on
the libdbd* packages making sure they have what they need installed.
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
ey don't conflict I can't see a problem. Doesn't look
like the two you put into your message conflict so it makes sense to
me. :)
Bernd> Would the following copyright be ok?
I believe so.
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http:/
n to
the GPL on your changes saying they can be incorporated into the other
program. That should satisfy the problem.
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
on master which I updated at
the same time as uploading the new keyring. The next time dinstall is
run (round about now), it should find your key.
Sorry for any inconvenience in the time taken to add your key to the
keyring.
--
James
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It wasn't available when hamm was released.
It was available, the maintainers just didn't want a severely outdated
version in what was then frozen.
--
James
gt; > WARNING: Already present in non-free distribution.
> [...]
>
> No it's not. Is this something I should worry about?
No; it was a thinko by Richard which confused dinstall. It should be
fixed now.
--
James
"matthew.r.pavlovich.1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: xfpovray
> Architecture: i386
Should almost certainly be `any'; unless the package is really i386
specific. See 4.2.3 of the Packaging manual for more details.
--
James
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any help/patch/comments?
>
> Help: Simply upload the orig.tar.gz manually.
No, that's plain wrong. If you do that the .changes file won't list
it. Instead pass `-sa' to dpkg-buildpackage(1).
--
James
"Stephen J. Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyone seen this?
Yes (the results, not the problem). NFS and dpkg-source don't agree
we other, I'd strongly suggest not trying to force the issue or you'll
end up with broken source packages.
--
James
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to know on which given package other packages depend.
> (yes, this has been posted somewhere last month, but I cannot find
> this)
pkg-revdep from pkg-order.
--
James
(>= 3.0-2) | giflib3g (>= 3.0-5.2), \
> xlib6g (>= 3.3-5), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.3)
This is bad. (I'd guess it's because of gdk-imlib, I just had to fix
it on m68k not to do this)
--
James
Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> without uploading the *.orig.tar.gz file. Is this because it is a
> -2 rev?
Yep. `-sa' to dpkg-buildpackage is your friend. See the fine manual
for more details.
--
James
(I'm pretty sure that's correct. I'm having a hard time checking at
the moment.)
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
Apt Propaganda Team are kindly
requested to take their comments on this to /dev/null :-P Even
ignoring the lack of rev dep checking, (1) is the Right solution
anyway.
--
James
the archives as soon as no more packages are dependant upon them?
I'd say so. (Hmm, we could remove the -dev package as soon as 1.1.5
is installed; I don't know off hand how evil that is though).
--
James
eck to make sure I was correct.
Thanks
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
ed?
I wouldn't; just create them in place, e.g.
ln -s libgpm.so.1.$(SOMINOR) debian/tmp-libg/usr/lib/libgpm.so.1
> Are they to be absolute?
Nee.
> Or dows ldconfig provide the links?
Nee.
--
James
gt; changelog-entry "wrong upload" and re-upload almost the same
Thimo> stuff with an increased version or can I just change the
Thimo> dsetination?
Reupload with incremented version IMO.
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.
d just text, and
> I don't want to bloat the size unnecessarily.
dpkg-source won't deal with altering binary files, but it doesn't mind
them in the source unaltered. As to the size, well, the waste of
space has to be traded off with the benefits of pristine upstream
source.
--
James
iend.
(Well it's mine anyway.)
--
James
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you get mail from dinstall in any case.
Not quite; in pathological cases, dinstall won't send you mail,
because it can't know who to send it to (e.g. unreadable, non-existent
or corrupt .changes files).
--
James
what I'm using:
>
> until [ `expr "$PASSWORD" : ".*"` -ge 8 ]
> do
> PASSWORD=`head -c 100 /dev/urandom | tr -dc '[:alnum:]' | head -c 8`
> done
Y'all do know about the pwgen and makepasswd packages, right?
--
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> James Troup writes:
> > Y'all do know about the pwgen and makepasswd packages, right?
>
> I do now. I can't see making chrony predepend on one of them,
> though.
Why would you need to? You're using it in the postinst (at least,
acco
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To avoid this you can claim that your package doesn't run on all
> platforms with the Architecture field. I think something like this:
>
> Architecture: i386, sparc, alpha
Eh, s/,//g.
--
James
forgot something rather important...
(4a) Install the package and test it to make sure you didn't break anything.
--
James
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to use dupload from a non-debian box?
Probably, it's just perl, but you don't have to use dupload, you can
always do it by hand; I did this for years on a Solaris box (and
continue to do it on a Linux box).
--
James
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You will then need to update your pgp key by sending it to the pgp
> maintainer email (i forget what it is).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James
Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I run this as root, how can I sign the package, as my pgp key was
> created for my personal account.
sudo is your friend.
--
James
all & test a package (as any
uploaded package should be).
So I'll continue to pimp sudo as long as people continue to have
problems with fakeroot. YMMV
--
James
; Adam> script if and only if the first argument is
> Adam> `configure'.
>
> Hoo boy.. didn't we end up deciding this was wrong?
Eh? No, we certainly did not.
--
James
Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>>> "James" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> Hoo boy.. didn't we end up deciding this was wrong?
>
> James> Eh? No, we certainly did not.
>
> I'm
"Stephen J. Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyway...I still wonder...do ineed to recompile?
`*Broken* libc' (emphasis added). What do you think?
--
James - (yes)
ething. It's not a precedent in any
event.
--
James
non-i386
ports and anyone who tries to build the package from source.
--
James
Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Troup wrote:
> > Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The $64K question is... is this okay?
> >
> > No; see the fine packaging manual. `build' is a required target for
> &
Sunday. I suggest you try
again, or upload directly to master, it's definitely in the keyring on
master.
--
James
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 10:43:47PM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> > No, the build target should be present and should do something,
> > i.e. build the package. Even if it only depends on the two other
> > build targets,
bad-distribution-in-changes-file
>
> Any ideas???
Uh, what is in the distribution field?
--
James
it's available on demand.
--
James
, but since this looks like a
single program shared object it shouldn't cause any troubles. The
worst that happens in any case is that each process that uses this lib
gets its own copy (so you can see how bad a thing having libc compiled
this way would be :).
HTH
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[E
t be able to use dpkg-source, which will place any
> files you have added to the original source tree into the diff.
Not binary files.
--
James
ivial exercise as we've been using qmail for
a long time and a lot of stuff relies on it.
--
James
source package and not the build system.
--
James
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 1999 at 11:59:31PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > Mika Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > But isn't there a i386 build daemon?
>
> > Not yet, but there will be.
>
> I thought
ptions [Hi, Ed :p]). This will be entirely optional, and won't
cost the applicant much (I'll call them right back, if I can), and
will I hope avoid the problems of missing people or people giving us
telephone numbers for what are virtually dedicated modem lines. I
trialled this last wee
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You describe the exact reason pre-depends exist for.
Say what? Hardly...
--
James
Tonnesen Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can I be certain that Mysql and DBD/DBI will be installed and configured
> before my postinst script runs?
Yes; dpkg orders package configuration.
--
James
gt;
>> > -- Roderick Schertler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Good point. It's too late now, unless I upload a new -2 version
>> identical to the changed -1 version.
Sven> a -1.1 will do also, altough dotted debian versions are
Sven> ususally reserved fo
Josip> downloads files from Incoming knows that he may have trouble
Josip> with them. If he doesn't know that, he is a fool, IMHO.
Sure, but that doesn't mean you should avoid doing things that are
simple and help make things easier for those who install from
Incoming. In this cas
you're looking for. (The 1: is an "era"; it won't normaly get
displayed. Made for just this sort of thing.)
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, b
inor upgrade will be 1:1.1.1 (and *not* 1:1.11), the next
> major release will be 1:1.2.0 and so forth.
Exactly what I meant; thank you.
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth a
ething could be done in the next version. Until then you can
remove the file from the .orig.tar.gz and do a dpkg-buildpackage with
the argument -sa so that the new source packages is included in your
next upload.
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
it require elaborate
hacking of debian/rules? I did edit the Makefile.in to replace ./libtool with
$(srcdir)/libtool, but it seems that will not be enough.
Any help would be appreciated. :)
Thanks -
- James
--
James Bielman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer
am and debian/rules
> for perusal if the above doesn't help? Or give a URL from where they
> can be downloaded.
>
Sure. Go to http://www.tailrecursion.com/libaccounting/
Thanks for your help. :)
- James
--
James Bielman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Debian GNU/Linux Maintai
ersion of this software, send
a check for $20,000 and a self-addressed stamped envelope to Ty Coon." It's
DFSG free, but it won't guarantee that users can get source code, which is
clearly the intent of the author. He might be better served by simply going
GPL; he has most of the gis
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 09:09:51PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
> Hi. Thank you for your opinion.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > clearly the intent of the author. He might be better served by simply going
to files
which aren't mentioned in a .changes file.
--
James
dpkg. Why ?!
Limitation of dpkg.
--
James
s file allows other packages to properly depend on your
> package. SO it is rather important. A call to dh_makeshlibs should
> do it.
Except you probably don't want things depending on debauch. I'd be
tempted to make the shlibs generate an unsatisfiable dependency,
personally.
--
James
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:11:36AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> "James M. Mastros" wrote:
> >/usr/doc/naim/examples is wrong because they aren't really
> >examples.
> That's the only place they _can_ go. I agree that we need a new
> director
Is it possible to "Provide: libslang (1.2.99)"? (Warning: Idle speculation)
-=- James Mastros
--
Caveat Emptator: I am not a Developer. (But I use libslang-using binaries,
if that counts for anything.)
d put it in /tmp if they don't have wget. This would probably
work fairly well -- though I'm not certian if you'd get the ordering you
want if wget and dpkg are installed in the same {apt,dpkg} run.
-=- James Mastros
--
True mastery is knowing enough to BS the rest.
residents.
> right, i have to break source in two anyway. i can't put source in main
> distribution that require some non-US packages, can i?
No, but you can put source in non-US/main that builds both main and
non-US/main binary packages.
-=- James Mastros
d because I, personally, think of graphics as display
(xloadimage) and editing programs (gimp), etc., but not
non-productivity docklets. That's my opinion, minus my ftpmaster hat,
YMMV.
--
James
+if ($s =~ s/^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-.*?\n\n//s) {
unless ($s =~ s/\n
-BEGIN\040PGP\040SIGNATURE-\n
.*?\n
--
James
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually James Troup appears to be working on this.
No, I'm not. I posted a RTP, and Phil Hands & Herbert Xu both said
they would give packaging it a shot.
--
James
/& | svgalib-dummyg1\1/'
debian/substvars; \
| rm debian/substvars-unhacked; \
| fi
|
| This replaces the svgalibg1 dependency by an alternative with
| svgalib-dummyg1, and versioned dependencies are preserved.
It Works For Me (TM) [q.v. xplanet].
--
James
Peter M Kahle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, then I have a question. is the old key then removed from the
> keyring?
Not unless [EMAIL PROTECTED] is specifically asked to.
--
James
n-us.debian.org's Incoming
directory.
--
James
n samosa was stuck at a passphrase prompt and
had stopped processing packages. Fixed. Sorry about that.
--
James
to do it.
Doesn't this mean that you have to upgrade both packages if you need
to change the *.so.* files in a binary incompatible manner.
Ie. wouldn't it be better to have something like...
libicu: virtual package, requires icu and libicu16
...or am I missing something.
--
James A
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:57:40AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > > > So I'm thinking about splitting into:
> > > >
> > > > libicu16: just the lib*.so.*
> > > > icu: the rest, depe
heard of this happening before, please send me a line.
( don't even get me started on the ordeal I went through with 2.2.18 )
james
program too. I just rebooted into 2.2.18 and compiled the new
kernel without any problems.
james
[ ops. about the mailing list, I will direct further questions to
debian-users ]
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:15:35AM +0500, James Leigh wrote:
> >
> > I am using debian woody wit
t. Just upload the new packages.
Ondrej, the packages haven't been rejected, IIRC, just marked as NEW.
They'll be processed in due course.
--
James
I'm in n the NM queue, and would like someone to sponsor my packages
"timer-q1", "timer-q1--dev", "socket-poll1" and "socket-poll1-dev".
Adding...
deb-src ftp://ftp.and.org/debian/james_debs/ ./
...to your sources.list will get the source.
--
#
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer
> than the version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but
> have not received a response.
Well, a response _was_ sent.
--
James
| From nobody Sun
ckages are less
Eric> than cooperative. I think it would be nice to setup an apt
Eric> source containing all of GNOME 1.4 built for potato. I realize
Eric> that keeping such a beast up-to-date is non-trivial, so i
Eric> volunteer to do all the work.
I'm willing to help where I can here. I don't have the time luxury
you do, but I can certainly compile and upload things if that helps.
Jim
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
; anywhere...
http://ftp-master.debian.org/
--
James
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:07:59AM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote:
> > James Troup writes:
> > > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > &
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0 6 */2 * * cd $HOME/.gnupg; scp -q -C
> auric.debian.org:/org/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.{gpg,pgp} .
ARGH! FFS, use the anonymous rsync method on keyring.debian.org,
that's what it's there for.
--
James
requires an
uptodate keyring package then it is IMNSHO broken.
The canonical source for the debian keyring _is_[2] kerying.debian.org
(via anon-rsync); period. The package is a convenience, nothing
more[3].
--
James
[0] Stuff tends to get put there in the same way that the key server
got
ion? Please let me know
Get gnupg 1.0.5-2 from incoming on pandora.
--
James
Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:08:10AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > Get gnupg 1.0.5-2 from incoming on pandora.
>
> Do you plan a package for stable too?
No. a) --send-key isn't broken in the stable package only in 1.0.5-1,
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Since there is no /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa in unstable, would
> > backporting the unstable gnupg to potato solve this?
>
> Yes, sid's gnupg includes RSA.
Err, huh? potato (2.2r3 at least) has gnupg 1.0.4-1 which includes
RSA.
--
James
It's in shared library form, but appears to be
> a fully functional mpeg-1 layer 3 encoder and not just a wrapper that
> invokes a lame binary the user already has on their system.
That's a bug then... (which I've just filed).
--
James
UBST(DEBIAN)
> else
> AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
...and all other changes in scripts are based on "#ifdef DEBIAN". Is using
/etc/debian_version the right thing to do, or is there a better/more accurate
way to determine this? Existence of /usr/bin/dpkg? Existence of /var/lib/dpkg
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:32:59PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small
> > set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and ho
lly, and b) installing it in
/usr/lib/gdbm1.8 is scarily wrong.
--
James
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to package kernel-patch-folk. However, the files are too big for
> me to download.
Hang on if you can't download it, how are you going to use or test it?
Or are you saying you're packaging software you neither use nor can
test?
--
James
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can not unpack my own packages anymore... where is the bug, in
> dpkg-source, in tar, or in my box?
Upgrade to dpkg-dev >= 1.9.15 or downgrade to <= 1.9.10. Usual dpkg SNAFU.
--
James
werpc,
sparc
| fvwm-common | 2.2.5-1.1 | testing | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, powerpc, sparc
| 11:42:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $
>From http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
| =
| [Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:49
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 11:40, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> James Damour dijo [Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:25:52AM -0400]:
> > Good evening. My name is James Damour, and I would like to adopt the
> > filler package that the Debian QA team has orphaned. I have made my
> > first modific
Good evening. My name is James Damour, and I would like to adopt the
filler package that the Debian QA team has orphaned. I have made my
first modifications to the package, and I have uploading them to
http://mentors.debian.net.
I would appreciate it if a sponsor could review my packaging, and
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
> Dear James,
>
> James Damour wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 14:29, Steven Augart wrote:
> >>Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> >>>As for SGID - if this is java game, so you most probably have a shell
> &
ckage and source to anyone wishing to review my
work. I'm not quite ready to have it uploaded to the Debian project
(not even Experimental) yet, however. If you don't mind, I'd like more
agreement on the basic concepts first.
--
James Damour (Suvarov454) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I work with the sudo upstream to get a setgid
option added?" Put another way, given that my needs are not met by
any of the alternatives presented in this thread, what is the best
way (for *all* of Debian) to address them?
--
James Damour (Suvarov454) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
301 - 400 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
