from:"Tore Anderson"

Uncertainty regarding kernel module and /etc/modutils/*

2002-04-23 Thread Tore Anderson

cause dpkg to panic about overwriting other packages' files. So, should I accept the redundancy and let dh_installmodules do its job, or should I use the postinst/rm approach? Or the insanely clever solution one of you are going to suggest? :-) Regards, -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Kernel module package depending on kernel-headers.

2002-09-19 Thread Tore Anderson

ult release, and so on. I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor release. -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kernel module package depending on kernel-headers.

2002-09-19 Thread Tore Anderson

Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > > > I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed > > in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor > > release. >

Re: orig.tar.gz

2002-10-28 Thread Tore Anderson

. You could try running dpkg-buildpackage with the -sa option for each upload you want to regenerate the fake upstream tarball? -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The "Replaces:" Field

2003-02-05 Thread Tore Anderson

ge, then you could conflict with that instead. -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: ScummVM

2003-03-20 Thread Tore Anderson

Thanks in advance, -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uncertainty regarding kernel module and /etc/modutils/*

2002-04-23 Thread Tore Anderson

cause dpkg to panic about overwriting other packages' files. So, should I accept the redundancy and let dh_installmodules do its job, or should I use the postinst/rm approach? Or the insanely clever solution one of you are going to suggest? :-) Regards, -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Kernel module package depending on kernel-headers.

2002-09-19 Thread Tore Anderson

ult release, and so on. I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor release. -- Tore Anderson

Re: Kernel module package depending on kernel-headers.

2002-09-19 Thread Tore Anderson

Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > > > I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed > > in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor > > release. >