have been overlooked. Is there anything I can do to
improve my RFS messages? Should I Cc previous sponsors? Alternatively I
could try to become a DM, but I don't really know who to approach to be
my advocate(s).
Kind regards
Tony Houghton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l
urrent unstable version is quite out of date now. My last few RFSs have
been overlooked so I've Cc'd people who have uploaded or helped with
previous versions.
While I've got your attention, would any of you be interested in being
my advocate for DM status?
Kind regards
Tony Hought
I received a message (below) about one of the package builders failing
on roxterm. The error is:
dh_shlibdeps -a
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 187: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion `info[20]->d_un.d_val == 7' failed!
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: objdump gave error exit status 127
d
I recently discovered a bug in the current release of roxterm: the
configuration editor doesn't respond to changes in the text widgets. I'm
surprised nobody else appeared to spot this; I suppose it's only been
used lately by long term users with stable configurations. But it's
quite a serious probl
I forgot to close #610981 when I released roxterm 1.21.4-1. I guess I
should fix this by sending a message to 610981-done@b.d.o but I'm not
100% sure what to do about debian/changelog. I think I should add
(Closes: #610981) retrospectively to the old change description which
applies to this bug. Is
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.22.1-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind reg
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:25:40 +0300
George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:38:00 Tony Houghton wrote:
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.1-1
> > of my package "roxterm".
>
> Uploaded. Thanks for taking care of the b
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.22.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Tony Houghton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:55:55 +0300
George Danchev wrote:
> Uploaded, thanks for your work.
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I noticed that RFS's from debexpo don't include a package description.
I'd prefer to see at least the short description without having to
visit the website, and personally I'd like to see the full description
too, at least for new packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@list
A new release of roxterm is in the pipeline. I've made a lot of changes,
mostly to replace libglade with GtkBuilder and to get it to work with
gtk3. I'd ideally like to call it version 2 and have the clear
distinction that version 1 was for gtk2 and version 2 is for gtk3.
However, I suspect a lot o
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:53:32 +1000
Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:40:34 +0100
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > I'm pretty sure I once read something about how to get a single
> > source package to build multiple binary packages from the same
> > source
I've split roxterm in to three packages:
roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
roxterm-common: All the other files
roxterm-legacy and roxterm Conflict with each other and both depend on
roxterm-common.
I've got 3 lintian warnings:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:30:55 +0300
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:19:44 +0100
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
> > roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
> > roxterm-common:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200
David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > package too, eg to roxterm-gtk3. In the latter case would adding
> > "Replaces: roxterm" cause it to automatically replace roxterm at
> > apt-ge
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:51:11 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200
> David Kalnischkies wrote:
[Snip]
> I'd rather keep the name "roxterm" for the GTK3 version if that's OK.
> I don't really want the main package to be named aft
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-3
Section : x11
To access further i
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the
> terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't
> know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appears
> on other environment. If y
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:12:30 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> Does roxterm-gtk3 have any functionality -gtk2 doesn't have? Unlike
> QT/GTK, there isn't a big difference there and I quite fail to see
> the reason to have both. It's a library rather than support for a
> whole environment, you need to
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:47:15 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Tony Houghton writes:
>
> > Yes, this is a known bug (#632403) and that's the main reason I'm still
> > providing a gtk2 package too. As soon as it's uploaded I'll mark the
> > bug as af
The last release of roxterm went to experimental instead of unstable.
TBH I forgot that I'd changed it to experimental at some point, but
after release I thought perhaps it's just as well because of the major
changes. However, I think this has resulted in few users noticing the
new version and I th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds th
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it was
> previously uploaded to experimental.
I think so, yes. I didn't really intend to send the previous version to
experimental and wanted to go back to unstabl
Sep 2011 10:23:05 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Tony Houghton writes:
>
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800
> > Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> >
> >> You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it
> >> was previously uploaded to experiment
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:44:03 +0200
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Kan-Ru Chen , 2011-09-14, 11:29:
> >>
> >>That is, more or less, what's happening, so I'll move the bug to
> >>libvte9. In case that takes a long time to fix should I manually
> >>override the dependency?
> >
> >Yes you can, just put the
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the
> moment, so I'll upload a new version later.
I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n:
You are not uploading to one of those Debian di
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:45:48 +0200
Arno Töll wrote:
> No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't
> merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet.
OK. Please post again when you do so I know when I can try again to
upload roxterm.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:08:33 +0200
Arno Töll wrote:
> our (not so) old host running http://mentors.debian.net was replaced
> right before by shiny new hardware. For you, as user you shouldn't
> hopefully notice the switch. The new hardware is much more powerful and
> has plenty of disk space. Hen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
Section : x11
It builds th
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
>
> * Package name: roxterm
>Version : 2.2.1-1
Hold that, I discovered corruption in the GtkBuilder definitions after
release (looks like vi fi
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
> >
> > * Package name: roxterm
> >Version : 2.2.1-1
>
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:37:04 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Tony Houghton writes:
>
> >> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
>
> Done.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:02:04 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:31:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > You might want to use dh --parallel.
>
> I really wonder why it's not debhelper's default. I understand, it
> can break old packages with buggy makefiles, but it'd be nice to
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:06:00 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > I agree, but there's another big problem: autoconf. It runs far more
> > tests than most projects need (especially when using glib which
> > t
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:40:43 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > I think writing build scripts in a language like python is very nice
> > (autoconf is too slow, let's use python, spot the irony :)) but I've
>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:04 -0500
Paul Elliott wrote:
> Perhaps this is offtopic, but there are so many packagers here,
> perhaps I can find an answer.
>
> Berlios is closing, I have two small projects, GPLed, that use
> subversion and publish tarballs, where should I go?
>
> I looked at sourc
I'm a bit confused about the Vcs fields in Control files. Many projects
have the upstream code and debian packaging maintained separately and
I'm not entirely sure what you're supposed to do with the Vcs fields in
that case. Should they point to upstream or the packaging? How can
tools, such as deb
What should you do if you have a dependency which can either use one
package or two (or more) different packages. For example, roxterm's man
pages can be built either with xmltoman, xmlto or xsltproc, but xsltproc
additionally requires docbook-xsl. I don't think control file syntax
supports groupin
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:23:41 +0200
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
> > Build-Depends: xsltproc | xmltoman | xmlto, docbook-xsl | xmltoman
> > | xmlto
>
> This would be a correct rewrite to CNF, but ...
>
> > Or would it be better to choose one and stick to that for the sake
> > of consistency
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:06 +0200
Boris Pek wrote:
> > This seems to be a bit excessive. There is no real use in having
> > many tiny packages for every function; please keep in mind that
> > this will make the Packages index even larger (which also affects
> > users that do not even have the p
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:14 +0100
Dennis van Dok wrote:
> On 23-11-11 10:27, Joseph Gunn wrote:
>
> > A popular way of accomplishing the task is to support
> > "configuration subdirectories"
> >
> > It includes all "configuration files" in that directory. If you
> > publish a name that you wil
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : x11
It builds th
Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Hought
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:16:15 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza,
> > so please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
> >
> If that's an is
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100
Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
>
> > The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
> > want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with
>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:58 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Unfortunately there is still one missing build-dep: librsvg2-bin. I
> have uploaded 2.4.2-1 with this fixed, please fix it in your
> repository as well :)
OK, I've corrected that my end too. Thanks a lot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:32:46 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Slavko wrote:
>
> > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
> > * License : [fill in]
>
> Try reading your emails before
Suppose I have a new version of my package available and I upload it to
experimental during a freeze. After the freeze I'd like that new
version in unstable, but I haven't made any changes in the meantime. Is
there a migration process from experimental to unstable, or is it
normal to bump the debia
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what
to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else to
the upstream tracker. I've applied the patch upstream but don't know
the best way to credit the author in debian/changelog. Include his
name? Not his email ad
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:03:50 -0500
Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:54:24PM +0000, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what
> > to do about documenting a patch that was submitted
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:02:44 -0300
Saulo Moraes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to contribute with Debian, I am a professional developer but
> will be better to start working as a maintainer. After check the "Debian
> Packages that Need Lovin'" I have choose the "samsung-tools" as my first
> expe
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto wrote:
> Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
>
> You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
> in debian/changelog. I suggest: "Uploaded to unstable", because
> lintian will search by "to u
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto wrote:
> Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
>
> You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
> in debian/changelog. I suggest: "Uploaded to unstable", because
> lintian will search by "to u
ROXTerm is going to need a new release soon and I'd like to include
debugging symbols. It currently has binary packages roxterm-common (data
files), roxterm-gtk3 (executables linked with GTK3 etc) and roxterm-gtk2
(linked with GTK2 etc). Should debugging symbols always be put in
separate -dbg packa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.8.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
Thanks for sponsoring it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118142157.427e1...@realh.co.uk
from
http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
Changes since the last upload:
* Re-enabled deprecated background options for now.
A few people were upset about these options being disabled so I decided
to keep them enabled until a vte without ther support arrives, or is
about to arrive, in Debian.
Reg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm not quite sure what that bit means though.
Do I just need to update Build-Depends to debhelper (>= 9)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian/source/options with this content[1]:
extend-diff-ignore = "^po/roxterm.pot$"
I did that, but I get th
On 04/08/14 21:58, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota
wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can
be built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
version. Please use the new link:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_2.9.2-1.ds
On 07/08/14 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can be
built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
ve
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.3-1
thanks
On 08/08/14 09:48, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
Except that wasn't working for me, it said it was incompatible with source
format 3.0 (Quilt) (see above). Or was it specifically my regex or synta
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.4-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". I have also posted
an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two "bugs"?
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.5-1
* Upstream Au
On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". I have also posted an
unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two "bugs"?
Please add the requested
I've decided to discontinue support for legacy libraries in roxterm and
concentrate on GTK3 and vte-2.91 and I want to simplify the packaging
because of this. The current/old version has these binary packages:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
roxterm-gtk2,
On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)
roxterm-gtk2-dbg, roxterm-gtk3-dbg (corresponding debugging symbols)
roxterm (virtual
On 10/06/15 12:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:22:30 Tony Houghton wrote:
Depending on its size, it may be better to keep roxterm-common: this
package is arch:all and this would avoid duplication these data for each
arch.
IIRC I was thinking of doing that a long time ago
On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)
roxterm-gtk2-dbg, roxterm-gtk3-dbg (corresponding debugging symbols)
roxterm (virtual
On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote:
If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you
want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the
release cycle is better than later, however). I think these changes
sound fine in principle, although a debdiff would c
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
>
What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old
virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I
was expecting the 'Replaces: rox
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old
virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I
was expecting the 'Replaces: roxter
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On 02/07/15 20:49, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Tony,
Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never
got back to you with your latest set of questions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies
On 02/07/15 21:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
I thought I had released 2.9.6-1 and 2.9.7-1 via sponsorship too, but
for some reason the current version in unstable is still 2.9.5-1. Is the
On 04/07/15 10:19, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
My thinking is that anybody still using roxterm-gtk2 has some good
reason to do so and will not want to upgrade to a GTK3 version even if
it means missing out on the latest features and bug fixes
On 04/07/15 22:29, Vincent Cheng wrote:
(If you have time, please upload an updated package to mentors so it's
easier to discuss any further changes.)
I've done that, hopefully it will be available by the time you read
this. The Breaks/Replaces I've decided on are as follows:
Package: roxterm
On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position
836: ordinal not in range(128)
debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
I've attached the full build log.
I think the problem is that the PC you tried the bu
On 08/07/15 07:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
NameError: name 'reload' is not defined
debian/rules:48: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_clean' failed
Oh, I didn't notice reload was python 2 only. And setdefaultencoding
doesn't work any more in python 3 anyway.
However, I was able to build you
: 3.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages:
roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - binaries
roxterm-data - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal
Hi,
I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded
and the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version
showing up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong
with the upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
On 08/12/15 14:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:59:56PM +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I must remember to change the level in my lintian options as well as fixing
I believe (because I have a pbuilder hook that runs lintian for me, I
rarely run it manyally) just dumping the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
101 - 193 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
