Hi,
how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for
the case that a service should be visible to runit, but not started by
default) or log services handled?
Regards,
Tino
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 14:38:31 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for
> > the case that a service should be visible to runit but not started by
> > default)
>
> At bootup (entering stage 2, more correct), every service in /etc/
wnload the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.5-1.dsc
More information about LinuxPTP can be obtained from
http://linuxptp.sourceforge.net/
Regards,
Tino Mettler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.
retitle 775284 RFS: linuxptp/1.5-2
thanks
I just uploaded a new revision. The package is now blhc and lintian
clean even with --pedantic, except for the missing upstream changelog
which is really missing in the upstream source.
Regards,
Tino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...
retitle 775284 RFS: linuxptp/1.5-3 [ITP]
thanks
I just uploaded a new revision.
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.5-3.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Add debian/watch file
* Correct documentation about adjusting systemd service parameters
*
ch, adopted upstream
* Adjust Debian copyright
* Fix python warnings during installation
* Fix 2 further python warnings
Regards,
--
Tino Mettler
Am 24.04.2022 um 21:41 schrieb Antoine Beaupré :
>
> Hi!
>
> I tested the package and it generally looks good, but tests fail in
> autopkgtest:
>
> autopkgtest [15:28:00]: test autodep8-python3: set -e ; for py in
> $(py3versions -r 2>/dev/null) ; do cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" ; echo "Testing with
Am 24.04.2022 um 22:04 schrieb Antoine Beaupré :
>
> You have actually configured it in the package, so it would be better if
> it actually works. :) Try just running `autopkgtest` in the source
> directory..
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/autopkgtest
Hi,
I was not aware that
Hi, Antoine,
I run autopkgtest after the build process with the following result:
# autopkgtest ./ -- qemu autopkgtest-unstable.img
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: starting date: 2022-04-25
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: version 5.21
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: host mac; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest ./ -- qem
Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:56:30 -0400 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> On 2022-04-25 17:16:35, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > Hi, Antoine,
> >
> > I run autopkgtest after the build process with the following result:
> >
> > # autopkgtest ./ -- qemu autopkgtest-unstable.img
>
Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 18:44:19 +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
[...]
> All Python module packages have a minimal automatic autopkgtest that tries
> to import the module. Make sure the module name used by the test is
> correct, and if it isn't you should set the correct one in
> debian/tests/a
Hi,
I uploaded a new package to my mentors account.
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/show-in-file-manager/show-in-file-manager_1.1.4-1.dsc
The only change to the last version is a
debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-python.conf
file. Now the autopkgtest-pkg-python test passes.
T
Hi,
the package triggers several lintian warnings. I guess most of them
were already present in old version. But at least the
package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files
warning for the new usbrelayd package can be trivially fixed by setting
its arch to "all" instead of "any".
Regards,
Tino
Am 03.05.2022 um 12:28 schrieb Michal Sojka :
>
> I'm also not sure about NMU warnings. Shall I mention NMU in the
> changelog or it will be done by the one who will really upload the
> package?
Hi,
the NMU warnings are triggered because you created the changelog entry, but
your address is not
Am Tue, May 03, 2022 at 10:09:12 -0400 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> On 2022-05-02 21:53:03, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I uploaded a new package to my mentors account.
> >
> > dget -x
> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/show-in-file-m
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service
> unit file. lintian is complaining about an init script:
>
> % lintian fw-skel_0.06-1_all.deb
> W: fw-skel: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile et
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:41:12 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service
> > unit file. lintian is complaining about an
17 matches
Mail list logo
