On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:51:46AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:40, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, can i ask you a ppp related question ?
> >
> > I have packaged unicorn, a kernel driver for the Bewan ADSL PCI st
> > modem, and it needs pppoatm supp
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I am very interested in having this in the CVS! However I have little
> > > time for testing at the moment. It's probably best if Sven tests it and
>
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:08, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > cycle of these drivers is not in sync, so a common driver will not be a
> > good idea. Also, i don't think it gains the user much, since he will at
>
ing list some time ago, maybe you should look into
that (if you did not already).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> hello sven..
>
> Received at 2002-11-27 / 09:01 by Sven Luther:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:54PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> > >
> > > i am currently adopting the package "gtk
ince i did not (yet) move some test binaries in their own package. It
is currently sitting in incoming waiting for approval, as it is a new
package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
possibility to fallback
to the original (non-free) fonts would maybe be the best solution, but
as Frank said, it is more work.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
>
> --
> gram
ler, i was told
that unless we spare 20Mo or something such per arch, it is not worth
it (on this list no less) so i have doubts about a little package being
too much for the ftp archive.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
dependencies in package
a build-dependency depends on ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
rs.
>
> If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> a package?
dh_make.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
log in one of the numerous debian machines, and build it
yourself. Provided the dependencies are there, and even if not, you only
need to ask debian-admin about it.
BTW, what package are you speaking about ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
e correct way to handle this, would be to associate a
priority or something such to each provide ? having the real package be
priority 50 for example, and other package able to provide virtual
packages with other priorities, be them higher or lower.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
led on the autobuilders at the time of the build, and the
buildd logs didn't give me much more info.
Any help would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-12 at 09:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I just uploaded a new version of my lablgl package yesterday, and all
> > autobuilder failed with :
> >
> > ocamlmktop -I . -I +lablt
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-
other binary packages provided
by the source package get build fine.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ll, why don't you simply do a package with a copy of the exim sources,
and add the patch in the .diff.gz. This way you upload the source just
once, and upload new .diff.gz each time there is a new version of the
patches ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:15:11PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Is there a right way for using the source of a different
> >> debian
or a sgml one) in
the source package, and generate the docs yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ally the recommended way to do this? Can I call
> dpkg --list from a postinst script without having it explode?
No, it is not. You just need to use the $1 argument to postinst, as
Jerome told you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
gt; When reassigning the bug to dpkg-dev, Branden has said that he would
> eventually
> split up the xlibs package [0], so this would go away when rebuilding against
> some future xlibs.
Or you could try a shlibs override. look at dpkg-shlibsdep manpage for
more details.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
:)))
(but then, this is biased advice, i am the ocaml maintainer after all).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the right place for this ? I don't
think debian-mentors is indicated.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
gnol
tambien.
Amigablemente,
Sven Luther
uild, i think, so maybe
it is an override thingy and needs you to contact the ftp-masters.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 09:29, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You can get the mail adress of the autobuild maintainers from :
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/people
>
> Sorry if this seems dumb, but I can&
or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access.
>
> all = all debian developers and perhaps special cases (don't know).
>
> Take a look at http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/
But i guess at least a signed key is needed.
I suppose that you would need to contact debian-admin for this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
> > maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
>
> > Now,
guide/
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Ok, thanks.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
oblematix packages ? Would a apt-cache rdepends be
> > enough for this :
>
> I think that would be enough.
> It would be obvious after the new package is installed, because they
> will be uninstallable in unstable.
Ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
301 - 332 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
