hat i did with gshutdown in gnome, gnome2 does not seem to
have gshutdown, so i am out of luck).
That said, you still would need to have the corresponding user having
sudo privilege, and i think this need to be done by hand.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
uld have been usefull if you provide links to your packages,
and/or a a short description of those.)
Also, feel free to join the debian-ocaml-maint mailing list, which
altough is devoted to maintainers of ocaml related packages, may be of
interrest to you, especially regarding the moscow ML freene
have an entry point? Like -mentors?
>
> | It is a matter of practice. The one Raphaël is proposing would not
> | be annoying at all.
>
> For me it would, because of the amount of noise. The BTS is quite
> noisy.
And -mentors is not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d you may consider subscribing to debian-ocaml-maint, where issues
regarding packages built with/for ocaml are discussed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Is such a thing possible, how can it be done.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I wish to be able, in a package postinst, to be able to know the
> > previously installed version of the package, so i can take different
> > act
ing to be installed at the same time). This would create a
symlink when both packages are installed.
Saddly, the current way dh_installmanpages handle this is broken (well i
was told it would be fixed post woody release) and it does not really
work (the symlink is to the original name, not the gzipped one).
I crea
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > > debian/
;Version numbering").
>
> OK, I will try, even if it's not exactly what I meaned.
Well, you could also use the ugly :
Provides: package_name-1.0.0 or something such.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ke i did for ia64
and powerpc, where the 3.04 native code compiler was broken, then there
suddenly is a previous version of the ia64 and powerpc packages to
contend with.
But then, in the case of the bug above, the native code compiler would
not have compiled from the start anyway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ld depend, and worry later if this don't work.
Or is there another list where we could ask.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
&
> I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed
> in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor
> release.
How do you handle the case when the module in question only works with a
subset of the kernels (let say a 2.4.x module will only work ith kernels
later than 2.4.7 or something such ?).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 12:20:05AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >
> > > I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed
> >
t. So what is the best way to build only the
arch:all packages, or maybe i should hand generate the .changes file for
upload ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
> > After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> > autobuilt, which seem
ecret key there,
> > and this may be unwanted.
>
> See debsign in the devscripts package ;-)
Mmm, i didn't know about this one, i did the signing by hand.
But this doesn't sole my arch:all only upload, i guess i will have to do
a new version of the package just for that :(
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> > without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> &
om a remote machine and signing locally. It'd be nice if it
> could operate the other way round.
I imagine that it would also work nicely if you copy the .changes and
.dsc files to your local box and sign them there locally ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kage manager that apache-ssl-ywesee has the same
> functionality as the named packages, so that any dependency that relies
> on one can depend on apache-ssl-ywesee instead.
Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
most probably run with
problems on versioned dependencies, do someone know what is the problem
with that, if there is a fundamental flaw with doing them, or if it is
only the manpower to implement them which is at fault.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven LUTHER:
> > Is there a way to handle this so that apt will get the native code
> > package if it is available, and resort to the bytecode one on arches not
> > supporting the native c
, or select randomly ?
Alternatively, we could also have the both a foo_1.0-1_all.deb and a
foo_1.0-1_i386.deb (for example) in the archive, and have the per arch
PAckages file point to the native code one (foo_1.0-1_i386.deb) when it
is available, and to the byte code one (foo_1.0-1_all.de
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther:
> > In case i submit a patch or something such, should i discuss things
> > first, or just go ahead and implement it ?
> >
> Probably talk about it first... though frankly I
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:44:50PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:09, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > >
> > > Sven LUTHER:
> > > > Is there a way to handle th
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:25:55AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Since the bytecode executables are arch independent, i think it would be
> > nice to build them arch: all, since this would mean, apart from smaller
> > sized packages, also that we don'
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:38:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Well, what about the coq for example, which is 7 MB package (on i386, so
> > maybe it is bigger for other arches) and 20MB installed.
>
> I guess it's on the line.
I thought so, But
gt;
> Provides can not provide a version (currently, may change some day). You can
> ask for people to depend on cron | dcron. Although the question is now, why
> a new cron??
Or fix versioned provides. But then i was told it is a dpkg issue.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:21:05AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:23:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Also notice that the s390 is not a released port, so it will not stop
> > your package from entering testing, so i would not worry too much ab
have to wait for are :
alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, powerpc and sparc
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the current release. And this
does not include non-us if you happen to be in the us.
BTW, something similar exist also with the testing script.
Does the testing script verify only the dependencies of a package for it
to enter testing, or also the build-deps ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Package: cupsys-pt
> Version: 1.0.2-1
Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Package: cupsys-pt
> > Version: 1.0.2-1
>
> Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Ok, package uploaded.
eekly and
other will retry when they have time for it.
You could wait a week or so, and if the situation doesn't improve,
contact the autobuilder maintainer.
Alternatively, you could login on a debian paroject machine, and build
the program yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUB
said, but in general i don't think
being impatient with the autobuilders warrants the upload of a new
version.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
> > intervention
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
> > intervention
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:44:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > &g
should
add the debconf template in the distributed package ?
Note that it is a multi-binary package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:39:03AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > I created a templates file, put it in the debian directory, created a
> > config file and a postinst file, like was adviced.
> >
> > Now, the package builds fine, i tried running the p
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:59AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Maybe this should be more proeminently said in
> > /usr/share/doc/debconf-doc/tutorial.txt.gz, no, there is only a quick
> > mention about installing in debian/tmp/DEBIAN/, which i missed, and
> it lets you unpack the file as is without having to worry about
> > overwriting the debianized version.
>
> Use a temporary directory. You should get into the habit of doing this
> when unpacking random tarballs anyway.
Especially since some random tarballs don't install in a
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:15:47AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:24:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:54:28AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:46:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > >
does not work
with unicorn-source, which needs to be root (with sudo). I tried
looking into the alsa-source code, but it is a huge and complex stuff,
and i am a bit lost.
Thanks for your help,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:47:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> I have packaged the unicorn driver for the Bewan ADSL PCI st and USB
> modems. There are still some licencing issues which will be solved in
> the next upstream release, but basically the package is rea
and the packaging changes go into the .diff.gz. You are free
to send the changes also upstream, so when the next release happens, the
.diff.gz would be empty. There is no problem in sending the debian
directory also upstream in this way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uccess.
I also had the problem, but then after a time the package built
correctly. You could simply look at it today to see if it is already
solved.
That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or something
such, so you would need to look at the build logs directly.
Friendly,
Sven
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Oliver,
> > > I got same the problem wit
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > >
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Freitag, 8. November 2002 10:35 schrieb Sven Luther:
>
> > > > That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or
> > > > something such, so you would need to look at the build logs
> >
previous one ?
Using it requires patching all over the source to change the ndbm.h
includes into gdbm-ndbm.h ones.
Is using /usr/include/gdbm-ndbm.h the right solution, or does a copy of
/usr/include/db1/ndbm.h still be included in a non obvious place ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
are removed by
clean though.
I have such a case in one of my packages, and i move them around during
the build and restore them when cleaning.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remote mount it on multiple
system, which may not all be using the same arch, while /usr/lib is arch
dependant.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-free or maybe even
non-debian packages, but i don't really know how the testing scripts
could handle this.
That said, you could try using one of the free java suites, but maybe
nbio does not build with them. kaffe, jikes and gcj come to mind, but i
have no particular experience with any of
#x27;t build nbio build with those suites, so I'm
> stuck with Blackdown for now.
:(((
> Thanks for the information...
No problem,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
very package that provides java-common will work with my package?
You should list the working package first :
working-java | java-common
This way, the autobuilders will pick the first option first.
> Thanks, all of you, for the help. Sorry if I'm rambling. It's 3:00am
> and I should stop hacking and go to bed. :-)
good night then, but i think nights are the best hack times.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
install PREFIX=$(CURDIR)/debian/package_name
or something such.
Then, check the upstream makefile, if it supports the PREFIX thingy or
not, and modify it so it works as you want.
This would be a first step, if this don't work, we can search further.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
ml compiler/runtime suite does not easily know how
to handle more than one directory.
That said, it could well go into /usr/share/ocaml.
Finally, i don't know, but are they all that much people really using
/usr/share shared between different arches ? Does dpkg/apt even allow
this to work
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:18:14PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> AS>>> "Ruby sucks". Ignore it. Arch-indep to share, arch-dep to lib,
> AS>>> screw everything else.
> DB>> That di
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
> Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is th
box would be fine, it needs nasm added to the
build-depends (is nasm available on all arches, its description says
it generate i386, so maybe the package for other arches are
cross-assemblers ?).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Can everyone agree that this is correct? If not, can someone suggest a
> line that will satisfy everyone?
Seems fine to me.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re is an open bug about pppoatm support in the ppp
debian package, but i think it is mostly ignored).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he official ppp
package, i may be willing to provide a ppp+pppoatm package or something
such. That said, ideally this would be included in the CVS version in
ppp upstream, and hopefully when it is released (any ETA for it ?) then
we would have pppoatm without needing to patch ppp.
Friendly,
Sven
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:29:27AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:25, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:57:15PM +0800, Matthew Bell wrote:
> > > Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a
> > > version of
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:51:46AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:40, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, can i ask you a ppp related question ?
> >
> > I have packaged unicorn, a kernel driver for the Bewan ADSL PCI st
> > modem, and it needs pppoatm supp
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I am very interested in having this in the CVS! However I have little
> > > time for testing at the moment. It's probably best if Sven tests it and
>
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:08, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > cycle of these drivers is not in sync, so a common driver will not be a
> > good idea. Also, i don't think it gains the user much, since he will at
>
ing list some time ago, maybe you should look into
that (if you did not already).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> hello sven..
>
> Received at 2002-11-27 / 09:01 by Sven Luther:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:54PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> > >
> > > i am currently adopting the package "gtk
ince i did not (yet) move some test binaries in their own package. It
is currently sitting in incoming waiting for approval, as it is a new
package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
possibility to fallback
to the original (non-free) fonts would maybe be the best solution, but
as Frank said, it is more work.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
>
> --
> gram
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ler, i was told
that unless we spare 20Mo or something such per arch, it is not worth
it (on this list no less) so i have doubts about a little package being
too much for the ftp archive.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dependencies in package
a build-dependency depends on ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rs.
>
> If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make
> a package?
dh_make.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
log in one of the numerous debian machines, and build it
yourself. Provided the dependencies are there, and even if not, you only
need to ask debian-admin about it.
BTW, what package are you speaking about ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
e correct way to handle this, would be to associate a
priority or something such to each provide ? having the real package be
priority 50 for example, and other package able to provide virtual
packages with other priorities, be them higher or lower.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
led on the autobuilders at the time of the build, and the
buildd logs didn't give me much more info.
Any help would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-12 at 09:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I just uploaded a new version of my lablgl package yesterday, and all
> > autobuilder failed with :
> >
> > ocamlmktop -I . -I +lablt
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-
other binary packages provided
by the source package get build fine.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ll, why don't you simply do a package with a copy of the exim sources,
and add the patch in the .diff.gz. This way you upload the source just
once, and upload new .diff.gz each time there is a new version of the
patches ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:15:11PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Is there a right way for using the source of a different
> >> debian
or a sgml one) in
the source package, and generate the docs yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ally the recommended way to do this? Can I call
> dpkg --list from a postinst script without having it explode?
No, it is not. You just need to use the $1 argument to postinst, as
Jerome told you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
gt; When reassigning the bug to dpkg-dev, Branden has said that he would eventually
> split up the xlibs package [0], so this would go away when rebuilding against
> some future xlibs.
Or you could try a shlibs override. look at dpkg-shlibsdep manpage for
more details.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
:)))
(but then, this is biased advice, i am the ocaml maintainer after all).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the right place for this ? I don't
think debian-mentors is indicated.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnol
tambien.
Amigablemente,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access.
>
> all = all debian developers and perhaps special cases (don't know).
>
> Take a look at http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/
But i guess at least a signed key is needed.
I suppose that you would need to contact
ading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
> > maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
>
> > Now,
guide/
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Ok, thanks.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oblematix packages ? Would a apt-cache rdepends be
> > enough for this :
>
> I think that would be enough.
> It would be obvious after the new package is installed, because they
> will be uninstallable in unstable.
Ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
compiler suite,
which is then used to rebuild everything.
I believe that maybe smlnj has some similar mechanism, maybe you should
ask upstream about this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
Is there a way of specifying that only xemacs installs should build a
given .el or something such ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
> > naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
> >
> > I
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:57:36AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 30, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I have a package that
101 - 200 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
