RFS: mysqltcl 3.03-1 (updated package)

2008-01-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.03-1 of my package "mysqltcl". It builds these binary packages: mysqltcl - Interface to the MySQL database for the Tcl language The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.de

RFS: tclcurl 7.17.1-1 (updated package)

2008-01-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.17.1-1 of my package "tclcurl". It builds these binary packages: tclcurl- Tcl bindings to libcurl The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/

Re: how to build two differently configured binaries from the same source?

2008-05-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > The user probably doesn't want to use "yabause-gtk" to start the program. > So I think they should conflict. Or you just decide on either library to > build the package and are done. What about using update-alternatives? Sven --

RFS: mysqltcl - Interface to the MySQL database for the Tcl language

2006-03-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
Package name: mysqltcl Version: 3.01-2 License: Free to use, modify, redistribute URL: http://sven.stormbind.net/debian/mysqltcl/ Description: Interface to the MySQL database for the Tcl language The mysqltcl package provides a Tcl interface to the mysql database system. . Homepage: http://www.x

How to deal with .sty files correctly?

2006-05-16 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hello, I'm in the process of packaging dvipost ATM and I'm a little bit puzzled with the 'dvipost.sty' file coming along with dvipost. The makefile installs the dvipost.sty file into /usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/misc/ and runs texhash afterwards. So I read http://people.debian.org/~frank/Debia

Re: autoconf problems (was: How to deal with .sty files correctly?)

2006-05-17 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:21:37PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Frank, first of all thank you for the detailed explanation > > I'm in the process of packaging dvipost ATM and I'm a little bit puzzled > > with the '

Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi all, while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev package. The package is clearly needed if you're going to build it by hand. I've been expecting the package to FTBFS on the buildds but the opposite

Re: Sponsorship offering

2007-06-23 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 06:23:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > If people in the NM queue would consider the list of packages here: > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis/ToDo > > which need update to a new upstream release, they would be considerate > soon for sponsoring and have an imme

Re: RFS: nginx 1.1.14-1 backport to Debian Squeeze

2012-02-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Cyril Lavier wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nginx". > > It's a backport of the package which is available on Debian Testing. Uploaded. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]

2012-05-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 01:55:25PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I fixed the "hardened build flags" which lintian did not check when I > uploaded last deb-src. > > Hope this version could be uploaded before frozen of wheezy. Uploaded but I've lost track of the current sponsoring procedures

Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]

2012-05-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:01PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > This is my first upload after debian-mentors started using BTS. > Below are documents I dug: > > [1] Wiki for sponsorship-requests BTS workflow > http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS Ah great, thank you. That's what I've be

Re: Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]

2012-05-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi Arno, > we do already include our own copy of these guidelines at [1], which is > also shown (mostly) filled-out to sponsorees for their respective packages. > > Of course we could still add another reference to it in the QA section.

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be > missing in action. I kinda doubt that, I guess they're just busy as everyone else is. :) > Can somebody review my updates and upload? Where coul

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo? Short round of "nitpicking the wrong way" ;) at what I've found in the git repo. 1) I see no point in listing changes from 2.0.7 and

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > > Rest seems to be ok at a first glance, And another small one I would change to be more generic: debian/copyright: -Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz +Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ > though

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 19:08:34 schrieb Sven Hoexter: Hi, > > debian/copyright: > > -Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz > > +Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ > > Shouldn

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > I updated my fio debian package to 2.0.8 of fio. Thanks & uploaded. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: how to upload a debian binary for lyx

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi, > There's a team maintaining the lyx package. You can reach it by e-mail > via Debian LyX Maintainers . > Please ask them if you can help them / join their team. Yes you can. ;) We maintain a wiki page http://wiki.de

Re: RFS: tclxml

2009-11-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: > Hello. > > The previous maintainer on tclxml package orphaned it, while package has a > bug > rendering it completely unusable, and there's a new upstream version > available > with that bug fixed. > > I'd like to take over

Re: RFS: evilvte (updated package)

2010-04-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:17:29AM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. :-) Uploaded. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: radiotray

2010-05-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:09:53AM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: Hi, > radiotray - online radio streaming player that runs on a Linux system tray I'm probably not in a good position to go and do some nitpicking on other peoples package description but 'a Linux system tray' sounds a bit odd. At

Re: RFS: libaosd (updated package)

2010-08-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:41:47PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote: Hi, > I have just uploaded the new version, 0.2.7-1, > which fixes the no-upstream-changelog lintian warning and > allowed to drop 3 of 4 patches. Please merge the changelog entries for 0.2.6 into one entry for 0.2.7 since 0.2.6 n

Re: RFS: libaosd (updated package)

2010-08-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 06:54:12PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote: > Or even to this: [...] > Thank you for the tip, Sven! Should be ok. Please rebuild the package with the changes and sent me the link to the dsc and I'll sponsor it. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed

Re: RFS: libaosd (updated package)

2010-08-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:18:42PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote: Hi, > Uploaded to m.d.n. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libaosd > > Thank you for your interest and support! Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution. :) Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in be

Re: RFS: libaosd (updated package)

2010-08-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:11:36PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs,--as-needed,--no-undefined > > Isn't -z,defs == --no-undefined? Oh right. Good catch. Blame me for copy&paste. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I&

Re: RFS: ripit, a textbased audio CD ripper (updated package) 2nd attempt

2010-10-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:29:10PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Hi, > I am looking once again for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-1 of > my package "ripit". It should be uploaded to experimental, please. Uploaded. Thanks. :) Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a gol

List of tutors [was: Re: RFS: peg-solitaire (Player and Solver)]

2010-10-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:18:37AM -0700, I. De Marchi wrote: Hi, be aware this is all my personal opinion and no consensus of this list or the project. > Congratulations for your thread "Four days". It is difficult for beginners > to find sponsor. I think it would be nice to create a list of tu

Re: RFS: xsol (updated package) [A solitaire game for the X Windows system]

2010-10-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Mònica wrote: Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload for the package "xsol", a > > solitaire game for the X Windows system. > > I just had a very first look. In general, it see

Re: RFS: xsol (updated package) [A solitaire game for the X Windows system]

2010-10-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Mònica wrote: > I think it's everything solved, but I'm sorry I don't understand what you > mean with "the linking in debia/rules can be shortened" :-( dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libSM.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/xsol/usr/games/xsol" we

Re: RFS: xsol (updated package) [A solitaire game for the X Windows system]

2010-10-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:40:08PM +0200, Mònica wrote: Hi, > But in Debian archives, there is the "long" solution (I copied from there). I > can't understand why these libraries were linked if they aren't used. Hm I see, guess I looked at the first part of the makefile but it even that is ove

Re: RFS: Several packages waiting sponsor

2010-12-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 06:51:39PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: Hi, > - peg-solitarie > (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg-solitaire) a small > game with pegs. I am the upstream autor and mantainer. Looks ok. Though I'm not so keen of sponsoring that. Partly because we've the

Re: RFS: Several packages waiting sponsor

2010-12-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 09:59:52PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > So as long as I don't find anything else and you sort out the things > mentioned above I'm willing to upload it. *sigh* It's for sure that you find something more after you've send a mail. - The path to t

Re: RFS: Several packages waiting sponsor

2010-12-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 09:29:00AM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: Hi, > >- There are now two patch files with de.po fixes, I'd like to see them > >consolidated to one file and passed on to the upstream dev if that hasn't > >already happened. > > The de.po is partially resolved in the new ver

Re: RFS: Several packages waiting sponsor

2010-12-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 09:29:00AM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > Thank you very much for your attention! And one more issue, and that's something I see frequently with newcomers, so I hope that some other new maintainers may read this mail too and avoid it in the future: Please don't

Re: RFS: yade-0.60

2010-12-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yade-0.60". > > * Package name: yade-0.60 > Version : 0.60-1 I did not look at the package itself but the versioning here seems to be wrong. I'd guess that the package na

Re: RFS: yade-0.60

2010-12-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi, > "yade-0.60" provides virtual package "yade". We want to have multiple > versions installed in parallel. This is a very specific software. Modeling > process can last months, but in most cases different versions of "yade" are > no

Re: RFS: gadmin-rsync (orphaned/updated package)

2010-12-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:41:22PM +0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.6-1 > of my package "gadmin-rsync". Please read the developers reference section 5.9 and 5.11 and the Debian policy to understand what a non maintainer upload

Re: RFS: Several packages waiting sponsor

2010-12-31 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 06:51:39PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: Hi, > fldiff(http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fldiff), > and gentoo (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gentoo). In the meantime I've uploaded those two. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this:

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

2010-12-31 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:00:15AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obexpushd". Uploaded to experimental (cause of the freeze). And yes, I removed the DMUA flag. If you change the Standards-Version in the future please note aswell if you had to change th

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

2011-01-01 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:00:46AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > > Uploaded to experimental (cause of the freeze). > > There are no reverse B-D/Depends so I guess unstable would have been > good too or better, no need to reupload it when squeeze is out. That's not only about reverse deps. Say

Re: [PING] RFR/RFS: openvpn-auth-radius (new package, fixes retitled RFP)

2011-01-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:38:46AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: Hi, > Please CC me in a reply, since I am not subscribed to the list. > > Could you reconsider this RFS? Two weeks have passed without a response. * The main technical thing is that I'm not able to double-build the package in the sa

Re: [PING] RFR/RFS: openvpn-auth-radius (new package, fixes retitled RFP)

2011-01-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:44:54PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:06:34PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > * There is a spurious file debian/clean in the package. Looks like a > > leftover > > from a failed build or something like that. Do you u

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-4~bpo50+1]

2011-01-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 03:20:45AM +0100, Michael Diers wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-4~bpo50+1 > of my existing backport of package "subversion". Uploaded. > On 2011-01-09, subversion 1.6.12dfsg-4 has migrated to testing. It > addresses the following issues

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-4~bpo50+1]

2011-01-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 03:48:09PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Again? I already assigned one today (017) Eh. Interesting. Looks like I jumped in the middle of someone else work. :-/ Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight

Re: RFS: gentoo (updated package already in Debian)

2011-01-15 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 06:37:43PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.19.8-1 > of my package "gentoo". I'll look at it. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetligh

Re: RFS: Dropbox

2011-02-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:24:36AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi, > (I've chosen python2.5 over python2.6/3.1 because python2.5 includes all the > python-related libraries that Dropbox needs, whereas python2.6/3.1 only > includes some.) Not sure if it makes sense to go with python2.5 now, consi

Re: RFS: mpg321 (New upstream release, 3rd try)

2011-02-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:38:15PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > Dear mentors, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.13-1 > of my package "mpg321". from debian/rules: INSTALL_PROGRAM = /usr/bin/install -c What should the -c achieve? Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do

Re: RFS: mpg321 (New upstream release, 3rd try)

2011-02-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 09:43:21PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > This is the old compatibility switch with the old Unix versions of "install". > Really nothing. Yeah, that's what I got from the infopage. What about droping it? I currently fail to see what it's used for within Debian. Besid

Re: using pristine-tar

2011-02-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:14:52PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Howdy d-m, > > I'm working on a package, and I'm thinking about using pristine-tar. > Is there a best practices / tutorial set anywhere? I did some > googling, but since nothing jumped out, I figured some of the better > resources

Re: RFS: mpg321 (New upstream release, 3rd try)

2011-02-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:23:52PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > Removed from debian/rules file. Ok, I think you should do the same with the conditional 'install -s' stuff because you run dh_strip anyway. It does no harm but is redundant. > Revised. I hope this is fine for the momen

Re: RFS: mpg321 (New upstream release, 3rd try)

2011-02-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:42:35PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > The package has been re-uploaded to mentors.d.n. Upload. Thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: RFS: evilvte (updated package)

2011-02-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:42:24PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.8-1 > of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C) Uploaded. Thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Stree

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package)

2011-02-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:58:04PM -0500, Ruben Molina wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-2 > of my package "scidavis". I would upload it but I currently can't build it because of python-qt4 missing sip-api-7.1 which seems to be deprecated. Beside tha

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-01 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15:17AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, > Note that I should soon be a DM, so if you do sponsor my package and deem it > appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this > package; I'll gladly adopt it once it's orphaned.) Without some more detail

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again. I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me later if it breaks ...) > As far as I'm aware LUI Qi is MIA (mia have been notified)

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:51:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Please follow up with mia@ to check the current state of the process. > > I didn't add the DMUA+Uploader flag because that should definitely not

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:36:41AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > I would upload it but I currently can't build it because of python-qt4 > missing sip-api-7.1 which seems to be deprecated. Uploaded. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart co

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:48:04PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 > of my package "antennavis". * Do not (never ever!) change prior changelog entries of versions that already hit the archive. * The package fails to build here wi

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:27:29PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > * The package fails to build here with pbuilder (-1 and -2), both > > linking issue. > > > > I don't have a similar prob

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:54:37PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: Hi, > I don't know what kind of change we are talking about here, but I > certainly disagree with your "never ever!". Sometimes there are > valid reasons to amend existing changelog entries; please see > Developers Reference 5.1 for an e

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > I really don't have the same problem. That's rather strange. > Please try to include the opengl library on the command line as well as the > glut library. Try adding -lGL to the end of LDFLAGS in the Makefile file and

Re: RFS: mail-notification (RC bug fix, NMU with maintainer's approval)

2011-03-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:36:30PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.4 > of my package "mail-notification". This is an NMU approved by LUI Qi, the > current maintainer. Uploaded. I hope it works cause I can't test the evolution part ...

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-04-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:39:58PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 19:12, Nanakos Chrysostomos > > wrote: > > > Another DD has told me in the past that I had to split my patches in > > > order for him >

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2 > of my package "ripit". Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight

Re: RFS: grub-customizer

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote: Hey, I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we handle software which edits rather vital configuration files and I did not even test i

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hey Peter, > -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper > +Description: textbased audio CD ripper this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases. Maybe we sho

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > It seems like lowercase would be the way to go. The description is not > a sentence and capitalizing the first letter makes it feel like a > sentence (when it is not one.) > Since it now feels like a sentence, you also begin t

Re: RFS: fetchmail-6.3.19 backport to Lenny

2011-05-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:05:10PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, more or less a full quote for debian-backports > I'm looking for a sponsor for a backport of fetchmail-6.3.19-1 to > Debian Lenny. The main reason for the backport is to forestall at > least the very first requirement of the up

Re: RFS: downtimed (updated package)

2011-05-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Dear mentors, > > pinging on my initial pledge. Uploaded. Sven -- I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart, comes a rebel fist [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: mp3splt-gtk (updated package)

2011-05-11 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:11:48PM +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-1 > of my package "mp3splt-gtk" along as the companion packages "mp3splt" > and "libmp3splt". Uh that's not very nice, this is a hidden NMU against all standards. Did you

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:55:59AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4-1 > of my package "cdpr". * Why are you mangling a prior changelog entry when the changes to debian/rules did not happen back then? * Will something break with compat leve

Re: RFS: ketchup (updated package, adopting, 3rd try)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.8+hg5533f6de130c-3 > of the orphaned package "ketchup" which I want to adopt. Uploaded. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden hea

Re: RFS: piwigo (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 06:43:43PM +0200, Nicolas wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 > of my package "piwigo". I think you forgot to merge the changelog from 2.1.2-3 back into the master branch. The french po is there but maybe double check that it's

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:04:50AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > Not sure about the breakage with compat level 8. This is where I saw > the reference to 7: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.ht

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > I've made the relevant changes and re-uploaded to mentors Uploaded to the archive. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]

Re: RFS: rush (new package)

2011-05-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: Hi Mats, > if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not > enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy > your desires. Still, I send a further reminder. I just started to look at your package and I'm not

Re: RFS: nzbget (2nd try)

2011-05-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nzbget". I only had a very short look at it: * debian/copyright is incomplete. An easy grep -i copyright diggs out some more names. Use something like head *|less to scr

Re: RFS: gtklp 1.2.8-1 (updated package)

2011-05-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:17:12PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.8-1 > of my package "gtklp". * Double builds leave some modified m4 files in the diff. (I consider this whole 'autoreconf & delete the files in clean' thing a bit hackish bu

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:07:55PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > The package is lintian clean (Lintian v2.5.0~rc3) but it not reports (post pbuilder build, lintian 2.5.0 but that shouldn't make a big difference for those warnings) $ lintian -iIv archivemount_0.6.1-2_i386.changes N:

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > > Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only > > to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? > > I changed Architecture Field from

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd > The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386. I have t

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which > > isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Uploaded to the archive. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: RFS: doctrine (updated package, ping)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Federico Giménez Nieto wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1 > of my package "doctrine". I'm not sure how the .orig.tar.gz has been generated (didn't digg deeper) but it contains a lot of 1970's files which will result in an

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my > package "squidguard". * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d

DEP-5 format definition hell

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi, I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP. It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be used.

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] > Also done. Shame on me but I missed two other things, I would've commited them to the collab-maint repo but that seems to still miss the the changes in the package. * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no secu

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Hi, > Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: > > > * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes > > and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should >

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Uploaded. > Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo > of collab-maint ... Hmpf. Is this really a permission denied to write to the repo or did you use ssh with password-auth in the past? I've seen som

Re: RFS: sfftobmp (updated package) (QA upload) (RC bug fix)

2011-06-01 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:29:59AM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.1.2-4 > of my package "sfftobmp". Uploaded. I took the freedom to extent your silent manpage improvement with the 'omitted' spelling fix proposed by lintian and fixed the watc

Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend

2011-06-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi, > I'd like to ask for sponsoring of my QA upload for the package netsed. > > It does not introduce a new version since upstream is dead since 2001 > but the package is fairly cool, has a reasonable popcon and no open RC > bugs (but W

Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend

2011-06-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi, CC'ed Tim: Are you still on board for netsed? Thread starts here http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00015.html > Fair enough. I just didn't feel comfortable to package an entire new > upstream source for a QA upload.

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

2011-06-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

2011-06-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/ > I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; > the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) > and, if necessary

Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links

2011-06-09 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:09:15PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > On 09.06.2011 12:45, rhash.admin wrote: Hi, > > Ok, switched to 8th version for auto-running dpkg-gensymbols, but some > > DDs (on #d-mentor) prefer to package with 7th debhelper to simplify > > backporting. > > That's right for oldsta

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:25:26AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi, > just for me to understand. DEP-5 is frozen. Why exactly is the version > needed now that it isn't altered anymore? It doesn't really matter because it has to be changed for the final location anyway. http://lists.debian.org/deb

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:21:50PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.10-1 > of my package "flush". Some 'LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed' should help to get the depedency list a bit shortened. Otherwise the package looks fine and I wou

Re: RFS: wav2cdr (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:59:26PM -0500, Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.4-1 of my package > "wav2cdr". Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:46PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi Fabrizio, > Really strange. > I tried to install and use it before request sponsor, and I have not > found errors I've no doubt in that, it's possible that there's something wrong with the dbus stuff here. With the devil sittin

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:44:01PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi, > I decided to take this package (and renew it) for his horrible state in > sid. Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Her

  1   2   >