Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

help accelerate the process. IIRC, Russ earlier expressed interest in helping as a co-maintainer in a collaborate effort to maintain Debian packages for Shishi. Russ, are you still interested? Thanks, Simon Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. I'd like to get in contac

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I have created rough Debian packages for Shishi: > >> http://josefsson.org/shishi/debian/ > >> and I am looking for a sponsor who would be willing to help me

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> I'm having some (for any Debian Developer surely) trivial problems >> with the dependencies: Shishi's configure finds gnutls13 on my local &

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello > > >> W: shishi source: native-package-with-dash-version >> N: >> N: Native packaging should only be used if a piece of software was >> N: written specifically to be turned into a Debian package. In this case, >> N: the version number shou

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I now have lintian-clean packages for Shishi! I'm using cdbs, with no >> upstream patches, so the diff is quite minimal. All the generated files >> are available from: > >> http://josefsson.org/shishi/debian/ > >> Any review would be appreciated. Spon

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Updated Debian packages for Shishi (lintian error free) are available from: http://josefsson.org/shishi/debian/ It is not unlikely that I forgot or misunderstood some of your comments, so please double check everything. The license change for the manual is not included. I want to wait for FSF o

Re: RFS: base64, utility for encoding to and decoding from base64

Anders Lennartsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm looking for a sponsor for a deb-package of base64. > > This command line application encodes and decodes base64 and can be > used in redirects and pipes etc. > > The sources are put in the public domain by the author John Walker. > > Upstream we

RFS: GNU Shishi

Since last time, I have removed the GFDL manual from the package. The package is still lintian clean. I believe I fixed all problems discussed in this thread, but please double check. Is it possible to upload this into unstable? Package name: shishi Version : 0.0.23 ITP

request for review of yubikey-val and yubikey-ksm

Hi, We have uploaded packages that implement the YubiKey validation server (VAL) and YubiKey key storage module (KSM) to mentors. Daniel Pocock has done initial review and volunteered to sponsor the upload. I want the package to be in perfect condition, so if anyone has time to look at it, pleas

Bug#848327: [Pkg-auth-maintainers] Bug#846359: Bug#848327: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.3-1

Luca Capello writes: > Sorry, I still do not see the reasoning behing such a move: > > > > Mickael or Martin (both Bcc:ed), can you elaborate a bit more, please? > Yes, I have read the full bug and I fully agree with Robert and Simon

Bug#764460: RFS: libu2f-host/0.0-1 [ITP] -- Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) host communication

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libu2f-host": * Package name: libu2f-host Version : 0.0-1 Upstream Author : Klas Lindfors , Simon Josefsson * URL

Bug#765179: RFS: yubikey-neo-manager/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- YubiKey NEO management graphical user interface

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for our package "yubikey-neo-manager": * Package name: yubikey-neo-manager Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Dain Nilsson * URL : https://developers.yubico.com/yubikey-neo-man

Bug#765179: RFS: yubikey-neo-manager/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- YubiKey NEO management graphical user interface

> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 21:35 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for our package "yubikey-neo-manager": > > Hello Simon! > > Thank you for your help in packaging the yubikey neo manager for > Debian! I

Bug#765179: RFS: yubikey-neo-manager/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- YubiKey NEO management graphical user interface

I have uploaded a new version of the package to mentors incorporating the changes mentioned below. > There is one remaining blocker for this package entering Debian: > > The libu2f-host0 package is not yet in Debian. I'd love for you two to put your review cycles into it: https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#765518: RFS: jabberd2/2.2.17+dfsg1-1 [RC]

e-critical. Changes since the last upload: jabberd2 (2.2.17+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Simon Josefsson ] * debian/copyright: updated (Thanks to Simon Josefsson). * debian/watch: updated link (Thanks to Simon Josefsson). * Repackaged tarball without non-free docs/code/jquery.js. Closes:

Bug#764460: libu2f-host update

Hi. I have updated libu2f-host-dpkg and uploaded new packages to mentors.d.n -- see http://mentors.debian.net/package/libu2f-host -- with the following changes: * Update to latest upstream 0.0.2 version. * u2f-host.pdf is included in the -dev package (the PDF is for programmers, not users, sin

Request for review of libu2f-server

Hi. I've packaged the libu2f-server project https://developers.yubico.com/libu2f-server/ for Debian, the sources are here https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-server-dpkg and there is an ITP open at https://bugs.debian.org/775597 and I've uploaded the packages to mentors http://mentors.debian.n

Bug#785683: RFS: mod-gnutls/0.6-1.4 [NMU]

Thomas Klute writes: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for a bugfix update of mod-gnutls that would > close bug #775909 (segfaults with reverse proxy configuration). > > I've uploaded the package to Debian Mentors a few weeks ago. T

Re: restund in debian

I have prepared a Debian package for the latest 0.4.14 release of "libre", and have uploaded it to Debian Mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libre For reference, upstream homepage and ITP bug links: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636272 http://www.creytiv.com/re.

Re: restund in debian

/Simon > > do you mind opening an RFS bug? > > cheers, > > G. > > > > > > Il Martedì 27 Ottobre 2015 0:54, Simon Josefsson ha > scritto: > I have prepared a Debian package for the latest 0.4.14 release of > "libre", and have uploade

Bug#1084101: RFS: golang-golang-x-oauth2/0.23.0-1 [Team] -- Google APIs support for OAuth2

Hi. I am looking at sponsoring this, but did you try rebuilding all reverse dependencies with this new version? Did they all build fine with the new version? I can try via Salsa reverse-dependency rebuild, but there should be some indication that you did this already. /Simon jas@coccia:~$ dak

Bug#1087183: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3/3.0.0-1 [ITP] -- high-level OpenPGP library built on top of golang crypto library

ts. Once > trixie is out I think I'll do the switch to v3. I am not involved with > the other two packages. > So I'd like to keep v2 for go-sendxmpp and have v3 for now. The v2 > version is not deprecated by the release of v3 and is still maintained > upstream. > > Be

Bug#1086872: RFS: git-credential-oauth/0.13.4-1 -- Git credential helper for GitHub and other forges using OAuth

Hi. Uploaded -- I tried to come up with something small to nitpick on, but failed, so good job! More self-tests would be a nice improvement, now debian/tests/ is empty, but the nature of this package may make that somewhat challenging to do offline. Would it be possible to test some of the comma

Bug#1087183: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3/3.0.0-1 [ITP] -- high-level OpenPGP library built on top of golang crypto library

Hi. This builds fine and packaging looks good, so I was about to upload this when I noticed we already have golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp -- why doesn't it work to bump that package to v3 instead? What packages in Debian require the 2.8.x branch? Can't they be made to work with 3.x instead?

Bug#1087286: RFS: libunistring/1.3-1 -- Unicode string library for C

Hi. The Vcs-Git URL is wrong, please see attached patch. /Simon From 4d2f88a9b3f996d6d79e7864e66b0c7376742203 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Josefsson Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 23:29:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Vcs-Git. --- debian/control | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion

Bug#1090036: golang-github-binwiederhier-ntfy and golang-github-olebedev-when

ons 2025-02-05 klockan 14:32 -0800 skrev Otto Kekäläinen: > Hi! > > I am currently reviewing > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/ntfy and the dependency > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-olebedev-when > that is being packaged for nfty. > > My first request is to ha

Bug#1090035: RFS: golang-github-olebedev-when/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- natural language date/time parser

Ahmad Khalifa writes: > - The Vcs value up there is not valid yet, I have parked it here instead: > https://salsa.debian.org/ahmadkhalifa/golang-github-olebedev-when Please change visibility to public, that simplify review. Could you move this into the Go-team? /Simon signature.asc Descripti

Re: Mentors. Confirmed packages needing DD review and possible sponsorship

Phil Wyett writes: > #1084884 RFS: golang-github-regclient-regclient [ITP] -- Docker and OCI > Registry Client (tooling) > RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084884 > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-regclient-regclient/golang-github-regcl