On 8/29/23 09:45, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please review what I did wrong for src:highway. For some
reason I cannot install libhwy1:amd64 + libhwy1:i386 on my system:
FTBFS on several architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=highway
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
On 8/29/23 10:38, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
FTBFS on several architectures:
That's actually a related issue, I am working with upstream to fix
those. In order to do so, I'd like to co-install i386 and amd64. Right
now I can only install one *or* the other. I'd like to install *both*:
You can't
On 9/9/23 09:17, Lorenzo wrote:
and at the end of the build I see the lintian error,
what I'm doing wrong?
You're not. lintian hasn't been updated in time to know about bookworm:
https://bugs.debian.org/1033894
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41
On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I am trying to use the following dh_link command:
>
> $ cat d/rules
> [...]
> dh_link -p$(pkg_dev) usr/include/charls usr/include/CharLS
>
> Which gives:
>
> $ dpkg -c ../libcharls-dev_2.1.0+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
> [...]
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0
On 2/22/21 2:23 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> However, when I did some research, I found that most packages put
> rm_conffile in the .maintscript file. Where does that come from? It
> is even not in the man page. OK that I put rm_conffile in the
> .maintscript file as well, instead of in all 3 scripts (pr
On 2/22/21 3:08 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> A follow up question, dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) suggests to use
>
> Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.17.14)
>
> But of the several packages that use rm_conffile that I checked, none
> of them is using `Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.17.14)` in their control
> file. Was I no
On 12/31/22 23:39, Barry wrote:
This is where i need help understanding what i do to get that deb.
Wait for it to migrate to testing. Keep an eye on the excuses:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qscintilla2
Or install it from unstable in the meantime.
Testing migration is complicated by the o
On 1/12/23 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to understand why src:jpeg-xl is in Needs-Build state for
the past 7 days:
* https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=jpeg-xl&suite=sid
I cannot remember where else I should be looking for a hint of this
state ? I tried there but did
On 1/13/23 08:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
This is a follow-up to my previous message. This time libjxl is build
on s390x but the autopkgtest does not seems to see the new binaries:
[...]
E: Unable to locate package libjxl-devtools
E: Unable to locate package libjpegxl-java
run-unit-test
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 29-07-15 22:48, Sven Geggus wrote:
> * Package name: sfcgal
> Version : 1.1.0-2~exp1
It looks like someone may have sponsored the upload already, I got a
bunch of "553 Could not create file" messages from dput:
Good signature on ..
On 29-07-15 23:33, Sven Geggus wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg schrieb am Mittwoch, den 29. Juli um 23:27 Uhr:
>
>> Did you perhaps upload to ftp-master instead of mentors?
>
> Unfortunately I already closed the terminal where I did the upload, but I do
> definitely have men
On 05-08-15 21:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Setting up pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy (0.invalid.0) ...
> aptitude: symbol lookup error: aptitude: undefined symbol:
> _ZN7cwidget7widgets5pager8set_textERKSsPKc
> [...]
> This is for a package that only Build-Depends debhelper. Other packages
> with m
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Forum:
>
> I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
> Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
> must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
You can change your SSH key via the LDAP mail gateway:
"
Par
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
>>> Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SS
On 20-08-15 00:51, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I keep getting the error message:
>
> Error: Unable to check the signature or the signature was invalid:
> ==> : UDFormatError: Signing key
> (80BFC3820C4B26E3, Jerome) has expired
>
> But my key has not expireed. On the other hand, it was renewed a few
On 20-08-15 12:52, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna , 2015-08-20, 10:29:
>> "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" should be added,
>
> FWIW, ${misc:Pre-Depends} was required for partial squeeze->wheezy
> upgrades. It is no longer necessary.
>
>> and the dev package should not marked as mu
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your work on sfcgal.
On 26-08-15 20:17, Sven Geggus wrote:
> I have just uploaded a new Version of sfcgal to mentors.debian.net.
>
> This is a very minor change. I included a patch from upstream which will
> make it compile again using boost boost 1.58 and gcc5
The Tracker r
On 01-09-15 11:51, Ole Streicher wrote:
> when using the Files-Excluded: tag in debian/copyright, in the past
> there was an "+dfsg" suffix added to the version number
> automatically. This seems to have changed; is there a reason for that?
> Is there any case to use Files-Excluded: *without* actua
On 01-09-15 12:24, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-09-01 12:13:07)
>> Add the repacksuffix option, e.g.:
>>
>> version=3 opts=\ dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,\
>> uversionmangle=s/$/+dfsg/,\ repacksuffix=+dfsg \
>> http://heasarc.gsfc.
On 01-09-15 14:22, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
>> On 01-09-15 11:51, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> What is recommended way for the watch file that it automatically
>>> generated to correct version number for a newly created orig.tar file?
>> Ad
To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis
sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option
along with -version-info to better support installation of multiple
postgis versions.
The -release option was added to support the multiple version use case
on W
Hi Emmanuel,
On 09-10-15 00:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/10/2015 13:40, Bas Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> Due to the difficulties getting JCS [0] and its dependencies [1]
>> packaged, I've not been able to update to any of the newer JOSM upstream
>> releases making the josm package increasingly
On 09-10-15 00:58, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/10/2015 13:40, Bas Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> Due to the difficulties getting JCS [0] and its dependencies [1]
>> packaged, I've not been able to update to any of the newer JOSM upstream
>> releases making the josm package increasingly irrelevant. An
On 11-10-15 22:22, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2015-10-08, 21:01:
>> To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis
>> sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option
>> along with -version-info to better support ins
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work on this package.
On 20-11-15 20:25, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-leaflet-hash"
I pushed some changes to document the license & copyright for the
embedded copy of leaflet-src.js, and update the Vcs-Browser URL to use
HTTPS.
Wh
On 29-12-15 11:54, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> should I fix the spelling and reupload now or wait for the NEW queue.
I'd fix it in git now, and wait for the next upload until it passes the
NEW queue.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 5
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your work kosmtik and its dependencies.
I've reviewed the package, and it needs a few changes.
Please update the Source URL in the copyright file to use the URL from
the watch file, the homepage link is not as appropriate for the
copyright file.
The Bug-* URLs in upstream/me
Hi Brian,
This question is not very suitable for the mentors list, this list is
intended for help with packaging and other developer-related issues.
On 04/14/2016 09:17 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote:
> I am writing this email, not as a Debian Developer in-training, but instead
> asking advice from
>
On 05/16/2016 11:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> When reading the code it seems to me that actually a test whether this
> code works or not is intended and thus fixing the format is not in the
> intention of the authors. So I tried
>
> export DEB_BUILD_HARDENING_FORMAT:=0
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS
On 05/20/2016 03:34 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> When I signed up some years ago, I got a user name with -guest appended. I
> guess that was the policy at the time. In any case, how can I change that?
You can get rid of the -guest suffix by becoming a DD or DM.
See also:
Alioth FAQ: 1.1. Why do I
On 05/22/2016 02:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any hint?
The arch:all package cannot be built on the buildds:
https://bugs.debian.org/824999
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On 6/29/25 5:16 AM, Ben Westover wrote:
I have tried a few times to upload in the past three days. I always get
rejected with the message "ACL dm: not allowed to upload source package
'libquazip1-qt5'". Are you sure I was added to the access list properly?
It's not there yet (libquazip1-qt6 is)
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
