On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:44, Michael Koch wrote:
> I maintain several libraries written in C++. Unfortunately the use gcc
> for linking. Currently I added added -lstdc++ explicitely to link all
> needed libraries which my libraries are depending on. Is ther a
> better way to tell libtool to use
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank Küster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that.
*snip*
> If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
>
(Policy 3.5).
You are req
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> > You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> > marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" does
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 18:44, Joel Baker wrote:
> Is it valid to use UTF-8 in the debian/copyright file? (Specifically, it
> is possibly to accurately reproduce a copyright symbol, using UTF-8, which
> would be a nice thing to have...)
>
There exists no policy for this; therefore common sense take
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 19:29, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> I am a bit confused about the usage of the Maintainer field in .changes
> files.
*snip*
> What is the correct policy? Should the automatically generated .changes
> file be updated to include the uploader's email?
>
I tend to request people I s
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:10, Frank Küster wrote:
> Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maintainer: field in debian/control contains their ASCIIfied[0] name,
> [...]
> > [0] this must match that given in changelog for bugs to correctly close,
> >
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:07, Frank Küster wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 11:36]:
> >> You're breaking policy by doing that ;-) policy only allows UTF-8
> >> in de
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 19:49, Stephen Frost wrote:
> We shouldn't be recommending providing staticlly linked libs for people
> to use, even in the 'fast moving' case- if it's that fast then it
> probably shouldn't be in Debian and that's just life.
>
> .la files shouldn't be included in anything,
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 21:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:18:35PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > We shouldn't be recommending providing staticlly linked libs for people
> > > to use, even in the 'fast moving' case- if it's tha
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 22:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging
> > > offense.
>
> > Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... th
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:46 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> * On 08-04-04 - 00:41, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > > There is a discrepancy between the .orig.tar.gz available on your
> > > website and t
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 22:50 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> On 06/17/2004 08:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Normaly thats what your configure script is for.
> >
> > Or just use and then int32_t, int64_t, intptr_t,
>
> Unfortunately Cernlib was largely written in the 1970's and
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:46 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> * On 08-04-04 - 00:41, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > > There is a discrepancy between the .orig.tar.gz available on your
> > > website and t
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 22:50 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> On 06/17/2004 08:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Normaly thats what your configure script is for.
> >
> > Or just use and then int32_t, int64_t, intptr_t,
>
> Unfortunately Cernlib was largely written in the 1970's and
n a few weeks now, I thought I'd try here (as suggested
by my Application Manager).
I live in Birmingham, UK and work in London, UK, so arranging a meet
in/around these two cities is usually possible at any time.
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt lik
#x27;s at
the NEC in Birmingham, yeah?
> Check out the debian-uk list at chiark.greenend.org.uk, for the UK
> debian people.
>
Thanks, will try that.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange
http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you go
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:02:30PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I live in Birmingham, UK and work in London, UK, so arranging a meet
> > in/around these two cities is usually possible at any time.
>
> You may want
ght file.
> >
> > Why/how would that help?
> >
>
> Then /etc/flipit.conf could just always have /dev/flipit, and the
> package's maintainer scripts would control where /dev/flipit pointed
> to.
>
And this would integrate with devfs, how?
Scott
--
Scott James
dozens of lines ...]
>
Ah, that would be using libtool 1.4, then.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange
http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:44, Michael Koch wrote:
> I maintain several libraries written in C++. Unfortunately the use gcc
> for linking. Currently I added added -lstdc++ explicitely to link all
> needed libraries which my libraries are depending on. Is ther a
> better way to tell libtool to use
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank KÃster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that.
*snip*
> If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
>
(Policy 3.5).
You are req
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> > You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> > marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" does
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 18:44, Joel Baker wrote:
> Is it valid to use UTF-8 in the debian/copyright file? (Specifically, it
> is possibly to accurately reproduce a copyright symbol, using UTF-8, which
> would be a nice thing to have...)
>
There exists no policy for this; therefore common sense take
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 19:29, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> I am a bit confused about the usage of the Maintainer field in .changes
> files.
*snip*
> What is the correct policy? Should the automatically generated .changes
> file be updated to include the uploader's email?
>
I tend to request people I s
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:10, Frank KÃster wrote:
> Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maintainer: field in debian/control contains their ASCIIfied[0] name,
> [...]
> > [0] this must match that given in changelog for bugs to correctly close,
> >
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:07, Frank KÃster wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 11:36]:
> >> You're breaking policy by doing that ;-) policy only allows UTF-8
> >> in de
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 19:49, Stephen Frost wrote:
> We shouldn't be recommending providing staticlly linked libs for people
> to use, even in the 'fast moving' case- if it's that fast then it
> probably shouldn't be in Debian and that's just life.
>
> .la files shouldn't be included in anything,
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 21:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:18:35PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > We shouldn't be recommending providing staticlly linked libs for people
> > > to use, even in the 'fast moving' case- if it's tha
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 22:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging
> > > offense.
>
> > Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... th
n a few weeks now, I thought I'd try here (as suggested
by my Application Manager).
I live in Birmingham, UK and work in London, UK, so arranging a meet
in/around these two cities is usually possible at any time.
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt lik
#x27;s at
the NEC in Birmingham, yeah?
> Check out the debian-uk list at chiark.greenend.org.uk, for the UK
> debian people.
>
Thanks, will try that.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange
http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:02:30PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I live in Birmingham, UK and work in London, UK, so arranging a meet
> > in/around these two cities is usually possible at any time.
>
> You may want
ght file.
> >
> > Why/how would that help?
> >
>
> Then /etc/flipit.conf could just always have /dev/flipit, and the
> package's maintainer scripts would control where /dev/flipit pointed
> to.
>
And this would integrate with devfs, how?
Scott
--
Scott James
dozens of lines ...]
>
Ah, that would be using libtool 1.4, then.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange
http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
34 matches
Mail list logo
