in a Conflicts:, I could install
both at once, seemingly, although one must have been overwritten).
Many thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/linux/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL
y that is
N: not installed by this package.
N:
debian/libgimpprint/DEBIAN/shlibs:
libgimpprint 4.1.4 libgimpprint
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:44:31AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 14-Feb-2001 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I am having a problem when packaging a shared library (libgimpprint from
> > CVS). It is normally named libgimpprint-.so e.g. currently
> > libgimppri
ecify
aditional options? SHould I be using a different syntax in the
.manpages files?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Publi
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm getting some errors from dh_installman, and the manpages are not
> > getting installed:
> >
> > $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
> > [...]
> > dh_installman -i
> > U
versioned properly as well
as being tiny, so I have just packaged it as a static library.
Would 'ijs-dev' be legal (as in publib-dev), or should I use
'libijs-dev' (or is this for shared libs only?).
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number:
ed library is worth the benefits right
now. The library is tiny, so it isn't going to gain much in reduced
memory usage.
I think I will use Sean's suggestion and have a static-only ijs-dev,
and once the specification and ABI are stable I will then make it
shared.
Thanks to all of you f
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > However, the value of having a shared library at this point in time is
> > doubtful. gimp-print will Build-Depend on it, and possibly hpijs, but
> > I
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The last three all use custom m4 macrocode I wrote (available in the
> ac-archive, renamed and specialised for use in ijs). Due to the
> unstable nature of the source, I defaulted to -release versioning, and
> disabling shared librari
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > Would the following scheme be acceptable to you?:
> >
> > Package: libijs-0.34
> > contains libijs-0.34.so
>
> In my little testing, if I
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 06 May 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Is it common or good practice to keep the build for Debian separate
> > for upstream, or should I really get my changes incorporated upstream
> > first? It's j
the library should be
installed, and I have never seen any lintian warnings. I don't think
it's equivalent to the ld -rpath, or it has no effect on Debian. It
has certainly not caused any problems in the year and a quarter of
using it. I need to use it because
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> >
> > > Would the following scheme be acceptable to you?:
> > >
> > > Package:
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > One thing I'm not sure about are the Build-Depends. dpkg-genbuilddeps
> > and 'dpkg-depcheck -b debian/rules build' both failed on my i386
>
u could also name it `debian/cron.d'. If
you are using debhelper compatibility >2, each debhelper file should
ideally be prefixed with `.'. See debhelper(1) for the details.
HTH,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
in this case? Preconfiguring will fail, as
I can't get the data to list at that point. The "multiselect" widget
type is just what I'm looking for, though.
If I can't use debconf, what is the best method for user interaction?
Many thanks,
Roger Leigh
--
Roger Leigh
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh
>
> | >From what I have read about debconf, the questions it asks are static.
> | However, in this case, I can't generate the questions until the
> | package is installed: the translations are gettext .
uildd etc, and then set the setuid bit on all
necessary binaries.
Is there a standard way to do this, when you do not know the UID in
advance? I guess it's not possible to do this at build time?
Is postinst the best place for this, or is there a better way?
Thanks,
Roger
--
R
symlink by hand in a postinst.
Why not make the symlink it in debian/rules in the binary-(all|arch)
rule and package it? If the packages will conflict, there won't be
any problems, and it makes the postinst/prerm cleaner.
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, htt
erface for the autoconf developers to preserve. No,
basically.
> Or if someone can explain to me another way of easily configuring a config
> file path from configure.
You should create a local "config.site" which tells configure what
your local defaults/preferences are. autoconf.i
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 19 Sep 2002 11:00 pm, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > The "average user" shouldn't be running configure with a prefix of /
> > or /usr, and so the default is what they want. /etc and /usr are
> > &q
Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS?
The source is available from
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/
as well as i386 binaries.
(http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/ijs_0.34-1.dsc)
Many thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - S
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]:
> > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS?
>
> Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to
> sponsor you if I know m
, the \fR does nothing.
>
> Can anyone explain the function of `\fr'?
Switch to Roman (normal) font. Other choices are I (italic), B (bold)
and P (previous style). This turns off the .BI (alternate bold and
italic).
See groff_man and groff.info.
HTH,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
/gimp-print-intl.h: * "$Id$"
/home/roger/gimp-print/current/include/gimp-print/gimp-print-intl-internal.h: * "$Id$"
/home/roger/gimp-print/current/include/gimp-print/Makefile.am:## $Id$
Perhaps the files are set to binary type, or something? I just
noticed that some of the unexpa
n't because it won't break if it's not installed (and the .diff.gz
will contain the files anyway, making it redundant) because of the
conditionals.
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance
Need Epson Stylus Ut
otify someone, to get
it changed?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keys
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
> > section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
> > there has been
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as
t-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists
[...]
> tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Li
Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tisdagen den 12 november 2002 21.28 skrev Roger Leigh:
>
> > It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source
> > -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory?
>
> ...
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > >
> > > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I believe the "incorrect overrides" mail is sent to the uploader, not to
> > >
ther than having some medium sized ones....
Personally, I would split them. In gimp-print, 10 binary packages are
produced from the same source (using debhelper). Feel free to use it
for ideas.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Co
Is a full description of the formats used in the Packages, Sources and
Release files available? Debian Policy only covers these in the old
Packaging Manual appendices, and this is looks outdated.
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the C
tzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is probably
more knowledgeable than me about this, but feel free to contact me
with any other questions.
HTH,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 availabl
the buildd team to ask whether I can
> rename some files, or whether this is not a purely Debian package
> and needs to be handled like a package with an upstream and a Debian
> diff.
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
t adding libcompress-zlib-perl to
perl:Depends, even if I add /usr/lib/perl5 to dh_perl's options.
I could just add the dependency manually, but I'd like to get this
working properly. Am I doing something wrong here, or is dh_perl not
the correct tool for this?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roge
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
> > script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
> > working, but i
he .global conffiles--these are not supposed to be changed
by the user (the .local or non-suffixed version should be used
instead; buildd uses a per-user conffile).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public K
t all. Afterwards, I tried
learning GTK+, and all made perfect sense! I would have liked to
write GTK+ programs from the start, but it's only after three years of
doing non-GTK+/non-graphical stuff that I have begun to appreciate the
beauty of the design of GTK/GObject, and be in
te the roles of upstream
and Debian, even though I am now both a Debian and upstream
maintainer. For example, I can add additional features to the Debian
packages, without changing the upstream tarball.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.
age.
Does configure.ac call the "AC_PROG_CXX" macro? Without it, automake
won't know anything about there being a C++ compiler available.
Whether you love or hate libtool, this is not a libtool problem. Are
you using libtool 1.5 yet?
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on
helper (dh_makeshlibs) adds the ldconfig call for you
automatically, so you don't need to do it yourself (assuming you're
packaging a shared library here).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
e is it in the Policy
Manual?
I'll remove the dependency next time I upload, but I'd like to know
where the requirement comes from.
Thanks,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB8
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:55:53PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> E: cupsys-driver-gimpprint: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version gzip
>> N:
>> N: The package declares a depends on an essential package i.e.
fit together--surely with UCS, most of these become
unnecessary (other than keyboard mappings)?
Apart from that, I've noticed no brokenness so far. UTF-8 text really
does look good!
Regards,
Roger
(looking forward to UTF-8 support in GCC!)
--
Roger Leigh
one digit, not two (NMU) or three (binary NMU).
Policy, Â5.6.11 may be of some help, and the Developer's Reference,
Â5.11.4.1.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sig
la files shouldn't be included in anything, they're just plain broken.
Even with static libraries? The .la does contain dependency
information. I know that using pkg-config .pc files can eliminate
this case, but not everything using libtool is using pkg-config yet.
--
Rog
te, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
them. We could provide some mechanism to automatically strip
binaries, surely?
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sou
angoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0
-ldl -lglib-2.0
Whew! Yet in reality, -lglademm-2.0 would have sufficed...
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
aviour is still required).
Scott, if you do find the time to look at this, I would be ecstatic!
If you don't have the time, I'll try to fit it in myself, since this
is my main peeve with pkg-config.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
>> build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
>&
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I used a statically-linked binary just a few days ago. I needed to
>> resize an NTFS partition on a newly-delivered system which came with
>> Windows XP. In the event, I was able
bdl directly on
Linux. For example, for Gimp-Print 5.0 (not yet released) I wrote a
module loader that works in 3 modes:
- libltdl [used when libdl is unavailable]
- libdl[the default]
- static [useful for debugging and static libs]
Add a little configure magic to detect the best optio
ed to specify
aditional options? SHould I be using a different syntax in the
.manpages files?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG P
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm getting some errors from dh_installman, and the manpages are not
> > getting installed:
> >
> > $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
> > [...]
> > dh_installman -i
> > U
in this case? Preconfiguring will fail, as
I can't get the data to list at that point. The "multiselect" widget
type is just what I'm looking for, though.
If I can't use debconf, what is the best method for user interaction?
Many thanks,
Roger Leigh
--
Roger Leigh
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh
>
> | >From what I have read about debconf, the questions it asks are static.
> | However, in this case, I can't generate the questions until the
> | package is installed: the translations are gettext .
uildd etc, and then set the setuid bit on all
necessary binaries.
Is there a standard way to do this, when you do not know the UID in
advance? I guess it's not possible to do this at build time?
Is postinst the best place for this, or is there a better way?
Thanks,
Roger
--
R
symlink by hand in a postinst.
Why not make the symlink it in debian/rules in the binary-(all|arch)
rule and package it? If the packages will conflict, there won't be
any problems, and it makes the postinst/prerm cleaner.
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, htt
erface for the autoconf developers to preserve. No,
basically.
> Or if someone can explain to me another way of easily configuring a config
> file path from configure.
You should create a local "config.site" which tells configure what
your local defaults/preferences are. autoconf.info documents this.
HTH,
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood"
Support the Countryside Alliance
www.march-info.org
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 19 Sep 2002 11:00 pm, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > The "average user" shouldn't be running configure with a prefix of /
> > or /usr, and so the default is what they want. /etc and /usr are
> > &q
Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS?
The source is available from
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/
as well as i386 binaries.
(http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/ijs_0.34-1.dsc)
Many thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - S
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]:
> > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS?
>
> Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to
> sponsor you if I know m
, the \fR does nothing.
>
> Can anyone explain the function of `\fr'?
Switch to Roman (normal) font. Other choices are I (italic), B (bold)
and P (previous style). This turns off the .BI (alternate bold and
italic).
See groff_man and groff.info.
HTH,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
bar.c
>
>const char bar_ident[] = "$Id$";
>
> in file header.h
>
> #define HEADER_IDENT "$Id$"
Minor nitpick:
You must use `$Id:$', or cvs will not expand it. The `:' is needed.
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelih
gimp-print-intl.h: * "$Id$"
/home/roger/gimp-print/current/include/gimp-print/gimp-print-intl-internal.h: *
"$Id$"
/home/roger/gimp-print/current/include/gimp-print/Makefile.am:## $Id$
Perhaps the files are set to binary type, or something? I just
noticed that some of the unexpa
n't because it won't break if it's not installed (and the .diff.gz
will contain the files anyway, making it redundant) because of the
conditionals.
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance
Need Epson Stylus Ut
otify someone, to get
it changed?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
> > section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
> > there has been
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as
t-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists
[...]
> tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Li
Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tisdagen den 12 november 2002 21.28 skrev Roger Leigh:
>
> > It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source
> > -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory?
>
> ...
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > >
> > > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I believe the "incorrect overrides" mail is sent to the uploader, not to
> > >
ther than having some medium sized ones....
Personally, I would split them. In gimp-print, 10 binary packages are
produced from the same source (using debhelper). Feel free to use it
for ideas.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Is a full description of the formats used in the Packages, Sources and
Release files available? Debian Policy only covers these in the old
Packaging Manual appendices, and this is looks outdated.
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
"Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the C
tzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is probably
more knowledgeable than me about this, but feel free to contact me
with any other questions.
HTH,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
the buildd team to ask whether I can
> rename some files, or whether this is not a purely Debian package
> and needs to be handled like a package with an upstream and a Debian
> diff.
You should probably subscribe to buildd-discuss at nocrew.org.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
t adding libcompress-zlib-perl to
perl:Depends, even if I add /usr/lib/perl5 to dh_perl's options.
I could just add the dependency manually, but I'd like to get this
working properly. Am I doing something wrong here, or is dh_perl not
the correct tool for this?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roge
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
> > script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
> > working, but i
he .global conffiles--these are not supposed to be changed
by the user (the .local or non-suffixed version should be used
instead; buildd uses a per-user conffile).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
t all. Afterwards, I tried
learning GTK+, and all made perfect sense! I would have liked to
write GTK+ programs from the start, but it's only after three years of
doing non-GTK+/non-graphical stuff that I have begun to appreciate the
beauty of the design of GTK/GObject, and be in
te the roles of upstream
and Debian, even though I am now both a Debian and upstream
maintainer. For example, I can add additional features to the Debian
packages, without changing the upstream tarball.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.
doesn't compute module dependencies.
(Closes: #179120, #179170, #179171, #179203)
-- Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:26:51 +
gimp-print (4.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New stable release
[...]
* The CUPS epson backend uses non-blocking I/O, and so
understand m4... it is so sweet when it all works but
> setting it up is a nightmare.
I have bitter experience of debugging m4, and it's not quick or easy.
m4 in itself isn't a difficult language, but the quoting gets quite
confusing once they are several deep, and you need to quote quotes
Why are libjpeg/libgnutls etc. absolute
paths, and why are the libgnutls dependencies expanded by libtool?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
ckage.
That's handy, but it's not a very big issue (I wrote most of the build
stuff myself). I am reluctant to do this, because it's a bit ugly.
I'll see if libtool 1.5 (just out) improves things, and go from there.
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
GTK+, but if anyone wants it, it's
yours.
This might not be suitable for home brewers who don't have acccess to
a lab, though!
Roger
(ex-brewery lab technician!)
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2003 01:22, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > I have a small GTK+ 2.0 tool
> > (http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/gtk/ogcalc.c) for calculating %ABV
> > and original gravity from present gravity and refractive
t out of the FHS are so
political and petty it's not true--the decision was definitely /not/ a
technical one.
In debian/rules, just use ./configure --libexecdir=\$\{prefix\}/lib to
redefine it.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > > libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/lib/${PACKAGE}'
> >
> > That's evil. The whole point of config
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 07:41:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > There's an easier way. In your Makefile.am, just do this:
> >
> > pkglibexecdir = $(libexecdir)/$(PACKAGE)
> >
> > and then
> >
> > pkgl
age.
Does configure.ac call the "AC_PROG_CXX" macro? Without it, automake
won't know anything about there being a C++ compiler available.
Whether you love or hate libtool, this is not a libtool problem. Are
you using libtool 1.5 yet?
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
