Dear mentors,
I wanted to ask about the debian/copyright file, I am currently working
on a package (openjpeg a jpeg2000 library) that has a long and
complicated copyright history. What i mean by that is there have been
many contributors over the years and therefor very few files have
identica
free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openjpeg/openjpeg_1.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 11, 2008 1:02 PM, Cyril Brulebois
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/01/2008, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> > Openjpeg is a JPEG2000 library and associated tools for the
> > encoding/decoding of jpegs that use the JPEG2000 format. It is a
> > required component of the
be glad if someone could review my package and, if acceptable,
please upload this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 12:12 +0100, Robin Cornelius wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xmlrpc-epi".
Hi Neil, thanks for your time on this.
>
> 2. expat - debian/copyright quotes this as being du
Hi Neil
I have finally had time to update upstream and produce a new Debian
package that hopefully resolves the previous issues.
I have been sitting on sending this mail for a while as I wanted some
testing of the library which is now happened and testing caught two
packaging mistakes.
For the
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Laurent Léonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you give me a sample rules file with cmake calls ?
>
> I put the cmake call in the "build-stamp" section, but when I use
> dpkg-builpackage it try to do a "make clean" before executing cmake... If I
> delete the "ma
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
roduces working debs and keeps the orig.tar.gz clean too.
>>
>> This does seem a little dirty which makes me think i'm not quite doing
>> it right though so if anyone has a better way to do this?, but it does
>> work.
>
> It is
free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qavimator/qavimator_0.0.svn.247+dfsg-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone would review this package, and if acceptable
upload this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi everyone, trying to create a new debian package but have a few
queries. I'm trying to create a new package for an app that i use that
I would like to see in debian, and hopefully in the longterm become a
DD. I have not yet filed a ITP on WNPP.
The first issue i had was getting my man page to be
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qavimator/qavimator_0.0.193-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ource repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qavimator/qavimator_0.0.203-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
ebian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libllmozlib/libllmozlib_1.1.1-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 8:50 AM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libllmozlib".
>
> Some comments on your package:
>
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the feedback
> lots of commented out stuff
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 6:50 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Where did the orig.tar.gz really come from? I can only find tarballs
>>> and zip files that use dates as version numbers instead of 1.1.1-2.
>>>
>> This is wh
Paul Wise wrote:
>> This is where the problems start, because upstream is a mess and I have
>> made the situation much worse.
>
> I think the best idea is to work with upstream to get it in shape
> first, and then work on a Debian package. Looks like the LindenLabs
> folk are interested in getting
glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Robin Cornelius
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 5:53 AM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcares".
>
> Awww, Debian definitely needs more caring, here is a review of your package.
>
> Upstream source pac
On Nov 20, 2007 5:09 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 6:53 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which way do you suggest I should go with the naming? I can recreate a
> > c-ares package if required or stick with the libcares n
On Nov 23, 2007 2:31 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 7:10 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So it think that is now all the issues you raised with the package dealt
> > with.
>
> Some minor issues (only the fir
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:29 PM, wrote:
>
>> You are free to play around with these executables and even to re-distribute
>> them, so long as such use or re-distribution is accompanied this copyright
>> notice and is not for commercial gain. Note
21 matches
Mail list logo
