it access to teh svn repo.
The advantage of doing that is you can simply mark your package as ready
for release and then one of the DDs participating in the group will
simply sponsor your package for you. No need to upload anywhere. No
need to request sponsorship.
Regards,
-Rober
rns a
non-true return value. [0]
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://www.davidpashley.com/articles/writing-robust-shell-scripts.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
means that there
is no .diff.gz. That means that every version creates a new
.orig.tar.gz which consumes more mirror space.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Sunday 18 March 2007 21:49, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Also, a native package means that there
> > is no .diff.gz. That means that every version creates a new
> > .orig.tar.gz which consumes more mirro
YES|NO" sort of option and have the startup or init script
check that. Then if the install is unattended, the admin has to go in
later, create the databases and set the ENABLED variable in the defaults
file.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~rober
nc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
> http://developers.facebook.com/documentation.php?doc=clients
> * License : FreeBSD
FreeBSD is not a license.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ry!
>
Wait a minute. You mean that the package has to do more than compile
successfully?
:-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hangelog entries from then on. No need to orphan the packages.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
requires some bandwidth.
>
Something like apt-move along with apt-proxy or apt-cacher would help
out a great deal.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
vm-tools - The LIBSVM binary tools
> libsvm2- The LIBSVM shared library
Could you choose a short description for libsvm2 that says something
about what the library gives you access to? Something like libpq4?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
ht
beginning of each short description. All the package management tools
display the package name and the short description together.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Additionally, if the features are that nice to have why
not make the packages which provide the functionality Recommended?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d-core CPUs available. Making them take double or triple the time
for a 10% gain space is probably not acceptable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:31:24PM -0400, Simon wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Because on some architectures, there are not 2 GHz dual-core or
> >quad-core CPUs available. Making them take double or triple the time
> >for a 10%
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:59:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 00:54 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > I am relatively certain that on those machines, the speed boost of
> > using
> > gzip compression over bzip2 compression is probably
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:06:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 5 June 2007 06:54, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Yes. But then what of projects like OpenOffice.org and gcc?
>
> No one has said that bzip2 should be *required* as a compression format, only
> a poss
ges. The
reason is that the Debian native pacakage has no .orig.tar.gz and
.diff.gz. Only a single .tar.gz. That means that *every* single
package update requires incrementing the "upstream" version number
and uploading the entire source all over again, even for trivial
packaging-relate
sg00055.html
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
self and others in the spirit in which it was intended: to help you
produce a better free software tool and to improve as a developer.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
19 matches
Mail list logo