Re: RFS: cnet - a network simulator

2003-10-03 Thread Rob Bradford
inst unstable rather than testing. (Although doing both is certainly a good idea) If no one else responds to you i'll look at sponsoring you, it certainly looks interesting but i doubt i'll use it. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: RFS2: gnochm - CHM file viewer for GNOME

2005-05-03 Thread Rob Bradford
rst upload by the new maintainer. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for sponsor (FWD from debian-devel)

2002-03-29 Thread Rob Bradford
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 01:01, Kristis Makris wrote: > Hello, > > I've packaged tkxcd, a Tcl/Tk diff front-end which is available at: > > http://www.public.asu.edu/~makrists/debian/tkxcd > > Anyone interested in sponsoring? > > Thanks, > Kristis A more apropriate list would be the debian-m

Re: looking for sponsor/advocate

2002-08-29 Thread Rob Bradford
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:01, Paul wrote: > > Mentors, > > Secondly, I have started to package the Mordor MUD engine, of which I am > one of the upstream authors. I have several questions about the proper > file system layout -- the upstream tarball assumes that you will be > installing into th

Re: Rejected upload -- adacgi

2002-09-03 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 17:22, Phil Brooke wrote: > Hi, > > I have had a package (adacgi) rejected, with a message that the .deb has > files with `time stamp too ancient'. > > There are some files in the upstream tarball with a 1980 timestamp. I > have two (broad) questions: Ouch someone's clock

RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-24 Thread Rob Bradford
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. I'm thinking something along the lines of the ITP format with the subject as "RFS: - description" And in the body several pseudo-headers, containing information such as a long

Re: RFS: cnet - a network simulator

2003-10-03 Thread Rob Bradford
inst unstable rather than testing. (Although doing both is certainly a good idea) If no one else responds to you i'll look at sponsoring you, it certainly looks interesting but i doubt i'll use it. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Looking for sponsor (FWD from debian-devel)

2002-03-29 Thread Rob Bradford
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 01:01, Kristis Makris wrote: > Hello, > > I've packaged tkxcd, a Tcl/Tk diff front-end which is available at: > > http://www.public.asu.edu/~makrists/debian/tkxcd > > Anyone interested in sponsoring? > > Thanks, > Kristis A more apropriate list would be the debian-me

Re: looking for sponsor/advocate

2002-08-29 Thread Rob Bradford
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:01, Paul wrote: > > Mentors, > > Secondly, I have started to package the Mordor MUD engine, of which I am > one of the upstream authors. I have several questions about the proper > file system layout -- the upstream tarball assumes that you will be > installing into the

Re: Rejected upload -- adacgi

2002-09-03 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 17:22, Phil Brooke wrote: > Hi, > > I have had a package (adacgi) rejected, with a message that the .deb has > files with `time stamp too ancient'. > > There are some files in the upstream tarball with a 1980 timestamp. I > have two (broad) questions: Ouch someone's clock

Re: Help!! Can't sign package: secret key not available

2002-09-16 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 02:07, Joe Nahmias wrote: > Hello all, > > I finally managed to sign my package, by specifying the keyid on the > command-line to dpkg-buildpackage (with the -k option). However, I am > still at a loss to explain why I needed to specify it explicitly... As > you can see belo

RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-24 Thread Rob Bradford
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. I'm thinking something along the lines of the ITP format with the subject as "RFS: - description" And in the body several pseudo-headers, containing information such as a long