RFS: Xapian - Search engine library

2006-06-09 Thread Olly Betts
I'm seeking a sponsor for packages for Xapian (http://www.xapian.org/). I'm the main upstream developer of Xapian. Richard Boulton (another Xapian developer) did the original packaging work, and more recently I've been maintaining them. Details: Package: Xapian (packaged as several debian packa

Re: RFS: Xapian - Search engine library

2006-06-17 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-06-10, Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm seeking a sponsor for packages for Xapian (http://www.xapian.org/). > > I'm the main upstream developer of Xapian. Richard Boulton (another > Xapian developer) did the original packaging work, and more rece

Re: rpath, libtool and amd64

2006-06-21 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-06-21, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is a Debian-specific issue, due to the upstream libtool maintainer > having a disagreement with Debian about rpath. He considers it a feature > which should always be used, we consider it a feature which may be useful in > some spec

Re: How to correctly patch without cdbs?

2006-06-22 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-06-20, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's my understanding that test ! is more portable than ! test (same >> for [ !). > > I would be very surprised to know why. The autoconf manual, section 10.10 "Limitations of Shell Builtins" (

Re: How to correctly patch without cdbs?

2006-06-22 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-06-22, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't say, though, whether legacy systems such as Solaris have a > 'test' builtin that supports negation. ;-P Not in that section, but it does elsewhere in the section on test (and it is portable): It is safe to use `!' as a `te

Re: RFS: libgfshare -- Shamir Secret Sharing in Galois Field library

2006-06-30 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-06-30, Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Package name: libgfshare > Version : 1.0.0 > Upstream Author : Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.digital-scurf.org/software/libgfshare > * License : GPL Actually, libgfshare is

RFS: xapian-core xapian-omega xapian-bindings

2007-05-30 Thread Olly Betts
n : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.xapian.org/ * License : GPL Section : libs,libdevel,python,web,utils The packages are free of lintian warnings, and build successfully with pbuilder in a sid chroot (I

Re: wxsqlite3 is replaced? how do I find the new functionality?

2014-05-30 Thread Olly Betts
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 07:13:40PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014, Paul Elliott wrote: > > >I have just been notified that my project is being removed from debian > >testing > >because of the resolution of bug 741730: > >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=74173

Re: wxsqlite3 is replaced? how do I find the new functionality?

2014-05-31 Thread Olly Betts
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:45:19AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote: > Is there any way the removal of maitreya from testing > can be delayed until after the new version of sqlite3 > becomes available in unstable? That shouldn't be a concern - the autorm is 4 weeks off, and there are only 3 dependent pac

Re: I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-25 Thread Olly Betts
[Cc-ing #749974 since that's the relevant bug] Thanks for your work on this, Paul. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:40:15AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote: > BUT! I have just checked packages.debian.org and I find that > libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev which the new version of maitreya will depend on > is still in exp

Re: Bug#942313: RFS: codelite [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE

2019-10-21 Thread Olly Betts
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:28:04AM -0400, Anuradha Weeraman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 02:30:56PM +0100, da...@codelite.co.uk wrote: > > This was very quickly fixed by the wxsqlite3 maintainer. Codelite > > now builds cleanly in a sid sbuild. > > Great, that was quick! Confirmed and looks go