-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Skaller wrote:
> Second call: can someone sponsor my package please?
I will sponsor you. I will try to take a look at the package this evening.
Cheers,
- -Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC0XBx7ZPKKRJL
Michael A. Dickerson wrote:
The package files are at: http://www.dci.pomona.edu/debs/
It looks pretty good. A few comments:
1) You haves patches in both the .diff.gz and in debian/patches. If you
are going to use dpatch, its generally a good idea to have all of the
patches managed by it, so tha
Michael A. Dickerson wrote:
Sure .. If I make those changes, would you like to upload the package?
Yes.
I am asking because the debconf, patches, etc. were all things that my
previous sponsor insisted on.
Developer's opinions about debconf usage varies quite a bit(like many
topics in Debian), so
I'm looking to get my key signed and I live in baltimore, MD.
(Catonsville specifically, but I can travel a bit)
I tried using the public ldap directory, but ran into some problems.
I was reading through the directions on
http://db.debian.org/doc-direct.html, but when I tried the example, I
got:
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:28, Mike Furr wrote:
> and I also tried
> ~$ ldapsearch -v -h db.debian.org -b 'dc=debian,dc=org' uid=wakkerma
> keyfingerprint
Bah. Nevermind. I got it.
$ldapsearch -P 2 -x
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
er before I sponsor you. Could you try to
> do that first? At least the key:
It has been signed. I'll waiting at that DAM stage.
> pub 1024D/B056CC96 2002-04-12 Michael E. Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Not me. My key is in the wwwkeys.pgp.net group of servers. I'll also
sign t
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:41, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Having an upstream debian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned.
counter-point: Having an upstream debian/ is bad. It can make
syncronization a ploblem since you have to update it with every debian
version revision and is especially p
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system?
The menu sub-policy doesn't menti
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> menu policy section 3.4.
Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems
www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2
sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link
to ftp://ftp.debian.or
Hi all,
My upstream has bundled several things into one big tarball, mixing
libraries and binaries all together. I would really like to have
separate package versions since the tarball is versioned 1.0, but the
bundled library has reverse depends on it for >>1.0, not to mention its
soname.
Is t
I'm looking to get my key signed and I live in baltimore, MD.
(Catonsville specifically, but I can travel a bit)
I tried using the public ldap directory, but ran into some problems.
I was reading through the directions on
http://db.debian.org/doc-direct.html, but when I tried the example, I
got:
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:28, Mike Furr wrote:
> and I also tried
> ~$ ldapsearch -v -h db.debian.org -b 'dc=debian,dc=org' uid=wakkerma
> keyfingerprint
Bah. Nevermind. I got it.
$ldapsearch -P 2 -x
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
re I sponsor you. Could you try to
> do that first? At least the key:
It has been signed. I'll waiting at that DAM stage.
> pub 1024D/B056CC96 2002-04-12 Michael E. Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Not me. My key is in the wwwkeys.pgp.net group of servers. I'll also
sign t
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:41, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Having an upstream debian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned.
counter-point: Having an upstream debian/ is bad. It can make
syncronization a ploblem since you have to update it with every debian
version revision and is especially pr
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system?
The menu sub-policy doesn't mentio
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> menu policy section 3.4.
Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems
www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2
sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link
to ftp://ftp.debian.org
Hi all,
My upstream has bundled several things into one big tarball, mixing
libraries and binaries all together. I would really like to have
separate package versions since the tarball is versioned 1.0, but the
bundled library has reverse depends on it for >>1.0, not to mention its
soname.
Is th
17 matches
Mail list logo
