Re: RFS: sshfp - DNS SSHFP records generator

Hola Julien Valroff! El 09/08/2007 a las 12:50 escribiste: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sshfp". > > * Package name : sshfp > Version : 1.1.3-1 > Upstream Authors : Paul Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Jake Appelbaum > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * UR

Re: RFS: sshfp - DNS SSHFP records generator

Hola Julien Valroff! El 23/06/2008 a las 21:01 escribiste: > > I've made several changes to your package, listed bellow: > > - I used the pristine tar.gz, as I don't see any reason not to. > The pristine tarball already has a debian/ directory. Keeping it makes > the diff.gz harder to read, but

Re: RFS: sshfp - DNS SSHFP records generator

Hola Julien Valroff! El 10/07/2008 a las 18:45 escribiste: > I look forward to receiving your comments on the small updates. Looks nice, I'll upload it as soon as I can. -- "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck, is probably the day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners."

Re: RFS: ktechlab (updated package)

Hola Georges Khaznadar! El 24/08/2008 a las 22:42 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-10 > of my package "ktechlab". > It builds these binary packages: > ktechlab - circuit simulator for microcontrollers and electronics > > The upload would fix these bugs: 474313

Re: RFS: samefile

Hola Thorsten Schmale! El 21/08/2008 a las 14:58 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "samefile". > > * Package name: samefile > Version : 2.12-1 > Upstream Author : Jens Schweikhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > * URL : http://www.schweikhardt.net/samefile

Re: RFS: gxemul -- machine emulator for multiple architectures

Hola Jonathan Wiltshire! El 25/08/2008 a las 18:25 escribiste: > I have adopted this package and I am now looking for a sponsor for version > 0.4.6.5-1. > It has been orphaned under bug number 482067 and I believe this upload > will close it. > There are various enhancements including an new

Re: RFS: fsprotect (try #2)

Excerpts from Stefanos Harhalakis's message of mar abr 21 12:12:02 -0300 2009: > > > I am looking for guidance and a sponsor for my package "fsprotect". > > 1. why this package is a native package? i think a normal package > > should be better > It was also mentioned on the last thread so I omit

Re: RFS: fsprotect (try #2)

Excerpts from Neil Williams's message of mar abr 21 14:53:13 -0300 2009: > On what basis? apt and dpkg are definitely native packages, as are most > other packages that use apt and dpkg directly (like emdebian-*). > Packages that use .deb files in explicit manners are often native too - > unless th

Re: RFS: lshell (3rd try)

Hola Ignace Mouzannar! El 24/07/2009 a las 11:18 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lshell". > I have made some modifications in the debian/control as well as > debian/lshell.postinst files, and added a debian/lshell.dirs file. > lshell now uses python-support instead of py

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

Hola Pádraig Brady! El 23/07/2009 a las 16:53 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.40-2 > of my package "fslint". > > It builds these binary packages: > fslint - A utility to fix problems with filesystems' data, like duplicate > > The package appears to be lintian c

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 23/07/2009 a las 15:00 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.15-1 > of my package "csv2latex". > It builds these binary packages: > csv2latex - a CSV to LaTeX file converter > The package appears to be lintian clean. A few comments: - The tar.gz provided

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

Hola Raphael Geissert! El 25/07/2009 a las 11:37 escribiste: > >* You closed a few debian bugs in a version that never hit Debian > > repositories, that requires some manual tweaking to process the > > correct part of the changelog, please avoid it. > That's ok, it was me who forgo

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (2nd try)

Hola Chow Loong Jin! El 23/07/2009 a las 17:18 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk2-engines-aurora". > * Package name: gtk2-engines-aurora > Version : 1.5.1-1 > Upstream Author : Eric Matthews > * URL : http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.p

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 25/07/2009 a las 18:40 escribiste: > Thanks for your comments. > I'll begin by fixing standard version to 3.8.2 and fix the easiest tasks > first. Great. > We switched to cdbs after 0.14-1 though. This seems to do the job > well. What's wrong with it ? cdbs is not documented an

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (2nd try)

Hola Chow Loong Jin! El 26/07/2009 a las 04:06 escribiste: > Thanks for your comments. > - Typo: fixed > - debian/watch: left alone, as per Daniel's comment > - The tarball-in-tarball structure is admittedly ugly, but not unheard > of, and even though I'm already rebuilding the orig.tar.gz, I'm no

Re: RFS: vera (updated package)

Hola Sven Joachim! El 22/07/2009 a las 17:41 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19-1 > of my package "vera". > It builds these binary packages: > dict-vera - Dictionary of computer related acronyms -- dict format > vera - Dictionary of computer related acronyms

Re: RFS: backup-manager (adopted package, RC bug fix)

Hola Sven Joachim! El 22/07/2009 a las 17:39 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.8-2 of my package > "backup-manager". > It builds these binary packages: > backup-manager - command-line backup tool > backup-manager-doc - documentation package for Backup Manager Uploa

Re: RFS: jigzo (updated package)

Hola Elías A. M.! El 22/07/2009 a las 07:06 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-3 > of my package "jigzo". > It builds these binary packages: > jigzo  - Photo puzzle game for children > jigzo-data - data of Photo puzzle game for children My comments: - Don't u

Re: RFS: obexpushd (small update)

Hola Dominik Bruhn! El 06/06/2009 a las 18:00 escribiste: > I'm looking for someone to sponsor a new version (0.8) for obexpushd. > The changes are small, so it should be reasy to review. It is of course > linitan clean, so no problems here. > It fixes all bugs currently in debian bugs. > Obexp

Re: UNS: Re: RFS: lshell (3rd try)

Hola Ignace Mouzannar! El 27/07/2009 a las 12:19 escribiste: > > - You are creating a group lshellg in postinst using groupadd, without > > checking the group existance, this would fail on reinstall, or upgrade, > > so, > > you to check the existance of the group, you should use addgroup ins

Re: UNS: Re: RFS: lshell (3rd try)

Hola Ignace Mouzannar! El 29/07/2009 a las 01:20 escribiste: > > - It would be great if you document how to use lshell inside a chroot, > > maybe > > even using makejail. > I am planning to work on this in the upcoming release. Ok, a few other things to add to the TODO list: - Upstream chan

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 29/07/2009 a las 23:02 escribiste: > Really thanks for your comments. Uploaded. -- "Haskell is faster than C++, more concise than Perl, more regular than Python, more flexible than Ruby, more typeful than C#, more robust than Java, and has absolutely nothing in common with PHP." --

Re: RFS: sqlmap (updated package)

Hola Bernardo Damele A. G.! El 25/07/2009 a las 18:21 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package "sqlmap". > It builds these binary packages: > sqlmap - automatic SQL injection tool The current release of sqlmap is not suitable for Debian, as it include

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 28/10/2009 a las 19:41 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-2 > of my package "csv2latex". > It builds these binary packages: > csv2latex - a CSV to LaTeX file converter > The package appears to be lintian clean. > The package can be found on mentors.d

Re: RFS: lshell (updated)

Hola Ignace Mouzannar! El 01/12/2009 a las 18:25 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.8-1 > of my package "lshell". Uploaded. Before uploading I made 2 small changes in debian/changelog (typos), so you'll need to fetch the uploaded changelog to preserve them in your f

Re: RFS: go

Hola Ivan Wong! El 21/03/2010 a las 16:42 escribiste: > So sounds like more people prefer "google-go". I just renamed it and > re-uploaded it: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian > unstable main contrib n

Re: What to do about a bug found after the freeze

Hola Tony Houghton! El 13/08/2010 a las 16:44 escribiste: > A bug was reported upstream in roxterm just after Squeeze's freeze: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3041926&group_id=124080&atid=698428 All new uploads need to be approved manually by the release team members to enter

Re: review of cinnamon-desktop

Roelof Wobben wrote: > I just finisched my first package of the 10 for Cinnamon. > You can find it here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cinnamon-desktop > Anyone of the mentors have any remarks on this package. > The source can be found here: > https://github.com/CinnamonDebian/cinnamon-deskt

Re: Ccache size for pbuilder

Mikhail Morfikov wrote: > In pbuilder's config file there's an option: > CCACHEDIR="/var/cache/pbuilder/ccache" > But there's no option as to size of the cache, the one you can see via > ccache -s. What is the cache size of the chroot environment? Is there a > way to set this parameter somehow?

Bug#740105:

In article you wrote: > The package is also at lp:~noskcaj/xsane/packaging if you wish to review it > there What's the address of the upstream current git repository? The website lists a commit list in alioth, but I couldn't find the upstream code. About the package, the copyright file is a bi