created recently and
it would be great if you could help out there.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
44:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 5 1
aeT5a
4045:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 5 2
Cha1w OhS0z
4046:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 4 2
h8Xr 1fG4
4047:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 4 2 > e
4048:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat e
chty
cpxj
4049:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~]
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
maintainer:
> http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html
The first package in your list shows that you're not handling epochs
properly. 1.0~rc1-13 vs 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9. Debian isn't out of date
here. You need to ignore epochs.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
ot having a package in the archive. Only that way
we can see how applicants respond to bug reports, etc.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 08:57]:
> I think it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I can't find it there.
> Certainly the keymaster is James Troup, so you could send it direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
68k (q650) buildd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
or:
coreutils
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (a4000t) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with:
exim4
Maintainer: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Go
ts
the whole purpose...
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web directory yet).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US is not worth bothering about anyway
(most things should simply be moved to main; most packages still in
non-US are not maintained).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
intainers adress (i.e. the person who is being sponsored). That
way, bugs get closed properly.
I think UploadQueue/README has binary-only uploads in mind. If
someone compiles your package on another architecture, he's listed as
Maintainer: so he'll get all messages about the binary he uploaded.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n regardless
of whether it's UTF-8 or Latin or ASCII, and to convert a string to
ASCII/Latin regardless to whether it's UTF-8 or Latin, speak up now...)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 11:36]:
> You're breaking policy by doing that ;-) policy only allows UTF-8
> in debian/changelog and not in debian/control ... so if you were to
Does policy prohibit UTF-8 in control anywhere?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s soon as no other package is depending on it any more?
It will be removed semi-automatically by rene; I don't think it checks
reverse dependencies, but that's okay in the development branch. You
could send the maintainer of the package depending on libsysfs0 a
warning.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-21 12:05]:
> [0] Why do I get the feeling Martin's going to add something to my
> TODO list in a minute ...
Well, actually, since you mention it, the Python UTF-8 question was
partly directed at you. ;-)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and 'unstable' chroots. Users can move between
chroots as necessary.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e with zorp.
Your debian/changelog is probably in UTF-8 while your debian/control
is in Latin1. katie currently doesn't know anything about UTF-8 and
so the comparison fails. I submitted a patch for this a while ago.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t all... it compares
Maintainer: and Changed-By: in the .changes file.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ges a few days/weeks
after James or Daniel make a removal run.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this package really useful? I know there are
lots of other packages ou there which do the some task, and probably
better, considering that this tool has not been maintained for ages
and doesn't have an active upstream maintainer.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 11:12]:
> This hthtml.sty is really dumb.
>
> In the attached patch, I replaced hthtml.sty with hyperref.sty. There
There was no patch.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
incts are often wrong. So should I file the bug
> first?
Your instincts were right. Just upload the package and request
removal later. When requesting the removal of B, make clear that only
the source package B should be removed and not the binary package it
generates (which are not gen
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> What would you like this message to say instead?
copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ver, what about: copyright-file-contains-full-gpl
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e debian bug tracking
> system. Your first upload should close this bug.
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for making a proper ITP bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes?
> Should I still build a separate package for it?
Yes.
> I've started packaging the Hexonet rfb software. However it requires
> the xclass library.
Well, since xclass is dead upstream, you could re-write rfb to use
another library and submit the patch upstream. How does t
r upload to fix your
RC bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
they are built from the same source.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010113 16:57]:
> Has tbm been made DAM?
No.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgphJ68owpxNQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
retitle the bug ?
Anyone can retitle bugs.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
id
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the body:
close 81745
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Closes: #" for a real bug in your
package, then you should have sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] saying
that the bug was fixed (possibly including the changes file) so the
submitter would get a message.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
meyer/debian/sponsor has some
information at the end.
But feel free to write a HOWTO after sponsoring some people. ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web page, but let's see first how it works out).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ugs because HPPA has the same problem.
So, before submitting a bug, check if it hasn't been reported yet.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and build packages there. Or am I missing anything?
P.S. Let's move this discussion to debian-s390@lists.debian.org
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010521 20:38]:
> hear, hear ... the law ... what's the fine for not useing -f? :)
dpkg errors (and thus RC bugs ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010531 11:38]:
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
>
> Add a Section: to each package.
>
> Like this:
Also, see pop3lite if you want an example. ;-)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010608 22:45]:
> >What is the procedure for getting one's name removed
> >from the new maintainer's application queue? Wishing
>
> You should be able to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask.
Removed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Shou
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web site even says
* Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010713 15:36]:
> What should I do to get the key replaced? I assume it has to be
> signed by a debian developer, but afterwards?
Then send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation.
> Any debian developer near Salzburg, Austria, willing to sign my key?
* Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010718 12:56]:
> (ps. what was that command one can run on the Debian machines that shows
> a package's status in the different distro's ?)
madison, on auric (or pandora for non-US).
pgpB2RBV90hqw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010718 12:56]:
> My package failed to build on hppa. I have updated the config.guess
> and config.sub, which did fix some problems, but I cannot be 100%
> sure whether it works now, as I cannot complete the compilation:
> build-dependencies are not met. I
* Eduardo Trapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010723 10:34]:
> The developer that would be willing to sign my key uses PGP and not
> GPG. Would that be a problem?
No, that is ok.
ges a few days/weeks
after James or Daniel make a removal run.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this package really useful? I know there are
lots of other packages ou there which do the some task, and probably
better, considering that this tool has not been maintained for ages
and doesn't have an active upstream maintainer.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 11:12]:
> This hthtml.sty is really dumb.
>
> In the attached patch, I replaced hthtml.sty with hyperref.sty. There
There was no patch.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
incts are often wrong. So should I file the bug
> first?
Your instincts were right. Just upload the package and request
removal later. When requesting the removal of B, make clear that only
the source package B should be removed and not the binary package it
generates (which are not gen
#x27;d like to review it.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ounds like something I'd really like to read.
He meant the "debian-mentors FAQ":
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eryone involved in the NM process necessarily speaks German,
and because showing that you have enough language skills to be a good
maintainer is an important part of NM.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
* Guglielmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-25 17:25]:
> What does "Done: Martin Michlmayr" means in the wnpp listing? Does
> it mean that person will take care of the package?
No, it means that I have closed your duplicate WNPP bug before you did
(#292140). The current ITP f
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 14:41]:
> > Isn't there an "owner" tag for WNPP bugs? Then Shachar could set
> > himself as the owner.
>
> This won't get you the messages forwarded either.
Of course it will. The owner receives m
- track inactive maintainers (MIA, see my USENIX paper at
http://www.cyrius.com/publications/).
- handle bugs which are filed against unknown packages
- debcheck (http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php)
There are also some other things missing from your list, e.g.
- the RC bug graph http://bug
Bug#310552 O: qterm -- BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Feel free to retitle it to ITA
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> What would you like this message to say instead?
copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
ver, what about: copyright-file-contains-full-gpl
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e debian bug tracking
> system. Your first upload should close this bug.
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for making a proper ITP bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes?
> Should I still build a separate package for it?
Yes.
> I've started packaging the Hexonet rfb software. However it requires
> the xclass library.
Well, since xclass is dead upstream, you could re-write rfb to use
another library and submit the patch upstream. How does t
r upload to fix your
RC bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they are built from the same source.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010113 16:57]:
> Has tbm been made DAM?
No.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
retitle the bug ?
Anyone can retitle bugs.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the body:
close 81745
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Closes: #" for a real bug in your
package, then you should have sent a message to -done@bugs saying
that the bug was fixed (possibly including the changes file) so the
submitter would get a message.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
rg/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor has some
information at the end.
But feel free to write a HOWTO after sponsoring some people. ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web page, but let's see first how it works out).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ugs because HPPA has the same problem.
So, before submitting a bug, check if it hasn't been reported yet.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and build packages there. Or am I missing anything?
P.S. Let's move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010521 20:38]:
> hear, hear ... the law ... what's the fine for not useing -f? :)
dpkg errors (and thus RC bugs ;)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010531 11:38]:
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
>
> Add a Section: to each package.
>
> Like this:
Also, see pop3lite if you want an example. ;-)
--
Martin Michlma
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010608 22:45]:
> >What is the procedure for getting one's name removed
> >from the new maintainer's application queue? Wishing
>
> You should be able to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask.
Removed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAI
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Sho
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web site even says
* Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010713 15:36]:
> What should I do to get the key replaced? I assume it has to be
> signed by a debian developer, but afterwards?
Then send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation.
> Any debian developer near Salzburg, Austria, willing to sign my key?
* Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010718 12:56]:
> (ps. what was that command one can run on the Debian machines that shows
> a package's status in the different distro's ?)
madison, on auric (or pandora for non-US).
PGP signature
* Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010718 12:56]:
> My package failed to build on hppa. I have updated the config.guess
> and config.sub, which did fix some problems, but I cannot be 100%
> sure whether it works now, as I cannot complete the compilation:
> build-dependencies are not met.
* Eduardo Trapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010723 10:34]:
> The developer that would be willing to sign my key uses PGP and not
> GPG. Would that be a problem?
No, that is ok.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK), where I'll be going tomorrow, for a conference.
See http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
Jaime Villate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Oporto, Portugal: always
Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Manchester, UK: always
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
you cannot.
If it has been deleted (which is quite likely), then pass -sa to
dpkg-buildpackage:
-sa forces the inclusion of the original source
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Maximilian Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011030 00:09]:
> My problem is that the next dd lifes pretty far away.
Where do you live?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Maximilian Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011030 09:47]:
> Passau (Germany). The next dd are in Vienna and Munich. afaik
I just checked; it seems as if there is really no one closer... so, to
answer your original question, a GPG signed photo ID will do for the
NM ID check.
--
Martin
* Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011104 16:08]:
> Maybe it would be worth listing it on the "can't be packaged" page
> at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package>?
Done.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
losed. If you want to include
more revisions in the changes file, you'd have to pass the -v option
to dpkg-buildpackage.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; right to ITA the package?
Yes. You should also try to find a sponsor. This mailing list is
a good place for this. If you say which package it is you're
interesting in, someone might want to sponsor you.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
t testing is frozen and delays have been doubled
> because of that ...
No, only certain packages are frozen. In any case, it seems to be ok
now:
* freenet-unstable (0.4.3+20020328-1 to 0.4.3+20020413-1)
+ Too young, only 0 of 5 days old
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ing this package into Debian
| again, they can fetch the removed sources from
| /org/ftp.debian.org/morgue/rhona/ on auric.debian.org.
You can ask your sponsor to get them for you.
> If it is removed from the Archive start with a new version. Its
> better. :)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROT
* Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 13:28]:
> Rather at a tangent, but it appears from reading the archives of
> debian-newmaint that no NM has been accepted as a developer since
> week ending 12 May. Is this correct?
No, just wait for the next report (on Sunday).
--
M
h says
"If you have passed all checks are are now a maintainer, you will be
on the New Maintainers List if you passed over 6 months ago"). [ I
will fix the "are are" in a moment. ]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-26 17:11]:
> I propose following (Please brash up my English)
Thanks, I've applied most of this. Next time, please submit a patch
against the WML files.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
un: dchroot unstable
If you need any dependencies installed, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/main/s/sourcenav/sourcenav_5.0-4.1.dsc
sourcenav_5.0-4.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sourcenav/sourcenav_5.0-4.1_i386.deb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- End forwarded message -
--
Martin Michlm
a while. Look on klecker in
/org/qa.debian.org/mia (there's a README there).
I wasn't aware Mark was inactive, but I see he has several RC bugs.
I will see what's up.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-13 02:25]:
> The fact that pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in
> debbugs, not
Well, then we can still blame you. :-P
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
this? I think buxy, mihtjel, tollef and most others who have
worked on sponsorship scripts/pages in the past should be there.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot having a package in the archive. Only that way
we can see how applicants respond to bug reports, etc.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 08:57]:
> I think it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I can't find it there.
> Certainly the keymaster is James Troup, so you could send it direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
68k (q650) buildd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
or:
coreutils
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (a4000t) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with:
exim4
Maintainer: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Go
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
