Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:25:47AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20051019-3
> of the package "joystick", which I'd like to adopt (it's been orphaned since
> February, and last had a maintainer upload in October 2005).
[sn
Hello Ryan,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:50:15AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "teseq".
>
> * Package name: teseq
[snip]
> teseq - utility for rendering terminal typescripts human-readable
A bit outside my usual territory, but the
the new version. The open problems listed in the BTS were easy to fix.
> The worst part was cleaning up the patches done fore Debian, because not all
> of Joe's changes were included.
>
> >This said, despite its maintainer seems to be active with other Debian
> >activiti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Winger wrote:
> Anyway, if anyone thinks it might be of value, or wants to read and
> improve on it, let me know. I'd be happy to attach it.
I'd be interested to read this.
Thanks,
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Li
Eric Winger wrote:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a rep
y=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
* debian/control(Std-Ver): 3.6.1.0
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:38:29 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Now I get it. It is the "-vversion" that I learned.
>
> For moon-lander it would be
> fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -v1:0.9.0-6 -uc -us
Now that we've figured out the usage of the -v option, will someone
please use it and uplo
lp ;-), I would suggest adding the IRC
channels #debian-mentors and #debian-devel.
Thanks again!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/V1DaKl23+OYWEqURAloEAJ9BpH4IYCvo/rNhr3knY00wXA+kpgCfWS5o
FqbfQ63OvNtCrprK5U8npiE=
=2tWS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
;
they should be able to give you more specific advice.
> More than anything else I want to be sure I don't screw things up by
> doing nothing.
File the bug, that'll make sure the problem doesn't get lost/forgotten.
Otherwise, it sounds like you're on the right track.
Jo
oved
since, as implied by your mail, pppconfig is more powerful.
If all this is ok with you, I will happily sponsor you.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f6/aKl23+OYWEqURAs0xAKDLjrbK2o94PSjsitVii1BzQjkoUACgo/KR
0WDePlsvjAg0FF4pVHtOfHU=
=twa9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Cory Dodt wrote:
> Note to AAP list: can I borrow anyone's web space for temporarily hosting
> this package? This will help me get it into Debian that much faster!
Have you seen http://mentors.debian.net/ ? It was created for exactly
this purpose!
Joe Nahmias
Clément Stenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my third try to find someone interested in the arp-sk program.
>
> (http://www.arp-sk.org)
>
> arp-sk is a tool that lets you create custom ARP packets, with fully
> arbitrary fields, and at arbitrary rate.
I was interested when you first posted, but I
ss, see Matt
Palmer's excellent FAQ at:
<http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html>.
Let me know when you've solved the above and I'll take another look.
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/lM5lKl23+OYWEqURAhHqAKCGp3a0AguVWysc1xRYfO99nbxz/wCgsWhu
iG1DteT4X6xY1nIOAZ7V5Ng=
=qa5L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Amit Shah wrote:
> lintian complains about
>
> W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl:
> package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
> usr/lib/perl5/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm
>
> but as Branden O'Dea mentioned[1], lintian is wrong in this case.
In that case you should use a lintian override; see section
Al Stone wrote:
> The packages themselves are tools that run in
> user-space, collecting and analyzing performance
> data from a kernel module that must be loaded.
Why not create a shell script wrapper around the tool(s) that checks
that the module is loaded, or tries to load it if missing? If th
Hello Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> I've been working with Debian for three years now and consider myself to be
> very experienced regarding the system. I maintain several servers and
> routers and even support datacenters using Debian systems. I've written down
> about 100 pages of docume
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> From your intro it looks like you could assist with the documentation
> projects. Perhaps with the new installer docs? We always need more and
> better documentation.
Agreed. I would recommend that Florian subscribe to the debian-boot
mailing list and see what you
Nico Golde wrote:
> I am surprised because i saw programs with an automatic created debian
> manpage or without a manpage.
If you find a program in Debian without a manpage, please file a bug
(severity normal) against the package that provides it.
--Joe
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> >
J> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
>
>
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but wit
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
> a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some reason you decided to build this as a debian-sp
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
> I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
> for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
> contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
Luk,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package. Here is the
> relevant information.
>
> Source package is available on mentors.debian.net, my current sponsor
> hasn
Hello Hubert,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
> > way to do this?
>
> dpkg --print-architecture.
Actually, I think the more p
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
> a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some reason you decided to build this as a debian-sp
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
> I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
> for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
> contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
Luk,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package. Here is the
> relevant information.
>
> Source package is available on mentors.debian.net, my current sponsor
> hasn
Hello Hubert,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
> > way to do this?
>
> dpkg --print-architecture.
Actually, I think the more p
for your help!
Joe Nahmias
first-time Debian packager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Please cc me on replies as I am not subscribed to the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92VkPKl23+OYWEqURAqljAJwJX1XPL/20L59a1RekLRpSYXRtWgCfc6sF
Ld/pfo9IiscAyLKAI7UWBao=
=3KZY
of FCE Ultra, for use in the linux console.
fceu-doc - The documentation common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
Source & 1386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have not applied to the NM process yet,
common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
ITP: Bug #160810 -- http://bugs.debian.org/160810
Source & i386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), zlib1g-dev, svgalibg1-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
an apt source (anyone care to enlighten m
day 10 Dec 2002 20:20, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
> >
> > You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
> > manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
&
Sam,
> Does this mean apt-get -b source must be run with root equivilency in
> order to pass dh_testroot?
I have the following line in my /etc/apt/apt.conf:
DPkg::Build-Options "-rfakeroot -b -uc";
This should configure apt-get -b source to create unsigned
binary packages as a normal user (provi
dwarp)
What are the pros/cons of each of these methods? Is there another
generally accepted solution to this problem that I haven't found?
Thanks for your input!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Here is the relevant snippet from one of the buildd logs that
failed:
** U
If you would like to try for yourself, add the following to sources.list:
deb-src http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian /
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ewbie guide to sort of adopting an orphaned
> packages :0?
See, for example, <http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/>, especially the
information at the end.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/L
> from debian/rules, or configure ?
>
> I'd use something like this:
>
> CFLAGS = "-O2 -Wall"
> if
> CFLAGS += "-mieee"
> endif
A reasonable incantation to do this in the makefile is:
ifneq (,$(findstring alpha, $(shell /usr/bin/dpkg-architecture -
file to list all the
manpages to be installed for a particular package. This is helpful if a
package has more than one manpage. See dh_installman(1) for more info.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Lin
r this package (#183341) and am cc-ing the BTS.
Thanks in advance for your sponsorship!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - There are plenty of NSFs available to download on the net...they're
not that hard to find if you search a bit...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux
need to do is sponsor the person
who has already done the work -- a win/win for all.
Comments?
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - Please forgive me if this has been raised/discussed/beaten to
death...I didn't find anything in the archives...
PPS - Let's keep the discussion on -mentors, that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > For Sponsorship?
> > > Comments?
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> > share for comment.
> >
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp pa
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> > solution in a
of upstream's borked makefile for Debian.
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:18:18 -0500
Build-Depends are: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.2-3.1),
libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, sharutils.
Package (source and i386 binary for sarge) is
t! :-)
That should get you started.
> Thanks in advance,
No, thank YOU in advance for your future contributions!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+b//rKl23+OYWEqURAu/QAJ9syCLUhiP2tnwYqTa6znn78No0TACfefrD
pM5aZCSOI++tyZAdy3kHubs=
=H
Hello mentors,
quick question: Where is the proper place to report spam in the BTS (bug
#137152, to be specific)? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? file a bug?
Thanks!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r (1:1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:21:10 -0500
moon-lander (1
hine, only developers have access to the archive.
Moderated : no
Subscription: developers only
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
Hope this answers your question!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
> suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >^^^ ^^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
> /etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Winger wrote:
> Anyway, if anyone thinks it might be of value, or wants to read and
> improve on it, let me know. I'd be happy to attach it.
I'd be interested to read this.
Thanks,
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Li
Eric Winger wrote:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a rep
y=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
* debian/control(Std-Ver): 3.6.1.0
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:38:29 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Now I get it. It is the "-vversion" that I learned.
>
> For moon-lander it would be
> fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -v1:0.9.0-6 -uc -us
Now that we've figured out the usage of the -v option, will someone
please use it and uplo
lp ;-), I would suggest adding the IRC
channels #debian-mentors and #debian-devel.
Thanks again!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/V1DaKl23+OYWEqURAloEAJ9BpH4IYCvo/rNhr3knY00wXA+kpgCfWS5o
FqbfQ63OvNtCrprK5U8npiE=
=2tWS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
;
they should be able to give you more specific advice.
> More than anything else I want to be sure I don't screw things up by
> doing nothing.
File the bug, that'll make sure the problem doesn't get lost/forgotten.
Otherwise, it sounds like you're on the right track.
Jo
oved
since, as implied by your mail, pppconfig is more powerful.
If all this is ok with you, I will happily sponsor you.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f6/aKl23+OYWEqURAs0xAKDLjrbK2o94PSjsitVii1BzQjkoUACgo/KR
0WDePlsvjAg0FF4pVH
Cory Dodt wrote:
> Note to AAP list: can I borrow anyone's web space for temporarily hosting
> this package? This will help me get it into Debian that much faster!
Have you seen http://mentors.debian.net/ ? It was created for exactly
this purpose!
Joe Nahmias
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Clément Stenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my third try to find someone interested in the arp-sk program.
>
> (http://www.arp-sk.org)
>
> arp-sk is a tool that lets you create custom ARP packets, with fully
> arbitrary fields, and at arbitrary rate.
I was interested when you first posted, but I
ss, see Matt
Palmer's excellent FAQ at:
<http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html>.
Let me know when you've solved the above and I'll take another look.
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/lM5lKl23+OYWEqURAhHqAKC
Amit Shah wrote:
> lintian complains about
>
> W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
> usr/lib/perl5/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm
>
> but as Branden O'Dea mentioned[1], lintian is wrong in this case.
In that case you should use a lintian override; see section 2.
Al Stone wrote:
> The packages themselves are tools that run in
> user-space, collecting and analyzing performance
> data from a kernel module that must be loaded.
Why not create a shell script wrapper around the tool(s) that checks
that the module is loaded, or tries to load it if missing? If th
Hello Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> I've been working with Debian for three years now and consider myself to be
> very experienced regarding the system. I maintain several servers and
> routers and even support datacenters using Debian systems. I've written down
> about 100 pages of docume
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> From your intro it looks like you could assist with the documentation
> projects. Perhaps with the new installer docs? We always need more and
> better documentation.
Agreed. I would recommend that Florian subscribe to the debian-boot
mailing list and see what you
Nico Golde wrote:
> I am surprised because i saw programs with an automatic created debian
> manpage or without a manpage.
If you find a program in Debian without a manpage, please file a bug
(severity normal) against the package that provides it.
--Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> >
J> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
>
>
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but wit
Hello list,
I am trying to package FCE Ultra (bug #160810), however when I
come to the crucial `dpkg-buildpackage` step, I get the following error
message:
gpg: skipped 'Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>': secret key not available
However I am able to see my secret key
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-13 18:34]:
> > gpg: skipped 'Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>': secret key not available
> >
> > However I am able to see my secret key when I issue the command
> > `gpg --list-secret-keys`, and I am
unable to... Should I file a bug against dpkg??
Anyways, thanks to everyone who responded to my pleas for help!
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/fceu-0.81 $ dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n
's/^Maintainer: //p'
Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/loc
.
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
first-time Debian packager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Please cc me on replies as I am not subscribed to the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92VkPKl23+OYWEqURAqljAJwJX1XPL/20L59a1RekLRpSYXRtWgCfc6sF
Ld/pfo9IiscAyLKAI7UWBao
of FCE Ultra, for use in the linux console.
fceu-doc - The documentation common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
Source & 1386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have not applied to the NM process yet,
common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
ITP: Bug #160810 -- http://bugs.debian.org/160810
Source & i386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), zlib1g-dev, svgalibg1-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
an apt source (anyone care to enlighten m
day 10 Dec 2002 20:20, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
> >
> > You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
> > manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
&
Sam,
> Does this mean apt-get -b source must be run with root equivilency in
> order to pass dh_testroot?
I have the following line in my /etc/apt/apt.conf:
DPkg::Build-Options "-rfakeroot -b -uc";
This should configure apt-get -b source to create unsigned
binary packages as a normal user (provi
lib-dummyg1'.
(eg. acidwarp)
What are the pros/cons of each of these methods? Is there another
generally accepted solution to this problem that I haven't found?
Thanks for your input!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Here is the relevant snippet from one of the build
If you would like to try for yourself, add the following to sources.list:
deb-src http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian /
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
ewbie guide to sort of adopting an orphaned
> packages :0?
See, for example, <http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/>, especially the
information at the end.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/L
y
> > from debian/rules, or configure ?
>
> I'd use something like this:
>
> CFLAGS = "-O2 -Wall"
> if
> CFLAGS += "-mieee"
> endif
A reasonable incantation to do this in the makefile is:
ifneq (,$(findstring alpha, $(shell /usr/bin/dpkg-architec
file to list all the
manpages to be installed for a particular package. This is helpful if a
package has more than one manpage. See dh_installman(1) for more info.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Lin
r this package (#183341) and am cc-ing the BTS.
Thanks in advance for your sponsorship!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - There are plenty of NSFs available to download on the net...they're
not that hard to find if you search a bit...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux
need to do is sponsor the person
who has already done the work -- a win/win for all.
Comments?
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - Please forgive me if this has been raised/discussed/beaten to
death...I didn't find anything in the archives...
PPS - Let's keep the discussion on -mentors, that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > For Sponsorship?
> > > Comments?
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> > share for comment.
> >
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp pa
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> > solution in a
of upstream's borked makefile for Debian.
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:18:18 -0500
Build-Depends are: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.2-3.1),
libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, sharutils.
Package (source and i386 binary for sarge) is
t! :-)
That should get you started.
> Thanks in advance,
No, thank YOU in advance for your future contributions!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+b//rKl23+OYWEqURAu/QAJ9syCLUhiP2tnwYqTa6znn78No0TACfefrD
pM5aZCSOI++tyZAdy3kHubs=
=HIES
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Hello mentors,
quick question: Where is the proper place to report spam in the BTS (bug
#137152, to be specific)? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? file a bug?
Thanks!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
r (1:1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
-- Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:21:10 -0500
moon-lander (1
hine, only developers have access to the archive.
Moderated : no
Subscription: developers only
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
Hope this answers your question!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
> suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >^^^ ^^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
> /etc
Fielder George Dowding wrote:
> I will sign up for the d-mentors list. I will lurk until I
> understand what my next step is.
Also, you should peruse the list archives[0]. At lot of the same issues
seems to come up with frightening regularity!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
[0
27;s just a matter of
making sure that upstream's makefile doesn't stomp on CFLAGS
unnecessarily (ie. they should use += instead of := or = ).
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
