Hi all,
I have a deb package that requires ia32-libs to run on a 64-bit
Debian/Ubuntu, otherwise it works without it on i386. I have tried in
the control file:
Depends: ia32-libs [amd64]
But that doesn't seem valid. How does one specify ia32-libs should be
a dependency when on 64 bit?
Thanks!
I can do the dependencies with logic only. -- IV
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin <
jackyf.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a deb package that requires ia32-libs to run on a 64-bit
> > Debian/Ubuntu,
It would seem a simple solution but I've searched and searched and
have not found one. Is there no resolution for this?
-- IV
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a deb package that requires ia32-libs to run on a 64-bit
> Debian/Ubuntu, o
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
>> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>>
>>> It would seem a simple solution but I've searched and searched and
>>> have not found one. Is there no resolution for this?
>>
&
Hi, I have a .deb that installs a reliable and well tested server that
we want to eventually get into a apt-get repository. Right now it
installs nearly everything into opt with a well-defined directory
structure. Will that preclude it from being accepted into an apt-get
repository?
-- IV
--
To
Hi, I want to define a variable such as package_initials in control
file and be able to access %{package_initials} in postinst file. Do I
define it in control file as:
XC-package_initials: the_initials
or some other way?
-- IV
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or
Have to package two .deb flavors as well as two .rpm versions. Can do
this with rpm using .rpmmacros but looking for the equivalent in .deb.
Is this not possible? The manuals seem to indicate that it is but not
exactly how. -- IV
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Why do you wa
done it but it does not.
-- IV
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>
>> Hi, I want to define a variable such as package_initials in control
>> file and be able to access %{package_initials} in postinst file. Do I
>> defi
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>
>> So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as
>> Package: in postinst?
>
> Generally, you don't, since generally there's no reason to do so. I can't
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>
>>>> So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as
>>>> Pac
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes wrote:
>> It is a very complex, large package.
>> Does anyone know the mechanics of doing introspection in postinst for
>> the control file defined variables?
>>
> Exactly why the postinst g
So there is no cross-compatibility between debian control file and rpm
spec file for introspecting their respective package variables? -- IV
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Goirand >
To my experience, it's a lot more easy to be able to maintain BOTH the
rpm
> and the Debian package rather than just porting from one to another. If you
> want to avoid redundancy and want to factor things a bit. Maybe you could
> suggest some modi
rpm doesn't. I am going through the joy of trying to reconcile the two
systems so as to not have two divergent code bases as much as
possible.
-- IV
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> echo "The package: %{Package}-%{Version} is now installed."
>>
>> How would one
situation?
I need to decide this soon and move on.
-- IV
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes wrote:
>>
>> Required to produce versions for both rpm and deb. No introspection
>> means not easy to convert this from rpm to deb which is where this
&g
to get this information out. Is there any bash
control file parsers out there?
-- IV
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On Friday 30 April 2010 11:12:57 Ignacio Valdes wrote:
>> So I am gathering that whereas it is repugnant to the dpkg design
>>
Moving on.
As suggested I am simply going to have to hack/kludge rpm and deb with
a bunch of sed pre-processing of the respective spec, control and
postinst to make it work.
These two divergent schemes put a large burden of effort on developers
and documenters. Wish I could get deb and rpm folks
mush it all together
into one common subdirectory for both rpm and deb building then move
it around without too much pain from one system to another with the
less duplication.
-- IV
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Moving on.
>
> As suggested I am simply going t
Hi all, Building an apt-get repository on CentOS. There seems to be
many documents on apt-get repository building but they point to many
different commands like apparently deprecated dpkg-scanfiles, reprepro
and others. Which one is the correct one? -- IV
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mento
Does reprepro run on rpm based systems? So far I am not finding that
it does. I currently have to use a rpm based repository server for
reasons of history... -- IV
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
>> Ignacio Valdes writes:
&
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>
>> Does reprepro run on rpm based systems? So far I am not finding that
>> it does. I currently have to use a rpm based repository server for
>> reasons of history... -- IV
>
&g
/archives/pool/universe/r/reprepro/
-- IV
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ignacio Valdes writes:
>
>> Does reprepro run on rpm based systems? So far I am not finding that
>> it does. I currently have to use a rpm based repository server for
>
apt-cache
search astronaut doesn't find anything. I may have misconfigured
something but I am not sure what as it seems visible.
-- IV
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Hi all, Building an apt-get repository on CentOS. There seems to be
> many documents
not be parsed or opened.
Browsing to here though shows that the Packages file can be opened or
read at least through http
http://174.143.201.52/ubuntu/dists/karmic/main/binary-i386/Packages
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Ignacio Valdes [100510 06:48]:
>>
/main/binary-i386/Packages.lzma
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> That improved things, but I am now getting
>
> E: Problem parsing dependency Conflicts
> E: Error occurred while processing astronaut-wv-server-beta (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
This is a vexing problem. The things that are supposed to fix all the
below do not. -- IV
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Checked my server logs and found the following. Packages.gz exists but
> that's not what the client is looking for:
>
> [Mon May
all works now.
Thanks to all for your patience and advice.
-- IV
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> This is a vexing problem. The things that are supposed to fix all the
> below do not. -- IV
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
>>
Hi, The Astronaut package has a dependency on the mkpasswd command
which was in the whois package in Karmic and is now in the mkpasswd
package in Lucid. How does one make this work for apt-get using
reprepro pool? When I reprepro includedeb karmic astronaut-common.deb
with the whois package depende
rors!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Hi, The Astronaut package has a dependency on the mkpasswd command
> which was in the whois package in Karmic and is now in the mkpasswd
> package in Lucid. How does one make this work for apt-get using
> reprepro pool? W
t for this purpose but is that how it works? -- IV
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> I tried doing the adding ~karmic and ~lucid to the filename with the
> control contents changed to whois and mkpasswd respectively but I am
> getting this after adding the ~lucid as
Take that back, I thought I was changing the version number. It seems
to work now. Thanks! -- IV
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> So I changed the filename and the version number in the .deb itself
> but I am still getting the same message as below. I read th
Hi all, I am trying to get repository signing going with reprepro. I
have my key built with gpg, Signwith set to yes, Release.gpg gets
generated. When I try to test it with apt-get update I receive:
W: GPG error: http://software.astronautvista.com karmic Release: The
following signatures couldn't
Hi, so where is the logical switchover specified for reprepro/apt-get
on 32 bit versus 64 bit packages? In other words I have package
x-32.deb and package x-64.deb, they need to be installed
differentially based upon 32 vs 64 bit architecture. Does this
specification occur in reprepro conf files? I
33 matches
Mail list logo
