Hi Andrea,
On Friday 25 April 2008 18:08, Andrea De Iacovo wrote:
> I'm in contact with wordpress security team.
> With the next release I'll close at least 3 CVEs for wordpress-etch.
cool. Very cool.
> At the moment I'm working in order to close other bugs too.
You've seen
http://www.lightblu
Hi,
On Monday 19 May 2008 10:04, Ben Finney wrote:
> Is there a way to do this when submitting the bug report?
AFAIK not, but Dondelcarlo said on -devel the last few days that implementing
this is on his not-so-distant todo-list.
regards,
Holger
pgpLFcCEv7XHe.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Hi,
On Sunday 22 June 2008 11:46, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > Unfortunatly I dont have time to sponsor it (as this also needs
> > continous involvement),
> You mean "every package does" or "this package particularly does"? (If
> it's the second: why?)
Every package does. If someone sponsors somet
Hi,
On Saturday 12 July 2008 03:19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> wmaker-data was uploaded by Dmitry E. Oboukhov
I'm not impressed.
$ lintian wmaker-data_0.8-2.1.dsc
W: wmaker-data source: debian-rules-sets-DH_COMPAT line 8
W: wmaker-data source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-vers
Hi Dmitry,
On Saturday 12 July 2008 14:34, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> HL> I'm not impressed.
> HL> $ lintian wmaker-data_0.8-2.1.dsc
I'm not impressed: I checked the version in etch.
> uploaded version contains only one warning:
You're right, sorry.
regards & apologies,
Holger
pgp
Hi Fabien,
On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote:
> This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This
> implementation seems to be the "best" available.
(Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean
this program is the best im
Hi Fabien,
On Saturday 30 August 2008 16:22, Fabien Cellier wrote:
> I mean that it *could* be the best implementation of rfc3561.
Ok :)
> I cannot answer this. I personally used it successfully with 3
> computers. For largest scale test, please refer to upstream author.
Ok. (I probably wont do
Hi Thomas,
I just use squid and it works like charm.
regards,
Holger
pgp2SZFG4JDaU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Saturday 18 October 2008 12:28, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Most people who want to run stable on their machines use an unstable
> chroot for development work.
Depending on the needs, a virtual machine using the virtualbox package is
another good option.
regards,
Holger
pgpQCyr2DTHf
Hi,
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 23:55, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> - 50 lines in debian/changelog for the first release is way to
> much: please collapse them in just one
[just a general comment, havent looked at the changelog in question.]
It doesnt have to be exactly one line, occasionally 2-5
Hi,
On Thursday 09 February 2006 13:32, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> What's about this description?
>
> Description: SIP-based software telephone with video and chat features
> WengoPhone is a Voice over IP application based on standard protocols
> like SIP and RTP. It enables voice, video and text
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 20:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Debian. It is currently already in Ubuntu
> > (http://packages.ubuntu.com/kzenexplorer). I created a brand new Debian
> > package (lintian clean except for lack of a man page) before noticing it
> > was in Ubuntu. Which is preferre
Hi Christian,
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:17, Christian Welzel wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.2+debian-1
> > of my packages "typo3-src" and "typo3-dummy".
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
> Is there really nobody who wants to sponsor th
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 18:17, Thanasis Kinias wrote:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has agreed to sponsor the upload.
> Thanks, Clint!
Cheers!
I was thinking of adopting the package too (and am now very happy you did), so
I would like to share my todo-notes with you:
1. sanduhr doesn
Hi,
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 18:08, Thanasis Kinias wrote:
> Thanks. It's such a cool little utility I was sad to see it go...
Yup :)
> I'll work on these. Since I'm new to this, I figure I should do the
> process properly. Would you be so kind as to file bugs on those two
> once the packa
Hi,
On Thursday 22 November 2007 20:53, Eriberto wrote:
> Ok. But in my package I chose the GPL as license (debian/copyright file).
Why? Why do you want to reduce the usefulness of your package? I cannot think
of any good reason...
You take choice away, gain nothing and make your package less u
Hi,
On Sunday 02 December 2007 13:19, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > Thats bad. You should not answer to such questions if you don't know it
> > > for your self! Thats especially true because of your DD status that
> > > causes others to give your saying more confidence.
> >
> > Please, try to ke
Hi Werner,
On Thursday 06 December 2007 16:56, JackTheDipper wrote:
> any comments or the redemptive upload would be great ;-)
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnomecc/gnome-color-chooser-0.2.3.tar.gz?modtime=1196203255&big_mirror=0
and
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-color-
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:10, JackTheDipper wrote:
> The packaging is now explicitly using GPL3 and the path to that version
> has been added.
Actually, as you are both upstream and maintainer, why dont you use the same
licence for both? It's definitly less "risky"...
regards,
Hi Werner,
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 22:46, JackTheDipper wrote:
> Oh, it's already planned to change gnomecc's license to GPLv3 with the
> next major release. ;-)
Ok :)
> The checksums of the sf.net archive and the orig.tar.gz do match, please
> redownload _both_ if you want to compare them.
Hi Matthias,
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:23, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ./src/gnome-color-chooser.1 says the licence is GPL, which means GPL3,
> > while debian/copyright says the software is GPL2+... please fix.
>
> Doe
Hi,
On Friday 14 December 2007 00:37, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > And yes, if you refer to "the GPL" today, it certainly means GPL3.
> Not at all. Well, at least not completely. ;-) GNU GPL 3 itself says
> abou
Hi Dmitry,
On Freitag, 20. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-django-djblets/python-d
> jango-djblets_0.6.17-1.dsc
a quick review reveals that you modified the upstream orig.tar.gz, yet you
don't document this (and why). Please ei
Hi,
On Sonntag, 22. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> Oops. Yes. It was done initially (actually converted from downloaded zip
> at github). There are no actual changes to upstream sources except that.
> Anyway I've switched to upstream tarball for it and md5 for orig.tar.gz
> matches to upst
Hi Dmitry,
a few comments:
- neither debian/README.Source nor debian/changelog tells me on which git
commit this is based exactly. There have been several commits on April 25th...
- README.Source further states: "Unfortunately ReviewBoard itself requires
JQuery-UI version 1.6 which is not in d
tags 676991 + pending
thanks
On Montag, 11. Juni 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyhoca-gui"
I'm uploading this at the moment... :)
I'm slightly surprised by these package-contains-broken-symlink lintian
warnings, as the package seems to have correct depen
tags 676991 - pending
thanks
Hi,
gah, it fails to build in pbuilder:
$ sudo pbuilder --build pyhoca-gui_0.2.0.0-3.dsc
I: using fakeroot in build.
I: Current time: Tue Jun 12 09:18:42 CEST 2012
I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1339485522
I: Building the build Environment
I: extracting base tarball [/var/c
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./python-
x2go_0.2.0.4-1.dsc
dpkg-source: info: extracting python-x2go in python-x2go-0.2.0.4
dpkg-source: info: unpacking python-x2go_0.2.0.4.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking python-x2go_0.2.0.4-1.debian.tar.gz
I: Building the package
I:
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> But now I'm not sure about:
> - if it is a good thing to have admin choosed ports
I dont think so and I guess I'm not alone and thats why there is no best
practice to do that. The only (typo of) package where I can think off where
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Eric Cooper wrote:
> I'm packaging approx, which for compatibility with apt-proxy defaults
> to port (not in /etc/services). That was fine when approx, like
> apt-proxy, was run as a standalone daemon from an initscript. But I
> just changed it to run (only
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 19. März 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> there were some good points of the earlier drafts of that page and I use
> these in my own packages but the current version is completely
> unusable and unacceptable. (For an example of an acceptable midpoint,
> see
> http://packages.debian.
Hi,
On Freitag, 20. März 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Yeah, that (file) looks totally reasonable to me. What has changed in the
> proposal that this is outdated now? Why not change it back?
Ok, I saw your mail on -devel now, stating that you were using revision 50 and
its at 5
Hi Jérémy,
On Donnerstag, 26. März 2009, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> is there a way to change a package dependency without rebuilding it ?
apt-cache show equivs
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
> Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within
> the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does its work inside a
> chroot; is it advisable for that to happen while already inside
> ‘pbuilder’s existing chroot?
not really
Hi,
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> $ desktop-file-validate phasex.desktop
> bash: desktop-file-validate: command not found
apt-get install apt-file
apt-file update
apt-file search desktop-file-validate
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
Hi Harry,
a havent't sponsored your package, but I looked at it and have some comments:
On Samstag, 3. Oktober 2009, Harry Rickards wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1
Please don't sponsoring requests too frequently to this list, you last for
this package you've sent
Hi Laurent,
On Montag, 26. Oktober 2009, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> I would like to know how to interpret piuparts logs.
> You can find in [1] and [2] information about package and logs provided
> from Debian pages...
>
> Where can i find information about to solve the problem if needed ?
> I searc
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your contribution to Debian!
On Freitag, 27. November 2009, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "g3dviewer".
Uploaded.
Could you please ask the upstream author to publish signed checksums on his
webpage, like he already does with libg3d?
ch
Hi,
(just to confirm)
On Montag, 4. Januar 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
> The puiparts host was broken when it tried your package, it couldn't
> find sid.tar.gz
[...]
> I'm guessing it is simply a sid installation, compressed into a
> tarball for use as the chroot puiparts does tests in.
[...]
> See it
Hi Nanakos,
On Dienstag, 5. Januar 2010, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11.dsc
this is a native package, please fix.
Thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Hideki,
On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I got error message during testing mecab-naist-jdic-eucjp package with
> piuparts but I don't know how to deal with this. The message is below.
how did you run piuparts?
Normally you give the .deb file as a argument, see for example
package: piuparts
x-debbugs-cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, henr...@debian.or.jp,
steffen.joe...@skolelinux.de
Hi Hideki,
congratulations! You found a bug in piuparts! :-)
On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > 0m38.1s INFO: PASS: Installation and purging test.
> > 0m38.1s D
Hi Nanakos,
again you are spamming this list with your requests for sponsors. Today,
yesterday and friday. Identical mails. Did you change the source (then say
so) or is it just a repeat?
You did this already in early January, when you were told to please not do
this. Your contribution to Debi
Hi Nanakos,
On Montag, 25. Januar 2010, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> i am not spamming the list with my sponsor requests. It is not a repeat,
> i changed the source and closed one more bug from the bug list that
> opened on Saturday. I am not trying to give a bad example though and
> trying not t
Hi,
On Sonntag, 14. Februar 2010, Christoph Egger wrote:
> There's absolutely no need to overwrite a lintian pedantic
> tag.
I think it's definitly ok to be pedantic and overwrite lintian here.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 18. März 2010, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the
> venerable go game.
Me too. I didnt notice until your mail
> May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired
> from the web site
Hi Laurent,
thanks for caring about your packages!
On Montag, 3. Mai 2010, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Is there any means to update the chapter "Problems" on the debian package
> home page (http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dhcp-probe.html) for dhcp-probe.
> The piuparts problem is for the 1.3.0-4 pa
On Montag, 3. Mai 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Who uploaded without installing the package? Surely 'package (>= ),
> package (<< +~)' breaks apt-get and aptitude, too, right?
appearantly not. else the outcry would have been much louder :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Hi Roland,
On Dienstag, 1. Juni 2010, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Is there any way to mark a configuration file as unchanged after package
> installation? Any other solutions?
You could deploy an unmodified configfile containing the default password (and
only modify it if a password is supplied via d
please dont send html mails to debian mailing-lists. thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> > - it seems to use embedded getopt copy, please use the one from glibc
> > - you don't mention LGPL in debian/copyright what is license of getopt
> Yes I have that in mind for some time now..I will fix it in the next
> version I hope.
D
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > This is bug #363193.
> But what should I do, then?
use the patch from that bug?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 25. August 2010, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> Can someone explain the following meaning of the lintian error message:
> file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile
run "lintian -I"
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
(order of quotes changed to make things clearer.)
On Montag, 4. Oktober 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Even if the "ACK, your message made it to the list" is all people get, to
> many people it means more than that -- it's "a human read it, and
> sympathizes with your lack of sponsorship". Als
Hi Stefan,
On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2010, Stefan Ott wrote:
> I have a small question: I'm aware that Debian is currently frozen,
> thus no new features can be added to squeeze. However, I maintain a
> package [1] (I'm also the upstream maintainer) which has an annoying
> but non-critical bug. The
Hi Mats,
thanks for using piuparts to improve the quality of Debian!
On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> being a simple DM, this has not yet given me the full knowledge
> to handle a failure from Piuparts.
don't worry, we all learn every day. (At least I hope so ;)
> I
Hi Mats,
On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> At this point only the number of packages differs: 6112 against 6113.
> All potential problems are clearly conceiled and postponed.
I wonder if your package (and all its depends) are installable in a empty sid
chroot...
> at
package: piuparts
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, mats.anders...@gisladisker.se,
566...@bugs.debian.org
Hi Mats,
On Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> I am reading that last logging report, and I must draw this conclusion:
>
>* There
Hi Michael,
On Freitag, 12. November 2010, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> but
> is it really necessary to spend so much effort to contact the
> maintainer (bullets 2, 4, and 5)?
Yes.
Also, your NMU attempt was about a RC bug you filed yourself (and recently
before). I think the "wait longer to give m
Hi,
On Sonntag, 21. November 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> If both those tests are true, you can be pretty sure that a user can be
> prompted (on stderr, blah) and you can get a response on stdin.
Don't do this, or rather: do it right: "Prompting must be done by
communicating through a
Hi,
On Montag, 22. November 2010, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> What is the proper way to test packages inside chroot?
you already found it :-)
sadly you also found out, that often also problems in dependend packages are
found.
> piuparts fails with error that seem unrelated to my package:
>
>
Hi,
On Montag, 22. November 2010, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Benoît Knecht (benoit.kne...@fsfe.org):
> > You should get in touch with the maintainer of ifupdown, Anthony Towns
> > .
you didn't reply to this important aspect...
> > And FYI, lintian reports the following:
> > W: ifupdo
Hi,
On Dienstag, 23. November 2010, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Holger Levsen >
>> /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/.path
> >> Can you recommend any best practices or helper scripts?
> > a.) file a bug against the dependend package
Hi Elías,
On Montag, 29. November 2010, Elías Alejandro wrote:
> I was testing my package with piuparts and in the end gets stuck and
> said (seems bug #594964):
>
> 0m25.9s DEBUG: No broken symlinks as far as we can find.
> 0m27.0s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified:
> /var/log
Hi,
On Dienstag, 30. November 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> The svn trunk version of piuparts is fixed and doesnt show this error.
I've started to prepare an upload to sid now... there should be at least one
in 2010 ;-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Hi,
On Montag, 6. Dezember 2010, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1
> of my package "googleearth-package".
I'll take care of this package, however I wouldnt mind people testing it on
amd64 (or ia64) as I dont have access to these archs as desktops.
And j
Hi,
On Montag, 6. Dezember 2010, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1
> of my package "googleearth-package".
I've uploaded it yesterday, with minor changes, Adnan please get them from
sid.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Hi,
#606222 gave me this idea:
> (*) it also would be nice if mentors.d.n could automatically mark bugs as
> pending, when a package is available fixing a bug, just like it is done for
> NEW.
What do you think?
mentors doesnt have a pseudo package in the BTS, should I file one agaist QA?
ch
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Is there something in the Debian Policy that supports my view?
> > I am not able to find any relevant part.
FHS is mandated by debian-policy.
> I'm not sure about this, but I think it would be reasonable
> to just create the /var/lib/
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/downtimed/downtimed_0.4-1.dsc
my comments:
- you have a build-dep on debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), which is not in the archive.
I assume this is intentional?!
- did you send your three pa
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> > - you have a build-dep on debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), which is not in the
> > archive. I assume this is intentional?!
> The use of an override target using debhelper is functional
> as of version 7.0.50~. This is clearly stated in t
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I don't like those disable-service-via-etc-default files at all.
> The only reason they should be used is when the default configuration
> should not start the daemon. After all, you can always achieve the
> same effect by putting an exit
Hi Mats,
do you need CC:s?
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Good point. I have now chosen compatibility "8" and hence
> a debhelper dependency "(>= 8)" in the control file.
:)
> I inserted Applied-Upstream stanzas in the two patches that
> have gone into Upstream's Lau
Hi,
On Freitag, 11. Februar 2011, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's yet another the FLV
> tool which related to my current job.
And do you really plan to support it for the next, say, 5 years? And why does
Debian need yet another tool like this? Sounds
Hi Neutron,
On Samstag, 12. Februar 2011, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> Hi, good to see you :)
likewise!
> Sorry for my English (It's T-English {Thai + English} :P)
No problem, almost everybody here is learning english as well. Me too
certainly :)
I didn't really doubt your good intentions, I just
Hi Fabrizio,
On Sonntag, 6. März 2011, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> I think the easy way is to move the package to non-free section.
Sure, but its also not the best way.
Is there really no source for those flash files?
> Not sure about the package name: it should be piwik-nonfree?
piwik is a per
On Freitag, 25. März 2011, Ben Finney wrote:
> What I thought you were referring to was that the images were a binary
> form and the “preferred form for making modifications” wasn't included,
> hence making the source package non-free. Is that the case for this
> package?
I'd say (certain) .gif im
Hi,
On Friday 20 May 2005 14:09, Njes Nilsen wrote:
> Am a bit unsure whether this is the correct mailing list, but I ask anyway:
debian-boot would have been the right mailing list...
> What I want is to edit the installation so the user get another option
> here, which will install some given p
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:15:21AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> A commit fixing this is already queued up for Holger.
…and merged and deployed on piuparts.d.o and 25 affected tests rescheduled.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Forwarded message from Holger Levsen -
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:34:42 +
From: Holger Levsen
To: Dashamir Hoxha
Cc: bugs-deb...@antipoul.fr, 903...@bugs.debian.org,
debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#903815: ITP: pw -- A simple command-line password manager
On Mon
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:41:36PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hmm, do you have tried to validate your shell code?
> https://www.shellcheck.net/
> I just pasted
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dashohoxha/pw/master/src/pw.sh into
> and got quite a lot of problematic remarks.
I've also don
81 matches
Mail list logo
