Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> The problems is that we're not rejecting 50% of our applicants, but
> they're still in the queue. We have more and more applicants joining the
> queue, but few becoming developers, and *the rest creating a backlog*.
> They're still in the application process, not being
Marc Leeman wrote:
>
> As long as my sponsors don't mind uploading the packages and I can use
> aloith to cooperate with others, I don't feel the need anymore to
> continue and try again for full DD; though I'm sure I would have
> contributed more (a number of packages never found a sponsor, so I
Hi folks,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.html shows that
bug #346938 is set to "Fixed and Pending" :-{. This
bug was fixed more that 6 months ago, so what is the
BTS waiting for?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> The upload that fixed the bug, 20041028-9, contained these fields:
> | Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | Changed-By: Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and thus, this is considered an NMU (the one uploading != the maintainer).
>
Blockade is o
Hi Mike.
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:58:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi Thijs,
>>
>> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>> Hello Harald,
>>>
>>>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.h
Hi folks,
Is there a changelog of the Debian policy online?
Actually I would have expected a pointer on
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, but maybe
I am too blind to see.
Thanx in advance
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi folks,
I am pretty optimistic to clarify the license conditions for
blockade (http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.html), making
it possible to move it to from non-free to main (hopefully).
Currently the game is public domain, except for the game scenes.
Is there some specialist for this l
Hi folks,
To fix a FTBFS I would like to upload a new version of my game
package "blockade". I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking
for a sponsor.
The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it
has to go to non-free. Is this a problem?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Desc
Hi Bart,
Bart Martens wrote:
>
> Where is the Debian package ?
>
The upstream sources of "blockade" are already in the official
repository. Maybe I can mail the new diff and *.deb files to you
(130 KB )? What would you suggest?
I have a question, anyway: The game is supposed to build and
work
Hi Leo,
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure:
>>
>> The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it
>> has to go to non-free.
>
> Then has to go to contrib. Or better, two packages, one in main (the f
Hi Stephane.
Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>
> See:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
>
A very helpful link.
Many thanx
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> so, I suppose that could be difficult to separate is as library with dynamic
> linking, etc
>
I think the real problem is mixing free and non-free sources in the same
*.orig.tar.gz.
What would be your recommendation to handle this
Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Get upstream to replace the non-free bits with free bits.
Upstream doesn't support this package anymore.
> Some free
> game resources are listed here:
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Games/Resources
>
The non-free part is not a wallpaper or some background
music, but
Paul Wise wrote:
>
> All too common unfortunately. In that case, I suggest a fork (since
> you can't hijack it). At least FreeBSD also includes blockade too BTW.
>
I found this version, too, even though I did not know that it is shipped
with FreeBSD. It is surely a different version. Especially
Neil Williams wrote:
>
> A dead upstream effectively requires that the Debian maintainer (you)
> become the upstream - are you ready to take on that task?
>
Lets say I am not completely unprepared, at least from the software
engineering side ;-). But I am not sure about the options I have to
rel
Hi folks,
To fix several bugs I would like to do an NMU for libkarma. Two weeks
ago I sent an EMail to the package maintainer asking for his permission,
but there was no response.
Two problems:
- I would need a sponsor to review and upload the new package.
- The NMU includes a new version from
On 10/10/09 08:02, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello Harald,
unless you are ready to take responsability for any breakage introduced by the
version change in this library, which basically means to hijack the package, I
strongly recommend against including the upstream update in the bug correction
tha
On 10/12/09 07:02, Charles Plessy wrote:
Fixing bugs is very welcome, especially RC ones. Actually, you can save time to
fix more RC bugs by not fixing the less important ones in the packages that you
try to rescue :) I still recommend to not include a new upstream release in the
NMU you are pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I found this in debian/control for libgl1-mesa-glx:
:
Conflicts: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
Replaces: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
Provides: libgl1
:
This looks weird to me. How can it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/10 13:37, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 05.12.2010 um 12:05 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
>
>> Doesn't this mean that no other
>> packages providing libgl1 can be installed,
>
> Not along libgl1-mesa-glx, yes. It&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I have updated blockade and put it on mentors. Do you think it would
be possible to forward it to the official repository?
Of course it is lintian-clean, but it would be very nice if someone
could take a look.
Many thanx
Harri
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
It would be very nice if somebody could volunteer to verify and
upload a new version of my package "blockade" into unstable (non-free).
I just brought it up-to-date wrt Debian policy and debhelper and
lintian. There were no bugs to fix.
R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Sorry, I missed the "RFS:" in my previous EMail.
I am looking for a sponsor for blockade. Its a sokoban-like
XWindow game. The game itself is public domain, but most of
the the levels included are not.
blockade is already in the official n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/11 04:12, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for blockade. Its a sokoban-like
>> XWindow game. The game itself is public domain, but most of
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
On 02/12/11 12:06, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> This is a topic I would like to bring up at the upcoming Debian games
> team meeting in March:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2011/02/msg9.html
>
I wouldn't like to postpone an u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I am running my own NVidia graphics package. Problem: After the most
recent upgrade of xorg the "${xviddriver:Provides}" macro in the
"Provides:" line expands to
xserver-xorg-video-
instead of
xserver-xorg-video-6.0
or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sven,
On 02/22/11 21:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Are you using xsfbs? If so, this is probably because the
> /usr/share/xserver-xorg/videoabiver file is gone.
>
>> instead of
>>
>> xserver-xorg-video-6.0
>> or
>> xserver-xorg-video-8.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sven,
On 02/22/11 23:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-22 23:08 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/11 21:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you using xsfbs? If so, this is probably because the
>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sven,
On 02/23/11 17:06, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-23 16:39 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I got confused myself. That should have read
> xserver-driver-video, not xserver-xorg-video.
>
Sorry, but this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sven,
On 02/23/11 20:24, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Do you think this is OK?
>
> Well, if you don't want to support xserver-xorg-core versions with a
> different ABI in the same binary package, then that's probably okay.
>
>> You can find my repos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I am trying to setup a pbuilder environment for mixed amd64 and i386.
Google pointed me to this page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto
Seems that Ubuntu provides the Debian keyring as well. According to this
page this makes Ub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/11 15:40, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> I have Ubuntu on my Laptop, but of course I would prefer to keep Debian
>> as the base platform for package development. What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
What is Debian's policy, if upstream provides its own debian directory
or package build procedure? Is upstream always right?
Does or should this source package become a "native" package? How do I
include patches?
What if upstream's package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/18/11 20:57, Harald Jenny wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 07:46:46PM +, The Fungi wrote:
>>
>> Not ignored at all... maintainers who find an upstream debian
>> directory getting in the way (and who are unable to successfully
>> convince upst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/18/11 21:13, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> The 3.0 format has a number of upsides and one downside: quilt. Sadly, the
> variants are only 3.0 (native) which doesn't apply and 3.0 (quilt). The
> latter interacts disastrously with keeping the packagi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bob,
On 03/19/11 03:35, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:18 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Of course that could be done for all packages. The disadvantage is that
>> these packages are not kept up-to-date
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I had sent this before, but there was no volunteer :-(.
Please don't feel offended if I try again.
I am looking for a sponsor for blockade. Its a sokoban-like
XWindow game. The game itself is public domain, but most of
the the levels includ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
I tried an NMU for autofs, but this failed for the binary package:
% dput mentors autofs_5.1.2-1.1_source.changes
/export/pbuilder/stretch-amd64/result/autofs_5.1.2-1.1_amd64.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: /home/harri/debian
Hi folks,
I am looking for a sponsor to upload a new version of
network-manager-strongswan 1.4.2-1.
Regards
Harri
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 10:26:52 +0100
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Harald Dunkel writes ("RFS: network-manager-strongswan 1.4.2-1"):
> > I am looking for a sponsor to upload a new version of
> > network-manager-strongswan 1.4.2-1.
>
> I'm willing. (Looking at m
Hi folks,
I would need a sponsor to fix lsb-base (#888743). The patch is trivial
(see the BR), but nevertheless this is a hot story, since every service
has this package on its dependency list.
Are there volunteers? Should this fix go to experimental first?
Regards
Harri
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi folks,
my previous sponsor became unresponsive, so I am looking for
a new sponsor for network-manager-strongswan. The source
package is on salsa.
Package name: network-manager-strongswan
Version : 1.5.2-1
Upstream Author :
Hi folks,
I am looking for a sponsor for network-manager-strongswan.
https://bugs.debian.org/964076
Regards
Harri
Hi folks,
I have a new version of mg ready to go, but I am concerned that
pushing it to Salsa might trigger an unwanted change to Bullseye
during code freeze. Does it?
Hope you don't mind asking. I am just careful.
Harri
--
[1] https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mg
[2] https://salsa.de
Hi folks,
I am looking for a sponsor to review the new mg package for Sid,
as it can be found on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg .
Its not tagged yet.
Thank you very much in advance
Harri
Hi folks,
I am looking for a sponsor to review the new mg package for Sid,
as it can be found on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg .
Its not tagged yet.
(I missed the RFS in the subject line, so this is a repost.)
Thank you very much in advance
Harri
On 2021-09-22 15:04:43, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Please refer to the mentors FAQ:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_get_a_sponsor_for_my_package.3F
Hilmar
The package is already in Debian, but the previous sponsor did not
reply to my EMail.
Regards
Harri
oad:
mg (20221112-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* new upstream version 20221112
-- Harald Dunkel Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:16:48 +0100
Thank you very much
Harri
Hi folks,
I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU to get rid of #767016.
Somebody with systemd experience would be welcome.
Regards
Harri
On 03/08/2016 12:12 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU to get rid of #767016.
> Somebody with systemd experience would be welcome.
>
PS: I posted a patch in the BTS.
Regards
Harri
50 matches
Mail list logo
