Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

Hi Lumin, the packaging now is really fine for me, I'm going to sponsor soonish. 1) I did a build&install of the package, and I can't make it work brew install cmake brew brew --help linuxbrew --help returns nothing 2) man brew doesn't work, man linuxbrew works 3) looking at the source,

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Daniel some issues I found: 1) please don't set architectures fields that way. Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way) leave any. When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted out), a s

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

Hi, >Oops...Sorry for that... >By mistake I introduced this bug into the wrapper script. >Patch [1] fixes this bug. And it was fixed in the freshly uploaded >mentor package. wonderful >Please note that, the linuxbrew installer will pull a manpage of brew >(as above /home/lumin/.linuxbrew/share

Re: Question about title

Hi, ITP is Intent To Package [1] PAPT is Python Applications Packaging Team [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ [2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=python-apps-team%40lists.alioth.debian.org cheers, G.

Re: Question about title

Hi >But, It`s tittle for sponsor request, is possible. > >"Subject: RFS: pacote [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] - Description." > >or I’am not right. > >only question for about this, for me doubt. > >Thanks very much. wnpp page explains it. ITP: a new package you want to introduce i

Bug#789699: vulture review

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or both. What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so maybe running pybuild --with python3, or providing two packages might be good. what do you think?

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

>with that symlink, both > > man $PACKAGE_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew-wrapper > man $WRAPPER_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew > >work. sure, I just got confused between linuxbrew and brew :) >Oops, that's a typo, in fact I mean the 'x' mode, not 'r'. >After all how can the ruby interpreter interpr

Bug#795771: RFS: dblatex/0.3.7-1

Hi Andreas, >I'm used to be very careful (you could also say: paranoid) regarding >publishing: never publish anything changed under the same release number >as before, even if it's only a release candidate on mentors. > >But as this seems to be overdone, I will merge the two changelog >sections

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

Hi Jeroen, >Thanks for the comments. I think I have fixed most or all issues you >mentioned. I uploaded a new version and there were no warnings this >time. However please let me know if anything is still wrong or missing. >Version now is 1.3.8-1. much, much better! still a warning in sour

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

Another little review: running wrap-and-sort might help you in spotting duplicated dependencies in the control file, and makes it look better. watch file has comments that needs to be stripped https://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template.html and please enable the

Bug#782074: RFS: ublock/0.9.5.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Matthew, quick review: 1) the license public-domain is in a non-english language. Can you please ask upstream to translate it? I'm not sure ftpmasters will enjoy it, neither I think licenses should be translated in some non english language (actually I don't think this c

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Jeroen, >I am not sure what I could (or should) change with regards to the >package to enable successful install of the whole xfce4 DE plus >dependencies, or the configuration of the xfce session for the login >manager. Wouldn't it be out of the scope of a panel plugin

Re: Forget to add pseudo-header when closing a bug

>Hi everyone, > >What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as > >Package: >Version: > >when closing a bug? >Should I manaully send something to cont...@bugs.debian.org to achieve >the same effect? >Any example would be helpful. Hi Alex, does this page [1] helps you? (hint: reass

Re: Forget to add pseudo-header when closing a bug

Hi again, >(hint: reassign) your "Package" mentioning confused me, I guess "fixed" is the correct hint. but RTFM is the more complete answer :) [1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control cheers! G.

Re: Looking for a mentor for the OpenSIPS project

Hi, I think you might want to fix the last two copyright issues I unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 1366 paragraph at line 53 I wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright cfg.tab.c (paragraph at line 53) cfg.tab.h (paragraph at line 53) (not blockers I guess, but nice to

Bug#786795: Review: dhcp-probe/1.3.0-11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: owner -1 ! Hi, let's review. please use the same tarball as the unstable version (orig tarball) dpkg-source: error: file /tmp/dhcp-probe_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz has size 214140 instead of expected 213279 1) changelog: do not remove the previ

Re: Looking for a mentor for the OpenSIPS project

Hi Julián, do you want to upload? Răzvan for the binaries false positive you can: 1) not care at all (they are pedantic) 2) add a lintian override for me both are good :) cheers, G.

Bug#795704: RFS: mlucas/14.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- program to perform Lucas-Lehmer test on a Mersenne number

Hi Alex, >What do you mean by not preferring the bootstrap script? I have >included the script in upstream's tarball, so that devs can >re-generate build scripts, man page and friends. Besides, according to >

Bug#788418: Review

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, the packaging looks good, unfortunately I can't sponsor right now because of: W debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols usr/lib/debug/.build-id/24/1f5b7a77afde9b121e3ff14f97151283c1ed14.debug X shlib-calls-exit it would be nice to address them :) t

Bug#782074: RFS: ublock/0.9.5.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

Hi Matthew, can you please contact the Debian Chromium maintainers and ask them? https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/chromium-browser.html cheers, G. Il Venerdì 28 Agosto 2015 15:39, Matthew Bekkema ha scritto: Thanks for the review! I contacted the upstream author of hufilter and it's now

Re: Transition question: "old binaries left on "

Hi Andreas, > old binaries left on : libgenome-1.3-0 (from 1.3.1-7) the problem was actually a cruft left because one rdep wasn't built. you can see it there https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt (I'm quoting, because on the next run it will be fixed, and ftpmaster will

Bug#792716: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.2-1 [ITP] -- command line encoder frontend for libfdk-aac

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Marius. some nitpicks: 1) please run a meld COPYING debian/copyright I see some differences that are MIT/Expat and some minor differences (like spaces and so on). Since upstream is using a machine readable copyright I suggest to keep it bit-

Bug#797407: RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien, lets review. 1) changelog, please set target to unstable and refresh the timestamp 2) rules: please remove the newlines after the dh call (oh here we are *really* nitpicking) well, the only issue is the changelog, please fix and I'll do some testing on a built

Re: Issues with neq package iqtree (use Debian packaged zlib in cmake build and others)

Hi Andreas Il Lunedì 31 Agosto 2015 15:57, Andreas Tille ha scritto: > >CMakeFiles/iqtree.dir/gzstream.cpp.o: In function `gzstreambuf::underflow()': >/tmp/buildd/iqtree-1.3.8+dfsg/gzstream.cpp:91: undefined reference to `gzread' >CMakeFiles/iqtree.dir/gzstream.cpp.o: In function `gzstreambuf::o

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Jose, 1) * New Maintainer.(Closes: #780195) and you didn't set youserls as maintainer? :) please fix 2) "debian/patched" please remove :) 3) d/rules: please use plain dh calls, it should be trivial dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog dh_installman d

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, 1) please remove everything from changelog. usually it is better to keep just an "initial ... Closes: #XXX" entry 2) Bonus points for using pybuild instead of distutils-extra :) 3) Bonus points for using install_requires: in setup.py inste

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Hi >more info about New Maintainer no, moreinfo means there are 6 points to be fixed, please remove the tag whenever you fixed all of them. >> and you didn't set youserls as maintainer? :) > >I set my names here? no, in the control file. >This package set RFA yes, but you need to be o

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Hi >The respective dsc file can be found at: >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-config/network-config_0.2-2.dsc I still don't like the rules file. I would appreciate a content like: #!/usr/bin/make -f # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. #export DH_VERBOSE=1 %: d

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Hi again, >The respective dsc file can be found at: >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/network-config/network-config_0.2-2.dsc -please remove debian/source/include-binaries, I guess they are a leftover of dpkg-source --commit -"debian/manpage/network-config.8" usually AFAICS th

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

>Sorry, for bother np >I don’t understand >Is to me install or no install . >Changeling of upstream ? look here https://sources.debian.net/src/network-config/0.2-1/debian/rules/ dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog so please provide a way to install it like it was before. (man dh_installchan

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

>look my debian/network-config/usr/share/doc/changelog.Debian.gz and change.gz >(upstream) and NEWS and README. override_dh_installchangelogs: dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog or whatever should do the trick (sorry I can't try, I'm on a hurry) but a file named debian/network-config.chan

Bug#797707: R: Bug#797707: RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Daniel, I admit I was waiting for this one :) I use subprocess a lot at work, and I admit I wasn't aware of the new python 3 implementation. I think this will be a great addition to Debian! I'll review the package shortly (in a few hours), as soon as I reach a pc :) ho

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Hi James >This was all done by upstream's packaging, which I used as a base. >Credits to Peter Levi :) I don't see it http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~peterlevi/variety/trunk/view/head:/setup.py am I looking in the correct place? I'm talking about this https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/r

Re: Bug#796917: snappy1.0.3-java: dependency on libsnappy1

Hi Andreas, > libsnappy1 is being replaced by libsnappy1v5. > Your arch:all package has >a hardcoded dependency on the former (how does that even work?).> > >Before I simply add a hardcoded libsnappy1v5 I would like to ask for >comments whether there is some better way to solve this. Well, I'

Bug#787396: Review for mupen64plus

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sergio, I reviewed the package, and you have already fixed many of the issues in the mentors comments, I have only one minor nitpick: why is Priority: extra? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html does the package conflicts with other packages? build is

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Control: owner -1 ! Hi again Sergio, first a question: what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org review based on mentors lintian: 1) please fix the copyright file 2) please fix the watch file (ask upstr

Re: Help on game packaging for non-free repository

Hi Carlos: > >http://archive.ubuntugames.org/dists/ubuntugames> lets look at them: fizzball osmose rune runescape sorrwakfu they need an ITP and to be uploaded on mentors with an RFS bug https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ mentors.debian.net for snes9x seems that somebody is already working o

Bug#797766: RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi David, where is the packaging? Please upload it somewhere with a dsc file. thanks G. Il Mercoledì 2 Settembre 2015 14:03, David TV ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor fo

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Edward, The packaging LGTM, however I have some nitpicks for you: 1) d/rules: please do not override dh_install and call dh_auto_install, unless you have a good reason to do that (I guess this is an error, you don't want to call it twice) dh_installdocs: please consider

Bug#797794: RFS: gnss-sdr/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

Hi Iain, I see you commented on mentors " debian/control: Vcs-Browser field should point to http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-hamradio/gnss-sdr.git (note the "c" in front of the git/ so it points to the browser not the repo) debian/changelog: please run "dch -r" to update the changelog distri

Bug#797794: R: Bug#797794: gnss-sdr

no need to be sorry, thanks for caring about the package and the group! :) (and plese remember to subscribe debian-mentors if you arent already) thanks for your work! G. -- Il mer 2 set 2015 18:16 CEST, Iain R. Learmonth ha scritto: >Control: owner -1 ! > >Hi, >

Bug#797864: RFS: eclipse-titan/5.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, I don't think I'll sponsor this package, if you really care you might want to get in touch with the pkg-java-maintainers list, and get help there. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Anyway, something you need to fix: 1) open an itp bug 2

Bug#797885:

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Bastien I don't think using a fakeupstream in watch file is useful, can you please try to use github instead? the rest looks good. (maybe you want to remove lines in the rules file, but not a problem) cheers, G.

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, 1) can you please address the lintian issues about description duplicated? 2) bugs.debian.org/597172 you need to set yourself as owner, and ask sven if he still want to comaintain (and retitle to ITP) 3) d/docs is empty 4) d/copyright, you might wa

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin, Can you please start by fixing the lintian warnings on mentors page? thanks :) G.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi, control: libboost-all-dev (>= 1.55) | libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55), what is the rationale for that? I guess libboost-all-dev is already enough... Multi-Arch: no isn't that the default? "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" this should be useless rules: --builddirectory= can be passe

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Hi James, >Uhhh, I don't see it either. Upstream uses distutils, and I've never >changed the setup.py myself when I packaged it. you might want to ask them to change :) >Noted. uscan is called with a bunch of arguments in get-orig-source to >comply with policy, so I assume they do something

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Hi Henrique, Do you think we should rename it? I can upload a new version on ftpmaster with changelog and control renamed. the python package has the correct name, and the source name is the pypi one... cheers, G. Il Giovedì 3 Settembre 2015 20:12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ha scritto

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

21:51, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ha scritto: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Henrique, > > Do you think we should rename it? Yes, otherwise I would not have suggested it :-) -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Hi, the reject has been performed, I'll reupload as soon as I get a confirmation email. thanks for the feedback! cheers, G.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin >Reduced one. wonderful >Stripped all Multi-Arch: no in d/control. wonderful > >Then, how about splitting those custom target into another file? > >e.g. debian/custom >$ debian/custom cpu >$ debian/custom cuda if they aren't called by standard dh calls it is fine to keep them

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi again, The package doesn't build in a clean environment. http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe/0.~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1/buildlog cheers, G.

Re: help

Hi, /usr/bin/ld: src/Daemon/usbguard_daemon-Daemon.o: undefined reference to symbol 'qb_ipcs_create' //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libqb.so.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line I think you need to add the library providing that symbol. Accoding to codesearch.debian.net http:/

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

Hi Bhuvan the packaging looks good to me, however I have some issues that you might want to address: 1) override_dh_install: dh_install well, this is funny and useless :) 2) no watch file is usually bad... please add one if possible 3) DH_VERBOSE in the rules file might be disabled, not an

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin, >I will keep those custom target in the bottom of d/rules. >Yes, all of custom-target-related lines had been already >clustered at the bottom of d/rules, and I have drew a big >split line at the beginning of them, in the updated version. wonderful! > >The custom stuff is explaine

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1

Hi, >2) Tried to set myself as owner, but I'm unsure if that was correct - I >guess not. bugs.debian.org is a bit tricky imho. (it should be fixed now, right?) >5) I did apply for membership something like a week ago, but nothing >hapenned yet. But I really think working together with the pkg

Bug#798186: RFS: node-punycode/1.3.2+git702cc2da-1 ITP

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Bastien review: 1) "As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities"; this still appli

Bug#798215: RFS: node-typedarray/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Ross, 1) control: "priority: extra" as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you have good reason to have extra https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities 2) "In order to run the tests pr

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, quick review: 1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set. I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure if a bug in lintian or something else... 2) d/rules: please use the new dh format, it should be trivial to convert. 3) d/control: do you really need autoconf as b-d?

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, quick review: 1) watch file does not work, please use something like this url https://github.com/ktap/ktap/releases 2) control: linux-headers-amd64 | linux-headers, why? e.g. on i386 The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-ktap-dummy

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, >Yes, you are right, dh-autoreconf is enough. so please drop the other one :) >Hm, according to lintian(1): > "For binary packages, Lintian looks for overrides in a file named > usr/share/lintian/overrides/ inside the binary package, where > is the name of the binary package." >

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi again, >Hm, so if I will replace all targets with dh_*_auto, and will add >override_* for them when required, this will not work for rules.d since >it will call the same again and again, no? Or do you suggesting get rid >off that rules.d stuff? yes, or merge them in the main rules file :)

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, well something has been buried by my MUA. There is a new upstream release, can you please update it? BTW there is a problem in versioning: -2.dfsg is bad, because it seems only Debian revision, while -2 is upstream and dfsg is Debian. please use two "-" but I'm not sure if it works or not.

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

(please also address issues from other emails) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/cunit_2.1-3-dfsg1.dsc quoting changelog: + * Bump to 2.1-3 + * Fix versions I see two patches dropped and the watch file updated (diff between this version and your previous one, not complete

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Another issue you should address: I duplicate-long-description libcunit1-dev libcunit1 libcunit1-ncurses-dev libcunit1-ncurses libcunit1-doc (you might append something like "this is the development package" "this is the common documentation" or so) feel free to steal from python-pyqtgraph or

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>You are correct, there is no need in "linux-headers-amd64", however there >is second option just "linux-headers", and I don't understand why it >doesn't work for you. it does work for *me*, it doesn't for buildd system. IIRC they are configured to pick only the first version... >Anyway I dropp

Bug#786795: dhcp-probe review

Hi Laurent, I'm pinging you because I think you missed my review on #786795 Let me know if you intend to address the issue I raised here :) cheers, G.

Bug#796030: tablesnap

Hi Jeremy, did you have time to look at my last review? let me know if you need help cheers, G.

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sergio, did you have time to look to my package review? cheers, G.

Bug#797766: pac is not really ready yet

Control: noowner -1 Since for now pac has an autogenerated Debian directory I guess it isn't ready for inclusion. Feel free to ping me as soon as you have a debian packaging, and I'll reassing myself back to this task. cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte ping

Hi Sergio, did you had time to look at the gambatte review? cheers, G.

Bug#788418: nfft

Hi Ghislain, with the gcc-5 transition almost done, how do you feel about looking at the nfft review? cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi, >You are correct, I've put debian/ktap.manpages statically. wonderful >s/dh_installmanpages/dh_installman/ yes, sure maybe something like override_dh_installman: help2man --no-discard-stderr -h-h --version-string $(VERSION) -n "$(DESCRIPTION)" ./ktap > debian/ktap.1 dh_instal

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Fabiano, +++ alien-8.95/alien.spec 2015-09-09 02:28:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Summary: Install Debian, Slackware, and Stampede packages with rpm. Name: alien Packager: Joey Hess -Version: 8.93 +Version: 8.95 Release: 1 -Source: ft

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>Hm, there is linux-headers package, why build bot can't install it? >vms? don't know, it doesn't install in a clean sid environment. maybe you want to deal with the module with some runtime build, like it is done with virtualbox-dkms package otherwise you need to force the module rebuild

Bug#789699: ping :)

ry()" ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax is it normal? cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 9 Settembre 2015 10:44, Daniel Stender ha scritto: On 09.09.2015 08:55, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 09.09.2015 08:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Hi, Ping about 789699 (vulture) >> &g

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, I'm referring to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792144#54 and (sorry for that I forgot to send the mail) to the need to mark the package as multiarch where needed https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation also, please rebase the changelog into one entry. (I mean,

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

>Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >realized it just now, >by testing is again in a new directory. Is there a way I could do the >QA work without changing >the tarball version? I guess this is because the package is native >Having two separate patches to

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi Azat, >dkms is good idea, thanks! (I was skeptic about linux-headers at the >very beginning). >Converted and uploaded to mentors. for sure the package is good now, there is still however a problem http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/ktap/0.4-1/buildlog it fails to bui

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Hi Sérgio, >> what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? > >What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my packages? just join the Games Team, set it as uploader or maintainer and live happy. I guess all the packages that are games should live under that pkg-games

Re: RFS: ranger/1.7.1-1 (new upstream release)

Hi, Built&Signed&Uploaded, the package is in a really good shape :) Just a nitpick, you might want to mention copyright changes in the changelog (this wasn't a showstopper since the license didn't change, the changes were minimal) keep up the good work! cheers, G.

Bug#798507: RFS: node-wrench -- Recursive filesystem (and other) operations for Node.js

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, just set the priority to optional in the control file and we should be good. cheers, G.

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Hi, you can just dput again, it will override the previous upload! cheers G. -- Il ven 11 set 2015 01:05 CEST, Fabiano Antunes ha scritto: >Hi Gianfranco, >> Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >> realized it just now, >> >> I gues

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Built&Signed&Uploaded, I tested and the package was looking good. Thanks for your contribution to Debian, I hope you will (as you said on irc) consider contributing more in this nice package! cheers, G.

Bug#798655: RFS: node-text-encoding/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- Polyfill for the Encoding Living Standard's API

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien some issues: 1) copyright: please mention the apache documentation without the link (e.g. hedgewars/copyright package has a 14 lines version) 2) examples.html examples-no-indexes.html what about installing them? 3) bower.json what does this file do? thanks

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? I can't see you https://alioth.debian.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=30862 this seems to be the last showstopper for me to upload, the package looks good. cheers, G.

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Geoff, lets review: 1) you dropped 0.10.0-2 entry from changelog 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly 3) bump compat level not mentioned in changelog 4) according to setup.py install_requires=['python-musicpd>=0.4.1', 'requests>= 2.0.2'], so I guess there is no need to s

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi, please open an RFS bug if you need a sponsor. Handling requests from debian-mentors mail list is not easy. cheers, Gianfranco Il Domenica 13 Settembre 2015 16:37, マイリノデイヴィッド ha scritto: Hello ChangZhuo, Thank you for the quick reply! I will make those corrections, and send the re

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi ChangZhuo, I didn't find any more copyright issue in the package. Actually I can ask ftpmasters to reject, but I looked at the RFS log, and every copyright issue seemed fixed to me. did I miss anything important? cheers, G.

Bug#798976: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, please change the changelog: the bugs are not fixed by Debian packaging, but from upstream new release. I would change it that way + * New upstream release + - Fix Multiplication of IPv6 addresses for upstream (Closes: #791582) + - Fix dhcpcd doesn't configure ch

Bug#799022: RFS: mgba/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Game Boy Advance emulator

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sérgio, 1) changelog: please do not mention "Bug" (nitpick) 2) sed 's/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/g well, using -DLIBDIR= in cmake configure will simplify a lot this stuff I guess. look e.g. http://codesearch.debian.net/results/-DLIBDIR%3D%20path%3A%2Frule

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

Hi Daniel, (please upload on mentors.debian.net next time) 1) changelog: you need to open an ITP bug and set the target distribution to unstable. 2) control: std-version should be 3.9.6 3) copyright should be in dep5 format https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ an

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Hi Geoff >>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly >I don't get what you mean. exactly what I wrote :) dget -x http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.10.0-2.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.13.1-1.dsc debdiff mpd-sima_0.10.0

Re: RFS: eviacam

Hi Cesar, please open an RFS bug and fix the lintian stuff shown on mentors.d.o page. + Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level – Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution – Watch file is not present after that I'll have a look at it. cheers, G. Il Mer

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

entors the new package. Thanks for your reviews :) Cheers, Geoff Le 16/09/2015 11:09, Geoff a écrit : > Alright, got it. > > I'll fix this and revert target to experimental. > Thanks for spotting that > > I'll update/uppload the package to mentor tonight (UTC+01:00) >

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

: I'm there now, could you upload ? :) Sergio Benjamim On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? > > I can't see you > https://alioth.debian.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=30862 >

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

BTW I guess many people would agree about merging the qt code into the main mupen64plus package :) cheers, G. Il Giovedì 17 Settembre 2015 9:46, Gianfranco Costamagna ha scritto: Well, I spotted another issue :( sorry for that Copyright (c) 2013, Dan Hasting seems this guy isn&#

Re: RFS: eviacam

s, > Alex > > 2015-09-17 3:38 GMT+08:00, Cesar Mauri : >> Hi Gianfranco (and all), >> >> I just filled a RFS bug [1]. Package seems know to be lintian clean (version >> 2.0.1-5). >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799205 >> >

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? P unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ (sorry, due to lack of time I can't review it properly now) cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 16 Settembre 2015 20:57, Cesar Mauri ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity:

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

ng-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Regards, Cesar El 17/09/2015 a las 17:16, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? > P unversioned-copyright-format-uri > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > > (sorry, due to lack of time I can't revi

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >