Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects"
thanks!
G.
control: owner -1 luci...@debian.org
> I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
thanks!
G.
>Seems you used git. I did forgot to push, sorry. Now last version is published
>both on mentors and in git
>(https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/bcron.git)
I used also mentors, and it is still outdated>Nobody should use dh-text. With
recent dpkg-dev, which provide S:foo
>substi
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acorn/acorn_4.0.3-1.dsc
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/acorn/4.0.3-1/buildlog
FTBFS
>(2) upstream moved forward very fast and uses rollup to compile itself,
>but we don't have
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
(resending from the correct email)
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acorn/acorn_4.0.3-1.dsc
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/acorn/4.0.3-1/buildlog
FTBFS
>(2) upstream moved forward very fast and uses rollup
Hi
>(autoconf specific copyrights)
they have special exceptions to be relicensed under another license.
So, if you don't account them specifically they will fall in the common
package license.
Somebody just don't care about them (I don't think it is source of reject by
ftpmasters).
I think ment
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
(resending to the open RFS bug)
Hi,
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/php-db-dataobject
fix lintian and remove moreinfo tag
(everything except gpg signature should be fixed or answered)
also piuparts is not happy (look the php parts)
http://deboma
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-net-idna2"
can you please enlighten me about the lintian warnings?
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/php-net-idna2/0.1.1-1/lintian
I would like to know them before sponsoring :)
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I still see the lintian error, and also the piuparts error
E php-script-but-no-phpX-cli-dep
usr/share/php/DB/DataObject/createTables.php
please remove moreinfo tag with an explanation :)
G.
Hi,
>I haven't received an answer to the following query. I'd appreciate if
>someone could help me decide whether I need to patch in upstream's
>missing SONAME bump or not.
the package is new, it has never been part of any Debian stable release,
and popcon reports a number ~10.
The answer is
Hi, still bad
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/acorn/4.0.3-1/buildlog
>It's strange : amd64 is precisely what I have here, so if my pbuilder
>was happy... why isn't debomatic?
not sure... different environment? some exports that aren't working?
HOME set to /nonexistent?
di
Hi,
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.44+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
>failed
usually this is not needed, since I presume you will do a diff between the
current version
in unstable and the one on mentors
pull-debian-source openldap
dget -u mentors-url.dsc
debdiff of them
Hi,
>I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
>the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
maintaining symbols on C++ projects is a nightmare.
and do subsequent uploads is done also by qt* folks
(see e.g. qtbase uploads).
You can consider however some things, e.g. marking
some
Hi, I'm sponsoring in deferred/5 to let the current one migrate
I'm also not really sure about the move from contrib to main, because one
(alternate)
runtime dependency is in contrib
quoting control file:
Depends: libdbd-mysql-perl | libdbd-oracle-perl,
$ rmadison -u debian libdbd-mysql-perl
reopen 846546
tags 846546 moreinfo
owner 846546 !
thanks
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
sorry for stepping in so late, I would just like to add a copyright :)
./src/flow.cc: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat (TCP No delay)
./src/flowtrafficspec.cc: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat (TCP No
delay)
./src/flowtrafficspec.h: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat (T
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go":
>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176).
I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer, but here something I'm
worried
about:
what is the reason for the
Hi,
>Bug#839383: RFS: php-net-idna2/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
in new queue
>Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for
>object based SQL query building
in testing :)
Will probably look at gnu-social once the new queue is cleared.
G.
Hi Adam,
>In light of the recently announced forced 10-day migration delay after
>Dec 5 and the soft freeze on Jan 5, I would like to move forward with
>the proposed changes so the package is in shape for stretch.
>
>Adam, I do not wish to take over poppassd. If you could sponsor one
>or two upl
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer"
sigh:
Binary files
/tmp/B972iVgMET/engauge-digitizer-9.3/dev/windows/appveyor/fftw-3.3.5-dll32.zip
and
/tmp/TUNKzqq_Ua/engauge-digitizer-9.7/dev/windows/appveyor/fftw-3.3.5-dll32.z
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
missing copyrights:
Roman Arutyunyan
Ruslan Ermilov
Maxim Dounin
Valentin V. Bartenev
Unbit S.a.s. 2009-2010
Vlad Krasnov
Sergey A. Osokin
Austin Appleby
Manlio Perillo
Scott James Remnant
2012-201
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush":
>
>+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
>+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
file?
G.
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge":
*happily* sponsored :)
G.
Hi,
>I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging.
>But I really want to contribute to this great project !
thanks for your interest :)
>It does not seems really easy to start with it but I think I have found a
>package which seems not to big, can be fun for me to m
Hi Dmitry,
>I believe that should be fairly obvious that we repack to drop all bundled
>dependencies. That's Golang for you where it is common to incorporate all
>dependency libraries into tarball. Throwing away private copies of those
>libraries is important to avoid using 'em accidentally,
Hi again :)
>
>I think "ds" is quite confusing let alone that it matches my initials. ;)
lol
>IMHO DFSG-repacking fits all cases even when we throw away useless files to
>avoid documenting their copyrights. Often you just don't know whether
>excluded content is DFSG compliant or not. And sinc
Hi
>> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
>> file?
>
>
>Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go,
>since gpgv only handles keyrings, not armoured keyfiles.
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Cryptographic_signature_ver
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>I consider git revision 4ba937fbc958fb5037e65fe351d18f2da8e0b988 ready
>for upload.
>
>Thank you for your patience, Kiwamu.
tarball?
verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d
gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
gbp:err
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freedroidrpg"
Hi,
>I may need some help to go further.
>For now I've managed to:
>- Build xmacro in Jessy
s/Jessy/Jessie :)
>- Reproduce the gcc-6 FTBFS in stretch
wonderful
>- Applied the patch with quilt and made it compile on stretch
>(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831195)
you need
Hi,
>There is no problem to fetch the key. The problem is to use it. My present
>use case is this
>
> gpgv --homedir debian/upstream --keyring debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp \
>archive.sig archive
>
>You are requesting me to use 'debian/upstream/signing-key.asc', an armoured key
>which gpg
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"
hopefully somebody from your team will pick it up, but
I already trust you enough to sponsor this package
compat level is 10 now (debhelper >=10)
but something I really would like is to
control: reopen -1
control: owner -1 sba...@debian.org
Hi,
>@Gianfranco, you want to sponsor/upload this package? Or I'll manage this?
please go ahead! :)
thanks in advance and welcome!
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> * Add dietlibc-dev into Built-Using, since it is linked statically,
>as mandated by Policy §7.8. (Closes: #847576)
I'm not sure about hardcoding the version, this will probably break binNMUs...
what about calculating that at build time?
http
control: reopen -1
>Package python-cartopy has been removed from mentors.
lets wait a little more
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>manpages-zh - Chinese manual pages
lets see, even if I don't speak such language, changes seems about
packaging:
d/compat <-- still "9"
this is why you didn't drop "--with autoreconf" from rules file, right?
(please drop it)
debian/copyrigh
Hello,
>Files: interval_tree.c interval_tree_generic.h
>Copyright: 2012 Michel Lespinasse
>License: GPL-2
>
>which then below lists GPL-2 license with address: Free Software
>Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
>02110-1301, USA.
>However I can see that in interval_tree
Hi Tobias,
>-- CFLAGS += `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS` looks wrong
this is done sometimes to make cmake aware of CPPFLAGS [1]
this package however uses autotools, and I don't know about it :)
[1] https://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12928
G.
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc"
> * Add debian/libdmalloc5.symbols file.
> * Update debian/libdmalloc5.shlibs file.
seems that the symbols file needs some tweaks :)
G.
Hi
> * New upstream release
close 848638
thanks
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
> * Remove autotools-dev dependency due to using dh-autoreconf
what about bumping compat/debhelper level to 10, remove autoreconf from
rules/control
file?
G.
Hi,
>Are you OK with the package in the current form? Could you sponsor it? The
>sooner it hits sid, the sooner I can submit a RFS for restic.
it went in sid :)
thanks Dmitry!
G.
Hi Tobias,>Can be done the next time :)
>Uploaded!
thanks! :)
and happy ;)
G.
Hi
>>what about bumping compat/debhelper level to 10, remove autoreconf from
>>rules/control
>That's causing the build to fail for some reason. I'll look into it.
>
a quick look seems to show a progress when removing debian/autoreconf file.
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstabl
>
>
>I did a source upload of r-cran-treescape at 2016-12-19 21:51:35.
>
>When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures
>a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is
>not build after > 36 hours.
clicking on "logs" shows a lot of failed att
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'd appreciate it if a friendly DD could have a look at this
>package and sponsor it. Thanks. :)
1) chmod a-x debian/ondir/usr/share/ondir/integration/*
why no dh_fixperms override?
2)
CFLAGS_FOR_MAKEFILE=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) $
Hello Petter,
> Debian is upstream.
>
oops, I read this email after sponsoring it in deferred/3.
I discovered that -O1 made the program stop crashing, so I sponsored the
debdiff with that change
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533688#45
the freeze is approaching, and a package
Hello
>I completely missed that part of the sentence, sorry. Any
>particular reason why you prefer it that way? (To me it seems
>logical the other way around, since the preprocessor is run
>before the compiler. But OTOH I don't really care, so had I
>not missed the sentence, I would have changed
Hello
>Ok Ben. I've just reported this bug. Thanks!
I think you can use dput-ng in the meanwhile, I find it
superior for my needs :)
(I don't want/care about a new flame war, I used dput for a while,
and then switched to dput-ng after some issues I encountered that
I can't recall now)
G.
package had target suite "unstable", dput-ng refuses to upload in a
ppa if the target
suite is Debian like
fourth issue:
dcut seems to work differently
dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 15 -f
virtualbox-guest-additions-iso_4.3.36-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
D: dcut 0.2.1
D: trying to get m
Hello,
>I found one more issue...
>
>- /usr/share/xtrkcad/{logo.bmp, html, examples, demo} should be in
>/usr/share/doc/xtrkcad
did you also merge the debian improvements from Mike?
G.
Hello
>>I wonder whether you want to upload this version of h5py to unstable
>>(rather than to experimental) since this seems to be a transition
>>and we are in transition freeze.
>>
>
>What do you mean by transition ? h5py has no abi and the changelog does not
>mention any API breakage. Unless y
Hello,
>Oh, I see what you are referring to. I am afraid I have not, and I am
>putting my faith on upstream staying as conservative as they have been
>with their releases since version 2.4.
>
>I reckon a transition has never been needed for h5py since I took over
>its maintenance, and I am crossi
Hi,
>I'm thinking how to make the Build-Depends fits both sid/stretch and
>jessie-backports.
>Whether the following is good enough? or appending the version is better?
>
>Build-Depends: asciidoc-base | asciidoc
backporting asciidoc should be the right solution here
(or reverting the change for
Hi,
>The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth
>it so no.
you can still clone/reassign/retitle this bug to make it an ITP :)
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:29:04 -0500 Doug Torrance wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 01/09/2017 06:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > to my understanding manual-031.pdf will be considered as "binary without
> > source" and thus rejected by ftpmaster. The best way to solve this
> >
control: tags -1 moreinfo
># debian/copyright and contradicting licensing.
this is worth a moreinfo tag, please remove once
the copyright (and other) issues are solved!
G.
control: tags -1 patch
>It's not useful for me to spare the maintainer(s) the work? 😐 I figured if I
>could do the footwork and let the maintainer just review and approve the
>patch, they >would be happy.
you already opened a bug, provided a patch and I'm tagging this bug accordingly.
The main
Hello,
>-export PYBUILD_AFTER_BUILD_python3=2to3 -n -w {build_dir}/pynzb/; sed -i -e
>'s/StringIO/BytesIO/g' -e 's/BytesIO(xml)/BytesIO(bytes(xml,"utf-8"))/'
>{build_dir}/pynzb/lxml_nzb.py
>+export PYBUILD_AFTER_BUILD_python3=2to3-{version} -n -w {build_dir}/pynzb/;
>sed
>-i -e 's/StringIO/B
Hi Taylor,
>So if I'm getting this correctly, only providing the output of nmudiff is
>enough, without needing to upload anything?
yep, also finding a sponsor or waiting for a maintainer upload, but in this case
the patch is enough I think :)
G.
Hello,
>https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt OTOH says:
>
>trying: sunpy
>skipped: sunpy (0, 0, 255)
>got: 36+0: a-3:i-23:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-7:m-0:p-0:s-3
>* s390x: python-sunpy, python3-sunpy
this usually means (if I'm correct) that the new sunpy makes python-sunpy
Hello,
>Would it be possible to do a 2.7.1-6 version of the package in unstable
>with the patches from Zesty so that we have this improvement in stretch,
>even if 2.7.3 is available ? Or do I need to have to upgrade to the very
>latest version available that is 2.7.3 ?
this is up to you, a -6 h
Hello,
>ppc64-diag (2.7.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Import patch set from Mauricio Faria de Oliveira to support Marvell HDD
>LEDs on S822LC for HPC (LP: #1650596) and commited in Ubuntu Zesty by Steve
>Langasek (2.7.1-5ubuntu1)
>
>-- Frédéric Bonnard Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:36:03
Hello
>Version : 1.0.0-2~rc2
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/t/telegram-desktop/telegram-desktop_1.0.0-2~rc2.dsc
I see tag for 1.0.1 pushed on github [1]
Isn't it a good release? I didn't look at the code, but instead of an rc, I
would prefer a stable
1.0.1 (even
Hello
>This is alpha version. It is not in upstream changelog on [1].
something I wondered too, maybe tagging it differently from official releases
might help
>To be noted upstream author does not always publish the tags in time.
>
>P.S.: I don't know how to put this remote changelog into the p
Hello Nico,
>I'm co-maintaining the Trilinos package [1] in Debian and recently found a
>bunch of new lintian warnings of the kind binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath [2].
>It say in >the description of the warning:
Usually lintian is right on such tags :p
You can look at src:ettercap, where I hav
Hello
>This makes me angry and disappointed. I reported
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841445 many months ago and
>posted "ping replies" and nothing was done to resolve it - either by the
>maintainer, who was missing-in-action and not for the first time - or by a
>different De
hello,
>> However I think the .dist files
>> should be installed in /usr/share and copied from there instead of being
>> installed in /etc.
>
>This is of course the Right Thing to do. Will implement, thanks!
This is nice, however I think this "workaround" should be dropped post-Stretch
releas
Hi,
>OK, I see your point.
>
>In my usual, provocative style: To me, this means that the bug should be
>closed without further actions unless there is more input.
or change to usr/share, that seems a saner approach.
Your call, I don't have an opinion here!
G.
Hello Shlomi, you need to make the package build against sid in less than one
day.:q
vi
I did the changes and I'm attaching them here, lots of conflicts between
fcs_enums.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_enums.h
fcs_dllexport.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_dllexport.h
(I'm removing t
Hello,
>I am on it :)
not sure, I probably uploaded it before you?
G:
control: close -1
On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:01:43 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> tags 839289 moreinfo
> thanks
>
Please fix for a future upload, I sponsored this one
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: forcemerge 853903 852415
Hello
lets see a preliminary review:
1) one single changelog entry, targeting sid and initial release (Closes: #ITP)
2) debian/rules, lots of comented out noise, please remove
3) copyright not in dep-5 format, and s
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
missing licenses, e.g.
bglibs-2.03+dfsg/include/md4.h
md5.h
why not a single plain libbg-dev? soname in the development package is painful
to maintain
Gianfranco
control: close -1
hello,
>That's not a valid reason to remove a package from the archive. Also, you
>are still requesting to remove only armel and armhf.
exactly
arm binaries have already been removed, the package will migrate now that I
lowered
the RC bug importance.
BTW fixing arm should
Hi,
>You are expected to set that bit on the file and commit it. Gitlab has
>nothing to do with this.
stuff like github now allows to modify files and commit them from the web
interface
(without having to checkout the repo).
I'm not sure about gitlab interface, but I don't think you can chmod
Hi,>Yes, but those docs didn't provide info detailed enough for me to start.
>Probably I too much rely on the high level tools, and lack of ability
>to use plumbing level tools such as dpkg-*.
a low-level manual is something nice to have...
I propose some additions for non-new packages:
"dget -
Hi,
>> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies>
>I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already
>exists in archive.
when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dependency list.
(IIRC this is a feature since apt 1.0 or 1.1)
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer"
not in the middle of a freeze, unless this release fixes
serious issues.
Please go for experimental in case
G.
Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ranger"
it is an NMU procedure to open a bug and post a debdiff...
doing the debdiff attach to this email, and uploading in deferred/15
please follow the rules next time, thanks
G.
debdiff
Description: Binary data
control: close -1
closing
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>Done. Experimental version uploaded to mentors.
missing copyrights, outdated copyright years
Ori Rejwan
+ * Copyright (c) 2004-2013 Sergey Lyubka
+ * Copyright (c) 2013-2015 Cesanta Software Limited
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Cesanta Software Limited
Eike Hein
Christi
Hello,
>W: ntfsundelete-tree source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.0
>(current is 3.9.4)
(this really depends on lintian version you are using, don't blindly trust it!)
>Independently of what Lintian says, how can I detect Standards-Version
>used in any Debian-like OS?
https://tracker.debi
Hello, I tried to debug this issue, but I didn't find anything useful
http://bugs.debian.org/855166
the failure doesn't happen on local pbuilder sid i386 environment, neither
on DebOMatic sid i386 environment (it should be really close to the one
used on buildd).
But I can reproduce it on barri
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>But, if I am able to adopt this package, then I would move this under
>debian's collab-maint project.
where did the current maintainer orphaned the package?
did he acked the changes to add you on uploaders list?
He is a dm, why can't he sponsor it?
Hi
>Jordan contacted me a few days ago, I gave him complete
>permission to adopt the package, as I've been for all intent and
>purposes, fallen MIA
thanks!
>While I am a DM, I haven't been
>active in the Debian community for something like two years (nor have I
>been using Debian). Thus, I d
control: owner -1 j...@debian.org
>Feel free to contact me for sponsorship as I'm an alot user and
>also>fixed/filed a couple of bugs together with upstream. I'm thus very
>interested
>in keeping this package in Debian.
well, I leave you the sponsoring then :D
thanks!
G.
Hi Paul
>It is far better to just remove build dates, they are very pointless.
might be true, but somebody still wants them, and removing them can be painful
to maintain on (some) graphical applications.
>That isn't necessary because Debian has implemented
>SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:>https://reprodu
Hi
>Thanks! Let me know if you'd like any additional changes made.
I'll let Josh doing the final checks and upload
(note: I didn't check your changes, but based on your reply
I think we are good!)
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
hello Marcelo,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "htp"
sadly we are on freeze, I can sponsor on experimental with two little changes:
added a newline before your signature on changelog file (line 23)
changed unstable/experimental
I'm wor
mmands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/)
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: "Gianfranco Costamagna "
4096-bit RSA key, ID 4E9F5DD9, created 2014-09-14
Uploading locutus-1487701064.commands to ftp-master
ping again when ready then
Hi Eriberto
>I am not a specialist but it seems a temporary problem. Today I did a
>test over barriere and pyrit is building fine. I suggest a new test
>over barriere and a new upload to unstable.
>
>I have a special interest over this package because forensics-extra
>depends of it.
how did yo
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker"
I can sponsor it if you get
1) an unblock bug approved
or
2) a targeted fixes for the RC bug.
I admit, the new release is mostly a "fix manpage, merge debian patches, fix rc
bug, release"
Hi,
>mv: cannot stat 'jellyfish.so.0.0.0U': No such file or directory
>I vaguely suspect that this might be connected to the latest perl
>upgrade but I have never seen things like this. I can confirm that
>in the build chroot there is
>
>root@sputnik:/build/jellyfish-2.2.6# find . -name "jellyf
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> So it means even after fixing the FTBFS, it cannot go back to testing again?
> Yes, until the stretch release.
lets have a look:
1) did you forward the patch upstream?
2) why are you disabling tests?
3) is the package still maintained?
Disabling
control: close -1
control: close 856495
control: close 856494
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package restic, patat, khard
all done,
and DM granted.
Please, please, ask before uploading in case of doubts, and try to avoid
binary uploads whenever possible :)
G.
Hi
>OK, I'll do that. It would be great to have an >automated way to do RFSes...
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841270
> gbp-dh". Sorry about it...
I got this by looking at git log :)
G.
Hi,
>> 1) one single changelog entry, targeting sid and initial release
>> (Closes: #ITP)
> 1) Exact, targeting sid only by now.
"please use "unstable" as target suite, not "sid", and use -1 revision
until it gets sponsored (dput -f, mentors won't complain)
>> 8) does not build twice in a ro
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
https://mentors.debian.net/my
G.
401 - 500 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo
