Re: problem with hard links?

2009-06-27 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Jay : Hi, Hi. I'm trying to create a Debian package, for the first time. It is for a compiler, so a source-based package is not practical -- you have to either already have the binaries or do a cross build from a system that does. (We could possibly put together a "source" package compo

Re: Bug#534866: ITP: kernelcheck -- tool for an automated build of a kernel from the latest source

2009-06-28 Thread George Danchev
Hi, > Hello Steven, > please keep the recipients list, replying in public so this discussion > can interest also other people. > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:24, Steven Pusser wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 19:57, Steven Pusser wrote:

Re: conditional dh-install

2009-07-02 Thread George Danchev
> Hi there Hello, > Once again I am struggling to make gdcm compile on some Arch. For > instance on alpha, I am getting: > > https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gdcm > > gdcm/alpha failing reason: > > [Category: none] > > > dh_install > > --sourcedir=/build/buildd-gdcm_2.0.12-1-a

Re: RFS: copher 0.2.0-1 (danchev)

2009-07-04 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Jonathan Wiltshire : Hi George, Hi, copher 0.2.0 was released yesterday because Sourceforge changed all their APIs. So, I have uploaded 0.2.0-1 to mentors - could you or another mentor take a look please? Unfortunately, I'll be far away from my gpg key until Sunday night (UTC) an

Re: RFS: roxterm (now 1.15.2-1)

2009-07-06 Thread George Danchev
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:25:04 +0200 > > Sebastian Harl wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > Before I try uploading it again, it occurred to me that as 1.15.1-1 > > > hasn't been released, should I remove its entry from the changelog and > > > add its chan

Re: RFS: roxterm (now 1.15.2-1)

2009-07-06 Thread George Danchev
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:02:47 +0300 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Sure, fixing bugs is always welcome, so package reviewed and uploaded. > > Thanks. Should I contact you personally when I need a new release > uploaded in future, or put it on sponsors.debian.net and post

Re: conditional dh-install (--same-arch does not always work)

2009-07-08 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Mathieu Malaterre : [Sorry I was not subscribed when I got the answer from George Danchev] So anyway I tried the --same-arch flag and it *seems* to be working on alpha (there is no log reporting failure), but it clearly does not work on armel: Here is a copy of the control file

Re: conditional dh-install (--same-arch does not always work)

2009-07-09 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Mathieu Malaterre : On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:39 AM, George Danchev wrote: Quoting Mathieu Malaterre : [Sorry I was not subscribed when I got the answer from George Danchev] So anyway I tried the --same-arch flag and it *seems* to be working on alpha (there is no log reporting

Re: RFS: xcftools (updated package, former O)

2009-07-14 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors and QA activists, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1 of the package > "xcftools". It was orphaned by the former maintainer (who is upstream as > well) and I intend to adopt it with this upload. > > debian/changelog mentions three new upstream versions whic

Re: Can't open man1/optin.so: No such file or directory

2009-07-28 Thread George Danchev
> Hi there, Hi, > I am working on the dicom3tools package. The dicom3tools is writing > the man page using groff '.so' macro (source) (*). Which leads to the > following lintian warning : > > W: dicom3tools: manpage-has-errors-from-man > usr/share/man/man1/andump.1.gz can't open man1/optin.so:

Re: Can't open man1/optin.so: No such file or directory

2009-07-28 Thread George Danchev
> George Danchev writes: > > There is no easy way for dh_installman to guess that optin.so as found > > in source directory is actually a manpage content meant for inclusion, > > so you should take the control yourself and install that files in place > > from debian/ru

Re: RFS: kwstyle

2009-07-30 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kwstyle". > > * Package name: kwstyle > Version : 1.0.0+cvs20090716-1 > Upstream Author : Julien Jomier > * URL : http://public.kitware.com/KWStyle/ > * License : BSD > Section : devel

Re: RFS: kwstyle

2009-07-31 Thread George Danchev
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:24 PM, George Danchev wrote: > >> Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, > > > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kwstyle". > >> > >> * Package name: kwstyle > >> Version

Re: RFS: cflow (updated package)

2009-08-02 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.3-1 > of my package "cflow". > > It builds these binary packages: > cflow - Analyze control flow in C source files > > The package appears to be lintian (-I -E --pedantic) clean. > > The package can be found on mentors.

Re: RFS: cflow (updated package)

2009-08-03 Thread George Danchev
> * Jakub Wilk , 2009-08-03, 09:43: Hi, > >>Just one comment: lintian 2.2.13 (from sid) reports: > >> > >>$ lintian -i --pedantic *.changes > >>E: cflow: package-contains-info-dir-file usr/share/info/dir.gz > > > >[snip] > > > >>and in fact it is correct: > >> > >>$ dpkg --contents cflow_1.3-1_i3

Re: RFS: yajl

2009-08-04 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yajl". > > * Package name: yajl > Version : 1.0.5.dfsg-1 > Upstream Author : Lloyd Hilaiel > * URL : http://lloyd.github.com/yajl/ > * License : BSD > Section : libs > > It builds these

Re: RFS: yajl

2009-08-04 Thread George Danchev
Hi, > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 12:07:11 pm George Danchev wrote: > > I haven't review the package, but it would be very nice if anyone can > > compare that to the json-c project [1], which looks quite serious to > > me, at least as briefly scanning thro

Re: RFS: kwstyle (patch 2)

2009-08-06 Thread George Danchev
> George, Hi, > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:46 PM, George Danchev wrote: > <...> > > > 1) Insisting on NMU prior to Initial release does not make much of sense > > and I don't think we even need a lintian check for that ;-) > > <...> > > >

Re: RFS: yajl

2009-08-09 Thread George Danchev
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 10:50:20 pm George Danchev wrote: > > The package looks solid, everything is put in place and I was unable > > to find any flaws other than boring nitpicking: > > > > * the short description of the libyajl1-dbg should read `... - > &g

Re: RFH, AlmostRFS: confget-1.02-2 (updated package)

2009-08-11 Thread George Danchev
> Hi, Hi, > This is not quite a request for sponsorship, but rather something > like a request for help. The confget package, kindly sponsored by > George Danchev back in March, has remained in unstable since then > because of a FTBFS bug #526961 on the "mips" and &q

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, First, thanks for the effort packaging such a beast. I didn't look at the package properly (sorry, lack of time), but I had a look at your debian/copyright which makes me think that you at least went through the code. > The upload would fix these bugs: 516896 > > The packag

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.35

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck". > > > > * Package name: cppcheck > > Version : 1.25-1 > > Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki > >Reijo Tomperi > > * URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourc

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
> Hi George, Hi, > On Sunday 16,August,2009 10:30 PM, George Danchev wrote: > > [...] > > I have some questions which might need a broader discussion, before we > > proceed (I don't place any burden on you to answer them, of course, but > > your opinion would

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
> Hi George, Hi, > On Monday 17,August,2009 02:42 AM, George Danchev wrote: > > [...] > > > >> I actually use a series of IDEs/editors hopping from one to another > >> depending on my mood or purpose: emacs, geany, codelite. > > > > That is some

Re: why?

2009-08-18 Thread George Danchev
Hi, > why is so hard to find a sponsor? > > I have a package online since 2 weeks ago, I sent 3 RFS and I have found > no sponsor yet. > > why It is most a lack of sponsor's time. Reviewing and testing packages (especially libraries) is not that easy and tend to consume significant amount o

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-19 Thread George Danchev
> On Monday 17,August,2009 04:46 AM, George Danchev wrote: --cut-- > > of codeblocks when packagers enter the scene, once again. Nonetheless, I > > promise to take a look at codelite too at some point, but can't promise > > to upload. JFTR: I don't think I will

Re: Requests to sponsor new library packages

2009-08-19 Thread George Danchev
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:42:38PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Sune Vuorela writes: > > > On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney wrote: > > > > That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you > > > > propose, then, for a maintainer who wants to get a new package into > > > > Debian, but tha

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, adoption)

2009-08-22 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-1 > of package "libvigraimpex", which I intend to adopt. > > It builds these binary packages: > libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library > libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, adoption)

2009-08-23 Thread George Danchev
> * George Danchev , 2009-08-23, 08:26: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-1 > >> of package "libvigraimpex", which I intend to adopt. > > > >Excellent work. Uploaded. > > Thanks! > > >P.S. I also verified that lpr

Re: RFS: getstream (updated package)

2009-08-23 Thread George Danchev
> Hervé Rousseau wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20081204-1 > > of my package "getstream". > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > getstream - DVB streaming application > > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > The package can be

Re: RFS: dtrx (updated package)

2009-08-23 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 6.5-2 > of my package "dtrx". > > It builds these binary packages: > dtrx - intelligently extract multiple archive types > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 541955 > > The package

Re: RFS: getstream (updated package)

2009-08-23 Thread George Danchev
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:51 PM, George Danchev wrote: > [snip] > > > That is not a big deal ;-). This hopefully fixes a bug (LP: #365658) > > which is also present in the version found in sid, although never being > > reported, but I don't have a DVB card

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-26 Thread George Danchev
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:43 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > Sorry, you made a step in the wrong way: > > * Remove debian/patches, now merged in git > > > > Makefile | 588 > > ++ > > src/commands.c|2 > > src/perl_utils.

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Zak B. Elep" : Hi, On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:49 +0200, George Danchev wrote: Nice argumentation, but not bullet proof ;-) Was never really an argument. Remember that I did use separate patching in the previous version (if you read my response in the other thread I mad

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-08-30 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 30 August 2009 16:41:26 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > 2009/5/27 George Danchev : > > The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with > > libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix > > that to dynamically link wit

Re: RFS: dma (updated, bugs fixed)

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Peter Pentchev" : Dear mentors, Excellent reaction. No comments. Uploaded. Thanks! I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-2 of my package "dma". It updates the packaging a bit and fixes two bugs from the Debian BTS - allows the spool directory to live on a fi

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 30 August 2009 20:37:13 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > 2009/8/30 George Danchev : > > * it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev > > Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n. This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Th

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 17:34:20 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: > El mar, 01-09-2009 a las 09:30 +, Yavor Doganov escribió: > > В Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:11 -0400, Leinier Cruz Salfran написа: > > > libsockets (2.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > * Added debugging symbols package > >

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:37:18 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: > thanks for the tips .. actually I use "pbuilder --login > --bindmounts /home/salfrancl --save-after-login" and after package > creation I install/remove within the environment .. the line "lintian's > authors do not recommend runni

Re: s390 and hppa virtual machines?

2009-09-02 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Peter Pentchev" : Hi, One of my packages, gforth, is having a weird FTBFS on hppa and a not-so-weird FTBFS on s390. for hppa assistance you may want to get in touch with these people: http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/09/msg6.html gforth was mentioned at the tail of the me

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)

2009-09-04 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hello, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-2 > of my package "libvigraimpex". > > It builds these binary packages: > libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library > libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer vision librar

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)

2009-09-04 Thread George Danchev
> * George Danchev , 2009-09-04, 18:06: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc > >> > >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > >I'm not that optimistic with the C++ code and sym

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)

2009-09-04 Thread George Danchev
> * George Danchev , 2009-09-04, 18:06: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc > >> > >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > >I'm not that optimistic with the C++ code and sym

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)

2009-09-05 Thread George Danchev
> > * George Danchev , 2009-09-04, 18:06: > > > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc > > >> > > >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > > > >I'm not that

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-09-12 Thread George Danchev
> 2009/9/1 George Danchev : > > This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks. > > Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too? > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc Also uploaded. Thanks for the heads-up!

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)

2009-09-12 Thread George Danchev
> * George Danchev , 2009-09-05, 11:40: > >>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc > [...] > >Unfortunately, I will get a chance to work on that package possibly during the > >next weekend, since I'm currently busy

Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)

2009-09-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.34-2 of my new package > of "windowlab". It builds this binary package: > > windowlab - Small and simple Amiga-like window manager > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debia

Re: RFS: sxid (updated package)

2009-09-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > (Since sXid author, Ben Collins, is not active anymore, I've took over the > upstream maintenance. And I've converted the package to non-native.) > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-1 > of my package "sxid". > > It builds these binary packages: > sxid

Re: RFS (updated): valikirye

2009-09-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.0-2 > of my package "valkyrie". > > It builds these binary packages: > valkyrie - open-source graphical user interface for the Valgrind > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 5431

Re: RFS: sxid (updated package)

2009-09-14 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Timur Birsh" : Hi George, Thanks for your review. George Danchev wrote: [./source/notify.c:112]: (error) Resource leak: mail_pipe In source/notify.c on lines 78-79: if (!nomail) mail_pipe = popen (buffer, "w"); and (lines 108-109): if (!no

Re: RFS: sxid (updated package)

2009-09-14 Thread George Danchev
> George Danchev wrote: > > > Fix these (eventually in a new upstream release?) and I will sponsor. > > So, the package fixed in version 4.2-1 :) Please find it here [1]. > > 1. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxid/sxid_4.2-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks! So

Re: RFS: grsync (updated package) closes #543844

2009-09-19 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1-4 > of my package "grsync". > > It builds these binary packages: > grsync - GTK+ frontend for rsync > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://m

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.36

2009-09-20 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: > > Dear mentors, Hi, > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.36-1.dsc * my checks showed that this release fixes #542352 and #544591, as also mentioned in the bug logs themselves they are fixed upstream. Please close them via debian/changelog,

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.36

2009-09-21 Thread George Danchev
> George Danchev wrote: > >> Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Thanks for pointing those out and sorry about forgetting the bugs. > > But now it seems that 1.36 contains a bug that causes trouble with a lot > of projects where macro is used inside macro. So we will need to do

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.37

2009-09-23 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.37-1.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: > #542352 False positive "Resource leak" > #544591 False positive: (error) Using 'memset' on struct that contains a > 'std::string' > > Also problems fo

Re: RFS: wmanager (updated package)

2009-09-26 Thread George Danchev
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:05:45AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-7 > > of my package "wmanager". This version adds some useful > > functionality to the wmanager-loop utility (maintained as > > part of the Debian packa

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, fixes an RC bug)

2009-10-10 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Jakub Wilk" : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0+dfsg-1 of my package "libvigraimpex". It builds these binary packages: libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer visi

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, fixes an RC bug)

2009-10-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0+dfsg-1 > of my package "libvigraimpex". > > It builds these binary packages: > libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library > libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer vision lib

Re: RFS: yajl (updated package)

2009-10-13 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6+git20090925-1 > of my package "yajl". > > It builds these binary packages: > libyajl-dev - Yet Another JSON Library - development files > libyajl-doc - Yet Another JSON Library - library documentation > libyajl1 - Yet An

Re: RFS: yajl (updated package)

2009-10-13 Thread George Danchev
> On Tuesday 13 October 2009 04:29:18 am George Danchev wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6+git20090925-1 > > > of my package "yajl". > > > > > > I

Re: Realloc is blocking execution

2009-10-14 Thread George Danchev
> Dear Mentors, Hi, > in my efforts to reintroduce the package windowlab-1.37, > I am facing the unexpected fact that realloc() is > repeatedly blocking execution, when I compile the > package on a Debian Lenny system. This blocking > does not happen in Debian Etch, nor in OpenBSD, > nor FreeBSD

Re: Realloc is blocking execution

2009-10-16 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Mats Erik Andersson" : Dear mentors and coders, Could you please try to check that on Squeeze (or eventually Sid), which has a newer eglibc. I have the impression that you faced the following problem: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550625 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: RFS: ktechlab (updated package)

2009-10-18 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.7-3 > of my package "ktechlab". > > It builds these binary packages: > ktechlab - circuit simulator for microcontrollers and electronics > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs:

Re: RFS: stx-btree

2009-10-20 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Ury Stankevich" : Dear mentors, Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stx-btree". Package name: stx-btree Version : 0.8.3-2 Upstream Author : Timo Bingmann (Mail: tb a-with-circle idlebox dot net) URL : http://idlebox.net/2007/stx-btree/

Re: RFS: ampache (updated package)

2009-10-20 Thread George Danchev
> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > >> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to > >> catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :) > > > > Personally, I use this as it catches more things and give

Re: RFS: stx-btree

2009-10-21 Thread George Danchev
> Thanks for your help, i have fixed flaws you notice. > Hi, * your binary-indep should not depend on targets that try compile the test- suites (speedtest, wxbtreedemo, testsuite), but should only install architecture independent parts of the source package into the corresponding -dev (headers

Re: RFS: anubis (updated package, fixes FTBFS on ia64, 2nd try)

2009-10-22 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Krzysztof Burghardt" : Dear mentors, Hi, I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=anubis Okay, good diff. Uploaded. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Re: RFS: stx-btree

2009-10-22 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Ury Stankevich" : Hello, * your binary-indep should not depend on targets that try compile the test- suites (speedtest, wxbtreedemo, testsuite), but should only install architecture independent parts of the source package into the corresponding -dev (headers files containing templates

Re: RFS: stx-btree

2009-10-22 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Ury Stankevich" : Hi, Hi, Okay, in that case it is recommended to provide support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules-options (having noopt and nostrip should be fine) Actually build target should depend on build-arch which

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, fixes an RC bug)

2009-10-24 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Jakub Wilk" : * Jakub Wilk , 2009-10-12, 19:49: override_dh_auto_install: $(MAKE) install-exec install-includes prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr; fi It's a leftover. Awkwardly, it doesn't do any harm if /bin/sh is symlinked to /bin/dash http://bugs.debian.org/550756 viff-typo.d

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package, fixes an RC bug)

2009-10-24 Thread George Danchev
> * George Danchev , 2009-10-24, 13:44: > >>I contacted upstream, and he: > >>- applied viff-typo.diff and docsrc-doxygen-any-version.diff > >>patches in his VCS; > >>- is willing to include docsrc/ directory in upstream tarballs; > >>- has rewritt

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.38

2009-10-25 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.38-1.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: > #550793 false positive resource leak Uploaded. Thanks! -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-10-26 Thread George Danchev
tags 354662 patch thanks > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-11 > of my package "scrot". > > It builds these binary packages: > scrot - command line screen capture utility > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bu

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-10-26 Thread George Danchev
> Георги Данчев wrote: > > +if ( strlen(argv[optind++]) > PATH_MAX ) { > > This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. You are correct. I think that using a hardcoded value of 1024 would be fine, though pathologically long file names (but still less than 1024

Re: Bug#354662: RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-10-26 Thread George Danchev
> I updated the package including the patch, is in the same URL in > Mentors: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-11.dsc Hi, I uploaded it with a slight change: used a hardcoded value instead of PATH_MAX (in 07 patch), since PATH_MAX (and _POSIX_PATH_MAX as well) ar

Re: RFS: timelimit (updated, new upstream)

2009-10-31 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5-1 > of my package "timelimit". > > It builds a single binary package: > timelimit - Simple utility to limit a process's absolute execution time > > It has been tested with lintian and pbuilder. > > The upload would fix thes

Re: RFS: lesstif2 AND Questions about collab-maint

2009-11-04 Thread George Danchev
> Hi mentors, Hi, > Paul Gevers wrote: > > I am looking for a thourough check of my packaging and preferably a > > sponsor for the new version 1:0.95.2-1 of my package "lesstif2" [0]. > > This new upstream version is only the incorporation of a lot of patches > > already incorporated in the curr

Re: RFS: xfe (updated package - new upstream release)

2009-11-15 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, I'm not using xfe, but here is my comment: > the privios maintainer of xfe had set the package to RFA. Because the > version is very old and with some bugs, there is a new upstream version > available with bugfixes and new features. > > I would like to take over maintainanc

Re: RFS: trend (updated package)

2009-11-19 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1 > of my package "trend". > > It builds these binary packages: > trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 556503 > > The pa

Re: How to do a survey on lbzip2 as a bzip2 alternative?

2009-11-20 Thread George Danchev
> Hi, Hi, > I'd like to ask users for their opinions about lbzip2 as a bzip2 > alternative in Debian, by requesting them to choose exactly one of the > following options, after reading my DebADay article [0]: > > > 1. I'd like to use lbzip2 as a bzip2 alternative. > > 2. I'd like to use lbzip

Re: New developer.

2009-11-26 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Patrick Matthäi" : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nuno Paquete schrieb: Hi everyone, I want to be a part of Debian developers team and I'm interested in some orphaned projects. I'm reading a lot about Debian developing and how to be a Debian developer but I have some q

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-11-27 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 557049 > > The

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-11-27 Thread George Danchev
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > > and roxterm- config(1) manpages -- they both cont

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-11-28 Thread George Danchev
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:09 +0200 --cut-- > > Adding autotools-dev back to build-dependencies fixes it, > > OK, I've added that dependency back. I've duploaded a replacement, but I > haven't changed the version number because I think it's better not to > when it hasn't been released yet. This

Re: RFS: shc

2009-12-03 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shc". > > * Package name: shc > Version : 3.8.6-1 > Upstream Author : Francisco Javier Rosales García > * URL : http://www.datsi.fi.upm.es/~frosal/ > * License : GPL2 > Section : util

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-12-05 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.3-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > The upload would fix these bugs: 559126 > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.16.3-1.dsc Uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Descr

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.39

2009-12-06 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.39-1.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: > #554448 false positive resource leak Uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-10 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hello Peter, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version > fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations, and > converts the package to the 3.0 (quilt) source format. > > It builds a

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version > fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations, and > converts the package to the 3.0 (quilt) source format. > > It builds a single binary

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-19 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:56:45PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > > > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-20 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, (I'm the usual sponsor of poco and poco-doc, and I'm looking for co- sponsors;-) Some preliminary comments follow: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1 > of package "poco" and "poco-doc". > > It builds these binary packag

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-24 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, I'm still waiting for an answer to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1 > of package "poco" and "poco-doc". > > It builds these binary packages: > libpoco-

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-26 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > George Danchev: > > I'm still waiting for an answer to this: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html > > Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't > check the ABI history

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-28 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > George Danchev: > > > I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1. > > > > Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included. > > Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks! Sure, thanks for the poke. Uploaded with

Re: How to handle source code dependencies?

2009-12-28 Thread George Danchev
Matthias Klumpp writes: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:21:10 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez > > wrote: > > Does Pascal have no notion of a shared library? > > It has, but the GLScene solution does not use it. > > > Nope, that set of components would be in a separate shared library and > > the > > > applica

Re: RFS: yajl (updated package)

2009-12-30 Thread George Danchev
John Stamp writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.8-1 > of my package "yajl". > > It builds these binary packages: > libyajl-dev - Yet Another JSON Library - development files > libyajl-doc - Yet Another JSON Library - library documentation > libyajl1 - Y

Re: RFS: procserv

2009-12-31 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "procserv". > > * Package name: procserv > Version : 2.5.0-3 > Upstream Author : Ralph Lange > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/procserv/ > * License : GPLv3 > Secti

Re: RFS: procserv

2009-12-31 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Hi, > > thanks for having a look. > > On Thu 31 Dec 2009 4:26:04 George Danchev wrote: > > This looks good, perhaps except the capital 'S' in the middle of the > > application name and the man-page, but I can imagine they had thei

Re: RFS: procserv

2010-01-02 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Hi, Hi, > Turned out that a build-gone-wild had messed up my build directory and > my cleanup was incomplete. Everything's nice when done in a clean > environment: no Makefile, no .deps remain. > I removed the .hg* stuff (inherited from upstream repo, it's actually > not in

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-01-02 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found o

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >