On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 6 May 2008 12:45, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the Debian version as a variable in the rules
> > file? Is there a standard way to remove the .dsfg from it?
If we accept that cdbs could be a sort of a standard and
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers
>
> 15:39, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> > Dear mentors,
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "figtoipe".
>
> Hi Alexander!
Hello,
> Fill an ITP when w
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Done, and re-uploaded to mentors.d.o
>
> Hey, is there any chance someone could take another look at this please?
Hey Noah,
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Aanjhan R wrote:
> Hi Neil!
Hi,
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Debian has systems that alert the maintainer to new releases, so Ernesto
> > will have had a reminder already from DEHS. Not every upstream release
> > needs a "P
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
--cut--
> > > Why not if it contains couple of important bugfixes?
> >
> > Here I disagree with Neil. While DEHS will detect it, having upstream
> > visiting Debian BTS and emphasizing on new features/bugfixes is a good
> > thing!
>
> Actually, I think we
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
--cut--
Hello,
> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
> have a Debian version of -1.
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not
being officially published, this source package is i
On Sunday 25 May 2008, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008 17:17:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. [..] 2) even
> > not being officially published, this source package is in the wild and it
> > is a bad idea to just reset
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> >> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
> >> have a Debian version of -1.
> >
> > I consider such re
On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Ruben Molina wrote:
Hi,
> How can I know what other packages depends on my library for test them
> too?
You can use `apt-rdepends -r lib'; where lib is the package with the shared
objects other packages depend on, not the -dev one they might build-depend
on. But checkin
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you all for the suggestions/comments, etc.
Hello,
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:19AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
> > command-optio
On Saturday 31 May 2008, William Vera wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 14.17-1
> of my package "hwinfo".
Looks solid. Uploaded.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--cut--
> > If there were 50 patches, some of which others contribute, there might
> > be a chance to figure which one blows something up. As long as the
> > patches are separate, there's a chance I could back
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, will you generate at some point a series logically separeted quilt
> > patches and store them in debian/patches/ in the final diff.gz which is
> > the canonical way of
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 15:19:02 -0500, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > You may recall I was the one who asked yesterday "Why do you encourage
> > packagers to open the source code and fool around?" I got answers
> > which indicate that the
rumps the
> use cases you are talking about. Now, in cases where the branches do
> not overlap, there can be a simple conversion to a stacked patch
> format; and I'll have no objection to using a tool that can do the
> conversion (at the expense of source package size blo
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> George Danchev skrev:
> > Very good, but please make these easily visible/readable to the rest via
> > diff.gz
>
> Oh no, not again... This was already flam^H^H^H^Hdebated on
> debian-devel. I believe debian-mentors is whe
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:37:43 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
--cut--
> Peer reviewers can either look at the SCM archive (since that is
> how the package is developed), or the divergence bugs, when they get
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> > Because people would hardly trust BTS for sourceful changes being
> > applied to a particular source tree.
>
> The point of the BTS in this regard is to track the issues that lead
On Friday 06 June 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
>
> "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> >> As Cyril stated in another post, you must (by policy) put this
> >> information in debian/copyright. Sorry
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
> >
> > "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> 2008/6/7 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >As a user of that package, I'm still reluctant to ship it in a
> > shape where lintian is not happy enough. I've read your reason
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> >> This looks reasonable, but trigger another lintian warrning:
> >>
> >> N: Processing binary pack
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
--cut--
> Yes, dh_strip -k was called to split debigging symbols in a separate file
> (containing the detached debugging symbols) in usr/lib/debug/, in order to
> avoid binary duplications with things we want debugable, but the above
&
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> > Hello George,
Hi Krzysztof,
--cut--
> So, as libpkg-guide suggests in table 5.1 (soname: libfoo.so.4 => pkgname:
> libfoo4) and lintian asks us to end in -dbg since we ins
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > shared library goes in /usr/lib and as expected lintian complains with:
> > libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoXMLd5
> > because of the missing 'd&#
On Monday 09 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2008/6/8 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I believe that the version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1 you have uploaded to mentors
> > on 07-Jun-2008 22:00 (ah I hate dealing with rewritten changelog
> > history;-) is basica
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually it would be smarter do ship only the detached debugging symbols
> > I believe. I can't think of a use case where the debugging version of
> > the shared librar
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
> > The package is still recognized as Debian native, simply because there's
> > only a tar.gz, without a diff.gz. It's not sufficient to change the
> > version number to 1.4.5-2, you need to create a tarball *without* the
> > debia
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "s5".
Peter,
This package is now uploaded. Thanks for your work [1] on the neat `s5'
utility, especially I like the minimalistic requirements for it to run -- a
Base System ;-).
On Friday 13 June 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:58 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:46:03 +1000
> >
> > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately they require using a Subversion repository. One of the
> > > big advantages of A
On Saturday 14 June 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
> One more question about quilt: dpkg-buildpackage stands that fbreader
> source is 1.0 source package. Should I correct it to be 3.0-quilt? If yes,
> how can I do it? I haven't found any info about it in policy and
> devreference.
On Sunday 15 June 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> >> One more question about quilt: dpkg-buildpackage stands that fbreader
> >> source is 1.0 source package. Should I correct it to be 3.0-quilt? If
> >> yes, how can I do it? I haven'
On Sunday 15 June 2008, Thomas Knott wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkwhiteboard". It was uploaded
> before by José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> but got rejected because the upstream source contains a win32-dll without
> source. I strippe
On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
the package seems to be in a good shape, but here are some remarks:
No need to use the trailing "unstable1" in the version string
(2.5.0~beta7-0unstable1) since the package is also supposed to migrate to
testing at some point
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
--cut--
Hello, and sorry for the late reply,
> > Seems like cdbs magic doesn't cope with that, but you can still save the
> > day: clean:: unpatch
> > common-install-prehook-impl:: patch
>
> This is a bug in CDBS, I have reported it as #486848:
>
>
On Saturday 21 June 2008, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
thanks for hunting RC bugs ;-)
> I prepared a QA upload for the latest upstream version of windowlab, a
> small and simple windowmanager.
>
> The upload would close the following bugs:
> - 486978 (serious): FTBFS: windowlab.h:37:34: er
On Saturday 21 June 2008, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi!
Hi,
--cut--
> > Your changes seems to bring improvements..., yet could you please also
> > fix debian/rules so that both the binary-arch (buildd's call
> > `/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch') and binary-indep targets
> > exist (see
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Thomas Knott wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2008 19:32:50 schrieb George Danchev:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi! Thanks for your suggestions.
Hi,
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkwhiteboard". It was
> > > uploaded before by
On Sunday 22 June 2008, The Fungi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > Is there any use in adding your fingerprint to the signature ? ... It
> > seems misleading at least, if users think they can trust that... and
> > without the public key, it's useless anyw
On Monday 23 June 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/06/2008):
> > In order to shorten my appendix with one line I decided on key ID only
> > instead, which is enough for public key diggers.
>
> Even shorter: Sign your mails.
Bleh 3
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Yavor Doganov wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
> If you define
>
> CFLAGS = ...
>
> in debian/rules, this is a make variable, not an environment variable,
> and it won't propagate to sub-make.
>
> However, if you do
>
> $(MAKE) CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)"
>
> that value will be used for the b
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Георги Данчев wrote:
> > This is true, unless the `override' directive is used in the
> > makefile to override variables set with a command line argument.
>
> Sure, make gives you plenty of rope to hang yourself, to abuse the
> users of your program
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
> of my package "poco".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
> libpocodata5 - The C
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> 2008/6/25 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
> >> of my pack
On Friday 27 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
--cut--
> > I just realized that I forgot to add new patch to patches/00list, so
> > pacakge is still buggy. Version 1.3.2+dfsg1-3 has this missing line
> > add.
> >
&g
On Monday 30 June 2008, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winff". This is my first
> contribution to Debian.
>
> * Package name: winff
> Version : 0.42-1
> Upstream Author : Matthew Weatherford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
On Monday 07 July 2008 16:39:14 Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:34:33PM +0300, Yavor Doganov a écrit :
> > Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello,
> > > When a Debian binary package is built, environment variables such as
> > > {{{CFLAGS}}} and {{{CXXFLAGS}}} are set by {{{dpkg-buildpacka
On Sunday 13 July 2008 13:10:24 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
> I am trying to understand the new dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt).
> There are two points in the documentation (man-page) I do not
> understand:
> * In the section "Building" of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
>
On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:30:34 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > > * In the same section there is a note:
> > > "Note: dpkg-source expects the source tree to have all patches
> > > applied when you generate the source package. This is not the
> > > case when the source tre
Quoting Star Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I wrote a program to copy the memory content of - to a
file, but it says "Segmentation fault", (i use AMD64 lenny, so the
address is long), how could i fix it? thanks!
you should only fclose() if Memory != NULL, so your function would be
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 17:59:14 Yavor Doganov wrote:
> В Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:33:52 +1000, Ben Finney написа:
> > POSIX is usually treated as an initialism, so should be spelled in
> > all-capitals.
>
> Not necessarily:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/13886/focus=4187
> http:
On Thursday 17 July 2008 17:47:51 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:19:37PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.19.dfsg-1
> > of the "dante" package - I'm adopting it, fixing three RC bugs
> > (dante does not currently hav
On Friday 18 July 2008 10:01:01 dmanye wrote:
> hello,
Hello,
> let me explain my "environment". i'm in a university taking care of
> computer science department's computer labs. teachers say: "i need for
> my course app1, app2 and app3". most apps are windows ones and in most
> of the lab sessio
On Saturday 19 July 2008 17:04:20 Marc Schoechlin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.0-1
> of my package "whatsup".
Hello,
This is an interesting approach, but the package looks unfinished.
There are
some *.ex files in debian/ which are actually
On Sunday 03 August 2008 02:43:24 Ben Finney wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > All other upstream files should be modified with patches.
>
> Or by some other method that results in the Debian source package
> format, with a pristine upstream tarball and all maintainer
On Monday 04 August 2008 02:13:30 Ben Finney wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--cut--
> Advice given here needs to be carefully examined for dogma, and a
> clear line needs to be maintained between "you should do this" and
> "this is one way to d
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 02:42:59 Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 21:29 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 23 juillet 2008, vers 21:37,
> >
> > Julien Lavergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "desk
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:56:59 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
> >> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
> >
> > I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
>
On Saturday 09 August 2008 05:26:33 William Vera wrote:
> Thanks everyone for their comments
> Nevertheless still a little confused, apparently I do not see any
> patch applied, apparently only need add to debian/rules manually
> delete those files, am I right?
Hello,
Your diff.gz brings i
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 23:46:52 Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.2-2.1
> of "keytouch". Please note, this is an NMU upload for a grave bug.
> IMHO this bug is release critical, since it renders the package unusable.
Hello Bernd,
On Saturday 23 August 2008 21:20:15 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "replaceit", closing ITP
> #490695.
Hello,
I can't figure out why you want to NMU your own package, perhaps there
might
be some reason I can't think of right now or
On Saturday 23 August 2008 23:08:08 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:28:47PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > I can't figure out why you want to NMU your own package, perhaps there
> > might be some reason I can't think of right now or it is
On Sunday 24 August 2008 00:59:00 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:28:46AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > Also, you can use the most recent 3.8.0 standards version, and as I
> > > > can see there are no changes needed to the package, but a
On Sunday 24 August 2008 16:23:55 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hello,
> > Probably I wasn't clear enough with my previous message, but I now see
> > that I wrote "1.0.0-2 or 1.0.0-1 in your debian/changelog". So, in a
> > package version like A.B.C-X.Y, in the second part (the debian revision)
> >
On Sunday 24 August 2008 21:09:06 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:49:21PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > Okay, uploaded, thanks for your patience. This will go through Debian NEW
> > queue [1] which will take some time.
>
> Cool, thanks :)
Welcome.
On Sunday 24 August 2008 21:49:34 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:37:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
--cut--
> No, that's fine. I'll close it when it goes in (presumably I'll get a
> mail when it does?)
Yes, we will be mailed about that.
> I
On Monday 25 August 2008 20:25:15 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have adopted this package and I am now looking for a sponsor for version
> 0.4.6.5-1.
>
> It has been orphaned under bug number 482067 and I believe this upload
> will close it.
>
> There are various enhancements incl
On Monday 25 August 2008 22:48:50 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:51:34PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > The rest of the package looks fine to me. So, complete that, and I will
> > sponsor.
>
> It is corrected and up at
> http://mentors.debian.net/d
On Monday 25 August 2008 23:04:45 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:08:09PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> > There is a change in the diff file that modifies the source code. Most
> > probably an auto-generated file, anyway, try to avoid such a change.
>
> It's not something
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 21:14:06 Fabio Balzano wrote:
> Hello, I am Fabio Balzano,
> I write from Italy, I use debian sinc 1999
> and currentli I am system administrator of different
> systems for my customers all debian based.
> I also made VOIP systems asterisk based with
> custom modificatio
On Thursday 28 August 2008 17:17:20 Stephan Peijnik wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4-12
> of my package "netmon-applet".
Hello,
here are some comments, you might want to address:
1) debian/copyright lacks important information - linux-data.c is
On Saturday 30 August 2008 04:30:21 Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hello,
> > * Package name: xinha
> > Version : 0.95~rc2-1
>
> Version 0.95 has now been released, could you please update the package?
>
> DD's: can anyone take a look at the package when updated? there are several
> packag
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:30:03 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hi -mentors!
>
> I am looking for a uploader for the new version 1.8-1
> of my package "bindfs".
>
> My usual sponsor for this package, Kapil Hari Paranjape, seems to be busy
> now. I want for pre-approved by release team upload of new
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:24:13 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.01-3
> of my package "exiftags". My previous sponsor, Anibal Monsalve Salazar,
> seems to be busy for more than week, so I am seeking for uploader or new
> usual sponsor
On Sunday 31 August 2008 10:00:44 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:24:13 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >> Dear mentors,
> >>
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.01-3
> >> of my pa
On Sunday 31 August 2008 09:49:05 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:30:03 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >> Hi -mentors!
> >>
> >> I am looking for a uploader for the new version 1.8-1
> >> of my package
On Sunday 31 August 2008 20:25:57 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 August 2008 10:00:44 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >> George Danchev wrote:
> >>> Ok, thanks for fixing an RC. Builds fine per autobuilders
> >>> (dpkg
On Sunday 31 August 2008 21:07:55 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
--cut--
> [cut build log]
> Ok, thanks, I finally understood you. Fixed, re-uploaded to mentors.d.o.
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exiftags/exiftags_1.01-3.dsc.
Thanks, uploaded will get to you in several hours.
--
On Sunday 31 August 2008 20:50:57 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
--cut--
> Ok. Done, re-uploaded.
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.8-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks and sorry for the delay. Please, consider reading that
announcement [1] when you request release team to unblock.
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 05:04:12 Ben Finney wrote:
--cut--
> I'm experimenting with Bazaar's "loom" feature, which allows a single
> branch to contain multiple "threads" of development. A loom allows any
> of the threads to be advanced, turned into separate patches as needed,
> while still h
On Thursday 04 September 2008 15:30:32 Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> I am looking for someone to upload an updated version of blam. This was
> already reviewed by Vincent Bernat but it has been over a month since
> that (I've been away from my computer and keys), so I'm asking ag
On Friday 12 September 2008 13:03:20 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tmux".
Hello,
Package looks good to me, provided the following:
* control: your Depends line is empty, but your package depends on libncurses5
(at least) run-ti
On Monday 22 September 2008 22:04:44 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
> there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing
> updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright.
The package seems to be in a very good shape, but I don't currently ha
On Sunday 28 September 2008 22:08:28 markus schnalke wrote:
> Hello mentors,
Hi,
> lintian reports this warning:
> using-question-in-extended-description-in-templates
> (see [1])
>
> But there is no question where lintian sees one. Instead it's a
> literally question mark. The text is:
> "You
On Monday 29 September 2008 15:55:55 Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello,
> Le Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:46:00PM +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 06:36 -0700, Kruti wrote:
> > > i mean when you do apt-get install , all the files of the
> > > package are installed in /usr.for eg: pa
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:09:07 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > * Thorsten Alteholz [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:06:09 +0200]:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
> > > Assuming tha
On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:33:53 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-1
> of my package "poco".
...
> Also I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3-1
> of my package "poco-doc".
Both uploaded. Thanks for your work
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:27:45 Jann Horn wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdarch".
Hello,
How is that better than mounting image loopback and then engage the whole old
unix tool armament in searching files ?
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
--
To
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it,
> does that mean it is now perfect? ;)
Package looks fine to me, although I can't figure out why xsltproc warns like
that [0] when -nonet option were passed
On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:49:52 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.25-4.dsc
Package uploaded. Thanks.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Saturday 08 November 2008 20:47:58 George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> --cut--
>
> > What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it,
> > does that mean it is now perfect? ;)
>
> Package lo
On Sunday 09 November 2008 22:41:13 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> Few questions as I'm still new with all of this:
> - In mentors.debian.net I have set the "seeking for sponsor" option to
> "yes". Are you now my sponsor for the future updates also? Should I set
> the value to "I have found a spons
On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:16:07 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
> of my package "poco".
Package uploaded. Thanks for taking care of these bugs.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On Sunday 16 November 2008 19:50:10 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.6.6-1
> of my package "gxemul". This is a minor new upstream version, the
> packaging has basically not changed.
Well I believe it has changed enough compared to the version
On Thursday 20 November 2008 11:16:14 Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le mercredi 19 novembre 2008 à 21:51 +, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > I've no idea what is going on but a version of tslib has been uploaded
> > to mentors.debian.net.
> >
> > I'm the maintainer for tslib and I see no reason for any su
On Monday 24 November 2008 00:19:14 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:42:43PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > * slight regression: dpatch was introduced in that revision, but the
> > 01_manhyphens_patch.dpatch is not applied during build. Basically you
> &g
On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hello,
> I am seeking a sponsor for a bugfix in gxemul, George Danchev kindly
> sposored last time. This is a patch taken from upstream's CVS pending
> it being included in a release, and fixes a segmentation fault
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 19:21:46 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny?
>
> I'm not sure. The patch looks straight-forward enough, so perhaps the
> release team would
On Sunday 30 November 2008 22:03:16 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.26-1.dsc
Uploaded. FYI: Package is still hanging in Debian's new queue.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On Monday 01 December 2008 16:04:33 Alexander Block wrote:
Hi,
Hm, interesting approach. Package looks good to me, except that it builds one
binary package, not three, which is fine. Adding a watch file would be good
idea too, regardless you are both upstream and debian maintainer of that
pack
1 - 100 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
