security fix dependency

not? - how should I change the version numbering? If I use the new upstream version, then lintian correctly see that as I am not in the Uploaders field, the packaging is an NMU but with wrong version number... Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Tux Commander & Borland Kylix

t in free tools ofcourse. I have already tried it to package it for Debian. It seems to be a no-go. > a lot of the problems you will face with this are problems that java folks > (prior to the recent availability of high-quality free JVMs) have faced in > debian. Exactly. Maybe even hard

how buildd's work?

to build, but subversion is tried? If I would be a Debian Developer, what I could do to resolve such situations (I mean for example to force the apache2 build)? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with zombie directory created on package install

's empty "nouvola" directory > created as well. It's part of the .deb . > I am recently unable to find out > the reason it appears here. Any suggestions what > did I do wrong? Bad shots: you have listed it in debian/dirs or the install target creates it. More if yo

RFH: gradm2

Hi, I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft. Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- BorsodChem

Re: working with Debian subversion sources

, or not to crush with the Apache2 libapr0. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]: > The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight. Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating. Regards, Laszlo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

RFC: crasm

mentors.debian.net[1]. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFD: take over packages

just see that the packages are not fixed for Sarge. :( What do mentors think about this? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFD: take over packages

* Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]: > If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding, > you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads, Thanks, I did this meanwhile. > but you should keep Ivo in the loop. Well, my sponsor

RFH: strange message after package upload

, only with two of them. Thanks for any hints in advance, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

ebian.org/xpat2 I look for a broader number of packages, so p.qa.d.o would be good to get back fully. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: library packaging problem

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]: > Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly trivial) > error? Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard time guessing. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To U

RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

build the package to include the changes from 2.1.0-3 (ie with debuild -v2.1.0-2), as it was uploaded, but not processed because my previous sponsor (Algernon, on holiday now) had several problems ranging from bad gpg signature on .changes to strange warning messages. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Sponsor for a new package

se that are granted in conjunction with the Debian system. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/ > > sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn&#x

Re: RFH: strange message after package upload

md5sum was not correct, etc. All in all uploding sidplay-libs 2.1.0-3 failed. > Which is a package you are taking over from ivo. Yes, and? It should not generate that warning. > Sorry for the noise. No problem, I am just curious why the uploading failed. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFC: crasm

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/ > > debian/copyright is missing the following line

Re: How to get rid of an epoch?

me has to be changed as well and thus epoch can be forgotten. - Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

haydn issues/login

y in /home/gcs/.ssh/known_hosts:11 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue:

echo+newline in postinst

t seems to work in every shell. Is it ok, or should I use an other solution? Like '(echo; echo line) >>config_file'? Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug# 238314 RFS: siefs - virtual fs for accessing Siemens mobiles

then to send the patch upstream. This would be the best, you are right. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

<    1   2   3