idsvn: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libsvncpp.so.0.0.0
usr/lib/libsvncpp.so
But in my readings it can be ignored this time, as it's a small package,
and does not make sense to split up into -dev.
Thanks for advance,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
P (well, he changed the bug title to RFP later on). So I am going to
change it back to ITP.
> with your (cryptic) name on it.
Do you mean 'László Böszörményi'? This is my real name, and often has
problems because of the lotsa accents. That's a reason why I use the nick
'G
and I will try to fix it somehow.
The Hungarian translation of Mozilla is an old project, I think it began
with Mozilla 0.9.x, proven to be an accurate translation with many happy
users. Unfortunately no one could make a package for Debian yet. :(
Thanks in advance,
GCS/Laszlo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ugin, but Blursk goes far beyond that.
It supports a variety of colormaps, blur patterns, plotting styles, and
other options.
One can check screenshots at:
http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~kirkenda/blursk/screenshots.html
Available from:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packag
quires this.
Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages
after build, as now I get:
gpg: skipped `L�¥szl�³ B�œsz�œrm�Šnyi (GCS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>': secret key
not available
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is addin
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a multi-binary package, vlevel:
* Package name: vlevel
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Tom Felker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vlevel.sf.net/
* License : GPL v2
Description : Command line filter and xmms p
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:35:39PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a multi-binary package, vlevel:
> * Package name: vlevel
> Version : 0.5
> Upstream Author : Tom Felker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
so. I think here chroot means some services or even
users are in their respective chroot environment, nothing more. But
beware, I am not an administrator of these machines, nor related to
them.
Cheers,
GCS/Laszlo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I would like to use ucf via the #UCF# macro, but I have to add
--debconf-ok switch to it. Can I do it with the macro, or do I have to
list all my files as 'ucf --debconf-ok $file'?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
.jar contained in /usr/lib of
> Architecture: all package.
That can be ignored IMHO, as I know all of the mozilla-*-locale-*
packages has this (mean: even ones in the Debian pool).
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the locales. On the other hand, I can make the test suite think
this test was passed with an one line change.
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should not tamper with upstream source except where really
necessary; but am I allowed to delete these files from upstream,
generate them from debian/rules and clean again afterwards? It would
make the .diff.gz very small, without any differences in .deb .
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
As the previous maintainer asking for an adopter of manpages-hu, I have
made a new release of the Hungarian manpages, which is available from:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
- or -
http://www.lsc.hu/packages/list.php
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:01:10AM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-03-21 GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a small package, which generates configure, Makefile[.in] at
> > every compilation.
>
> Why? Do you patch configure.(i
that a not-yet-DD has packages in the stable (to-be) version
of Debian, in Sarge? (IMHO yes).
- should I work on my packages in Sarge/Sid, or helping others with
their packages[2], so hopefully make Sarge release sooner?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=gcs%40lsc.
showing it
is already patched, and skip it? Also, I have noticed dbs, but I have no
idea at all, how should I use it. It seems I have to reorganize the
package, put the tarball into the package instead of the source
directly, and do some magic. Any docs on this subject?
Thanks,
GCS
ch -patch >$$stamp.new 2>&1; then
Does it try to execute my patch made with 'diff -Nur'? I get the
following errors:
debian/rules build
test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
/home/gcs/build_sources/openldap-2.1.21
applying patch debian/patches/01-schemas.patch.
h the
postinst scipt, so build a new package from postgresql?
Thanks,
GCS
t; looking for sponsor.
I'll check it if I get home - if no one objects against the Python3
variant of ProtoBuf.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
it is correct. So let's wait for maintainers' comments.
Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff
in some hours if you don't mind.
Thanks for your contribution,
Laszlo/GCS
diff -Nru protobuf-3.0.0/debian/changelog protobuf-3.0.0/debian/changelog
--- prot
and, small transitions are still possible, that doesn't
affect too many packages. But to be honest, the 3.0 transition was big
enough and still not finished (see the kFreeBSD build problems). I do
_not_ want to risk having more problems with 3.1 so close to the full
freeze.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
PS: please don't Cc me, I'm subscribed to the list.
ng more
> efficiently).
wxSQLite3 has a new upstream release, but it should be basically the
same from the packagers view. I can upload it to unstable anytime
without conflicting it with the ones for wxWidgetx 2.8 .
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@li
dd
the changelog entry with a patch - grrr!
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
t seems to work in every shell.
Is it ok, or should I use an other solution? Like
'(echo; echo line) >>config_file'?
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
then to send the patch upstream.
This would be the best, you are right.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
use
debuild and co.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
ontrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
ns, this is
a way to do that.
The package is available from:
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks in advance for any offers,
Laszlo/GCS
upstream maintainer.
I agree with your justification. I withdraw the RFS and will retitle
the bug back to O today. Please ask for it's removal from the pool.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be related
to my system, but I think it's more likely that the hdd on mentors.d.o
is full.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
have any web space to place my stuff
> to. Especiall anonymous FTP server access. I can send all stuff to you
> if you want. ;) Or tell me where I can upload some files for free.
Take a look at mentors.debian.net ; and please don't take personal, but
*.ru domains are usually very slow. :(
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
close it in
debian/changelog etc...
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
ched? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
answer yet.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
format, different type arg (arg 3)
[...]
gnome-ppp-main.c: In function `main':
gnome-ppp-main.c:34: warning: statement with no effect
- (ITP the package, so others will know it's being packaged).
After fixing the first two, write a RFS mail to here, hope you will find
a sponsor soon.
Gotta go catch some sleep,
Laszlo/GCS
it as a last resort, only if the 'make
install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
the idea.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
idea.
> >>I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
> >>ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
>
> Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.
Che
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should s
owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the
first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As
I see Dan already corrected it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the pool, after
the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are
almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when your package is ready and in the pool, so he
can add autochoose support for it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
f no one volunteers until then, my first move
will be to sponsor this package. _Seriously_.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
;s choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
do it. Can someone help me out here?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how
ven when using udev
> there is a bug somewhere, either in udev or in the kernel-patch.
It is a missing feature only, the grsec device is very uncommon, and
only gradm2 and kernel-patch-grsecurity2 packages will need it.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
er.fr.8
> Although the actual file is:
> doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
Do an 'install' on the manpage, directly to the package directory
(debian/tmp or debian/maradns whatever do you use).
> Btw I have informed upstream
That's good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
r/man/zoneserver.8
>
> The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 in the tarball and you want it to
> be installed into the correct location, i.e.
> /usr/share/man/fr/man8/zoneserver.8?
Not exactly he wants doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 to be installed as
zoneserver.fr.8 (notice the added 'fr' tag in the filename).
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
please see:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
* Sergio Cayuqueo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]:
> deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./
> http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb
> the original (orig) tgz file is
> http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz
Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out
e for any pointers,
Laszlo/GCS
x27;
bugs in BTS does not show anything relevant.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
BorsodChem Joint-Stock Company Linux Support Center
Software engineer Developer
+36-48-511211/12-99 +36-20-4441745
ecause it is
blocked by perl at the end; the problem is that p.q.d.o still shows
version 0.0.1173 in "Testing Status", and not see the new, 0.1263
version. It should show "* 4 days old (needs 10 days); * Too young, not
considered." as 0.1263 was uploaded on 2004-07-19.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
gain. Also, now I install package
modules under /usr/lib/site-python instead of
/usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VER}/site-packages .
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
not?
- how should I change the version numbering? If I use the new upstream
version, then lintian correctly see that as I am not in the Uploaders
field, the packaging is an NMU but with wrong version number...
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
t in free tools
ofcourse. I have already tried it to package it for Debian. It seems to
be a no-go.
> a lot of the problems you will face with this are problems that java folks
> (prior to the recent availability of high-quality free JVMs) have faced in
> debian.
Exactly. Maybe even harder.
Laszlo/GCS
to build, but subversion is tried?
If I would be a Debian Developer, what I could do to resolve such
situations (I mean for example to force the apache2 build)?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
's empty "nouvola" directory
> created as well.
It's part of the .deb .
> I am recently unable to find out
> the reason it appears here. Any suggestions what
> did I do wrong?
Bad shots: you have listed it in debian/dirs or the install target
creates it.
More if you make the source available.
Laszlo/GCS
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since
then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
BorsodChem
, or not to crush with the Apache2
libapr0.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]:
> The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight.
Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still
broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating.
Regards,
Laszlo
mentors.debian.net[1].
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/
just see that the packages are not fixed for Sarge. :(
What do mentors think about this?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]:
> If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding,
> you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads,
Thanks, I did this meanwhile.
> but you should keep Ivo in the loop.
Well, my sponsor
, only with two of them.
Thanks for any hints in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
ebian.org/xpat2
I look for a broader number of packages, so p.qa.d.o would be good to
get back fully.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]:
> Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly
> trivial) error?
Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard
time guessing.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
build
the package to include the changes from 2.1.0-3 (ie with debuild
-v2.1.0-2), as it was uploaded, but not processed because my previous
sponsor (Algernon, on holiday now) had several problems ranging from bad
gpg signature on .changes to strange warning messages.
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
se that are granted in conjunction
with the Debian system.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/
>
> sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn&#x
md5sum was not correct, etc. All in
all uploding sidplay-libs 2.1.0-3 failed.
> Which is a package you are taking over from ivo.
Yes, and? It should not generate that warning.
> Sorry for the noise.
No problem, I am just curious why the uploading failed.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> >[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/
>
> debian/copyright is missing the following line
me has to be changed as well and thus epoch can be
forgotten.
- Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
und key in /home/gcs/.ssh/known_hosts:11
debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug1: Authentications that ca
use
debuild and co.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ontrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ns, this is
a way to do that.
The package is available from:
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks in advance for any offers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
upstream maintainer.
I agree with your justification. I withdraw the RFS and will retitle
the bug back to O today. Please ask for it's removal from the pool.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be related
to my system, but I think it's more likely that the hdd on mentors.d.o
is full.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have any web space to place my stuff
> to. Especiall anonymous FTP server access. I can send all stuff to you
> if you want. ;) Or tell me where I can upload some files for free.
Take a look at mentors.debian.net ; and please don't take personal, but
*.ru domains are usually very slow. :(
close it in
debian/changelog etc...
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ched? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
answer yet.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
format, different type arg (arg 3)
[...]
gnome-ppp-main.c: In function `main':
gnome-ppp-main.c:34: warning: statement with no effect
- (ITP the package, so others will know it's being packaged).
After fixing the first two, write a RFS mail to here, hope you will find
a sponsor soon.
it as a last resort, only if the 'make
install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
the idea.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
idea.
> >>I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
> >>ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
>
> Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.
Che
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should s
owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the
first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As
I see Dan already corrected it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the pool, after
the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are
almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when your package is ready and in the pool, so he
can add autochoose support for it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
f no one volunteers until then, my first move
will be to sponsor this package. _Seriously_.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;s choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do it. Can someone help me out here?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how
ven when using udev
> there is a bug somewhere, either in udev or in the kernel-patch.
It is a missing feature only, the grsec device is very uncommon, and
only gradm2 and kernel-patch-grsecurity2 packages will need it.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.fr.8
> Although the actual file is:
> doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8
Do an 'install' on the manpage, directly to the package directory
(debian/tmp or debian/maradns whatever do you use).
> Btw I have informed upstream
That's good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
r/man/zoneserver.8
>
> The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 in the tarball and you want it to
> be installed into the correct location, i.e.
> /usr/share/man/fr/man8/zoneserver.8?
Not exactly he wants doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 to be installed as
zoneserver.fr.8 (notice the added &
please see:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Sergio Cayuqueo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]:
> deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./
> http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb
> the original (orig) tgz file is
> http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz
Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out
e for any pointers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;
bugs in BTS does not show anything relevant.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
BorsodChem Joint-Stock Company Linux Support Center
Software engineer Developer
+36-48-511211/12-99 +36-20-4441745
--
T
ecause it is
blocked by perl at the end; the problem is that p.q.d.o still shows
version 0.0.1173 in "Testing Status", and not see the new, 0.1263
version. It should show "* 4 days old (needs 10 days); * Too young, not
considered." as 0.1263 was uploaded on 2004-07-19.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gain. Also, now I install package
modules under /usr/lib/site-python instead of
/usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VER}/site-packages .
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 200 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
