build gave error exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1361:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed
-- cut --
Please make it buildable first.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
doing wrong? How does Debian compile glibc?
Thanks,
GCS
Hi,
Is it adviceable to take over libghttp? It seems the only one package
needs it is libhttp-ghttp-perl and also orphaned. IMHO it would be
better to remove them: gnome-vfs replaces libghttp and perl has other
bindings to http usage.
Cheers,
GCS
thod - gnome-vfs? As IMO it
would be good to remove libghttp...
Cheers,
GCS
l: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
usr/lib/perl5/HTTP/GHTTP.pm
Should I care this, or can I override this?
Thanks,
GCS
stream homepage and email address
* New standards version
You can get it via the following sources.list entries:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
The package is linda and lintian clean.
Thanks in advance,
GCS
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:10:02PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor of tuxeyes. Which is a fancy version of
> xeyes, but showing Tux, and other GNU figures on your screen.
Sorry, I meant s/RTS/RFS/ in the $subject.
GCS
ted
libraries would be better in one hand it's up to you if you want to take
them, or use my work. You can take a look at my packages at:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
Cheers,
GCS
instead a mirror list for that source should be maintained, and
automagically downloaded by 'apt-get source' from the first available.
Cheers,
GCS
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:22:07PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:10:02PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor of tuxeyes. Which is a fancy version of
> > xeyes, but showing Tux, and other GNU figures
d do
statistics at the end.
Cheers,
GCS
unstable packages already available using a stable system?
Yes, what you seek is 'pbuilder' (preferred), but 'debootstrap' can
give you an unstable chroot environment as well.
Cheers,
GCS
end on tetex-bin
and tetex-extra?
Thanks for your time,
GCS
idsvn: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libsvncpp.so.0.0.0
usr/lib/libsvncpp.so
But in my readings it can be ignored this time, as it's a small package,
and does not make sense to split up into -dev.
Thanks for advance,
GCS
P (well, he changed the bug title to RFP later on). So I am going to
change it back to ITP.
> with your (cryptic) name on it.
Do you mean 'László Böszörményi'? This is my real name, and often has
problems because of the lotsa accents. That's a reason why I use the nick
'G
and I will try to fix it somehow.
The Hungarian translation of Mozilla is an old project, I think it began
with Mozilla 0.9.x, proven to be an accurate translation with many happy
users. Unfortunately no one could make a package for Debian yet. :(
Thanks in advance,
GCS/Laszlo
ugin, but Blursk goes far beyond that.
It supports a variety of colormaps, blur patterns, plotting styles, and
other options.
One can check screenshots at:
http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~kirkenda/blursk/screenshots.html
Available from:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
Thanks,
GCS
requires this.
Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages
after build, as now I get:
gpg: skipped `LĂÂĄszlĂÂł BĂÂśszĂÂśrmĂŠnyi (GCS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>':
secret key not available
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is addin
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a multi-binary package, vlevel:
* Package name: vlevel
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Tom Felker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vlevel.sf.net/
* License : GPL v2
Description : Command line filter and xmms p
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:35:39PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a multi-binary package, vlevel:
> * Package name: vlevel
> Version : 0.5
> Upstream Author : Tom Felker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
so. I think here chroot means some services or even
users are in their respective chroot environment, nothing more. But
beware, I am not an administrator of these machines, nor related to
them.
Cheers,
GCS/Laszlo
Hi,
I would like to use ucf via the #UCF# macro, but I have to add
--debconf-ok switch to it. Can I do it with the macro, or do I have to
list all my files as 'ucf --debconf-ok $file'?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
.jar contained in /usr/lib of
> Architecture: all package.
That can be ignored IMHO, as I know all of the mozilla-*-locale-*
packages has this (mean: even ones in the Debian pool).
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
the locales. On the other hand, I can make the test suite think
this test was passed with an one line change.
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
I should not tamper with upstream source except where really
necessary; but am I allowed to delete these files from upstream,
generate them from debian/rules and clean again afterwards? It would
make the .diff.gz very small, without any differences in .deb .
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
Hi,
As the previous maintainer asking for an adopter of manpages-hu, I have
made a new release of the Hungarian manpages, which is available from:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
- or -
http://www.lsc.hu/packages/list.php
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:01:10AM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2004-03-21 GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a small package, which generates configure, Makefile[.in] at
> > every compilation.
>
> Why? Do you patch configure.(i
that a not-yet-DD has packages in the stable (to-be) version
of Debian, in Sarge? (IMHO yes).
- should I work on my packages in Sarge/Sid, or helping others with
their packages[2], so hopefully make Sarge release sooner?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=gcs%40lsc.
archs to acknowledge that it's really fixed; then I kindly ask for
someone to upload it for me. The package is available from a web page[1]
and with apt[2].
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.lsc.hu/packages/list.php
[2]
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
>
> I mean is it good way? Then changelog from version 1.1-2 will be parsed
> two times.
IMHO close the bugs by hand, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Cheers,
GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d make it built on mips(el). What do I overlook, or the config.sub
change I already made may solve this as well?
Anyone knows about free access to mips(el) machines, like Sourceforge
does, and I can try it out myself?
Thanks your help in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&am
Dear Mentors,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 07:41:59PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to ask help for my package, xmms-blursk, which exists in
> the pool, and a great visualisation plugin for XMMS.
Forgot to note, that I have tried to upload the new version to
debian
ilable from the same locations on the web[3] or via apt[4]. For this
I haven't filed an ITP, as the name is not yet fully clear, I would
appreciate your point on this. Also if someone has notes about the
packaging, I would be happy to hear them.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://packages.qa.debi
Dear Mentors,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:23:03AM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am intend to contine Martin F. Krafft's work on Grsecurity[1],
s/contine/continue/ and for making the life easier for Sponsors and
Mentors, I have uploaded both kernel-patch-2.4-grsecur
> Source: libfann1
Section:
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Steffen Nissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
> Standards-Version: 3.6.0
FYI: the latest Standards-Version is 3.6.1.0 (the last digit is
optional).
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:04:00PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it's easy enough to fix, and you should read about the required
> files in a control file.
s/files/lines/
Sorry,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d be just fine. Please read [4].
> i did a -2 version with the fixes and put it at
You don't have to increase the Debian version I think; but it's not a
problem.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with x.y as Debian version, it's for NMU.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
27;m also interested in other arches).
Will do. All I know that sourceforge.net has a build farm, available
for all registered users. They are various archs/OSes, but very few --
not including any mips(el) arch I needed for testing/trying.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
Hi,
I have just noticed, that on the summary page of my packages[1] the
already closed bugs still shown in xmms-blursk. On the PTS page I can
see that the bugs are closed, and will be archived in 26 days. Is it
normal, ie why I can't see the same with cvs2svn, where I also have
closed bugs going
ot; (not
'going in today' message)
- "Other available versions" shows the old version in testing.
I am sure it will be all right when the page is re-created next time,
but one may sync the events in time, so differences do not happen like
this.
Thanks for listening,
Laszlo/GCS
].
Anyone may enlighten me what can be the root of the problem?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gradm
you are done.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:49:24AM -0700, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:27:59AM +0200, GCS wrote:
> > public part to any keyserver like pgp.mit.edu then search someone who
> > volunteers to sign your key and plan a meeting.
>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:03:48PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php It seems a couple of DDs are in Canada, the
Err, sorry, I should meant California.
Laszlo/GCS
Hi,
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I got a FTBFS as a simple user it can
not be b
n.
> I'd be very thankful for any notes and / or sponsorships.
Hope this helps to find you a sponsor, I can not be it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1769
I have wrote to both of them (James and Lamont) some days ago. No
answer, no action done. Is there anything I can do more, or should I
wait more?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
t instead of the White list. It is easier to avoid
> the Black list than getting on a
> White list. I doubt that they maintain much of a White list.
They may do, but I got your point. I will wait at least a week from now
on, but probably two, and see how things evolve.
Thanks for both of you,
Laszlo/GCS
completely lintian- and linda-clean (and completely I
> mean, I do not even get warnings any more).
Sounds very good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with
them IMHO.
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
security expert.
> Should I post this to debian-security?
Please do, this list is more about packaging and sponsoring uploads for
non Debian developers. Maybe debian-devel is also good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:58:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > 3. is it tracked anywhere (other than the bug report, non-existant
> > >in this case) if this is being worked on? Having a month
> > >passed, I'd assume that the maintainer isn't aware of this, but
> >
to_Debian_stored_version_if_possible; ie:
On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
-- cut --
> Please CC me.
Done.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
ic[1][2][3] as well. Especially[4]. You
can find out the correct build dependencies with building your package
with pbuilder.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
[3] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
[4]
http://www.
tion may be
wrong.
Thanks for the help in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228452
[2] http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=gcs%40lsc.hu
[3]
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstabl
archs to acknowledge that it's really fixed; then I kindly ask for
someone to upload it for me. The package is available from a web page[1]
and with apt[2].
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.lsc.hu/packages/list.php
[2]
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ packages/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ packages
1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
>
> I mean is it good way? Then changelog from version 1.1-2 will be parsed
> two times.
IMHO close the bugs by hand, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Cheers,
GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d make it built on mips(el). What do I overlook, or the config.sub
change I already made may solve this as well?
Anyone knows about free access to mips(el) machines, like Sourceforge
does, and I can try it out myself?
Thanks your help in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&am
Dear Mentors,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 07:41:59PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to ask help for my package, xmms-blursk, which exists in
> the pool, and a great visualisation plugin for XMMS.
Forgot to note, that I have tried to upload the new version to
debian
ilable from the same locations on the web[3] or via apt[4]. For this
I haven't filed an ITP, as the name is not yet fully clear, I would
appreciate your point on this. Also if someone has notes about the
packaging, I would be happy to hear them.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://packages.qa.debi
Dear Mentors,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:23:03AM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am intend to contine Martin F. Krafft's work on Grsecurity[1],
s/contine/continue/ and for making the life easier for Sponsors and
Mentors, I have uploaded both kernel-patch-2.4-grsecur
> Source: libfann1
Section:
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Steffen Nissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
> Standards-Version: 3.6.0
FYI: the latest Standards-Version is 3.6.1.0 (the last digit is
optional).
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:04:00PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it's easy enough to fix, and you should read about the required
> files in a control file.
s/files/lines/
Sorry,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d be just fine. Please read [4].
> i did a -2 version with the fixes and put it at
You don't have to increase the Debian version I think; but it's not a
problem.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with x.y as Debian version, it's for NMU.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;m also interested in other arches).
Will do. All I know that sourceforge.net has a build farm, available
for all registered users. They are various archs/OSes, but very few --
not including any mips(el) arch I needed for testing/trying.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hi,
I have just noticed, that on the summary page of my packages[1] the
already closed bugs still shown in xmms-blursk. On the PTS page I can
see that the bugs are closed, and will be archived in 26 days. Is it
normal, ie why I can't see the same with cvs2svn, where I also have
closed bugs going
ot; (not
'going in today' message)
- "Other available versions" shows the old version in testing.
I am sure it will be all right when the page is re-created next time,
but one may sync the events in time, so differences do not happen like
this.
Thanks for listening,
L
].
Anyone may enlighten me what can be the root of the problem?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gradm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you are done.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:49:24AM -0700, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:27:59AM +0200, GCS wrote:
> > public part to any keyserver like pgp.mit.edu then search someone who
> > volunteers to sign your key and plan a meeting.
>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:03:48PM +0200, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php It seems a couple of DDs are in Canada, the
Err, sorry, I should meant California.
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi,
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I got a FTBFS as a simple user it can
not be b
I'd be very thankful for any notes and / or sponsorships.
Hope this helps to find you a sponsor, I can not be it.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to_Debian_stored_version_if_possible; ie:
On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
-- cut --
> Please CC me.
Done.
Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have wrote to both of them (James and Lamont) some days ago. No
answer, no action done. Is there anything I can do more, or should I
wait more?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
completely lintian- and linda-clean (and completely I
> mean, I do not even get warnings any more).
Sounds very good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ad of the White list. It is easier to avoid
> the Black list than getting on a
> White list. I doubt that they maintain much of a White list.
They may do, but I got your point. I will wait at least a week from now
on, but probably two, and see how things evolve.
Thanks for both of you,
La
with
them IMHO.
Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
security expert.
> Should I post this to debian-security?
Please do, this list is more about packaging and sponsoring uploads for
non Debian developers. Maybe debian-devel is also good.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:58:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 3. is it tracked anywhere (other than the bug report, non-existant
> > >in this case) if this is being worked on? Having a month
> > >passed, I'd assume that the maintainer isn't aware of this, but
> >
ic[1][2][3] as well. Especially[4]. You
can find out the correct build dependencies with building your package
with pbuilder.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
[3] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
[4]
http://www.
tion may be
wrong.
Thanks for the help in advance,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228452
[2] http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=gcs%40lsc.hu
[3]
deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstabl
showing it
is already patched, and skip it? Also, I have noticed dbs, but I have no
idea at all, how should I use it. It seems I have to reorganize the
package, put the tarball into the package instead of the source
directly, and do some magic. Any docs on this subject?
Thanks,
GCS
--
To UNSUB
ch -patch >$$stamp.new 2>&1; then
Does it try to execute my patch made with 'diff -Nur'? I get the
following errors:
debian/rules build
test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
/home/gcs/build_sources/openldap-2.1.21
applying patch debian/patches/01-schemas.patch...diff:
h the
postinst scipt, so build a new package from postgresql?
Thanks,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doing wrong? How does Debian compile glibc?
Thanks,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is it adviceable to take over libghttp? It seems the only one package
needs it is libhttp-ghttp-perl and also orphaned. IMHO it would be
better to remove them: gnome-vfs replaces libghttp and perl has other
bindings to http usage.
Cheers,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
thod - gnome-vfs? As IMO it
would be good to remove libghttp...
Cheers,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
usr/lib/perl5/HTTP/GHTTP.pm
Should I care this, or can I override this?
Thanks,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stream homepage and email address
* New standards version
You can get it via the following sources.list entries:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
The package is linda and lintian clean.
Thanks in advance,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:10:02PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor of tuxeyes. Which is a fancy version of
> xeyes, but showing Tux, and other GNU figures on your screen.
Sorry, I meant s/RTS/RFS/ in the $subject.
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
ted
libraries would be better in one hand it's up to you if you want to take
them, or use my work. You can take a look at my packages at:
deb http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
deb-src http://www.lsc.hu/ ita/
Cheers,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead a mirror list for that source should be maintained, and
automagically downloaded by 'apt-get source' from the first available.
Cheers,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:22:07PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 09:10:02PM +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor of tuxeyes. Which is a fancy version of
> > xeyes, but showing Tux, and other GNU figures
cker is a GNOME2 tool that can check links
> on a single web page or on a whole web site in order to determine
> validity of each page.
What's the main differences between the linkchecker debian package and
your proposed package? As I understand is, you have a GUI, and do
sta
unstable packages already available using a stable system?
Yes, what you seek is 'pbuilder' (preferred), but 'debootstrap' can
give you an unstable chroot environment as well.
Cheers,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
end on tetex-bin
and tetex-extra?
Thanks for your time,
GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
