Hi,
I've run into a technical issue with packaging CCL, which I describe
below. I don't know whether debian-mentors or debian-devel is a more
appropriate forum to post this - please advise if mentors is
inappropriate.
CCL was once in Debian, but under a different name, namely openmcl. I
be
Hi,
Please CC replies to my email address. Thanks.
I have put my preliminary packaging of CCL on Bitbucket as a Mercurial
repository, located at https://bitbucket.org/faheem/ccl-debian-tmp
Please test and report problem and suggest improvements. For
preference, open an issue.
This packaging is
8, The Fungi wrote:
>> On 2012-07-17 11:38:32 +0530 (+0530), Faheem Mitha wrote:
>> [...]
>>> CCL requires itself to build. Since it is not currently in the
>>> Debian archive, that raises the question of how this should
>>> happen.
>> [...]
>&g
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:45:44 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Or the mingw-w64 gcc crosscompiler, which has documented it's bootstrap:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=3Dcollab-maint/gcc-mingw-w64.git;a=3D=
> blob;f=3Ddebian/README.source;h=3D697d003e76d9afe20a40556bc619cc5e30a3c0e=
> d;hb
and pkg-common-lisp-devel@
is -- it appears -- not getting enough of my attention to see your
messages in time.
Ok, I'll do that.
Faheem Mitha writes:
1) I'd like to take over the outstanding ITP for CCL (#609047,
cc'd). I've written to Darren Ho, the creator of th
X-Debbugs-CC: Peter Van Eynde , Christoph Egger
, openmcl-de...@clozure.com,
pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Faheem Mitha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ccl"
* Package name: ccl
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi again
Faheem Mitha writes:
Could one just use upstream binaries instead? CCL has upstream
binaries available, which I use to initially build my Debian package,
for at least i386 and amd64. My package currently does not attempt to
build on
Hi,
I'm trying to build mercurial 1.3.1 on etch from the unstable sources, and
I think I'm close. I'm currently getting
fah...@etch:/usr/local/src/mercurial/mercurial-1.3.1/debian$ debuild binary
dh --with quilt binary
dh_install --with quilt
cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/debian/tmp/usr/lib'
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would he
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> * Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
>
> > > I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
> I think David already started with it, as we got a request for th
Dear People,
I've tried my hand at building Subversion 1.1.0-rc2 packages. I've
imitated the packaging of the official Debian packages as far as possible.
Whenever possible I applied the Debian patches. However, since I don't
understand exactly what I am doing, I suppose some breakage was
in
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would he
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> * Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
>
> > > I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
> I think David already started with it, as we got a request for th
Dear People,
I've tried my hand at building Subversion 1.1.0-rc2 packages. I've
imitated the packaging of the official Debian packages as far as possible.
Whenever possible I applied the Debian patches. However, since I don't
understand exactly what I am doing, I suppose some breakage was
inevi
18 matches
Mail list logo
