Hi,
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hi,
the new policy version 3.8.0 recommends a README.source that describes
how to use the patch system. I'm using dpatch and I thought the dpatch
maintainer publish a README.source with their package. But it didn't
happen until now. Does anyone who uses dpatch has writte
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Three, and here my Java ignorance begins to show, I see that the
upstream source also includes some .jar for which I am not sure I can
find the corresponding source. How can I gather more
Hi,
here some answers, if you have some more questions, the
debian-java@lists.debian.org mailing list might be a better place,
especially if you plan to make your application with a free alternative
of Java (i.e. not Sun's and not Blackdown's).
Jarle Aase wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to make a lit
Hello Bart,
is there some kind of agreement between Debian and Ubuntu concerning the
distribution part of the version?
I ask this because you seem to assume that:
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) << X.Y.Z-L (Ubuntu)
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) << X.Y.Z-KubuntuA (Ubuntu)
(also dfsg stuff doesn't s
Hi,
actually, you're supposed to use dh_installmenu (or cdbs) in your rules
file, and not add yourself the update-menu commands into the postinst/rm
files.
I _guess_ that the menu file isn't installed at all and that something
else takes care of adding the menu point into the Gnome menu.
What I
Hello Glen,
please take care that groovy is already packaged for Debian (version
0.1.0beta10-3), though it's more or less orphaned.
I looked into packaging a more recent version, but:
- the current package is pretty ugly (many binaries in it)
- cleaning it up would mean adding many packages in
Hi,
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
# Check whether we were configured to not start the services.
check_for_no_start() {
if [ "$SERVICE_DISABLED" = "yes" ]; then
This is such a broken behavior. Initscripts are enabled and disabled in
the configuration of the init system.
That's
Hi Enrico,
your best start is probably http://www.debian.org/devel/ and especially
the New Maintainers' Guide (at least, that's how I started).
Good luck, Eric
On 12/06/12 06:23, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:12:46AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I've seen wwwof
Hi,
On 15/07/12 20:08, Daniel Martí wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
Probably not. As far as
Hello,
I'm trying to get FreeMind files to be properly opened with FreeMind
within KDE/GNOME (and probably other freedesktop compatible desktops),
e.g. click in Konqueror on a FreeMind file (shown with the FreeMind
icon) and FreeMind is opened with the file.
I'm quite at the end of my knowle
, no need to copy me.
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Samstag, den 21.11.2009, 08:33 +0100 schrieb Eric Lavarde:
I'm trying to get FreeMind files to be properly opened with FreeMind
within KDE/GNOME (and probably other freedesktop compatible desktops),
e.g. click in Konqueror on a FreeMind file
Hi,
I now know why it's not working, it's because I'm testing under KDE 3.5
(Lenny) and it makes a difference for xdg-utils!
OK, here it is:
- under a sid chroot, i.e. without Desktop environment:
$ DISPLAY=:0 XDG_UTILS_DEBUG_LEVEL=100 xdg-mime query filetype New\
Mindmap.mm
Running /usr/bi
Hello,
George Danchev wrote:
* Generally, your sponsor(s) would want to test the packages, however that
would need certain home automation infrastructure to be in place which is not
available everywhere, so you might need to suggest a way to simulate their
operation if that is easily possible.
Hello,
I fear I know the (negative) answer, but perhaps I missed something: I
have one source package which creates a library and an application,
where each has its own (different) version.
The logical approach would be to have two binary packages created from
the same source, with two differe
Hello,
On 07/06/10 17:08, Stefan Haller wrote:
As far as I can see, there are currently two ways to avoid circular
dependencies:
[...]
(2) Rename the binary packages to:
* desktopnova-gnome
* desktopnova-xfce
* desktopnova-common
[...]
Solution #2 is much better, bec
entors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.1-1.dsc
- and also present in Svn-Java
svn+ssh://ewl-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/freeplane
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind r
Hello Monica,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to
package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P
Anyway I'm happy that someone has more courage and/or time to do it!
On 15
/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Eric Lavarde
PS: Lintian currently complains about the class-path manifest, but we
agreed on the Debian Java list that this is a special case (due to OSGi
specifics) that Lintian might be able t
Hi,
On 10/03/13 18:48, Antonio Valentino wrote:
The question is how to specify the the dependency.
The GUI app have to depend from binaries built from the same source code
(not previous of later versions).
For what I can understand the correct approach should be the one
described in [3,4], som
Hi,
On 10/03/13 20:17, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Hi Sven, hi Eric,
Il 10/03/2013 19:59, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
On 2013-03-10 19:26 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
On 10/03/13 18:48, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Configuration item 'binary:polsarpro Depends:2' has a wrong value:
Hi,
On 09/07/13 08:20, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:37:25AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:04:28PM -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
However, the upstream chose to put 0.9.5-1 in the changelog file,
You shouldn't care about changelog entries added by the
Hi,
On 06/09/13 11:31, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
Hi All,
I have a little python project which creates one executable script.
where should go the project.py ? is there a special place for a script
which later can be imported by other python script ?
The question is of course also if one script ju
The other question might be if this new package is really required because both
seem to do the same thing...
Fernando, you're the upstream author, you might want to join forces with the
other author.
Eric
Tobias Frost wrote:
>Hallo Fernando,
>
>please do not open new bug when you upload a ne
Hi Felix,
have you tried to use uversionmangle to add a 0 at the end of 1.0 -> 1.00 ?
Cheers, Eric
On 06/10/13 17:16, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
I am about to finish the jmapviewer package
(http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-osm/jmapviewer.git;a=summary)
but have a small problem with the ne
Hi,
gregor herrmann wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:12:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> > Packaging is out of the scope of Debian? That's an unexpected
>response. :-)
>> You asked about automated packaging, which isn't something we do in
>>
Hi Barry,
Are you saying that you're trying to build a Debian package under Ubuntu? It's
the same package format but else I'd say that you're asking for the kind of
strange behavior you're describing.
Cheers, Eric
On 14 April 2014 16:03:35 CEST, Barry Drake wrote:
>On 13/04/14 23:08, Tobias Fro
Hi,
I'm packaging FreeMind (old version somewhere on the upload path), and
the new version is requesting multiple packages. So here two questions:
- is there somewhere a specific description of multi-packaging? the new
maintainer tutorial isn't really explaining much and I couldn't find
anythi
Hi,
I'm packaging FreeMind (old version somewhere on the upload path), and
the new version is requesting multiple packages. So here two questions:
- is there somewhere a specific description of multi-packaging? the new
maintainer tutorial isn't really explaining much and I couldn't find
anything
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
- more specific question: one of the additional packages is a plugin,
FreeMind itself "requires" Java, the plugin "requires" Java and
FreeMind. Am I supposed to write in the control file that the plugin
Hi,
I have a java package (i.e. Architecture all), freemind, and linda gives
me the following warning:
W: freemind; File /usr/lib/mime/packages/freemind contained in /usr/lib
of Architecture: all package.
I've seen, there is a /usr/share/mime/packages directory but nothing in
it, I am supposed
Hi,
no problem, nothing was upload_ed_, everything is ready for the described
upload.
Eric
>
> Theoricaly, this shouldn't ever happen but anyways and since it's written,
> i
> think i be better to tell about it even if i'm certainly wrong on what
> really
> happened.
>
> [...]
>
> dpkg-buildpack
Hi,
have you read the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide"? That's what I started
with recently, and it's pretty easy to follow.
Install it with "apt-get install maint-guide" or have a look at
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/.
Cheers, Eric
>
> We are trying to make .deb packages using
> dh_mak
Hi,
I just sent this answer to an user, and now I have doubts: is there a
way to enforce dependency on a non-free Version of Java?
Thanks, Eric
Original Message
Subject: Re: Bug#292182: freemind will not start
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:29:49 +0100
From: Eric Lavarde <[EM
in advance,
Eric
Original Message
Subject: Bug#291946: freemind: Installs with java1.3 but won't works
Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:18:03 UTC
Resent-From: Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Eric Lavarde <
o: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:28:30 +0100
From: Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
the new version of FreeMind is coming with a whole lot of pre-compiled
libraries (jar files to be precise). Some of these libraries already
exist in Debian, so fine; one isn't free but I can do without, so
acceptable (it's the online help, so it's not so nice, but well); and
three are not (
fixes, it doesn't go
forward.
Matt Brubeck wrote:
Eric Lavarde wrote:
I got the below bug report, and I'm a bit hesitating: on one side I
understand the wish from the requester, and it would be a useful
extension of the package; on the other hand, I already use
update-menus and updat
Hi,
package is anyway already in contrib. So OK!?
Eric
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:35:22AM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote:
Eric Lavarde wrote:
the new version of FreeMind is coming with a whole lot of pre-compiled
libraries (jar files to be precise). Some of these libraries
Hi,
I had a first look at cdbs and it looks quite neat, but, from the
documentation, I don't understand how I am supposed to start packaging:
1. from scratch (possibly starting from an existing package using cdbs)
2. or using dh_make, and then cdbs'itting it.
(the rules file is actually not the pr
Hi,
perhaps a bit off-topic but we had the discussion already a while ago,
and I don't come further on what is the "Right Thing To Do".
My understanding after the last discussion is that:
- if one use a standard kernel, say kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7
- one install as well kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-k7
return to Continue?"; \
fi; \
done
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/pwc'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `kdist_image'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/pwc'
Modul
l
build should require that. Don't take the name of root in vain.
3. make-kpkg strongly suggests the usage of fakeroot. Why then?
Cheers, Eric
Victor Seva wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Lavarde wrote:
Nevertheless, if I try to compile pwc as non-root (how it s
Hi,
as a last input, I compile pwc the ugly way and it worked, only some
warnings, but I'm not experienced enough to say if they're important.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/modules/pwc$ make
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.10-1-k7/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/pwc modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr
Hi,
it seems I haven't been clear enough:
- the fact that I need to be root to compile the pwc module is _not_
something you are responsible for. I think it's a problem between
kernel-headers-2 and make-kpkg (either kernel-headers-2 should
be installed belonging to group src, group-stick
Hi Daniel,
On 3 June 2014 20:54:58 CEST, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>Hi Mentors!
>
>I'm currently packaging a notification application, BuildNotify [1].
>
>It only makes sense to start the application when the user logs in,
>which can be done using the $(HOME)/.config/autostart directory or
>adding an
Hi Olivier,
I move this thread to debian-java, where it belongs :-) - debian-mentors
in Bcc
I think that the short answer is that there is no such howto, but I might
be wrong:
- there was a thread about the topic
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2007/12/msg00039.html (and you can
search furthe
Hi Laurent,
Al Nikolov said:
> Laurent Guignard wrote:
>
>> I have read the main documentation about pbuilder but i haven't seen if
>> it is possible to build a package from upstream sources.
>> In all examples, the command is like "pbuilder build ???.dsc"
>>
>> What is the correct method to build
And if it's nevertheless a packaging question (i.e. how to add a global
variable as part of the installation of a package), the policy states that
no executable can depend on the definition of a global variable, hence
your package should not define any global variable (but you should
document that
Hi,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso said:
> 2008/12/7 Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Looking quickly through the binary download, you might have quite a lot
>> of
>> fun (JOGL is in Debian, Gluegen isn't, JNA neither, Antlr is there, dxf
>> viewer not, etc...)
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire said:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 05:12:38PM -0700, Brian C. Christensen wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ganttpv".
>>
>> * Package name: ganttpv
>> Version : 0.11a-1
>> Upstream Author : Brian C. Christensen
>> * URL : http://ww
Hi,
sorry for this, but I think another round might be required:
1. move sample.ps, barcode_with_sample.ps, docs/* from debian/install to
debian/docs.
2. I think you should just remove the Depends line (as far as I understand
the thing you could just "cat barcode_with_sample.ps > /dev/lp0" and it
Hello,
I'm trying to add a 'get-orig-source' target to my debian/rules file, and
it looks like this:
get-orig-source:
debian/export-freemind-cvs.sh 0.8.0+01 FM-0-8-0
It works quite fine, but the Debian policy manual specifies under [1] that
"This target may be invoked in any directory",
Hello,
did I miss an answer to the below email, or is the question more stupid
than I thought?
Thanks, Eric
> Hi,
>
> I have the problem that menu entries I've created are properly registered
> in Gnome, but neither in KDE nor in XFCe. And I have no clue what I'm
> missing.
>
> The 'debian/menu'
Hi Ben,
if you create yourself the orig.tar.gz, the building tools from debian
don't try to create it themselves.
i.e. something like:
tar cvzf foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz --exclude=foo-X.Y/debian foo-X.Y
before actually building the package should solve your problem.
Hope this helps, Eric
--
You don't
Hi,
>> * debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright
>> holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and phpmailer is missing (and
>> likely also others, stopped after finding these two).
>
> Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules don't install
> them, as
Hello,
OK, I got the point ;-), I'll keep the same version for both binaries. A
README.Debian will do the trick to avoid complete confusion.
Thanks for the insights,
Eric
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
==> I'm not sure what my (tablet) mailer did with my initial posting, but
you might have got it garbled, hence I apologize and send it again. Eric
Hi,
I would tend to agree with what Paul wrote but IANAL and you should ask on
debian-legal for a more authoritative answer. A few more comments below
57 matches
Mail list logo
