I never really got onto the SPF/SRS bandwagon.
qc-usb #421444
Device driver for some really old quickcam cams. I still have one so
if you're interested in taking the package I could probably arrange to
ship you my camera.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabbe
27;m honestly just curious and I don'ty think anyone
likes it when someone cuts in line ahead of them.
Eric Dorland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
pgpR5ypm3vy2n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
; On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
> > <http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php> and it appears that today the DAM has
> > apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
> &
Ok... well, since no one seems too bothered by this, I guess it's not a
problem. But does anyone know if the DAM has some procedure for picking
people out of the queue, or is it all quite willy-nilly?
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Just forwarding my ITP to see if anyone would be willing to sponsor me.
The package is all done, and can be downloaded from
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~edorla/debian/ . Thanks.
- Forwarded message from Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:07:06 -0500
From
1.so.0, what happens if the next release is
> libfoo1.so.1? The least-bad option that seems to hold forth is to name the
> package 'libfoo10' (perhaps with a delimiter between the 1 and the 0?)... and
> then petition the upstream to un-break their library names...
>
> HTH,
>
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Actually it's not version 2.0 of Imlib... its a completely new library
> > called Imlib 2... so the versioning is correct...
>
> However, consider:
>
> - Imlib2 is int
"release". I'm guessing i'm going to have to rename and retar the
directory, but i couldn't really find any policy on how much to
change. Is it alright to let the thing untar into some other directory?
Eric Dorland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861
ould i put this non-free?
* Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:00:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > i'd like to package the opengl manpages... but there tarballs are a bit
> > strange... they're .Z files to begin with, and they don't a
es, I'm honestly just curious and I don'ty think anyone
likes it when someone cuts in line ahead of them.
Eric Dorland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
PGP signature
; On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
> > <http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php> and it appears that today the DAM has
> > apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
> &
Ok... well, since no one seems too bothered by this, I guess it's not a
problem. But does anyone know if the DAM has some procedure for picking
people out of the queue, or is it all quite willy-nilly?
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Just forwarding my ITP to see if anyone would be willing to sponsor me.
The package is all done, and can be downloaded from
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~edorla/debian/ . Thanks.
- Forwarded message from Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:07:06 -0500
From
1.so.0, what happens if the next release is
> libfoo1.so.1? The least-bad option that seems to hold forth is to name the
> package 'libfoo10' (perhaps with a delimiter between the 1 and the 0?)... and
> then petition the upstream to un-break their library names...
>
>
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Actually it's not version 2.0 of Imlib... its a completely new library
> > called Imlib 2... so the versioning is correct...
>
> However, consider:
>
> - Im
"release". I'm guessing i'm going to have to rename and retar the
directory, but i couldn't really find any policy on how much to
change. Is it alright to let the thing untar into some other directory?
Eric Dorland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861
ould i put this non-free?
* Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:00:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > i'd like to package the opengl manpages... but there tarballs are a bit
> > strange... they're .Z files to begin with, and they don't a
http://www.lobefin.net/~steve/debian/pool/main/ - this is the fixed
> version that doesn't depend on build-essentials. If anyone has any
> suggestions, I am all ears. automake is not one of my strengths, and I
> would like to sort this out.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Steve
>=20
--=20
Er
unterstand why ! I made a diff -Naur from the two directory, and the
> content is the same. Then I made a diff from the md5sum of each file in
> the directory, and it is also the same ! That's why I don't understand
> why it doesn't compile (with debuild) from the debian
i.e., a clean environment, had no problem.
>
> Unless you or someone else can tell me what is going on, and a better way to
> fix it, I am inclined to go ahead and include automake in the build
> dependencies.
>
> For reference, the buildd logs are here:
>
> http://buildd.deb
g=kcdlabel&ver=2.7-1&arch=s390&stamp=1035140946&file=log&as=raw
> and source can be downloaded from
> http://www.lobefin.net/~steve/debian/pool/main/ - this is the fixed
> version that doesn't depend on build-essentials. If anyone has any
> suggestions, I am all ears
unterstand why ! I made a diff -Naur from the two directory, and the
> content is the same. Then I made a diff from the md5sum of each file in
> the directory, and it is also the same ! That's why I don't understand
> why it doesn't compile (with debuild) from the debian
i.e., a clean environment, had no problem.
>
> Unless you or someone else can tell me what is going on, and a better way to
> fix it, I am inclined to go ahead and include automake in the build
> dependencies.
>
> For reference, the buildd logs are here:
>
> http://buildd.deb
23 matches
Mail list logo
