looking for a sponsor

2002-03-18 Thread David H. Askew
I'm trying to make a contribution to the debian project with .debs of jedit, and possibly a seperate .deb for jedit-docs, and have filed a wishlist bug against the package. -reading thru the new maintainer docs I see that I need a sponser in order to continue with the process of becoming an offic

Re: no changes file

2002-03-18 Thread David H. Askew
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 01:58, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi! > > I think this thread belongs to -mentors... > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +, David H. Askew wrote: > > dh_clean > > dpkg-source -b jedit-4.0 > > dpkg-source: building jedit using existi

Re: no changes file

2002-03-19 Thread David H. Askew
rieu wrote: > "David H. Askew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > and fakeroot debian/rules binary, but neither produces a .changes > > file! > > Again, what's the output from dpkg-buidpackage ? > > > > .. only errors/complaints report

packaging question

2002-04-02 Thread David H. Askew
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package. so there will be jedit jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)? background(for non-jedit users) : jedit has a built-in doc-browser which loads a startup page

no arch debs

2002-04-17 Thread David H. Askew
I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? ..since jedit is written in java ... its technically platform independent ... is it possible t

looking for a sponsor

2002-03-18 Thread David H. Askew
I'm trying to make a contribution to the debian project with .debs of jedit, and possibly a seperate .deb for jedit-docs, and have filed a wishlist bug against the package. -reading thru the new maintainer docs I see that I need a sponser in order to continue with the process of becoming an offici

Re: no changes file

2002-03-18 Thread David H. Askew
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 01:58, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi! > > I think this thread belongs to -mentors... > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +, David H. Askew wrote: > > dh_clean > > dpkg-source -b jedit-4.0 > > dpkg-source: building jedit using existi

Re: no changes file

2002-03-19 Thread David H. Askew
rieu wrote: > "David H. Askew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > and fakeroot debian/rules binary, but neither produces a .changes > > file! > > Again, what's the output from dpkg-buidpackage ? > > > > .. only errors/complaints report

packaging question

2002-04-02 Thread David H. Askew
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package. so there will be jedit jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)? background(for non-jedit users) : jedit has a built-in doc-browser which loads a startup page.

no arch debs

2002-04-17 Thread David H. Askew
I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? ..since jedit is written in java ... its technically platform independent ... is it possible to

sponsorship for jedit debs

2002-06-17 Thread David H. Askew
responding, and even flaming if I deserve it. David H. Askew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]