[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Bialasinski) writes:
> >> "MS" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MS> Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> will dpkg remove a conffile on a upgrade, if I remove it from the
> >> package?
>
> MS> I guess so. Why don't you try it on your system? Make a backu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Norris) writes:
> I was wondering if anyone can point me to some information on what
> drivers are compiled-in (i.e. not modules) to the kernel on hamm's
> rescue-disk image? I'm trying to generate an alternate rescue-disk
> containing the latest version of the aic7xxx SCS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Chrony (essentially an xntp3 clone) includes two binaries: a daemon that
> runs as root and a control program that runs in user space. To perform
> certain operations the user running the control program must provide a
> password which is stored in a file readable only
Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But now: How do I put the additional Debian-Logo (only 2k) into the
> diff file ??? Can I rely on the sharutils package though it is only
> "standard" and not "essential" ?
Well, since the sharutils won't be used for installing the package,
but o
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alexander Koch wrote:
> > > I have a source which has "samples/admin/" as a dir.
> > > Now I want to have a simple
> > > install -m 644 samples/* $(tmp)/usr/doc/$(pkg)/examples
> > > without touching the admin/ subdir at all.
> > >
>
> Assuming that
What, exactly, is the proper location for .xbm and .xpm icons?
I ask because I had just been putting the fvwm95 icons in
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps - but I notice that other packages
place icons in a variety of places:
usr/X11R6/icons
usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmap (Almost certainly a typo
So I screwed up in packaging, and going directly from bo my fvwm95 for
hamm won't upgrade. Ooops; I made a mistake - this happens. (People
upgrading from a previous hamm version did fine - I really thought I'd
tested this, but apparently not thoroughly enough)
Ok, so after the hamm release I g
After looking at the most recent WNPP list, I decided that there were
packages (specifically, fvwm95 and tkdesk) that I would be willing to
maintain, so I then read the documentation on www.debian.org on
applying to become a maintainer.
However, after reading that documentation and what the WNPP h
I have just been approved as a Debian maintainer (as in, I've been
told I'll get my master account and subscription to debian-private
tomorrow) and I've gotten fvwm95. Now, whether you may know it or
not, fvwm95 has had a truly ugly configuration up untill now, because
of a bug in FvwmTaskBar. (W
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With your proposed scheme: warn on fvwm95-n and fail on fvwm95-(n+1); it
> means if I never install fvwm95-n but instead skip straight to
> fvwm95-(n+1) I miss out on the warning and am told that the installation
> isn't possible until I delete the old sy
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I've checked the archives, followed the instructions, and I
> still can't get it working. What I did (as best I can remember):
>
> On my local machine, did ssh-keygen, stored the files in
> .ssh/identity and .ssh/identity.pub.
>
> Telnet
I know I read this at one point, and I _think_ I remember most of it
correctly, but which doc. describes how dpkg compares version numbers?
I think that in the case of tkdesk I may have to use epochs (the
upstream authors have 1.0-beta-1 through 1.0-beta-5 coming before
1.0-pre-1, which comes befor
What's the procedure for moving something that's been uploaded into
unstable into frozen? Whom do I contact and what information do I
need to give them? Do I then send out a debian-*-changes message?
I uploaded something into unstable but have been convinced that it
belongs in frozen.
Should I
I am the (new) maintainer of tkdesk and am (finally) getting around to
packaging it up (blame my end of term exams). My question is: where
should this go? It'd be a shame for hamm not to have tkdesk; however,
at the time hamm was declared "frozen", tkdesk was not in it, but in
project/orphaned.
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tkdesk requires BLT. in frozen, only BLT2.3 exists, which is
> compatible to tcl7.6/tk4.2 only. Last weekend I uploaded blt8.0-unoff, a
> BLT version compatible to tcl8.0/tk8.0 to unstable (not frozen). Since
> tkdesk seems to profit from the byte com
There's an annoying bug in fvwm95 that I'd like to close (actually,
there are several, but the rest are for another day). Here's the bug
- if one installs fvwm95 but does not install the "menu" package, then
fvwm95 uses the menu derived from the example fvwm95rc provided in the
upstream source (ra
16 matches
Mail list logo
