load_0.6.4-2.dsc
The update closes the RFA bug, as well as another two bugs by adding their
patches. Some lintian cleaning took place as well.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Descriptio
he package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for your quick reply, Arno.
"Arno Töll" wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix
>thanks
>
>Hi Daniel,
>
>On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote:
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net
>Orphan it again. Regarding this bug you can either close it or we
>reassign to ftpmaster and ask them for a package removal.
Orphaning again, OK.
And as far as this bug, I'll leave it up to you :-)
>Yes, I understood. However, times change as do packaging styles and
>available technologies. T
>I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether
>or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find
>it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it.
>
>*I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough.
Oh, don't take me wrong - You pointed it out, I
retitle 658306 RFS: preload [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
thanks
Just a little fix on that subject style. Nothing important.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
wnload the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ptop/ptop_3.6.2-5.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
My apologies, I've by mistake left some fields blank.
Upstream author: PostgreSQL team
URL: http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/
License: BSD
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
close 658530
thanks
Bas van den Dikkenberg wants to be the new maintainer, thus why I'm removing
my package from mentors and closing this bug.
Cheers!
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Also, might I ask why are there three changelog entries? Or has there been
*three* uploads in a two day period?
Cheers!
e. Would
anyone know how to make that work with debian/watch?
Thank you.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
? I would very much like to, but then, which GPL license
should I refer to when I don't know which one to choose? (GPL-[123])
Thanks for your time,
Daniel
PS: Still looking for a sponsor, thus I would really appreciate it if someone
helped me through this adoption :-)
--
Daniel Mart
GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9.
The package can be found at mentors, as usual:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc
Would anyone be willing to upload?
Thank you!
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58B
L:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Da
.n as usual:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I'd be very grateful if somebody uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would very much appreciate it if anyone had a quick look at them. Thanks for
your time!
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ckage with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
he package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/identicurse/identicurse_0.9+dfsg0-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
P.S. There's a debian/collab-maint git site, should I push once the pa
Why did I file the RFS as ITP? :) Thanks for the correction, Benoît.
I'll have to start doing the "block # with #" thing as well.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
>> I already downloaded and analyzed the source code so I want to start
>> working on it. Also, what does maintaining means? Just correcting
>bugs
>> or improving it? Like UI or something?
>
>Maintaining a package is to do all the work of taking a non-Debian work
>and making it a Debian pac
x27;t
give any kind of specific help and I have absolutely no idea as to how to
solve this issue.
I'm obviously open to more suggestions, and welcome any patience you put in
this :-)
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ain/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I'd be very grateful if you could review it and upload it.
Thank you both for your time, much appreciated.
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
far as I know the correct thing to do is to remove
the orig part.
What do you think about it?
If you think I should've left the orig tarball intact anyway, please do tell
me. I'll re-upload the package to mentors.debian.net since 3.9.3 has been
released, as well.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Da
heers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hich would give extra work), I've sent a mail to Jakub about the
subject. I'll wait a week or two for his answer. For the time being, the newer
upload seems to be fine apart from those two warnings.
I'd be very glad if someone sponsored this package for me.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
he manpage.
* debian/copyright now refers to GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9.
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.
I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thank you,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
- Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.
* debian/copyright:
- Switched to DEP-5 format 1.0.
* Added "status" support to its init.d script.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility level to 8.
I would be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Dan
close 661988
thanks
I submitted this RFS since I thought the ITA bug had been abandoned, but it
seems like for some reason the package is being left aside for now. Closing
this bug.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ork. (Closes: 447402)
* debian/watch has been fixed.
Regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ebian/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0.
I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tream's
changelog file.
I'd be very glad if someone were to upload this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7;t seem sensible
to me, at least as far as I can tell.
That being said, just wanted to thank everyone who is involved in this
mentoring project. Really helpful.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
# Re-orphaning.
submitter 658426 !
owner 658426 !
close 658426
thanks
I wish to re-orphan this package. The changes are minimal, plus the
package is pretty old and unpopular.
Cheers,
Dan
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpwpdTVPorfU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
It has been a while since I first uploaded this package, so I thought a
bump wouldn't hurt. This is a pretty popular piece of software; I'd be
very grateful if anyone considered uploading it for me.
Ki
thash-dev, openssl
That doesn't seem to make much sense. Where does burp come in here?
Unless you've packaged the wrong debian/control file, I can't understand
why would it warn about burp's build-depends if it's neither any of the
packages nor in any of their depends.
;s packaged in any other format other
than .tar.gz. I suppose renaming it to prelink-20111012.orig.tar.bz2
would be enough? All the patching is done via *.debian.tar.gz as usual.
Thanks for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpJfavEg2O7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thanks for the heads up.
I'm waiting for a reply in its O/ITA bug, because this upload might be a
NMU after all. Once it's decided, I'll fix this issue and re-upload to
mentors.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgp866Mw7f9oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bart,
Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug
now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as
its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU,
right?
Thank you.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58B
I'm waiting for -3 to hit Unstable to repackage my version from scratch
as a QA upload. This latest revision includes the patches in -2, I
suppose.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpfZ7YvO7L4J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
package from 2090925-1 it
worked flawlessly with the same dpatch -> quilt script, I'm assuming
some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this
package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch.
Any clues?
P.S. I tried once again, now deleting debian/patches completely. 3.
than
> dpatch.
>
> Since they exist in the upstream, the can just be dropped.
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike
I did remove them before running deb3, that's not the problem. Moreover,
building 20111012-1 *without* any patches fails both with the old
compat level 5 and with any newer compat lev
Hmm, my bad. Taking a closer look at the deb3 script, it does change
debian/rules. So much for that.
That was the problem. Sorry for bothering you. Will upload soon.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpyKdrKCluKn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uild flags
- postrm uses set -e in its body rather than in #!
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.0. No changes needed.
I'd very much appreciate if anybody could review this package and upload
it for me.
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpTCUwYJsUKe.
enELEC.tv/issues/812
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/204502?id=204502
I'll look into it.
This problem used to happen back in 2003, we are obviously doing
something wrong.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpenyeJgGwSe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
now exactly what the solution is going to be, but those discussions
> are about related problems, which I hope to somehow guide you in the
> right direction.
Hmm, right. A quick google search brought up threads almost ten years
old, but now that I take a closer look at your links this
debian/rules makes no reference to any of the
two, I suppose it would need a quilt pach.
Anyhow, for now this is as far as I've gotten.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpHvvJ74anfo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
et/package/heybuddy
Alternatively, here is its .dsc file ready to be downloaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I'd very much appreciate it if anyone took the time to review this
package.
With kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí -
s accepted by the DFSG, but not by the GPLv3. I've emailed
the upstream author about the subject. For now, debian/copyright has
been solved.
A new .dsc file is up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
Thanks for your help, Jakub.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpaRRmAl2IrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tian hardening complaints by adding the Debian build flags.
Regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpo53gpW3Dai.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r as I have seen the debian/copyright file is
carefully made, since not only the licenses must be listed but the
copyright owners too.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpIzbnj93WY9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e old. The package is lintian clean and fixes the CC-BY-SA + GPLv3
issue the 0.2.3 release had.
Regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgptSHUgtdQ01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
u know if there's anything new.
Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away?
On a side note, I'm neither a DD nor a DM yet - a sponsor would be needed.
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgprUFdbjlxMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > >
Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the RFA bug for
xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new maintainer's guide, as
well as the packaging basics. I do know how to make a package from scratch and
build it, but I am having more trouble with creating a new
Etienne Millon wrote:
>* Daniel Martí [22 20:40]:
>> Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the
>> RFA bug for xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new
>> maintainer's guide, as well as the packaging basics. I d
>$ dget -q
>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
>curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
>dget: curl dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
>failed
I confirm that behaviour. Maybe it's in
oaded this package for me. This will hopefully be
my
first package update, so please be patient in case I made any mistakes. Thanks
for
your time.
Kind regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Descriptio
tively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3
signature.
Jakub Wilk wrote:
>* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-15, 17:12:
>>Here you have the link again!
>>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
>
>s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog.
>
>I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than the
>
>old one
Make sure the .orig.tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz are correctly named, and if you
are just doing a debian update (e.g. upstream.version-2) make sure to build the
package with dpkg-buildpackage -sa. Then, dput mentors *.changes should do the
trick.
Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>Hi All ,
>
>I run into
Original Message
From: "Daniel Martí"
Sent: Sun Jan 15 17:49:03 GMT+01:00 2012
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov".
Package name: xfont
I was not aware of such packaging team, thanks for the tip.
Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>Hello Daniel,
>
>On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Martí
> wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov".
>
>Since this is a font package I would s
Wow, thanks for that work.
Michael Stummvoll wrote:
>Hi mentors,
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for my fresh adopted package
>"suckless-tools".
>
> * Package name: suckless-tools
> Version : 39-1
>Upstream Author : Serval (look at the projects in the URL for more
>info)
> * URL
his
> message?
>
> >
> > 2013/1/15 Arno Töll
> >
> >> Sorry for the hijack of your RFS, I'm testing our new mail filter.
> >> Please ignore me :)
> >>
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpC6ejxKbOoy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
thus there's no further
need for this patch. (Closes: #537043)
* Fixed vorbisgain.1 to make the use of -r clearer. (Closes: #698253)
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpxLLTnuC21R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
67 matches
Mail list logo
