Bug#825965: RFS: gtk3-nocsd/3-1 [RC]

2016-05-31 Thread Christian Seiler
e Multi-Arch case. * Ship /etc/X11/Xsession.d/01gtk3-nocsd by default. (Closes: #824620) * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8. (No changes.) * Xsession scripts: properly handle package removal without purge. * Process README.md with markdown to create nice HTML file

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

2016-06-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/03/2016 06:25 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 03/06/16 17:10, Wookey wrote: >> On 2016-06-03 16:43 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a >>> pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? >

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

2016-06-03 Thread Christian Seiler
is rather useless... But other programs will now hopefully also work.) Regards, Christian Description: Make MAIN__ a weak symbol Make MAIN__ a weak symbol, to make sure that non-f2c binaries can link against libraries created by it. Also make main() a weak symbol, just in case, because we really

Bug#825693: RFS: nlohmann-json/1.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2016-06-13 17:06, schrieb Muri Nicanor: On 06/13/2016 02:35 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: debian/copyright: It has Files-Excluded: test/catch.hpp but the tarball still contains this file. i don't know what i'm doing wrong. i've tried multiple sytaxes, but the file somehow resists of being

Re: Deterministic "ar" breaks build

2016-06-19 Thread Christian Seiler
(Cc'ing the reproducible-builds mailing list) On 06/19/2016 10:23 AM, Ole Streicher wrote on debian-mentors@: > since a while, the "ar" command is built with --enable-deterministic-archives, > which basiacally resets (among others) the timestamp to null. This has > the unfortune disadvantage, that

Re: ITP: no-new-privs -- Set PR_NO_NEW_PRIVS before executing another program

2016-06-26 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, (cc'ing mentors since you already filed an RFS [1]) > It builds a single, eponymous, binary package. > > I think it is a useful, though extremely simple, utility: > system administrators may use it to starts processes as a non-privileged > user and ensure that they cannot attempt to exploit l

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

2016-06-27 Thread Christian Seiler
(resending because I got the mailing list address wrong, sorry) On 06/27/2016 05:00 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > ftpmaster spotted in two of my packages a code copy of libdisorder[1] > which better should be packaged separately. Since I'd like to create > dynamic and static library (upstream Makefi

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

2016-06-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/27/2016 07:49 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Other comments regarding the package: Oh btw. I just noticed that you don't install the manpage for the library function in the -dev package (because d-shlibmove doesn't care about manpages, and you don't have an .install fil

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

2016-06-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/27/2016 10:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> - you build tool/ropy, but you never use it? Neither in the test suite >>(dh_auto_test doesn't do anything) nor do you package that - why? > > Si

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

2016-06-28 Thread Christian Seiler
(Merging replies.) On 06/28/2016 08:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> [Multi-Arch] >> In your package, that's already the case, so you can just add the header >> to debian/control. > > A, well, ye

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

2016-06-28 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/27/2016 10:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> - if you use autoconf/automake, you don't need to use d-moveshlibs >>for multiarch, dh_auto_configure / dh_auto_build / dh_auto_install >>will do all the heavy lifting for you (just create proper .install >>files for the packages, and use

Re: How to specify a generic architecture to GCC (Was: SSE3 issue with iqtree when trying to enable i386)

2016-06-28 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/28/2016 11:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I admit I can not answer the question asked by upstream. The package in > question is iqtree[1] and they said that they have different > computational kernels implemented to respect different hardware. > Current Git[1] does not even build - may be due

Bug#829242: RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP]

2016-07-01 Thread Christian Seiler
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-isns" * Package name: open-isns Version : 0.96-1 Upstream Author : Lee Duncan * URL : https://github.com/open-iscsi/ope

Re: pause command line utility

2016-07-01 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/02/2016 02:45 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > I need pause utility to keep gpg-agent in foreground: > gpg-agent --use-standard-socket --daemon ./pause > > Something like following C program: > > #include > > int main (void) > { > return pause(); > } > >

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 03:49 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: libacl1-dev > > This is doubly strange, because it worked for libisofs 1.4.2-3 before i did > apt-get "update" and "dist-upgrade" today (7 Jul 2016), and because now > > apt-get install libac

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 04:07 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> What does >> dpkg -l libacl1-dev >> say? > > $ dpkg -l libacl1-dev > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWai

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 04:35 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libacl1-dev: >libacl1-dev depends on libc6-dev | libc-dev; however: > Package libc6-dev:amd64 is not configured yet. > Package libc-dev i

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 05:32 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Now i can concentrate on the problem why lintian underneath debuild -S says: You are using an older version of lintian (probably the one from Jessie). If you use lintian from sid, it will properly say that 3.9.8 is the latest version (and a couple of

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 06:46 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> You are using an older version of lintian (probably the one from Jessie). > > It is what apt-get "update" and "dist-upgrade" gave me on Sid. > It was downloaded duri

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 08:38 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> I would highly recommend you doing an apt-get dist-upgrade again > > So let's see how a successful end of dist-upgrade looks like: > [...] > No fireworks on success ? Looks good. To be sure

Re: Blocked bugs

2016-07-04 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/04/2016 09:13 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote: > I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my > package had lintian errors and updated the change log noting that > packaged fixes the ITP bug and uploaded to the debian-mentors site. I > then placed an RFS bug for the packag

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

2016-07-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/06/2016 10:36 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > all the symbols have been updated: > e.g. > > [snip] > > - u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0 > > + u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 1.0 That's a change in the minimum version of the symbol, but not the symbol name itself (that's still the

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

2016-07-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/06/2016 11:30 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Basically, the debdiff is not showing ABI incompatible changes > (please double check, I'm really far from being expert) Changes in the header files: - u2fh_rc (return code for lots of functions) got an additional enum value, but the o

Re: pbuilder error

2016-07-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/06/2016 06:25 PM, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Unpacking libfakeroot:i386 (1.21-1) ... > dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: > compressed data is corrupt > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess returned error exit status 2 > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/arch

Re: pbuilder error

2016-07-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/06/2016 06:55 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Sometimes I'm behind a proxy, and I get a *lot* of hash sum mismatches > when using pbuilder/sbuild. On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents" files while pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the latter, that problem s

Re: pbuilder error

2016-07-07 Thread Christian Seiler
Well, there you have it: File 1: On 07/07/2016 11:09 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hashes of expected file: > [...] > - Checksum-FileSize:2286262 [weak] > Hashes of received file: > [...] > - Checksum-FileSize:2254536 [weak] File 2: > Hashes of expected file: > [...] > - Checksum-FileSize:

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

2016-07-08 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/08/2016 10:47 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Patrick Schleizer , 2016-07-08, 14:18: >> Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the >> individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, >> corridor-init-snat, ...) be acceptable by Debian policy > Yes, this is fine. If I may p

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

2016-07-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/09/2016 12:20 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 8 July 2016 at 23:53, Christian Seiler wrote: >> - If I use dh_installman's ".so" feature to do automatic linking, >>dh_installman will not replace the manpage with a link, because >>it also doesn&#x

Bug#829242: RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP]

2016-07-10 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear mentors, I've uploaded an updated version of the package to mentors (and pushed to git), that incorporates the following two changes: - debian/copyright: s/License: MIT/License: Expat/ - use .so for manpages (see [1] an followups) The package is available under: https://mentors.deb

Re: Secure Vcs-Git on alioth

2016-07-17 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/17/2016 02:15 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Regarding Lintian's informational warning about insecure git:// URIs in > the Vcs-Git field: > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri.html > > I can switch easily from: > > git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/trend.git > >

Bug#831694: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-3 -- lightweight and secure socks5 proxy

2016-07-18 Thread Christian Seiler
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor, but: On 07/18/2016 04:53 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > * debian/rules: > - Add param "--disable-ssp" to dh_auto_configure command. > Thanks to Aaron M. Ucko and Boyuan Yang. (Closes: #829498) Please don't disable the SSP unconditionally, because it's a u

Bug#831694: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-3 -- lightweight and secure socks5 proxy

2016-07-18 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/18/2016 05:40 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Please don't disable the SSP unconditionally, because it's a useful >> defense-in-depth strategy. Especially since you are packaging a >> network service, I w

Re: Please help upgrading eigensoft

2016-07-19 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/18/2016 10:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > ... > cc -Wl,-z,relro pca.o eigensrc/eigsubs.o eigx.o nicksrc/libnick.a -lgsl > -lblas -lgfortran -lrt -lm -o pca > eigx.o: In function `eigx_': > /build/eigensoft-6.1.2+dfsg/src/eigx.c:100: undefined reference to `dspev_' > eigx.o: In function `eig

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2016-07-19 11:29, schrieb Dominique Dumont: On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote: dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Not a user myself, but the package is already in the archive (it's not an ITP), and I think reproducibility for _all_ of Debian is a goal

Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler

2016-07-25 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/25/2016 02:51 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote: > The problem is: ld is not stable w.r.t. linking pure assembler files. How so? $ cat write.s .text .global _start .type _start, @function _start: mov $1, %rax mov %rax, %rdi lea str, %rsi mov

Re: Bug#832299: python-ruffus: FTBFS: sphinx.ext.mathjax: other math package is already loaded

2016-07-25 Thread Christian Seiler
Control: block 832299 by 827806 On 07/25/2016 02:02 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Format: "jpg" not recognized. Use one of: canon cmap cmapx cmapx_np dot eps > fig gd gd2 gv imap imap_np ismap pdf pic plain plain-ext png pov ps ps2 svg > svgz tk vml vmlz x11 xdot xdot1.2 xdot1.4 xlib > ' returned n

Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler

2016-07-25 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/25/2016 09:28 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote: > Christian Seiler schreef op 2016-07-25 18:14: >> I don't quite get what you mean, I never had any problem with >> that. > > {Probably going off topic here] > A pure assembler file means full control over section

Re: Request for access to porterbox

2016-07-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/27/2016 09:17 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:51PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >> Rationaly: reproduce #832544, #832543 > I wonder why these bugs are important and not wishlist. Because they are FTBFS bugs on non-release archs and hence should be of severity im

Re: systemd WantedBy= target changed - canonical way to clean up old .wants symlinks?

2016-07-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/27/2016 10:21 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote: > Hi! > > When changing a systemd WantedBy= target... > > Is there a canonical way to clean up the old .wants symlinks? > > These are not automatically removed on package upgrades. Considered a > bug or feature? :) Bug, I reported that a while ba

Re: Request for access to porterbox

2016-07-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/27/2016 07:41 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Hello, I am looking for DD to sponsor my request for access a portbox > to debug #832544, #832543. > Architectures requested: hurd, m68k, sh4 If you have access to x86 hardware (as most people do), you can run Hurd in a VM - no need for a porterbox.

Re: Request for access to porterbox

2016-07-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/28/2016 12:21 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:07:17PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> m68k and sh4 do work in qmeu-user-static chroots, the setup >> is not quite as trivial however. (I can give you a tarball >> that will work in pbuilder and schr

Re: Request for access to porterbox

2016-07-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/28/2016 12:56 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > qemu-debootstrap fails for m68k with Illegal Instruction at the > beginning of debootstrap --second-stage. I did get a working > chroot by fiddling with stuff for a while manually IIRC (not on > the computer I'm currently on, I&#x

Re: Request for access to porterbox

2016-07-28 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/28/2016 08:52 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:56:11AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> That works now? When I set up a SH4 chroot a while back, I had to >> use the qemu-sh4-static binary from the i386 version of the >> qemu-user-static packa

Bug#827933: RFS: yabar/0.4.0-3 [ITP]

2016-08-02 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/27/2016 03:28 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > 13. Why a 'low' upload urgency? Counterintuitively, this means that you > think the package is more likely than usual to be buggy and so it should > take longer to migrate to testing; it doesn't actually mean "less > important". Unless you think the u

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

2016-08-08 Thread Christian Seiler
On 08/08/2016 10:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ifstat upstream is alife and responsive. The command is just complete, > no new features have been added. So I guess we should keep ifstat, if > only for kfreebsd and hurd. Maybe the best idea would then be to have iproute2 ship the ifstat util

Re: gcc-6 and sip help (bug 812138)

2016-08-15 Thread Christian Seiler
On 08/15/2016 12:43 PM, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > This fails to compile with the following message: > > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/gudjon/nb/pyqwt3d/ > pyqwt3d-0.1.7~cvs20090625/build/py2.7-qt4/configure/OpenGL_Qt4' > g++ -c -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-secur

Re: Any idea why bitbucket watch file does not work?

2016-08-31 Thread Christian Seiler
On 08/31/2016 09:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I was following the Wiki[1] to get a bitbucket watch for metaphlan2[2]. > Unfortunately uscan does not detect any match and after starring on the > code and trying several other regexp I failed finding the mistake. > > Any idea how to get the watch fi

Re: Daemon config update

2016-08-31 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, Am 31. August 2016 13:51:41 MESZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov , >Please share best practices on daemon configuration upgrade -- should >I restart (no reload, unfortunatelly) daemon, when I upgrade it? In general: yes. Even if your daemon supports reload, you should restart it, because you've ins

Re: Daemon config update

2016-08-31 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, Off topic: I initially replied to both you and the list, but your address doesn't seem to exist. Just as a heads-up, in case that's unintentional. Regards, Christian

Re: Daemon config update

2016-08-31 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, to add two more comments : Am 31. August 2016 18:55:08 MESZ, schrieb Christian Seiler : >Am 31. August 2016 13:51:41 MESZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov >, >> If not, how should I tell user, >>that default configuration changes and they may want to restart daemon >>

Re: d/control: Depends on same version

2016-09-04 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/04/2016 09:40 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > if i have source package foo-x.y that builds binary packages foo_x.y and > libfoo_x.y, how can i declare a dependency from foo on libfoo where > libfoo has to be the same version of foo? If both are Arch: any (or linux-any or something similar): Depen

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

2016-09-05 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/05/2016 07:20 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:07:51PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> so, i've got my first two FTBFS bugs (on mips and hppa)- what the >> recommended way of testing fixes for architectures i don't have >> testmachines of? > Porterboxes. See https://ds

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

2016-09-05 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/05/2016 08:59 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > On 09/05/2016 08:33 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>Since you depend on systemd.pc, which is part of the >>systemd package, just Build-Depend on systemd to make >>systemd.pc available. You won't need porterbox acce

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

2016-09-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/06/2016 11:57 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Seiler , 2016-09-05, 20:33: >> Also note that there are plans to make init non-Essential in the future, > > The future is now! init is non-essential already. You can remove it > from your unstable chroot if you want to. Oh

Re: atomic_LIBS

2016-09-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/10/2016 03:22 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > On 09/06/2016 12:44 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > [...] >> I didn't think about adding -latomic to the linker flag list >> directly via -Wl. I just tested your suggestion and it's really >> funny; libtool does man

Re: NFS_SUPER_MAGIC portability

2016-09-25 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/25/2016 03:12 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > I have the problem that in a package (casacore) there is basically the > following code: > > -8< > #include > #include > > Bool Directory::isNFSMounted() const > { >struct stat

Re: Finding the correct alignment for all architectures

2016-10-12 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 10/12/2016 11:51 PM, Thomas Weber wrote: > I am maintaining lcms2. In #749975, I received a patch to ensure correct > alignment for doubles von MIPS. I have forwarded the patch upstream[1], but > in the latest release, upstream has chosen a different way. It is now > possible to configure t

Re: Data updates in debian packages

2016-10-30 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/30/2016 10:20 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > IETF is responsible for internet standards, not for leap seconds. They > will take the leap seconds from IERS. I would assume that this > connection is well-established to rely on it. I was not so much > questioning upstream here, but I worry a bit abo

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

2016-10-30 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/30/2016 11:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:04:16AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: >> Older versions of the packages already exist in jessie-backports. My >> key has been added to the backports ACL (and has worked for similar >> updates in the past), and I have DM upload

Re: Data updates in debian packages

2016-10-31 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/31/2016 09:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: >> The required timeliness depends a lot on what you're using leap seconds >> for, and in particular if you need to know about them far in advance, or >> if it's only necessary to have an updated table before the leap second >> it

Re: Data updates in debian packages

2016-10-31 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/31/2016 10:30 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > debian/triggers -- > interest /usr/share/zoneinfo/leap-seconds.list > ---8<-- > > However, I now get the following error when I try to update tzdata: > > dpkg: cycle

Re: Building package under kfreebsd/hurd

2016-11-07 Thread Christian Seiler
On 11/07/2016 12:46 AM, Elías Alejandro wrote: > I wonder if there's a way to build packages for distinct > architectures, specifically for > Hurd or Kfreebsd. Do I have to create a new installation or use qemu?. In my experience the easiest way to do so is to use a virtual machine (I prefer libvi

Re: Scala 2.10

2016-11-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 11/11/2016 03:08 AM, Marko Dimjašević wrote: > # Adding debian-mentors >> /build/scala-2.10.5/build.xml:218: Directory /nonexistent/.m2/repository >> creation was not successful for an unknown reason pbuilder sets the home directory of the pbuilder user to /nonexistent to make sure that builds

Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed

2016-11-16 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, Am 16. November 2016 10:28:41 MEZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov : > * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno As a current co-maintainer of dietlibc in Debian, could you elaborate here? I've spent the last couple of months fixing all sorts of bugs in there (and improving packaging, for

Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed

2016-11-17 Thread Christian Seiler
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 11/18/2016 08:34 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2016-11-16 13:09] Christian Seiler >> Am 16. November 2016 10:28:41 MEZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov : >>> * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno >> >> As a current co-maintainer

Re: Writing outside of build dir

2016-11-25 Thread Christian Seiler
On 11/26/2016 01:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On 11/11/2016 0826:45 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> pbuilder sets the home directory of the pbuilder user to /nonexistent >> to make sure that builds don't modify files in the home directory, >> which is forbidden by Debi

Re: Writing outside of build dir

2016-11-26 Thread Christian Seiler
On 11/26/2016 02:31 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 02:30:59AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >>> 2) Is there a common pattern for handling upstream tests that break this >>> rule? Maybe there's an alternative to disabling them? >> >&

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-11-29 Thread Christian Seiler
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 846237 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ondir" * Package name: ondir Version : 0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 Upstream Author : Alec Thomas * URL : http://swapoff.org/ondir.html

Re: Problems with openssl when upgrading r-bioc-rtracklayer

2016-12-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 12/04/2016 08:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to upgrade r-bioc-rtracklayer[1] to the latest upstream version > (see trunk in SVN) but the build failed with: > > * installing *source* package 'rtracklayer' ... > ./configure: line 1676: syntax error near unexpected token `OPENSSL,' >

Re: Please help with symlink_to_dir expression (Was: Bug#847234: r-cran-rcurl: directory vs. symlink conflict: /usr/lib/R/site-library/RCurl/examples)

2016-12-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/06/2016 11:22 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/12/16 21:36, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 07:06:39PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> Package: r-cran-rcurl >>> Version: 1.95-4.8-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >>> Usertags: piuparts >>

Re: Please help with symlink_to_dir expression (Was: Bug#847234: r-cran-rcurl: directory vs. symlink conflict: /usr/lib/R/site-library/RCurl/examples)

2016-12-06 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/06/2016 11:45 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/12/16 22:34, Christian Seiler wrote: >> On 12/06/2016 11:22 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >>> The version number should be the version number immediately before the >>> one where the dpkg-maintscript stuff i

Re: usbguard soname stability

2016-12-08 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/08/2016 02:34 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > the usbguard source package ships a shared library libusbguard0. i asked > upstream about bumping the soname when the interface changes, but > upstream considers usbguard 0.x as not stable yet and will start > maintaining soname version beginninig with

Re: Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

2016-12-08 Thread Christian Seiler
Control: retitle -1 soapdenovo2: FTBFS with parallel builds (dpkg-buildpackage -J$n, $n > 1) On 12/08/2016 09:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:11:07PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:58:37AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> it seems there are

Bug#847650: RFS: fgetty/0.7-2

2016-12-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/10/2016 10:43 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > >> * Add dietlibc-dev into Built-Using, since it is linked statically, >>as mandated by Policy §7.8. (Closes: #847576) > > > I'm not sure about hardcoding the version, this will proba

Re: Bug#847650: RFS: fgetty/0.7-2

2016-12-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/10/2016 11:15 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/10/2016 10:43 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> control: owner -1 ! >> control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> >>> * Add dietlibc-dev into Built-Using, since it is linked statically, >>>

Re: Distinguishing native package / package with upstream

2016-12-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/10/2016 06:03 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Then I stumbled across a package that has in its .dsc file: > > | Format: 1.0 > | Source: package-name > | (...) > | Version: 4.3.2-1 > | (...) > | Files: > | 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef 12345 package-name_4.3.2-1.tar.gz > > While the version

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

2016-12-13 Thread Christian Seiler
On 11/02/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Warning in rgl.init(initValue, onlyNULL) : > RGL: unable to open X11 display > Warning: 'rgl_init' failed, running with rgl.useNULL = TRUE > Error: segfault from C stack overflow Hmm, was going to take a shot at debugging your segfault, but I simply

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

2016-12-13 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 12/14/2016 08:10 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:32:24AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> On 11/02/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> >> Hmm, was going to take a shot at debugging your segfault, but I >>

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

2016-12-14 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 12/14/2016 08:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > I'm going to try an i386 build in a VM running a stable kernel > and see if that does indeed change things and if I can reproduce > the problem. Should that not be the issue though then I really > can't repro

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

2016-12-14 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 12/14/2016 11:47 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/14/2016 08:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> I'm going to try an i386 build in a VM running a stable kernel >> and see if that does indeed change things and if I can reproduce >> the problem. Should th

Possible workaround (was: Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more)

2016-12-14 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi again, On 12/14/2016 03:00 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > If I had to guess what was going on in the backtrace, I'd suspect > an infinite recursion in R code, which translates to infinite > recursion of the underlying C code. But I'm really not sure here. Interestingly enoug

Re: Possible workaround

2016-12-14 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 12/14/2016 03:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > thanks a lot for your extensive analysis about of the stack problem. I > admit I have no idea why this large stack is needed on those > architectures with stable kernel. I also have no idea why everything > went fine with treescape versi

Re: Possible workaround

2016-12-14 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 12/14/2016 04:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > One quick thought: does it die in _compilation_ which we have seen with other > (C++-heavy) packages? No, g++ works fine here. (The C++ file itself is trivial if you look at it.) Current package in Debian: http://sources.debian.net/src/r-cra

Re: Possible workaround

2016-12-15 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/15/2016 02:37 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 15 December 2016 at 14:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > | Sorry, but I have no idea how since I'm totally clueless currently and > | upstream also did not yet responded to this after the initial idea that > | it might be some ape related issue was not

Re: Possible workaround

2016-12-15 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/15/2016 03:03 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 15 December 2016 at 14:42, Christian Seiler wrote: > | On 12/15/2016 02:37 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > On 15 December 2016 at 14:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > | > | Sorry, but I have no idea how since I'm tota

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I did a source upload of r-cran-treescape at 2016-12-19 21:51:35. > > When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures > a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is > not build after > 36 hours. >

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, (dropping cc) On 12/21/2016 12:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build > people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? There's a mailing list for that: https://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/ See also th

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/21/2016 12:19 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/21/2016 12:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build >> people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? > > There&#

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear mentors, I'd appreciate it if a friendly DD could have a look at this package and sponsor it. Thanks. :) On 11/30/2016 02:03 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 846237 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-22 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for taking care of this. On 12/22/2016 12:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) chmod a-x debian/ondir/usr/share/ondir/integration/* > > why no dh_fixperms override? I forgot about dh_fixperms, will change that in the next iteration. > 2) > CFLAGS_FOR_MAKEFILE=$(shell

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-22 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/22/2016 01:18 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:29:23PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Hi Gianfranco, >> >> Thanks for taking care of this. >> >> On 12/22/2016 12:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > [snip] >>> w

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-22 Thread Christian Seiler
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Gianfranco, I've uploaded an updated version of the package to mentors (and also to git on alioth) that fixes these issues. On 12/22/2016 12:29 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/22/2016 12:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> 1) chmod a-x de

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-22 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Gianfranco, thank you very, very much for sponsoring and your proactiveness w.r.t. the public copyright statement issue! On 12/22/2016 03:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>> CFLAGS_FOR_MAKEFILE=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) $(shell >>> dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) -DVERSION=\"$

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

2016-12-22 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, as announced on IRC, I'm just doing a review, since I'm not a DD and can't sponsor: - packaging in a VCS would be nice to have (plus the appropriate Vcs-Browser / Vcs-... headers in d/control) - debian/copyright: * Tobias Klauser wasn't just active in 2016, the earliest cop

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

2016-12-23 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, sorry for the formatting, writing this on my phone. Am 23. Dezember 2016 10:18:52 MEZ, schrieb Andreas Henriksson : >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12:17AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> - init.d: this file name works with dh_installinit, but is not >>documented, s

Re: as upstream - Makes sense to run 'make clean' when running 'make all'?

2017-01-04 Thread Christian Seiler
On 01/04/2017 07:20 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote: > as upstream, does it make sense to run 'make clean' when running 'make all'? Typically it doesn't because it breaks incremental builds, which makes development uglier. (You have to rebuild everything everytime you call 'make'.) For the purpose of

Re: Gentle does not build on two architectures

2017-01-31 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 01/31/2017 09:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > while gentle 1.9+cvs20100605+dfsg1-5 has migrated to testing and #845844 > is marked as done it still affects unstable since it does not build on > kfreebsd-amd64 and x32[1]. On both architectures it fails to build with > > > /usr/bin/l

Re: serious bug in usbguard installation

2017-02-04 Thread Christian Seiler
On 02/04/2017 10:09 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > i just found a bug (#854192) in the installation procedure of usbguard: > when i install usbguard on a minimal stretch system, the installation > stalls and never ends successfully. apparently it has something to do > with dbus being a dependency of usb

Re: serious bug in usbguard installation

2017-02-04 Thread Christian Seiler
On 02/04/2017 11:25 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > That said: I just tried this in a VM, and systemd appears to be > quite broken if you try to start a Type=dbus unit when DBus is > installed, but not properly configured. And while that is not > normally the case, I couldn't ge

Re: Packaging a gui app

2017-02-26 Thread Christian Seiler
On 02/26/2017 04:52 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2017-02-26 at 10:47, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > >> On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote: >> >>> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do >>> I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as

  1   2   >