Re: new pkg: libcrypt-simple-per

2005-12-19 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:11:16AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >[Russ Allbery wrote:] >> Is the source package available? It's hard to judge packaging and >> impossible to sponsor a package from just the deb. > >here is the archive from where i generate the deb: >matrixhasu.altervista.org/debian/lib

Re: RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:43:29PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: >I've kept the architecture field in the control file as any. It has some >inline C code, hence I guess it should be built from source for each >architecture; though the module itself is arch-independent. Hence, I've >installed the module i

Re: RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:28:59PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: >On Friday 31 Oct 2003 17:07, Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> $(MAKE) install PREFIX=$(TMP)/usr > >That introduces the foll. lintian warning: > >W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib

Re: Lintian report that man pages are not compressed with --best

2000-05-02 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:05:25PM +0100, Pedro Guerreiro wrote: >How does lintian (or I) see if a man page is compressed with the --best >option? lintian runs `file' on each page, then checks that the output contains: /gzip compressed data/ and /max compression/ Regards,

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

2001-06-07 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
rl's >removal after perl-modules 5.6.1-3 has reached testing. Thanks, please do that. Regards, -- Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

2001-06-06 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
rl's >removal after perl-modules 5.6.1-3 has reached testing. Thanks, please do that. Regards, -- Brendan O'Dea[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:43:29PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: >I've kept the architecture field in the control file as any. It has some >inline C code, hence I guess it should be built from source for each >architecture; though the module itself is arch-independent. Hence, I've >installed the module i

Re: RFS: libogg-vorbis-header-perl

2003-10-31 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:28:59PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: >On Friday 31 Oct 2003 17:07, Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> $(MAKE) install PREFIX=$(TMP)/usr > >That introduces the foll. lintian warning: > >W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib

Re: lintian goes wild?

2001-09-12 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
t supported" would work, although perhaps you could use a value which would cause sys_syscall to return -ENOSYS. >Yep, looks like exactly it. Either the kernel needs fixin, or h2ph needs >to deal with it. lintian should also probably be changed to us

Re: Proper section for perl manpages

2002-02-18 Thread Brendan O7;Dea
o man8? > >Well perl policy says to use the standard directories. The fact that it >only bothers to list two of them does not override debian policy which >says sysadmin stuff goes in man8. Correct. Since neither of the issues described above affect pages in section 8, using a suffix of