>> where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
>
> sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
> it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
> actually having a package in Debian.
>
> It's for use with http://mentors.de
> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
> to debian-mentors list?
It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing filter
>>> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
>>> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
>>> to debian-mentors list?
>> It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
>> uncomfortable to people who did not setu
> Unfortuantly, I cannot find a link to the mailinglist archive for
> pkg-virtualbox-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Hi everyone,
Continuing the theme of excessive noise in the mailing list, we can look at
simple statistics for the first 7 days of this month:
$ curl -q http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2>
/dev/null | \
grep '' | wc -l
191
$ curl http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentor
>> I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
>> reason to filter these messages?
>
> Try your luck: #658498
I haven't seen it. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Hi Jerome,
> does someone know Debian packages using get-orig-source in d/rules ?
For example you can look at my package:
https://github.com/tehnick/libterm-shellui-perl-debian/blob/master/debian/rules
Nothing difficult. You can add any script or list of commands to get-orig-source
section of m
Hi,
> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
> announced,
> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>
> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
> prefer a new version on mentors
Hi,
Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!
Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
1) Error "Package closes bugs in a wrong way".
Your script processes wnpp pseudo-package in wrong way.
2) Package has lintian warnings:
-
Hi,
> Hm, it doesn't show the error with the new uploaded version, only for the
> older versions. Now it says "Package closes a WNPP bug" with a green colour
> instead.
This was discussed yesterday:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/msg00687.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBS
Hi,
>> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
>
> Thanks a lot, this is exactly what I was looking for :)
Just for a note. It was the message with brief list of changes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/02/msg00013.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi list,
I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream tarball.
This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point to?
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
>> I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream
>> tarball.
>> This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
>> I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point
>> to?
>
> Well, there's nowhere in the DFSG or co
Thanks all for answers.
I was searching for:
/doxyfilter -g
This command generates Doxyfile which is necessary for Doxygen.
> However I can't find anywhere in the Policy that it's an actual
> requirement to re-generate this kind of files at build-time.
So do I. That's why I've asked here should
>> You need to add doxygen-latex and graphviz as build-deps.
>
> Rather as Build-Depends-Indep.
>
>> override_dh_auto_build:
>
> which would also run when building only the arch-dep packages. rather:
>
> build-doc:
>
>> cd doc ;\
>> rm -rf html/ ;\
>> qmake ;\
>>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qxmpp-lc".
* Package name: qxmpp-lc
Version : 0.3.61-1
Upstream Contact: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev
* Lice
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package "kde-gtk-config".
* Package name: kde-gtk-config
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Aleix Pol Gonzalez
* URL :
https:/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
Hi everyone,
I have strange problem with my package eiskaltdcpp-qt.
When I compile this binary file using gcc 4.6 program works fine.
But when I compile it using gcc 4.7 program crashes at launch time.
Full backtrace from gdb shows that segmentation fault is in Qt library [1].
Bug was also confi
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo
Ok, I can rename binary package to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-style for example.
Does it look good for you? Or have you another suggestion?
> second, what does it do that kde-config-gtk-style doesn't do ?
It
Hi,
You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)
>> kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
>> * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
>> * preview
Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one:
Hi,
You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)
>> kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
>>
Hi,
Problem is solved. Thanks a lot to Pino Toscano.
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1164201336840...@web15e.yandex.ru
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
>
> * Package name : leechcraft
> Version : 0.5.6
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qxmpp-lc".
>
> * Package name : qxmpp-lc
> Version : 0.3.61-1
Hi,
I uploaded updated package. There are such changes in it:
* compat level and debhelper version were increased to 8
(not to 9 because I still support packages for Ubuntu Oneiric)
* debian/control was updated:
- binary package was renamed to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-styles
- binary p
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "eiskaltdcpp" which is already available in Debian.
Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches.
But new binary package
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
> package "uhub" which is already available in
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
>> We are talking about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package
>> kde-gtk-config which has wider functionality.
> That's debatable.
I can't agree with you: kde-gtk-config has wider functionality objectively.
As I wrote earlier, kcm-gtk does not allow to:
* sele
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "psi-plus-i18n".
* Package name : psi-plus-i18n
* URL : https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
* License : GPL-2+
Description : translation files for Psi+
Hi Stephen,
>> I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ?
>
> It must have expired - I'm re-uploading it just now.
Have you received the mail with note that your package was deleted from m.d.n.?
If no it could be an imperfection of m.d.n., and it affects all of us.
Regards,
Boris
--
to check that program builds fine
on s390 and s390x before this release.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-09 21:44, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponso
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking fo
Hi,
> No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is
> still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten
Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no
RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor
for
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> 2) Handling of the transition
>
> I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
> .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
> that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
> 04_no_
Hi,
> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> f
Hi,
> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> f
Hi,
More than 2 weeks passed without any reply.
Is here any interested in translations for Debian?
Package is very simple. It will not require a lot of time for check.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-18 22:40, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
Hi,
> Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
> themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
> package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
> consider including it in your psi-plus package?
Yes, most of sources comes wi
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub" [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in debian-devel-anno
Hi,
Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-config&suite=experimental
And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:
kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstab
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> 117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.
> Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.
Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for up
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-science mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libquantum".
It builds those binary packages:
libquantum-dev - library for the simulation of a quantum computer
(develo
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> Why don't you upload it into Debian Science instead ? (and set the
> maintainer to Debian Science ?
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
> See
> http://debian-science.alioth.debi
>> This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
>> I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
>
> Well, you should ask to the QA team then, no ?
Hmm, you are right. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unadf".
It builds binary package:
unadf - Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)
To access further information
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processed moment ago. Thanks.
2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
> via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
> uploads (tested using dput).
>
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvisual".
It builds those binary packages:
libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio vi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sg
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for
Psi+
thanks
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdaudio".
It builds those binary packages:
libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
(debug)
libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio C
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
>
> You say "QA upload" below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
> right?
Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.
> Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
>> Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with
>> increasing of
>> version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
>
> Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
> So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU
Hi,
> I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
> problem.
Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.
> I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
As usual.
> Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "sgml-data".
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.
>> * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Added debian/watch.
* Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depen
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "xmhtml".
It builds those binary packages:
xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "qpxtool".
It builds those binary packages:
libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
pxf
Hi,
> The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
> download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
> between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
> construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
> the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
exa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "lightspeed".
It builds binary package:
lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like
To access further information about this packag
Hi,
> % debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb
> [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
> different names, permissions or owners.]
>
> Files in first .deb but not in second
> -
> -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr
2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
>
>> Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
>>
>> Now there are only such changes:
>>
>> libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "awffull".
It builds binary package:
awffull - web server log analysis program
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
U
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
It builds binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://men
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy
thanks
Waiting for reply:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html
(See also timestamps)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb
See also:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html
Quotation:
"I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Hi,
> turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
Regards,
Boris
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Forwarded from debian...@lists.debian.org :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
>> which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
>> an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
>>
>> But now
Hi,
> I'm interested in making a Debian package of my own software Fortuner,
> homepage https://github.com/jnumm/fortuner . The software is a
> modernization of classic UNIX fortune program. I think it falls under
> the games category so I'm writing on pkg-games list, too.
>
> Should I put this pa
Hi,
> Unfortunately your package "..." was rejected because of the following
> reason:
>
> You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
> unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports
> oldstable-backports-sloppy
> oldstable-security stable-security t
>> I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
>> package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
>
> Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day in
my case.
> Ho
>> Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package
>> files and they will be available using dget?
>
> Unfortunately no, I usually just serve them off my home Internet
> connection when I need to do that, but I'm also a sysadmin by trade.
> I guess you don't have a personal Web
>> Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day
>> in my case.
>
> I assure you no one will mind having one hang around. PPAs are nice to
> have around, even if you don't use them.
>
> I have one that I use for stuff like this, it's not like it's a burden
> on the sy
Hi,
> Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as I use laptop)
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Hi,
>> I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
>> (scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
>> How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
>> package, or just package it, change the maintainer to me and
>> upload it to mentors.debian
Hi,
Unfortunately my sponsor of "psi-plus" package still has no time for package
"psi-plus-i18n" (since March month) and I am looking for a sponsor for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/673457
To prevent possible questions: yes, newer translations are available in
upstream repo, but this version (0.15
Hi,
> How can i exclude hurd-i386 from a build
Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/83861349362
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
It builds those binary packages:
leechcraft - Full LeechCraft installation
leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for
LeechCraft
leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
leec
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc
Anyone interested?
2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
>
> It builds one binary package:
> zgv - SVG
Hi,
> I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
> problem.
>
> During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
> at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Po
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package "matanza".
It builds binary package:
matanza - Space ascii war game
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "astromenace" and "astromenace-data".
Basic information:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Fathi Boudra
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-style-qtcurve". I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email I sent on 30 October 2012)
Basic information:
http://
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
of my package "plasma-widget-cwp".
It builds these binary packages:
plasma-widget-cwp - Customizable Weather Plasmoid (CWP)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http:/
fields Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser
* Removed useless file README.source
So potential sponsor doesn't need to spent much time for its checking.
Also this update is quite important because it closes bugs and improves the
package quality.
Boris Pek wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regu
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor unfortunately can not upload packages at present time due to
life circumstances. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of
package.
There are such changes in this updated package:
eiskaltdcpp (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Update to stable rele
>> It builds those binary packages:
>> leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
>> leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
>> []
> None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing what
> leechcraft is.
Thank you for interest. Of cause I can describe
> Didn't have time for a through review yet, but a couple of things I'd
> like to comment on:
Thanks a lot for your remarks. I fixed some of them.
>* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
> would recommend using either, but not a mix between the two, as that
> loo
> (Please don't CC me, when replying to list mail)
Ok, I have just read interesting document:
http://catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I have never used mailing lists befor.
It's a little bit archaic method of interaction...
>>> It would also be nice if you'd describe how exactly the .or
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
in Debian repo for a long time).
This package contains small count of source fil
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor unfortunately can not upload packages at present time due to
life circumstances. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of
package.
There are such changes in this updated package:
plasma-widget-cwp (1.5.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Update to stable
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
