On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:24:34PM +0200, Francesco Aloe wrote:
> Hi mentors,
> eterm-themes is an orphaned package and because this I am interested in
> adopting it, but i need a sponsor :)
Hello Francesco,
There are several issues:
1) eterm-themes is not orphaned but RFA'ed. This means I am sti
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 07:44:09PM +0200, Francesco Aloe wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> i must apologize because i have done a mistake,a newbie error, i didn't
> want hijack your package for asking a ransom. True is that this package
> isn't orphaned but RFA'ed, I wrote on your Bug report logs - #313183 a
> m
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:50:49PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Goswin,
>
> Thanks very much for the succinct lesson on biarch and multiarch.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > If you want to support 64bit (and n32) gmp on ppc, s390, sparc, mip
available at
ftp://megrez.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/Linux_packages/debian/potato
This package has already been approved for Task & Skills but I wait
for DAM approval, so I look for a sponsor to upload my package in the
meantime.
Thanks you !
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpi3O4
Hello,
I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
and arch-independant (documentation).
I would like
debian/rules binary-indep
create the arch-independant package
and
debian/rules binary-arch
create the arch dependant package
Does the policy requires this ? (I
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
>
> Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
>
> `binary-
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:46:48PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > The way I set up the Makefile
> > (like in example/rules.multi) when I do a debian/rules
> > binary-indep(or arch), the build targ
Hello !
I have implemented build-arch/build-indep in my package.
Here is the skeleton of my debian/rules files.
If Bug #72335 go into policy, it will be helpful to have a template file,
so I will appreciate your suggestions and comment about it, and especially
problems because they will be in my p
available at
ftp://megrez.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/Linux_packages/debian/potato
This package has already been approved for Task & Skills but I wait
for DAM approval, so I look for a sponsor to upload my package in the
meantime.
Thanks you !
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP signature
Hello,
I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
and arch-independant (documentation).
I would like
debian/rules binary-indep
create the arch-independant package
and
debian/rules binary-arch
create the arch dependant package
Does the policy requires this ? (I
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
>
> Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
>
>
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:46:48PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > The way I set up the Makefile
> > (like in example/rules.multi) when I do a debian/rules
> > binary-indep(or arch), the build targ
Hello !
I have implemented build-arch/build-indep in my package.
Here is the skeleton of my debian/rules files.
If Bug #72335 go into policy, it will be helpful to have a template file,
so I will appreciate your suggestions and comment about it, and especially
problems because they will be in my
Hello developpers,
My package (pari) has the bad habit of breaking compilers.
Only gcc-3.0 compiles pari correctly on ia64, hppa and arm.
So what is the best way to ensure pari is not compiled with a buggy compiler
on these archs ? I don't want buggy packages generated...
I could
Build-Depends
Hello developers,
I would like to change the permission of a directory in a new
version of my package, but it seems that when you upgrade a
package, dpkg keep the old permissions on directories.
Specifically /var/games/toppler is 755 root.games for now. I would like
to change it to 770 root.gam
Hello Developers,
dh_make produce a debian/rules that look like this (for a single binary package).
build:
dh_testdir
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
binary: bu
Hello developpers,
My package (pari) has the bad habit of breaking compilers.
Only gcc-3.0 compiles pari correctly on ia64, hppa and arm.
So what is the best way to ensure pari is not compiled with a buggy compiler
on these archs ? I don't want buggy packages generated...
I could
Build-Depends:
Hello developers,
I would like to change the permission of a directory in a new
version of my package, but it seems that when you upgrade a
package, dpkg keep the old permissions on directories.
Specifically /var/games/toppler is 755 root.games for now. I would like
to change it to 770 root.game
Hello Developers,
dh_make produce a debian/rules that look like this (for a single binary
package).
build:
dh_testdir
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
binary: b
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:23:48PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:17:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> > 'install' do not fully install the package.
>
Hello all,
What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
Cheer,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please CC me)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> > The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
> I think "-ICVS" pa
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:55:52PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What is the best way to handle native Debian packages under CVS?
> > The problem is to avoid the CVS directories going in the tarball.
>
> cvs-bui
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 02:07:51PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>I think "-ICVS" passed to dpkg-buildpackage does the trick. See the man
> >>page of
> >>dpkg-source for details.
> > No, this will remove the CVS dirs from t
Hello,
ldapsearch does not work for me anymore with db.debian.org:
(both woody and sid version)
$ cat ~/.ldaprc
HOST db.debian.org
BASE dc=debian,dc=org
$ ldapsearch uid=ballombe
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such object
Is it a know problem or I am just doing something stupid ?
Cheers,
--
as requested by Felix Salfelder to build gap-dev object files with
-fPIC for this purpose.
Instead of using sed, Sage should use a linker script, this would be
much cleaner.
gap (4r6p5-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules:
- build gap-dev object files with -fPIC to be compatible with us
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 12:11:37PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> > Let give a try. I am dealing with the libgap-sage package [1].
>
> Thanks for the extensive details.
>
> > To begin with, GAP is a Computer Algebra System (CAS).
> > From an u
27 matches
Mail list logo
