dpkg-deb --build or dpkg -b if you really want to do such
things. Needless to say, you better forget about this possibility in its
entirely.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Li
lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00365.html
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt
.org/devel/testing
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
[3] http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
urse this does not prevent you to look for sponsors
nonetheless.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBA
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPIIDrAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt49AP/2lWc2MCInSrk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Slavko,
On 27.01.2012 23:06, Slavko wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/packages/my
> ^
thanks, fixed and committed!
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D
ve.html#s-main
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPJGwFAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt6
ebian.net isn't updated yet, so consider ourself
being in a transitional period where both approaches are fine. That is
something coming up in a few days though.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.01.2012 21:10, Slavko wrote:
> please, will be change in mandatory way announced here?
I will announce the the mentors.debian.net change, but I can't do much
to get people adapting the the new workflow.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno
asy opt-in possibility to everyone
who is interested to read them.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.
ractices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis
[4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
[5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny
[6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
[7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg00001.html
[8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
- -
s do packaging styles and
available technologies. This package wasn't touched for years. It is
your job to bring a package in shape if you want to take it over. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
hat to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether
or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find
it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it.
*I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03.02.2012 12:36, Daniel Martí wrote:
> Agreed. I didn't mean I wouldn't solve those issues, the fact is
> that since support for this package will be dropped, there's no
> need in talking about them :-)
I *suggested* that to you. It's your or an
phaned (#592977)
* no reverse dependencies
* dead upstream
* let's put it that way: "limited usefulness"
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using Gnu
please get in touch with Debian's Virtualbox maintainers. They might
consider sponsoring you.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
now, you may choose
either alternative but don't do both.
I'd also ask you to subscribe to the debian-mentors mailing list.
Doing so, you would realize all RFS bugs end up here anyway and you
could read replies Ansgar sent to you.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.02.2012 19:56, Boris Pek wrote:
> I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
> reason to filter these messages?
Try your luck: #658498
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG
which are determined
by the +x bit.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPOV+4AAoJEMcrUe6dgP
are more
flexible. ;-)
> Are there other aspects of a UID change that I am overlooking?
As long as either your name or your UID matches, you are fine. That
said, I am not sure how exactly the key transition works for DMs. I
could be wrong, but I think there is no automated update or a DM's
ke
o ignore you more easily.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPPXuAAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtN4
, indeed.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPPvERAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtf
onsorship-requests' based BTS workflow. Beyond, no automated
integration is done yet.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozill
13115
[4] http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/7996/bootstrap40.png
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQI
nd copy its contents at build time to a
defined position in your maintainer script (e.g. just like debhelper
does with #DEBHELPER#).
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Commen
elper/).
> Could it be that dh_maintinsert is something that at least has not
> been suggested before?
Ask Joeyh :)
I could imagine dh_installdeb could be taught to parse such a magic
line in addition to #DEBHELPER#, but that's up to Joey, really.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
nce almost a decade or so.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/03/msg00013.html
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/Apache/PackagingFor24
[3]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=blob;f=debian/PACKAGING;hb=next
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daem
ned are fairly nitpicking suggestions I admit.
Moreover you can ignore me anyway, as you don't need to convince me as
I can't sponsor you after all. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
ned are fairly nitpicking suggestions I admit.
Moreover you can ignore me anyway, as you don't need to convince me as
I can't sponsor you after all. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
one cares enough for it. Thus I'd suggest you to file a RM bug,
point out reasons why the package should be removed and stop bother
(don't forget to update the WNPP bug).
If someone cares enough he can re-upload the package later as said.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeep
ntion.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPe4H8AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtAjQP/14wpz
pt and such, instead the archive-wide
meta-data needs to be signed (there are tools like reprepro which can
help you to achieve that). This can, but does not need to be same key.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
w that, though.
Just add "* QA Upload" to the changelog entry to make Lintian shut up.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - ht
Hi,
On 07.04.2012 12:42, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>downtimed - monitor of downtime, shutdown, and crashes
this sounds quite interesting. I'll likely have a look at this at some
point this weekend unless someone beats me on it or Sven finds time.
--
with kind regards,
Arno
e the dependencies out of them.
Otherwise you did good work as I used to know from you.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d a way to achieve that in proper LSB headers.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d to use is not used anymore either.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uscan(1) [1] and other Debian core services.
[1] http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=uscan
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
m appears to be local. The problem is either dput
(although I couldn't reproduce it) or there is something broken with
your network connection.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-threaded-dev
There is a typo. Moreover, you should mention the two bugs this fixes.
> * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.3
don't do this in a NMU.
Please send an updated package and I'll see what I can do, given I broke
it at the first place.
--
with kind regards,
Arno
6 and #669476) unless
the maintainer steps in first.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 20.04.2012 22:27, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> Do you want me the change the changelog also ?
Yes, of course you should mention things you fix in an upload. Moreover,
you shouldn't push the standards version in a NMU.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on
nd on that
* Do not hard code the error log path in the very same file. Instead use
${APACHE_LOG_DIR} as a prefix. Likewise for the access.log.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ove entries and such.
Of course that's nothing which should be advocated on a mailing lists
where the purpose of it is to assist people to make proper, well made
and clean packages.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
ind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
is there still anything left to come from you?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cluded in Debian. Just obey
the usual NMU rules for now (i.e. don't do things like Jari does in
#668077 for your targeted package which is sadly what he regularly does).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Descripti
3]
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-mscriptsinstact
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Arno Töll, BSc.
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Wavecon GmbH | Ludwigstrasse 2 | 90763 Fuerth
Web: wavecon.de | Mail + Jabber a...@wavecon.de
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkee
e file system?
iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
I am willing to sponsor your package if you fix the fist two concerns at
very least.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
g. you) uploads the package it's not
the maintainer to close the bug by uploading the package, but the
sponsor (i.e. you).
Thus, we would like sponsors to close the bug along their notice that
they have uploaded the package which the sponsor is likely going to send
anyway.
--
wi
distributable by Debian".
Your idea only makes sense for packages going through mentors.d.n where
you can actually access them beforehand I fear.
[1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signa
-
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hese guidelines at [1], which is
also shown (mostly) filled-out to sponsorees for their respective packages.
Of course we could still add another reference to it in the QA section.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on F
known to
emit false positives. See #673112 for an up to date discussion for that
problem.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n also contain additional
original tarballs
(.orig-component.tar.ext). component can only contain
alphanumeric characters and dashes ("-").
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/05/msg01057.html
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s, whereas "bts-control"
control does. Can anyone verify this?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a newer version shouldn't be much
of a deal. See RFP #635504 for details and [1] for the corresponding
repository.
If you care enough, you can just pick it up yourself. I do not need a
sponsor anymore by the way.
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/flashcache.git
--
with kind
ic changes which are a matter of taste and try to keep the
differences low.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 27.05.2012 10:18, Liang Guo wrote:
> Do you still use it ?
to some extent: yes. I was using it mostly as a file system read cache
but I found kFreeBSD + ZFS does a much better job.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F
in Pascal which are interfacing with C
libraries (including libc I think). It needs to be carefully checked if
hardened stacks (e.g. stack canaries) are compatible with that.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ct that somebody answers them...
14:15 < jwilk> But yeah, separate list + forwarding bugs to d-mentors is
certainly better than status quo.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and-the-gpl
[2] http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
or ASF software.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04.06.2012 23:41, Arno Töll wrote:
> Software License which is GPL compatible. There is no need to do such
^ that should read: OpenSSL
compatible
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like to to
request
a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list would be used to manage
sponsorship-requests bug traffic as a pseudo-package owner [2].
Name
At your
ors mailing list only.)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
avors
for the configure/build/(install) stages. Take a look at the Apache 2.2
source package for a (complex) example.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
binNMU back then. That's why the Release
Team does transitions. Just to avoid such things.
[1] http://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1] (CC:ed). Granted having contact
details on the home page directly would help a lot.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
during a freeze, but it does not make much sense.
Also the FTP team might not process NEW regularly during a freeze.
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
self to find some
bugs or other issues with it you would like to _fix_ yourself. Then it
makes sense that you are in Uploaders as well and you eventually form a
packaging team with your sponsoree.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
sig
es may need an update
and someone who cares about. But we remove packages which weren't
touched or even sponsored over a long time. This is more of a problem of
Debian's sponsoring process than mentors.debian.net I'd say.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper
Hi,
On 23.07.2012 22:19, Bart Martens wrote:
> The package at mentors is marked "needs sponsor = yes" so an RFS bug is not
> really needed.
but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag
(you know, even less than about RFS bugs).
--
with kind r
files.
As a workaround you could install/divert your files when a user starts a
program, in your example xchat.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the first
place. Actually, being a DM makes sponsoring unnecessary in many cases.
Having that said: Criticizing is easy, but do you have actual
suggestions how to improve?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description
on your use case you may want to install a compatibility
symlink to the default version or you may consider using the
alternatives system (update-alternatives(8)).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
Testing at this stage. That's fine, of course, just telling you.
If nobody steps in, I may take care of it this week. By the way, did you
notice the RFS bug workflow [1]?
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
Gnu
le once you ask concrete questions.
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o hint apt but there is no support for upgrades
beyond one release at time.
[*] Your upload needs to clear NEW, however.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e typicially much easier to read.
[1]
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Phony-Targets.html#Phony-Targets
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
[6] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l request.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15.09.2012 16:13, Arno Töll wrote:
> ftpmaster removals do only affect Sid. They are not propagated to
> Testing (even less during a freeze).
Just for the archives: I meant: They are not removed straight from
Testing by a ftpmaster removal, but Britney may propagate the change in
Test
On 17.09.2012 21:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> AFAIK freeze doesn't affect removals in any way. So:
>
> s/ in non-freeze times//
I can confirm that. This is what Niels and Adam confirmed a few days ago.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-
maintainer to me and
> upload it to mentors.debian.net to find a sponsor?
> Thanks!
Yes. Removed packages can be re-introduced like any other package using
the same procedures. Please check the reason for the removal, however.
You new package should fix that problem as very least.
--
with
regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rote the wrong destination :>)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
squeeze for this package is confirmed.
Sponsored, thanks. Please file a RFS bug for future sponsorship requests
as described in [1] :)
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Des
kype
Uhm. I don't think this meant that way. Instead you should ask your
previous DMUA sponsor(s) individually for the package(s) they advocated you.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Bart noticed, you uploaded a new version to Mentors. Should it be uploaded?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You do not need to file a RFS bug.)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You do not need to file a RFS bug.)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gs like that?
Mentors sends you an email when a package is removed (after a timeout of
20 weeks that is). Bart may not follow that tightly, so that the package
may have been removed quite a lot of days before already.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 20:08, Robert James Clay wrote:
> Arno,
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote:
>> On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
>>> Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
>>> had been removed from
queue,
>>> did you try to upload it twice?
>> Yes, I made another change and then tried to upload again
> You cannot make a new upload until the old one has been processed.
True, but the actual problem is #665986. Using FTP or getting dput to
ignore HTTP/403 errors solves the problem
tory will disappear) ?
Yes, you may need to do so. Alternatively you can just upload the
package including the debian/bug-control file you mentioned to mentors
and hope your future sponsor will hopefully detect it and ask you to
remove it by then.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daem
ailing list (or any other third party hosted service).
That said, I'd be very glad to have some mailing list Debian service
different to lists.d.o for such lightweight list management purposes.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
On 11/19/2012 08:10 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-11-19, Arno Töll wrote:
>> That said, I'd be very glad to have some mailing list Debian service
>> different to lists.d.o for such lightweight list management purposes.
>
> wasn't there a teams.dn ?
Does n
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
