Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-07 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Oliver, in attachment is the my suggestion of debian-directory of this package. 2013/6/25 Oliver Sander : >> Yes, but in the previous uploaded version there are in "patch-section" >> only Makefile, badpixels and manpages. You have now also configure, >> Makefile.in etc. > > > That's a thing t

Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-10 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, 2013/7/9 Oliver Sander : > I am getting one new lintian warning: > > I: dcraw source: quilt-patch-missing-description > remove_LO_line_from_manpage.diff > > I split that patch off from the remaining ones, because it was obviously a > separate thing. But not knowing manpage syntax at all I hav

Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-11 Thread Anton Gladky
2013/7/11 Oliver Sander : > I don't understand. I am not the maintainer, hence what I am doing > is a NMU, hence the NMU number? Please tell me the version number > you want and I'll use it. Hmm, please, read, when you are allowed to do NMUs. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen

Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-13 Thread Anton Gladky
2013/7/12 Oliver Sander : > I kind of knew these rules, but it's good to now the details anyway. > > Problem is, I don't understand how much these rules apply to me, since > the actual upload to unstable will not be done by me. That case is > not covered by the text. It does not matter, who "phys

Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-18 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Oliver, i do not really have any motivation to discuss "social" questions any more. You want to upload a newer version without intend to maintain it. Right? 2013/7/18 Oliver Sander : > Hi Anton, > > >>> Problem is, I don't understand how much these rules apply to me, since >>> the actual uploa

Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1

2013-07-20 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Oliver, [Quoting your private mail to me, hoping there is nothing private] 2013/7/19 Oliver Sander : >> You want to upload >> a newer version without intend to maintain it. Right? >> > No. I made up my mind and I promise to be the dcraw maintainer if that > is what it takes. The package cann

Re: Sponsor for miredo 1.2.6-1 (which is ITA)

2013-07-30 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Tomasz, thanks for your work. Some minor notes on your package: - Close #713005 by changelog entry. - "Bug #661983 workaround (again)" entry is irrelevant. CDBS is not used any more. - #635749 has a patch. Consider applying it. - Try to fix pedantic and info-warnings of lintian. - Use -par

Re: Sponsor for miredo 1.2.6-1 (which is ITA)

2013-07-30 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Tomasz, 2013/7/30 Tomasz Buchert : > Hi, > done! I've pushed changes to the git repository and I've uploaded a new > version > of the package to mentors (it should be visible soon). > > Systemd support is a different story. It is available in a 'systemd' branch > in the > git repository. The

Bug#719720: RFS: skycat/3.1.2+starlink1~b-1 [ITP]

2013-08-14 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Ole, why is the tarball on mentors different from that one, which is on the website? Thanks, Anton 2013/8/14 Ole Streicher : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, > package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org, > pkg-tcltk-d

Bug#719720: RFS: skycat/3.1.2+starlink1~b-1 [ITP]

2013-08-14 Thread Anton Gladky
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution. Anton 2013/8/14 Ole Streicher : > Hi Anton, > > Am 14.08.2013 20:16, schrieb Anton Gladky: >> why is the tarball on mentors different from that one, which is on the >> website? > > I did not use the tarball provided by ESO but the

Bug#721839: RFS: musl/0.9.13-2 [ITP]

2013-09-20 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Kevin, thanks for working on the package. Generally it looks good and almost ready for uploading. Some minor notes: - Remove Readme.Debian, it is useless. - Changelog should have just one note: "Initial packaging, Closes...". The package was not yet uploaded into Debian. - The package number s

Bug#721839: RFS: musl/0.9.13-2 [ITP]

2013-09-21 Thread Anton Gladky
Debian upload (Closes: #713072) * Respect user set CC * Reworked package according to feedback gven by Anton Gladky. See #721839 for reference. So you should close only ITP-bug. RFS-bug will be closed manually. Please, for future upload create only one additional changelog-paragraph

Re: FWD: RFS: doublecmd/0.5.6-1 [ITP] -- twin-panel (commander-style) file manager

2013-09-24 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, I am glad to see this software packaged! I have created already this one, but still not managed that to be uploaded, though using it locally. The package itself looks OK. I will have a closer look at it, and if there are no critical notes, it will be uploaded. Thanks, Anton On 09/24/2013 0

Re: Re: Re: FWD: RFS: doublecmd/0.5.6-1 [ITP] -- twin-panel (commander-style) file manager

2013-09-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Ok, uploaded both packages! Thanks for contribution. Anton 2013/9/25 Graham Inggs : > I've updated to 0.5.7 in the git. I was able to drop one of the patches > included upstream and none of the others required refreshing. > > Dropping CCs now as my last mail did end up on the list. > > > -- > T

Bug#721839: RFS: musl/0.9.13-2 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Anton Gladky
24277) > * Revorked debian/rules > * Solved possible problem with postrm script (Closes: #724247) > > I would appreciate if someone could upload the package. > > Regards, >Kevin Bortis > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> Ok, I uplo

Bug#725420: RFS: diodon/1.0.3 -- GTK+ Clipboard manager

2013-10-05 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Oliver, I have uploaded it. Please, consider to migrate from cdbs to dh (just a suggestion) and try to use alioth for VCS of your package. Thanks for contribution, Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Bug#725447: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-2

2013-10-05 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Alexandr, please add 2-3 words into changelog entry about the bug, which was fixed by upstream; use canonical VCS-fields. Just commit into VCS, no need to reupload package into mentots. Best regards, Anton 2013/10/6 Alexander Inyukhin : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > >

Bug#727673: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-4

2013-10-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Uploaded. Anton 2013/10/25 Marco Balmer : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey" > > * Package name: couriergrey >Version : 0.3.2-4

Bug#729734: RFS: nlopt/2.4+dfsg-1

2013-11-16 Thread Anton Gladky
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution. Anton 2013/11/16 Sergey B Kirpichev > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlopt" > > * Package name: nlopt >Version : 2.4+dfsg-1 > * URL : http://ab-in

Re: miredo / upload or DM rights

2013-12-27 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Tomasz, It seems, your commits to miredo-VCS are OK. Thus I granted you permissions to upload miredo. Thanks for contribution, Anton 2013/12/27 Tomasz Buchert : > > Hi, > I'm a "de facto" maintainer of miredoš. I want to release > a new version, however I'm not a DM so I can't do it myself.

Re: shared and static library names differ

2014-01-19 Thread Anton Gladky
2014/1/19 Roman Valov : > What is the best way to handle this? Is it okay to drop static library > from -dev package? My personal opinion is not to ship static library at all, if it is possible. Regards, Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, 2014-03-22 13:33 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer : > I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library > libB. Obviously I need libB to be present whenever I build an > executable against libA. Where in debian/control will I have to fill > in libB? I think it should be in Depends of

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

2016-06-07 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this one is not. AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved under the r

Bug#860050: RFS: xtensor/0.8.4-1

2017-04-10 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Ghis, I will try to sponsor this package within the next 2 days, if it is OK for you. Anton 2017-04-10 21:46 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Antony Vaillant : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > * Package name: xtensor > Version : 0.8.4-1 > Upstream Au

Bug#860050: RFS: xtensor/0.8.4-1

2017-04-12 Thread Anton Gladky
ersion 0.9.2-1. > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor-python.g > it > > Cheers, > Ghis > > > On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> Absolutely, thanks Anton. >> >> Le 10 avr. 2017 9:10 PM, "Anton Gl

Bug#860050: RFS: xtensor/0.8.4-1

2017-04-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Ok, 0.9.2-1 is already in archive. Uploaded! Anton 2017-04-12 18:54 GMT+02:00 Anton Gladky : > Hi Ghis, the 0.9.2-1 was not uploaded yet. Maybe it makes sense to use > the 0.9.2-1 number? > > Anton > > > 2017-04-12 18:12 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Vaillant : >> May I also

Bug#858538: Package review

2017-04-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marco, there are a couple of minor notes regarding your package: 1) integrate changes from NMU two years ago [1] (to be consistent d/changelog) 2) Try to use compat level 10 and debhelper >=10. 3) Use "cme fix dpkg" over your package to fix minor issues Please drop me an email, when you are r

Bug#860415: RFS: python-xarray/0.9.2-1

2017-04-17 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Ghis, it looks like this package is under heavy development. 0.9.5 version has just been released. Would you mind to package it instead of 0.9.2? Best regards Anton 2017-04-16 15:49 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Antony Vaillant : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > >

Bug#763615: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2

2014-10-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Where is it? On mentors? Anton 2014-10-25 20:15 GMT+02:00 Sergey B Kirpichev : > Hello, > > is there any chance that this trivial upload will > be sponsored before the Jessie freeze? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Bug#763615: RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2

2014-10-25 Thread Anton Gladky
As far as I see, Sergey is DM and the only maintainer of this package. Sergey, is it OK for you if I you get the permission for this package to upload it? Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Bug#762012: fadecut package has been removed from Mentors

2015-02-04 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, sure I can. Anton 2015-02-05 8:08 GMT+01:00 Marco Balmer : > Hi, > > I've uploaded again to mentors.debian.net. > > Anton: Maybe you can do that again for me? > > Thanks, > Marco > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:30:14AM +, mentors.debian.net wrote: > > Your package fadecut all versions h

Bug#783676: RFS: gummi/0.6.5-4 -- GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview

2015-04-28 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Daniel, I will review/upload your package within the next couple of days. Best regards Anton 2015-04-29 7:31 GMT+02:00 Daniel Stender : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org > > I'm looking for a uploader/sponsor of this new packa

Bug#783676: RFS: gummi/0.6.5-4 -- GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview

2015-04-29 Thread Anton Gladky
Daniel, your changes to the package look fine. I did not upload your package but granted you uploading rights for that. So, you can do it yourself. Best regards Anton 2015-04-29 7:31 GMT+02:00 Daniel Stender : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@li

Bug#858538: fadecut package review

2017-04-28 Thread Anton Gladky
d, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: >> there are a couple of minor notes regarding your package: >> >> 1) integrate changes from NMU two years ago [1] (to be consistent >> d/changelog) >> 2) Try to use compat level 10 and debhelper >=10. >&g

Bug#858538: RFS: fadecut/0.2.1-1

2017-11-29 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marco, sorry I forgot about this package. I will review it ASAP, Best regards Anton 2017-11-29 19:32 GMT+01:00 Marco Balmer : > Dear mentors, > > I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut" > > * Package name: fadecut > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Mar

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

2018-02-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Kurt, Just a short review. I did not test the package. But some stuff should be fixed before it will be uploaded. As I understand you want to maintain the package under the umbrella of debian science team? If so, please fix some corresponding fields (maintaner etc) in d/control. = 1. sour

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

2018-03-03 Thread Anton Gladky
2018-03-01 5:32 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki : > To summarize: > 1. When the OCC was in Debian previously, and its current form in the Ubuntu > PPA, we had e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.1.0 > 2. Anton suggested e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.2 > 3. Appendix A of the Debian New Maintainer's Guide

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

2018-03-03 Thread Anton Gladky
Then after each release you one need to make a diff over all headers and create also symbols-files to be sure that the ABI is not broken. Anton 2018-03-04 1:18 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki : > > > On 03/03/2018 04:12 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> >> 2018-03-01 5:32 GMT

Re: vtk8

2019-10-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Hello Nico, thanks for your work on this monster-package. I will try to review it in the next few days. Regards Anton Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 21:21 Uhr schrieb Nico Schlömer : > > Hi everyone, > > I've worked on VTK8 [1] and I think it's about ready to be included > into Debian. (More than two

Re: vtk8

2019-11-15 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Nico, it looks like the package does not build: CMake Error at CMake/vtkModuleTop.cmake:56 (message): No such module "vtkIOXdmf3" needed by "vtkIOParallelXdmf3" Could you please have a look? Thanks Anton Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 21:21 Uhr schrieb Nico Schlömer : > > Hi everyone, > > I've

Re: vtk8

2019-12-20 Thread Anton Gladky
I've pushed a tentative fix, but cannot verify since it build and used > > to build on the PPA [1]. Best try it out yourself. > > > > Cheers, > > Nico > > > > [1] https://launchpad.net/~nschloe/+archive/ubuntu/vtk8/+build/18120968 > > > > > >

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
Control: tags -1 +pending Hi François, thanks for fixing this issue. I am testing it and if it works, I will upload it. I am not sure, whether it will be possible to reintroduce this package in testing on this stage of the freeze. Please contact the release team about that. Welcome to join Debia

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev [1]. Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984 Thanks Anton Am Do., 13. Mai 2021

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
should be fine. > > Let me know if I'm missing something. > > Best, > François > > > [1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/f/freefem++.html > [2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/m/mumps/changelog-5.3.5-2 > > > Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, An

Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover

2016-02-26 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marko, the package looks fine, but I have a couple of notice: - Use DEP-3 format for the patch - Try not to use source/lintian-overrides, but fix it in the code. - lib/extlib-abc/aig/cnf/cnfData.c looks strange, is it some kind of binary, not the source code? - Use Files-Exclude parameter in

Bug#816635: RFS: memtailor/1.0~git20160302-1

2016-03-03 Thread Anton Gladky
Uploaded. 2016-03-03 16:44 GMT+01:00 Doug Torrance : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "memtailor" > > * Package name: memtailor >Version : 1.0~git20160302-1 >Upstream Author : Bjarke Hammersh

<    1   2