Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> You should mention that the package has a new maintainer and close the
> bug indicating that the package is orphaned (#612734).
Oh, I forgot: you also should retitle the bug from "O (orphaned)" to
"ITA (intend to adopt)" and set yourself
Hi,
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
+include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
clean: unpatch
>>> I had to leave the line "include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make" otherwise
>>> the package build fails.
>>
>> With what error? I guess you did not remove the "u
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
>> +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
>> +build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
>> clean: unpatch
> I had to leave the line "include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make" otherwise
> the package build fails.
With what error? I guess you did not remove the "unpatch" dependency f
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
>> How did your rules file look like?
> Currently:
[...]
> include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
> clean: unpatch
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_clean build-stamp
And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
suspect you
Hi,
"yannubu...@gmail.com" writes:
> Quick solution: upload these 5 packages separately (Lintian clean):
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/boot-repair
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean-gui
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean-ubiquity
> htt
Hi,
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "policyd-weight".
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc
Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They
should be removed b
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
>> And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I
>> suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean.
>
> With:
>
> # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
> # clean: unpatch
> clean: dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> d
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
> I've recreated and reuploaded the package.
It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build
dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the
d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions
it was deleted).
Ther
Hi,
sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
in the end anyway :)
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
> Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest
> version to mentors. So
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 02:12 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
When I now run "uscan -debug -f" (to check the script), I get
uscan debug: [...]
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
[...]
http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 03:27 PM, Ivan Reche wrote:
The package is just a directory with lots of binaries and it likes to
install itself in /opt. Besides that, it needs to set some environment
variables (similar to JAVA_HOME and friends).
What is the best way to approach this? Do I change the PATH en
uture (of course this would also require
someone working on it, see the previous section).
[1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/09/msg00166.html>
[2] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/09/msg00133.html>
DRIVERS
===
Ansgar Burchardt
Jakub Wilk
Arno Töll
gregor herrmann
pgpsNd69mxM0X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>> If you changed the package to address concerns, please send a follow-up
>> to the sponsoring request (To: n...@bugs.debian.org) that includes the
>> URL to the source package and the last changelog entries similar to the
>> initial request.
>
> What would sponsoree
[ I have no intention to sponsor this upload. ]
Hi,
the Replaces: eggdrop (>= 1.6.16-2) for eggdrop-data in debian/control
looks wrong. eggdrop-data should Breaks+Replaces version of eggdrop
that are *before* than the package split.
Given that eggdrop-data was introduced in 2004, you could
On 01/24/2013 17:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 24.01.2013 16:09, Dominik George wrote:
>> - a2enmod headers
>> + [[ -x /usr/sbin/a2enmod ]] && a2enmod headers
>
> Unfortunately the fix is not good enough. Two issues:
> a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if
> a2en
Hi,
[ I do not intend to sponsor this package. ]
On 02/15/2013 00:51, Benjamin Eltzner wrote:
> 11) The only alternatives I see to shipping the "binary" file are:
> a) Patch to skip the initialization of the database at first program
> start. This will probably result in the "intelligent word seq
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:54:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> None of the C files contain copyright or license information, which is
>> a good idea:
>>
>> http://tieguy.org/blog/2012/03/17/on-the-importance-of-per-file-license-information/
>
> Please, don't!
Please do!
H
Hi,
Alfonso Sabato Siciliano writes:
> if I run: # dpkg -i beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb
[...]
> beret depends on libc6-amd64 (>= 2.2.5).
libc6-amd64 is a i386 package providing an 64bit libc. For some reason
the ${shlibs:Depends} picks this as a dependency instead of the native
libc6 package.
This
Hi,
On 03/22/2013 11:05, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The second problem is that (unsurprisingly?) the local package I want to
> install us untrusted, but this causes pbuilder to fail:
> WARNING: untrusted versions of the following packages will be installed!
Recent versions of apt (wheezy or late
Hi,
I don't plan to sponsor this package, but here is one comment:
On 06/20/2013 11:34, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> igtf-policy-classic - IGTF classic profile for Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-experimental - IGTF experimental Authority Root Certificates
> igtf-policy-mics - IGTF MICS p
On 06/25/2013 14:35, shuerhaaken wrote:
> I'd like to point out that releases of xnoise never require vala for
> building because the release contains the C sources!
>
> Usual configure-make-makeinstall works without vala.
Generated files aren't source (as in "preferred form of modification").
It
Hi,
"Pol Hallen" writes:
> I've a production server particularly patched. I prefer install only
> security packages but keep others packages to same version.
>
> Should I've some problems if keep only:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
>
> to /etc/apt/source
Hi,
On 03/28/2014 14:35, W van den Akker wrote:
> I have a package which have version 2.2.17-1.
> I applied a patch on the mainstream source code which closes a bug.
> Should the new version then be 2.2.17-2, or something else?
> The package is not yet in stable.
If you upload an updated package,
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 08:13 +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-06-30, 22:28:
> > > * default configuration of pbuilder do not provide possibility to
> > > allocate
> > > pty
> >
> > Sounds like a bug in pbuilder.
> >
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 18:39 -0400, Paul Elliott wrote:
> I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.
>
> What parameters should I use?
[1] has a guide which options to use to make sure that you use strong
hashes for the (self-)signatures on your key. I'm not sure if GnuPG
upstream has changed their de
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 10:19 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> * Package name: debrequest
> Version : 0.2
> Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
> * Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-gue
> st/debrequest.git
It might be more useful to add this to `devscripts`
On 06/04/2014 07:24, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El Tue, 3 de Jun 2014 a las 9:03 PM, Eric Lavarde escribió:
>> Hi Daniel, On 3 June 2014 20:54:58 CEST, Daniel Lintott
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mentors! I'm currently packaging a notification application,
>> BuildNotify [1]. It only makes sense to st
On 06/04/2014 12:07, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 04/06/14 09:53, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> BuildNotify lets you "monitor multiple continuous integration servers
>> with customizable build notifications for all projects".
>>
>> I would assume it will only do use
On 08/04/2014 08:15, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> I tried to upload viewnior to ftp-eu but it seems unoperable. Then I
> tried to upload to master, and have a problem. Since this is -2 point
> release, ftp already knows the orig source tarball but it has
> different size and checksum from .dsc. Pr
On 08/05/2014 10:17, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> On 04.08.14 13:52:52, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> On 08/04/2014 08:15, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>>> I tried to upload viewnior to ftp-eu but it seems unoperable. Then I
>>> tried to upload to master, and have a prob
Hi,
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
> Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file
> [3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS lists
> them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this done, and
> shouldn't the uploade
On 08/18/2014 14:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The license header in the artifact doesn't state the "or later", but
> refers to the license as published by the FSF which does include it:
[...]
> The full license text is not included in the header, but is deferred to
> the license as published
On 09/12/2014 12:13, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> for some reason, if I recompile iipimage from a sid chroot I keep
> getting a warning:
>
> [...]
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package iipimage-server:
> unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
> [...]
>
> It did worked well i
Hi,
Andreas Tille writes:
> I'm trying to ugrade jellyfish which is maintained here
>
>Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/jellyfish.git
>
> I'm using autoreconf and when building the package this leads to
>
> ...
> checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
>
Hi,
On 05/21/2015 11:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I noticed that the ftpnew gatherer for UDD is currently broken. The
> reason is that it is usually fetching files via
>
>wget -q -r -N --level=2 --no-parent --no-directories
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/
[...]
> It seems it is forbidd
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:13 +0200, p...@reseau-libre.net wrote:
> I'm writting deb-ci tests to check backward support to sysvinit for
> openscap-daemon. I've written a sysvinit script, the systemd service
> file also exists [1].
>
> The problem is that the deb-ci test (which run explicitly
Roger Shimizu writes:
> Stretch is just released [0], Yeah~!
> We're having a release party in Tokyo [1].
Yay \o/
> [0] https://www.debian.org/News/2017/20170617
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleasePartyStretch/Japan/Tokyo
>
> So it should be fine to release various packages currently being
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:58 +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote:
> Anyhow, if you want to enable, you can do something like this, to
> make
> > me and you happy, and then easily revert when new bugs are opened
>
>
> HAVE_DIETLIBC=no
> ifeq ($(shell dpkg -s dietlibc-dev | grep -o installed)
Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
>>This means building the package will give different results depending
>>on dietlibc-dev installed or not? That shouldn't happen...
>>
>>Please check via some other means that a build using dietlibc has been
>>requested; don't do different things just because a packa
"Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> as mentioned in my other thread of today, my lib*-dbg*.deb
> packages do not contain the same files as their 2 year old
> predecessors.
>
> apt-file list from old libburn-dbg (1.3.2-1.1):
>
> libburn-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/cdrskin
> libburn-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/u
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, according to [1] [2] [3] FDL with the "no invariant" section is
not considered DFSG.
[...]
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#GNU_Free_Documentation_Licen
se_.28GFDL.29
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/gfdlinvariant
>
> [3] https://www.debian.o
201 - 241 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
