eforge.net
Please fix copyright file like described in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
config.guess should not be included in diff.gz
Fix the above issues and I upload for you.
Contact me off-list then.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [
patches to a special format. I would like to
> submit a patch to the new maintainer guide to promote quilt together
> with dpatch. Shall I send a bug report directly, or shall we discuss
> the patch on this list before ?
I would welcome it to discuss it before since different
pacakgers, d
ource
> package must be rebuilt ? Or maybe I did not understand how it
> works. Where is it described ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
Yes, from what I understand the patches are in a seperate
tarball (debian) and will be applied after unpacking the
so
Hello José,
* José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-15 02:57]:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "echroot".
[...]
The description says that this is an alternative to the
well-known chroot. What makes it different?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde
g system
> inferno-dev - A distributed operating system (development files)
[...]
Without looking further into your package (which shouldn't
be native btw). What is the purpose to package an operating
system in debian?
Kind regards
Nico
P.S. Oh and would be nice if you announce if you highj
ne operating system."
>
> Why not?
Really nothing against Inferno, Limbo is great and I love p9
but I think the user base is a bit too small to justify an
upload here. I don't see a point in using archive space for
operation systems if they can be used in qemu for example
ion should no longer be used (it does not make
a difference here)
Fix this and I'll sponsor you, please contact me off-list
then.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpbSwp36ZUAB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 13:26]:
> Le lundi 16 avril 2007 12:54, Nico Golde a écrit :
> > Really nothing against Inferno, Limbo is great and I love p9
> > but I think the user base is a bit too small to justify an
> > upload here. I don
Mhm, ok bad, I also wrote him a mail if he is still
interested in maintaining tilda but no answer yet.
Regarding that you both didn't get an answer I think it is
fair to let Davide proceed.
> > Anyway I'm glad to tell Nico Golde to sponsoring him.
>
> Nico, did you get answ
into the description.
- You don't need usr/bin in dirs file since the Makefile
will create it, if it does not exist.
Fix this and I am happy sponsoring you.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in th
Hi Martin,
* Martin Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 01:03]:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:11 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > [...]
> > I will sponsor your upload.
> > Just two little things that would be nice:
> > - Use the Homepage tag in control l
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 01:27]:
> Nico Golde ha scritto:
> > [...]
> >
> > Davide, I looked at your updated package, I am not yet
> > gratified with the copyright document. Here my proposal for
> > what it should look li
re begining my job I would like to know your
> opinion.
Look at http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals that should
be enough for the beginning :)
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e
Hi,
* José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 21:35]:
> The diversity is one of the attractiveness of free software, I
> see very interesting echroot
I don't see diversity here apart from the name.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL
Hi,
* José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 00:47]:
[...]
> It builds these binary packages:
> rootsh - A logging wrapper for shells
[...]
What is the difference to script(1)?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x
ot; is used to create such package releases, so the .changes
> file contains the entries for several releases?
Is it really a trick? Looks like there were versions in a
rcs which weren't packaged and uploaded.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647
but you don't convert it while building?
- you have Uploader in control it has to be Uploaders
- you directly patched Makefile, why not using dpatch or quilt?
(or just do the rm proda and instal from within rules, patching is
not really needed here and you never call distclean)
Kind reg
Hi,
* Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 16:58]:
> Le Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:46:37PM +0200, Nico Golde a écrit :
[...]
> - I would tend to remove the template's comments, but this is up to
>your taste.
> - Similarly, you can safely remove lines such
Please send your info with an RFS template like the others do.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpnCelpY0iol.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 19:36]:
[...]
> The package has been uploaded again to mentors. See previous mails for the
> link.
Uploaded.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text
> the problem for gcc. Should I upload it to mentors, and eventually have it in
> Debian already fixed, or wait and release a 1.0-2 version? I think the first
> solution is the preferable one.
You need to provide a -2 since I uploaded -1 ;)
But there is no real bug yet, the warning is no
Hi,
* David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 20:58]:
> Nico Golde ha scritto:
> >> I had lots of warnings, all of the same type:
> >>
> >> warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*'
> >
> > From what I can see
Hi,
* David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 22:23]:
> Nico Golde ha scritto:
> I've uploaded proda_1.0-2 to mentors. It's available in:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proda
>
> Please update the version in Debian :-)
Done, happy pac
e to
remember me to upload tomorrow?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp9VhmzbOp2j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ow to unpack gz files (import gzip) but don't have a proper
> parser for diff files at hand (I don't suppose that the difflib does
> that).
What about parsing it from the ITP then?
The overhead should be a bit smaller here.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL
* Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 15:18]:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:56:23PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hallo Christoph,
> >
> > * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 14:29]:
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:45:15PM +0100, N
es, paco wraps the
> "make install" command (or whatever is needed to install
> the files into the system), and generates a log containing
> the list of all installed files.
[...]
Do we really need this since there is checkinstall?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://n
gt; Can anyone tell me with what I should replace this function?
There is no portable workaround function provided by a
standard library AFAIK.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
does not mention any problems with the
> > getpass function--so I don't see any particular reason to avoid it.
> >
> > [0] http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/getpass.html#index-
> > getpass-3653
>
> Should I submit a bugreport/patch againt "manp
work?
Sounds good!
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpxuQniruOYk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-06 12:51]:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?
>
> Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS
> wi
ildscript located in
> the
> grml-mercurial-utils package.
>
> http://deb.grml.org/pool/main/g/grml-mercurial-utils/
Nope, they include different tools.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all
ar errors if I do not provide a mirror)
What does --debug say?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpp20wTz7alU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
>Section : misc It builds these binary packages: cdemu
> - simulate a CD drive from a CD image cdemu-source - source for the
> cdemu kernel module The package is lintian clean.
You can also run iso images in qemu. What is the difference
Hi,
* Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-17 17:16]:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:53:52 +0200 Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > You can also run iso images in qemu. What is the difference
> > here?
>
> As I understand the upstream website, cdemu is not for booting an i
his: should I first have the package accepted into
> Ubuntu Gutsy before getting it to Debian, or should I do the reverse?
I don't really understand this question, package it for the
distribution you want to contribute too.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libB and libB is missing the proper dependencies you could
to this as a workaround, but I would not close the bug then
with the new upload since the lib is still missing
dependencies.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security rea
ssues and I will upload the package for you.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpbiReTCvo2R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
our package for the Debian policy using
the lintian package. If it doesn't complain please state
that the package is lintian clean. This is a must for most
of the packages".
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all te
Hi,
* Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 19:13]:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I saw many packages using the template from
> > mentors.debian.net which then always says:
> > "The package is lintian clean."
>
information in the very first RFS email to this
> list, you have a much higher chance of attracting my interest. In most
> cases, a bare template RFS will simply be ignored, regardless of the
> merits of that particular package.
ACK.
I want to come up with an additional wish.
5. If the R
Hi,
* Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 21:41]:
> On 01/07/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
> >Lintian is now v1.23.31 instead of v1.23.28 (Etch). Hope that
> >hel
> The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a
> commonly available font.
>
> even tough those files aren't included in the final .deb
Linda has way too much false-positives (the above is just
one example) which is really bad.
bugs.debian.org/linda vs bugs.debi
Hi,
* DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-02 09:42]:
> 2007/7/1, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
The fixes look good.
> >> The package is lintian clean.
> >
> >It's not please check.
What about this one? It still is not even if the warning is
not
Hi Denis,
* DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-02 14:05]:
> 2007/7/2, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> >What about this one? It still is not even if the warning is
> >not that important it should be fixed:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fortunes-ru$ lintian -I *
: http://disksearch.sf.net
> * License : GPL
> Section : python
[...]
It would help people with some spare time if you would give
a description of what this actually is.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security
son to search for a new
sponsor now?
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpKhI62AShvO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hould I use for building packages in Debian?
I guess most of the people (and the available documentation
for developers) ues -rfakeroot.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http:/
be" :)
The host running mentors.d.n is not an unstable box, I guess
we have to wait for a new lintian backport or Chris maybe
have time to try the unstable version.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all te
Hi,
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-16 21:28]:
> [ dropping debian-devel-games; topic moved ]
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070716 19:53]:
>
> > Thats why it was change from "is" to "appears to be" :)
> > The host runnin
from the look or command line parameters whatever? In
functionality (of course look would be a criteria in kde and
gnome but they have a strong focus on the look while
bandwidht limitation tools should have a strong focus on
bandwith limitation) for example?
Thats what differs in kde and gno
Hi,
* Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:17]:
> On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe
[...]
> As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options
> written in mind with si
Hi,
* Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:41]:
> On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe
> >[...]
> >> As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options
&
d.
I also see a problem in missing descriptions for the RFS.
Sure it would be not very efficient to download the message
from the archive and parse them but browsing a huge list of
non-descriptive names is somehow bad.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GP
Hi,
* Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 19:33]:
> On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Did you look at trickle?
> >>
> >> Hmm. Looks simple/good too.
> >>
> >> Should I withdraw ITP?
> >
> >Ye
et the time.
>
> Done.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
>
> (If this could be added to mentors.debian.net in due course maybe? Ta.)
Here's my rough checklist:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PRO
Hi,
* Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 16:47]:
> -=| Neil Williams, 24.07.2007 17:32 |=-
> > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
>
> Content seems to be missing?
? I see alot of content.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Neil!
* Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 17:12]:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:43:41 +0200
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
> > >
> > > (If this could be added to mentors.debian.
ons dock app which should be
dockapp.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpotMKb6jlbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 17:48]:
> On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"The upstream homepage can be found at http://www.markstaggs.net/.";
> >Please use the Homepage tag like described in 6.3.4 dev-ref.
>
Hi,
* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 19:31]:
> On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 17:48]:
> >> It's a recommendation. It's not wrong to don'
ebuilt, just to be sure that the packages are build on a clean, sid
> chroot.
That won't work because you can't ensure that the chroot or
pbuilder of the maintainer is up2date :)
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security re
is that you write Copyright:
and then follows copyright and license information, please
divide this with Copyright: and License:
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
ht
Hi,
* Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 13:31]:
[...]
> Thanks for having a look and if you can sponsor the upload.
I am sorry but I won't sponsor any php package, but since
the package is in a good shape I hope someone else will.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - ht
apes in ruby?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgp824eFMzlSJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-15 01:17]:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 20:44]:
> > > libterm-ansicolor-ruby - Ruby library that colors strings using
pp.sourceforge.net/>
> >
> > Rationale? Sponsoring isn't really about making sure your
> > preferences are honoured.
>
> My education was: Every difference from the dh_make templates are bad,
> except if you have good reasons for it. But hmm, ok...
Since you don&#x
nt to become an
official Debian developer. If you just want your package in
Debian you need a sponsor who uploads your package for you.
Have a look at:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-intro
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For s
ch to get into a dpatch
environment, edit the files and dpatch will update the patch
file for you.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sp
ebian users, as it is one of the most complete wikis around... maybe
> not much interest to DDs ?
[...]
The current twiki package and also the new -2 revision not
yet uploaded has a security problem, please do not sponsor
until you carefully checked the debdiff.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico
ged section you will
get a mail back describing an override disparity from the
installer on ftp-master. You can then reply why this is
correct and they will change the section in their list then.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For securi
ditional copyright holders, license terms, etc.), and usually a
> quick note about the packaging itself.
Also worth reading when writing copyright files is:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nu policy, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07/msg0.html
The changelog:
* Added debian menu entry
* Closes bug#452982
This is really no appropriate changelog entry, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-changelog-
hich I am getting sponsorship from the security team.
> They can be ignored.
>
> Would anyone be willing to sponsor this upload?
Please split the security patches into separated files for each CVE id.
Otherwise it's impossible to check whether you fixed all of them or not.
Ch
r me.
Please follow the normal NMU procedures
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines
I don't see your intention to NMU this package in the BTS.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, al
Hi,
* Jakub Wilk [2012-01-08 13:50]:
> * Nico Golde , 2012-01-08, 13:40:
> >>More information here:
> >>
> >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxml2
> >>
> >>
> >>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.
- invisible, visible and ignore list management
>- search features
>- fingerprinting of remote clients
>- sending/receiving of URLs an contacts
[...]
why is it better than centericq?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
Hello PeNGuin,
* PeNGuin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-06 10:03]:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:51:47AM +0200, PeNGuin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:30:18AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > hi,
> >
> > First, thanks for your fast reply :-)
> &
:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
P? this must
> follow #250538 bug?
yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want
to have a program packaged. if you want to package it, send an itp
(intent to package), package it and close the bug after the upload (do
it in the changelog file)
regards nico
--
Nico
Hello martin,
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]:
> also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]:
> > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want
> > to have a program packaged. if you want
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:07]:
> * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]:
> > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]:
> > > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want
hi,
i had a talk on the berlinux 2004 about debian packaging.
it is in german, if someone is interrested:
http://www.ngolde.de/download/debian-packaging.tar.gz
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5
give us the sources, you have to provide
a dsc, .diff.gz and an orig.tar.gz file (only tar.gz if it is a native
debian package). we dont need a deb and a changes file. i think you
package isnt a native debian package so you have to rename your .tar.gz
in .orig.tar.gz.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EM
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
am not
really shure how it works.
Can someone (a Maintainer) help me?
With best regards
Nico Golde
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
pgpMLCWsu6rjI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hallo Nico,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-10 23:17]:
> I am not sure if I am on the right mailing-list.
> I have written a binary clock for text mode.
> It is available on
> http://www.ngolde.de
oh sorry:
http://www.ngolde.de/binclock/
regards nico
-
er) help me?
> I'm not maintainer, but I have tried to help you ;)
thanks very much :)
> Please fix these errors, and then please fill RFS (request for sponsor)
> and send it here.
Ok, i will do this.
Best regards Nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
pgp1n3qpnXKWa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
fo documentation in it.
I am surprised because i saw programs with an automatic created debian
manpage or without a manpage.
However, I will write one :)
regards nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
pgpl1g5Ve4okd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/binclock_1.3-1.dsc
http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1_i386.changes
http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1_i386.deb
http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3.orig.tar.gz
I hope you#ll enjoy it.
Best regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
[...]
> You can find the files it under:
sorry, this is right:
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.diff.gz
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.dsc
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/bincl
pnotic.
:)
> I have no particular need for a software binary clock, though, as I've got a
> breadboard of LEDs doing the job for me.
yes you but not the majority of the people.
nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
echo "[q]sa[ln0=aln
improve and KDE, for instance, really has some
> source code to show. ;)
why do you compare it with kde programs? it is a text based program and
i hate kde.
> However you gain the experience, i hope that you staying with Debian
> will be enyoing and enlightening for you, the community an
n't configure colors and printing characters.
i saw wmbinclock and that was the reason to program binclock, because i
wanted a binclock for terminal.
if wmbinclock is in debian, shouldn't binclock be in it too? ;-)
regards nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key availab
a sponsor for binclock...
regards nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
echo "[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb729901041524823122snlbxq"|dc
pgpQHtjK8F216.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or example with:
patch -b -p0 < foobar
for more information read the manuals of diff and patch.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde nico ngolde de
public key available on:
http://www.ngolde.de/gpg.html
echo "[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb729901041524823122snlbxq"|dc
pgpeKae9pdYfw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ile is only for changes on your package i think.
if it's wrong please correct me.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
Fingerprint
know why
> such things happen?
really? i think it is not possible, because the keyservers synchronize
them with other servers. you keyserver have to change the keys with the
other server so all servers have to delete your key at the same time.
wait a few days and look, if it is still deleted.
reg
.
> I'm a little stumped, as this is the first package I'm debianizing on my
> own. Is the errors due to some oversight on my part ?
yes
regards nico
--
Nico Golde| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://www.ngolde.de
nd why you can't use gpg for these things.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D
101 - 200 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
